How The 100-Hour Fight Displayed India's Massive Strength, Pakistan's Weaknesses
Last Updated:
Pakistan's inability to protect its most sensitive bases revealed gaps in air defence coordination and radar coverage, said Indian government sources
India's precise airstrikes on key targets highlighted the vulnerabilities in Pakistan's defence, forcing the latter to beg for a ceasefire, said government sources.
'Despite Pakistan's tall claims, India's strikes on May 10 showed Pakistan's forward-operating capabilities had degraded. Pakistan's inability to protect its most sensitive bases revealed gaps in their air defence coordination and radar coverage," said sources.
#Breaking | A cylindrical metallic object found near Bikaner, Rajasthan, further confirming the suspected use of a BRAHMOS missile in the direction of Pakistan. @kaidensharmaa shares more details @akankshaswarups | #BrahMos #Missile #Drones #OpSindoor pic.twitter.com/g5cd9IHNs3 — News18 (@CNNnews18) May 11, 2025
PAHALGAM, SINDOOR AND AGGRESSION IN A NUTSHELL
On April 22, terrorists gunned down at least 26 at Pahalgam in Kashmir. An offshoot of Pakistan's Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), the Resistance Front, claimed responsibility for the attack. After diplomatic steps such as holding the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance and cancellation of visas, India on May 7 carried out Operation Sindoor and struck nine terror hideouts belonging to Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) and Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) in response to the Pahalgam attack.
As Pakistan attempted to strike military installations at 15 spots the following day, all of which were foiled, India retaliated by demolishing the HQ-9 air defence systems in Lahore and its drones even reached the Sharif household, the family that has sent two Prime Ministers to Islamabad, Sialkot, Islamabad and major airbases. On May 9, India said missiles and drones were sighted at 26 locations across many areas in Indian states bordering Pakistan, including Srinagar, Jaisalmer, Chandigarh among other cities and districts. The projectiles were tracked and engaged, the government said.
On May 10, Pakistan claimed India fired missiles at its air bases. It, however, did not acknowledge the extensive damage caused to the garrison city of Rawalpindi, near the capital Islamabad, Murid air base in Chakwal city and Rafiqui air base in the Jhang district of eastern Punjab province. Additionally, Sargodha air base was also targeted. Pakistan then fired missiles that were thwarted in the cities of Srinagar, Jammu and Udhampur.
Around 5 pm, Pakistan DGMO called the Indian counterpart and urged de-escalation. Firing across LoC stopped, as the DGMOs agreed to meet on May 12. US President Donald Trump claimed that he mediated the ceasefire, while India said ceasefire was agreed following bilateral talks. Hours after the announcement of 'understanding", heavy shelling and drones were reported in Jammu and Kashmir, to which the Indian armed forces gave an 'adequate and appropriate response".
HOW INDIA JOLTED PAKISTAN
Within 90 minutes on Saturday, India pounded the Nur Khan airbase, Rafiqui airbase in Shorkot, Murid airbase in Punjab, Sukkur airbase in Sindh, Sialkot airbase, Sargodha airbase, Skardu airbase, Bholari airbase near Karachi, Jacobabad airbase, and Pasrur airstrip. India also struck and took out Chunian radar installation in a swift response. India fired its Brahmos missiles, and HAMMER and SCALP missiles from Rafale fighter jets at these strategic airbases — in its biggest set of attacks.
Noor Khan (Rawalpindi) airbase located near Pakistan's Army HQ is base house for VIP transport fleets and premier transport squadrons. India's strike demonstrated that Pakistan's heavily guarded installations, too, are penetrable.
Murid (Chakwal) is a hub for drone operations. Murid's destruction disrupted Pakistan's UAV-led asymmetric warfare strategy. India targeted this base after intercepting 300-400 drones launched from this base.
Rafiqui (Shorkot) is home to JF-17 and Mirage fighter jets. The neutralisation of this base degraded Pakistan's rapid-response capabilities. India's use of high-speed missiles showcased precision against critical asset.
'It also showed how Pakistan is heavily dependent on Chinese systems such as the HQ-9 Russian. This shows their inability to secure air corridors amid Indian strikes," said sources.
'India preemptively shut 32 northern and western airports, citing threats from Pakistani drones and missiles. This proactive measure contrasts with Pakistan's reactive posture," they said.
INDIA VS PAKISTAN'S DEFENCE: A STUDY IN CONTRAST, SAY SOURCES
top videos
View all
Pakistan's airspace management lacks accuracy, while India's multi-layered air defence such as S-400, Akashteer ensures operational continuity.
After Pakistani drone attacks, India struck Neelam Valley and Sialkot, targeting terror launchpads and radar sites. Pakistan claimed Indian missiles fell into the Indian territory, but later its intercepted Fatah-II ballistic missile was found neutralised in Sirsa. 'This contradicted their narrative, and showed Pakistan's failed offensives. Pakistan's reliance on disinformation such as false civilian casualty claims revealed a defensive strategy only in perception management, not in tactical success. The Barak-8 system downing Pakistan's ballistic missile targeting Delhi displayed India's ability to neutralise long-range threats. Systems like S-400, Akashteer, L-70 guns, and Schilka repelled 50+ swarm drones, emphasising India's technological edge," sources said.
'Pakistan's Chinese-supplied HQ-9 systems lack the range and integration to match India's defence network, leaving critical gaps. Viral videos of intercepted missiles and burning airbases amplify India's narrative of dominance, countering Pakistan's claims."
The attacks show Pakistan's strategic indefensibility due to: fragmented air defence systems reliant on outdated Chinese tech; inability to protect critical military assets from precision strikes; and overreliance on asymmetric tactics (drones, disinformation) that India neutralised systematically. India, meanwhile, used calibrated escalation combining military precision, diplomatic restraint, and transparency.
The conflict has exposed Pakistan's vulnerabilities while consolidating India's regional dominance.
Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
news18 specials Operation Sindoor Pahalgam attack
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
May 11, 2025, 15:42 IST
News india How The 100-Hour Fight Displayed India's Massive Strength, Pakistan's Weaknesses | Exclusive
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
'River that grows in India...': Assam CM Sarma hits back at Pakistan over threat of China halting Brahmaputra flow
In a befitting reply to Pakistan over threat of China to stop Brahmaputra water to India, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma took to social media, calling Brahmaputra 'a river that grows in India'. The Assam chief minister also argued that China contributes to only 30-35 per cent of the river's total flow, while the remaining is generated in India. CM Himanta Biswa Sarma wrote, 'What if China stops Brahmaputra Water to India? A Response to Pakistan's New Scare Narrative After India decisively moved away from the outdated Indus Waters Treaty, Pakistan is now spinning another manufactured threat: 'What if China stops the Brahmaputra's water to India?' Let's dismantle this myth -- not with fear, but with facts and national clarity: Brahmaputra: A River That Grows in India -- Not Shrinks.' CM Sarma wrote, 'China contributes only ~30-35% of the Brahmaputra's total flow, mostly through glacial melt and limited Tibetan rainfall. The remaining 65-70% is generated within India, thanks to: *Torrential monsoon rainfall in Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Nagaland, and Meghalaya *Major tributaries like Subansiri, Lohit, Kameng, Manas, Dhansiri, Jia-Bharali, Kopili *Additional inflows from the Khasi, Garo, and Jaintia Hills via rivers such as Krishnai, Digaru, and Kulsi.' 'At the Indo-China border (Tuting): Flow is ~2,000-3,000 m3/s. In Assam plains (e.g., Guwahati): Flow swells to 15,000-20,000 m3/s during monsoon. The Brahmaputra is not a river India depends on upstream -- it is a rain-fed Indian river system, strengthened after entering Indian territory,' Himanta Biswa Sarma said. 'Even if China were to reduce water flow (unlikely as China has never threatened or indicated in any official forum), it may help India mitigate the annual floods in Assam, which displace lakhs and destroy livelihoods every year. Meanwhile, Pakistan, which has exploited 74 years of preferential water access under the Indus Waters Treaty, now panics as India rightfully reclaims its sovereign rights. Let's remind them: Brahmaputra is not controlled by a single source -- it is powered by our geography, our monsoon, and our civilizational resilience.' Himanta Biswa Sarma's comments came after Rana Ihsaan Afzal – a senior aide to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif – reportedly said that India suspended the flow of the River Indus to Pakistan and China can also do the same to India.
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
In Spain, Kanimozhi of DMK asked what's national language of India? Her reply wins applause
Kanimozhi of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, who is leading an all-party delegation from India, was applauded by Indian diaspora in Spain for saying that the "national language of India is unity and diversity', and that is the message the delegation brings to the world. On being asked what the national language of India is while addressing the Indian diaspora, Kanimozhi said, 'The national language of India is unity and diversity. That is the message this delegation brings to the world, and that is the most important thing today.' The DMK MP's response comes amid the Tamil Nadu government's tussle with the Centre on the issue of the three-language formula in the National Education Policy 2020. The all-party delegation, led by Kanimozhi, includes Rajeev Rai (Samajwadi Party), Brijesh Chowta (BJP), Prem Chand Gupta (Rashtriya Janata Dal), Ashok Kumar Mittal (Aam Aadmi Party), and Former envoys Manjeev S Puri and Jawed Ashraf. The delegation visited five nations to expose Pakistan and brief them India's response to the April 22 Pahalgam terrorist attack and its broader fight against cross-border terrorism. Spain has extended its "unequivocal support" for India's efforts to combat terrorism as an all-party delegation led by DMK MP Kanimozhi Karunanidhi met with Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares here to convey New Delhi's strong message of zero tolerance for the menace. The delegation arrived in Madrid on Saturday for a three-day visit in the final leg of its five-nation tour. The Association of Victims of Terrorism in Madrid also met with the delegation led by Kanimozhi, news agency ANI reported. The association, one of the largest such associations globally, works with over 4,000 victims of terrorism and provides psychosocial support to those affected. The meeting between the association and the all-party delegation aimed to exchange experiences and best practices in supporting victims of terrorism.
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Javed Akhtar on Pakistani actors wishing death upon him after choosing ‘hell over Pakistan' remark: ‘If their prayers had effect, the country wouldn't be in…'
Last month, noted lyricist and screenwriter Javed Akhtar, who is often targeted for his views on patriotism and religion, says that if there comes a time he has to choose between Pakistan and hell, he would prefer to go to hell. At the event, the lyricist — who identifies himself as an atheist — said extremists from both India and Pakistan shower abuses on him on a daily basis. 'If you're on one side, the abuses come only from one side. But if you're on neither side, you get abuses from both sides. So I get abuses like, 'Kafir, jehnumi, mardood, tu toh jehnum mein hi jaega (You'll go to hell).' And from the other side, I get, 'Jihadi, Pakistan chala ja' (Go to Pakistan, traitor). People can call me a jihadi too? They have quite an imagination,' said Akhtar. In the interview with The Lallantop, Akhtar reasoned that if all the fundamentalists of India want him to go to either Pakistan or hell, he'd choose hell. 'Pakistan felt really bad by that. But I said you don't issue me a visa anyway,' said Akhtar. His last appearance in Pakistan was two years ago when he attended an event to commemorate legendary poet Faiz Ahmed Faiz. Pakistani actors Imran Abbas, Mishi Khan, and Asim Mehmood criticised Akhtar's 'hell over Pakistan' remark, with Mehmood going to the extent of wishing death upon him. 'If their prayers had that effect, then they wouldn't be in the state they're in today,' responded Akhtar, laughing. He reasoned that India being in a crisis suits Pakistan's agenda. 'Your stability is in the claim that you can point to India's state and say why you formed Pakistan in the first place. But if a Javed Akhtar earns respect and money, then it doesn't suit you. How would Shah Rukh Khan, Aamir Khan, and Salman Khan being such big stars suit them either? Their existence is proving your basic argument wrong,' said Akhtar. He argued that Pakistani actors would be wishing today if they'd have stayed back in India, they would've prospered like Indian actors did. He pointed out the example of Pakistani actor Bushra Ansari, who recently advised Akhtar to stay as quiet on Pakistan as veteran Indian actor Naseeruddin Shah. She also claimed that Javed would not even get a house on rent in India. Also Read — Javed Akhtar on Bollywood's silence over Operation Sindoor: 'Kuch log abhi abhi paisa aur naam kamane mein lage hain…' 'She's a very fine actor! If she was in India, she'd be a global name by now. I've seen a couple of her plays, so I know how good she is. This sadness of not making it like Indian actors did has stayed with them,' said Akhtar. Last month, Akhtar said in an interview with PTI that this is not the time to even think about whether Pakistani artists should be allowed to work in India.
