
Democrats Newsom and Bass have destroyed America's Golden State
It is only five months since California last burned down. That happened while Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass was away on a foreign jaunt, and Governor Newsom took the brilliant opportunity to have himself photographed as his state burned.
You'd have thought that the complete destruction of the Palisades and the loss of billions of dollars of property in the most destructive wildfire in Los Angeles's history would have focused minds. Perhaps someone would even have taken responsibility for the water hydrants that had no water?
But no — five months later both the mayor and governor are still in place.
Advertisement
And now their state is burning once again.
This time the cause is even more man-made. If you're a politician seeking to avoid blame you can always blame wildfires as simply an act of God, lament the problem and move on.
But when the fires are as man-made as these latest ones — and encouraged — well then it's different.
Advertisement
The fact is that the unrest, car-burnings, Apple-store lootings and more that have overtaken California in the past week can be placed firmly at the door of California's leadership.
Newsom has been Governor of California since 2019 and since he came into office everything in his state has got worse.
His attacks on the rich, insane lockdown policies and encouragement of lawlessness have meant that his state has seen a record exodus.
In 2020 alone, some 725,000 people left California. The next year some 692,000 Californians called it a day. And in 2022 a staggering 818,000 people left his state.
Advertisement
Newsom inherited the most prosperous state in the Union. A state that is also one of the most beautiful in the country.
But he has made sure that life in California has become increasingly less livable. Not least by chasing out the people who have been following the rules and welcoming in people who break them.
Like Mayor Bass, he likes to talk about the importance of California being welcoming to immigrants. But in doing so they make sure that there is no difference between immigrants who have paid to follow the rules and come to this country legally and the millions of people just in recent years who have broken into the United States illegally.
Advertisement
Newsom and Bass insist that California is a welcoming state, and that to threaten the security of one Californian is to threaten all.
But why should there be zero difference between someone who has made it to California by following all the rules and an illegal migrant who broke the law to come to the US and (in the case of at least half a million people here illegally) got a criminal record while being here?
If I was a left-wing do-gooder on the make I think I'd try to draw the clearest possible line between those two things. But not Newsom and Co.
For the nation's richest state it should be a source of shame that California has the highest rate of poverty of any state in the union.
In 2021, California's poverty rate was 11%. After just one more year of Newsom the poverty rate rose to 16.4%. Another year of him and by 2023 the state's poverty rate was a disgraceful 18.9%. Meaning that almost a fifth of people living in California were living below the poverty line.
And then there is the homelessness problem — the most visible example of California's deep sickness under Newsom and Bass. Today there are almost 200,000 people in California who are living homeless.
You can call them 'unhoused.' you can say they have the 'right to rest' or any number of other get-outs, but if you escape from the language games the left loves to play that is a disgrace. Today the single state of California contains almost a quarter of the total homeless population of the USA. There are some 45,000 people in Mayor Bass' Los Angeles alone.
Advertisement
That is the result of California's Democrat leaders own choices. After all, if you declare yourself a sanctuary state, and welcoming to all — whatever the nature of their arrival in this country — you may make yourself look kind and welcoming.
But you will also create exactly the conditions that now exist in Los Angeles. You'll see the routine lawlessness, lack of public safety, open drug use and the massive costs that ordinary taxpayers then have to pick up.
In the past five years alone a modest estimate suggests that California has spent a staggering $24 billion on homelessness programs.
Advertisement
This means that ordinary Californians pay in every imaginable way for the policies of their state. In the same way that New Yorkers have to pay through increased crime, lawlessness and housing costs (among much else) for the policies that Kathy Hochul has brought to New York.
Policies that Hochul proved utterly incapable of defending when she was questioned by Rep Elise Stefanik in Congress today.
Like Newsom, Hochul hopes to dodge the consequences of her own policies.
And so they double-down.
Advertisement
After federal agents, the National Guard and then the Marines were sent into Los Angeles to quell the rioting, Governor Newsom sent straight for his lawyers to get the troops out of his city. As if he had it so well under control until the National Guard came in.
Today he again condemned the arrival of the troops who are stopping the lawlessness in his state. According to Newsom the arrival of troops is 'unconstitutional,' 'madness' and 'theater.'
Apparently hitting a cop for the cameras isn't theater. Standing behind a podium and pretending that the detention of violent foreign criminals is an attack on every Californian is also apparently not theater.
Advertisement
But try to address the lawlessness and put it down? Apparently that is the real problem in the eyes of Newsom and Bass.
Well everyone who isn't a deranged open-borders activist can see who the real actors are here.
The National Guard and the Marines, like the beleaguered LA police, are trying to put out the fires. Perhaps the once-Golden State's political leaders could stop starting them?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr team forced Medicaid officials to reveal the immigration status on millions of enrollees to DHS: report
The Trump administration has handed over the personal data of immigrant Medicaid enrollees to deportation officials, the Associated Press reports. Included in the data are the immigration statuses of millions of Medicaid enrollees, which could be used to identify individuals for deportation as part of President Donald Trump's hard-line immigration crackdown. This has caused notable concern among officials in California due to the raids in Los Angeles by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, supported by troops, which have ignited protests and civil unrest. An internal memo and emails obtained by the AP show that Medicaid officials unsuccessfully attempted to block the data transfer, citing legal and ethical concerns. They were overruled by two top advisers to Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr., who ordered that the dataset be handed over to the Department of Homeland Security, the emails reveal. The data consists of the details of people living in California, Illinois, Washington State, and Washington, D.C., all so-called 'sanctuary states' that permit non-U.S. citizens to enroll in Medicaid programs funded solely by state taxpayer dollars. California Governor Gavin Newsom's office expressed concern that the data would be used for immigration raids supported by the National Guard troops and Marines that President Trump deployed in Los Angeles. 'We deeply value the privacy of all Californians,' a statement said. 'This potential data transfer brought to our attention by the AP is extremely concerning, and if true, potentially unlawful, particularly given numerous headlines highlighting potential improper federal use of personal information and federal actions to target the personal information of Americans.' Department of Health and Human Services spokesman Andrew Nixon said the data was shared legally, 'to ensure that Medicaid benefits are reserved for individuals who are lawfully entitled to receive them.' The data includes addresses, names, Social Security numbers and claims data for enrollees in those states, the AP reported, based on details of the memo and two people familiar with what the states sent to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Officials at CMS were given just 54 minutes on Tuesday to comply with the RFK Jr. team's directive, the outlet reported. The AP states that Nixon wouldn't answer questions about how Homeland Security would use the data, and DHS officials did not respond to requests for comment.


Newsweek
39 minutes ago
- Newsweek
US Veterans Oppose Trump's 'Illegal' Takeover Of National Guard
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A group of veterans have filed an amicus brief in support of California Governor Gavin Newsom's suit against President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles. Governor Newsom has called the deployment "illegal" and that it "poses a dangerous and serious risk to Americans who may find themselves in the crosshairs of troops ordered to act against their fellow Americans." The amicus brief, filed by U.S. Army and Navy Secretaries and Retired Four-Star Admirals and Generals, says that the troop deployment is poor for soldiers' morale as they are not prepared or trained to combat Americans, that local law enforcement should be in charge of crowd control, and that this move will erode trust between the military and civilians. The White House has been contacted via email for comment. California National Guard positioned at the Federal Building in Los Angeles on June 11, 2025. California National Guard positioned at the Federal Building in Los Angeles on June 11, 2025. Ringo Chiu/AP Photo Why It Matters President Trump said he is deploying troops to Los Angeles to prevent rioting, but veterans have said troop presence will decrease public safety as they are not trained to deal with domestic peace-keeping. What To Know President Trump deployed the California National Guard to Los Angeles to quell anti-ICE protests on June 7, against the wishes of Governor Newsom. The president utilized a statute that allowed him to deploy the National Guard in the event of "a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government." Governor Newsom and 21 other attorneys general who have written a separate amicus brief in support of Newsom say that protests in Los Angeles do not pose a danger to the Government. The brief filed by Admiral Steve Abbot, United States Navy (Retired), Admiral Thad Allen, United States Coast Guard (Retired), Former Secretary of the Army Louis Caldera, and five other veterans, focuses on the impact of National Guard troop deployment on troop morale and on military-civilian relations. The brief states: "The United States military is not primarily a law enforcement organization and is prohibited by law from acting as a domestic police force unless doing so is "expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress." It reads: "Domestic law enforcement—particularly in emotionally charged situations and instances of civil unrest—is a specialized skill set for which law enforcement officers train extensively and continually. "Personnel in the U.S. military, on the other hand, do not receive extensive training on how to operate safely and effectively in the context of domestic law enforcement. "Our longstanding tradition of entrusting domestic law enforcement to local, state, and federal law enforcement personnel has, unlike other countries around the world, allowed the U.S. military to remain focused on its core mission." And, it says that this deployment takes the National Guard away from its primary duties in Los Angeles, which is aiding civilians after natural disasters. For example, their help was critical when responding to devastating wildfires in January. Protester Annie Jones holds a U.S. Flag upside down as a sign of distress while California National Guard stand behind a barricade in Santa Ana, California, on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. Protester Annie Jones holds a U.S. Flag upside down as a sign of distress while California National Guard stand behind a barricade in Santa Ana, California, on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. Jae C. Hong/AP Photo Donald Trump has posted to Truth Social, saying "The Appeals Court ruled last night that I can use the National Guard to keep our cities, in this case Los Angeles, safe." This is because the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked an order from U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, who said the president broke the law and needed to return the California National Guard back to Governor Newsom. Governor Newsom's office told Newsweek that the ruling issued is a temporary stay of Judge Breyer's order determining that the president broke the law. The ruling is now going to a three-judge appellate panel, which will determine whether the order can go into effect on June 17 or later. Governor Newsom has said: "I'm confident in the rule of law. I'm confident in the Constitution of the United States. I'm confident in the wisdom and judgment of a very well-respected federal judge. And I'm confident, on the basis of the review of the 36 pages – absolutely it will stand." What People Are Saying California Governor Gavin Newson said in a press release: "Veterans of our military agree that President Trump's takeover of Los Angeles is not only illegal – it poses a dangerous and serious risk to Americans who may find themselves in the crosshairs of troops ordered to act against their fellow Americans." Amicus brief filed by veterans: "National Guard personnel and active-duty Marines are not trained or qualified to conduct domestic law enforcement operations, which poses a danger to the safety of both the troops and the public. ...The use of federal military personnel in the context of law enforcement operations should be a last resort to avoid the politicization of the military, which inevitably erodes public trust, impacts recruitment, and undermines troop morale." What Happens Next Judges will review the ruling issued by Judge Breyer on June 17 or later. Meanwhile, the National Guard will remain active in Los Angeles throughout the weekend, when the city expects to see more demonstrations against President Trump. Protest organizers have urged attendees to remain calm and non-violent.


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Newsom tries to give Trump the Biden treatment, says he's 'not all there'
Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., said President Donald Trump had seemingly lost a step mentally in a new interview, in an unmistakable comparison to Joe Biden. During an episode of The New York Times' "The Daily" podcast published Thursday, the California governor accused Trump of being "not all there," saying that the president's been making up a different reality than what is actually going on with the federal government's response to the unrest in Los Angeles. "And he's not all there. I mean that," Newsom told Times podcast host Michael Barbaro, who seemed to be stunned by the description. As Newsom told it, Trump's behavior regarding the riots has been erratic and unhinged. "Then I talked to the president. Hours later, to your point, I wake up, and I'm Newscum again," he said, referencing a nickname Trump has called the governor on multiple occasions. "Wow," Barbaro replied. "Yeah, it's the President of the United States calling someone scum, Newscum, which is, for what it's worth, what I think a seventh grader used to call me on Baltimore Street in Corte Madera, California," Newsom continued. "He begins the day with that, and then talks about the National Guard, and then starts making up all these things he claimed he told me about, which honestly starts to disturb me on a different level that maybe he actually believed he said those things." When Barbaro prompted him to clarify his "not all there" claim, the governor replied, "I don't know. Honestly, he literally a few days later talked about a conversation he had with me after he announced his 700 U.S. Marines to be deployed for domestic law enforcement in the United States of America. That's blatantly against [the] law. He claimed he had another conversation with me." In another interview, Newsom told Fox LA that Trump has "lost it" and not the same person he was four years ago. However, Newsom had no reservations about former President Biden's mental fitness when even Democratic figures were calling it out. After Biden's disastrous debate with Trump last summer, Newsom rejected the idea that Biden should step away from re-election, telling CBS News, "I'm all in, no daylight." Last year on "Meet the Press," Newsom said he'd seen Biden up close and said his age was what made him successful. Biden's mental decline in office has been a hot topic since he left office, coming to a head last month after the book "Original Sin" outlined alarming examples while he was still president. Trump, who turns 79 on Saturday, will break Biden's record as the oldest president ever by the end of his second term. Newsom and Trump have been feuding over the president's response to the Los Angeles riots that began after Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations commenced downtown last week. Trump ordered the U.S. National Guard and subsequently 700 U.S. Marines into the city to support local law enforcement. Newsom spoke out against the actions, calling them a "brazen abuse of power" during a televised address on Tuesday night. Democrats have claimed Trump exacerbated the situation to benefit himself politically. The White House did not immediately reply to Fox News Digital's request for comment.