Singapore International Arbitration Centre rules in favour of Amazon in Future Group case
Amazon claim trimmed
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) has ruled in favour of Amazon in its long-standing legal battle with Kishore Biyani-led Future Group , holding that Reliance Retail- Future merger deal breached its pre-existing contract. However, Amazon has managed to get minuscule damages of Rs 23.7 crore against claimed amount of Rs 1436 crore.In a final award issued late Thursday night, the three-member tribunal said the 2020 board resolution by Future Retail Ltd (FRL) approving the sale of its retail, wholesale, and logistics assets to Reliance was in breach of contractual obligations under the Shareholders' Agreement (SHA) and Share Subscription Agreement (SSA) signed between Amazon and Future Coupons Pvt Ltd (FCPL).While Amazon had sought damages of Rs 1,436 crore, the tribunal awarded a significantly smaller sum of Rs 23.7 crore. It directed 11 promoters and parties, including Kishore Biyani , to jointly and severally pay the amount, along with interest at 10.3% annually (compounded) from March 9, 2022, until full payment. The parties are also liable to bear Amazon's arbitration and litigation costs.The tribunal noted that 835 of FRL's 1,534 retail stores were transferred in a manner that breached Amazon's contractual rights stemming from its 2019 acquisition of 49% in FCPL for Rs 1,400 crore. FCPL held a 10% stake in FRL.The Tribunal held that Amazon was entitled to damages due to the promoters' repudiatory breaches of the Future Coupons Pvt Ltd (FCPL) Shareholders' Agreement (SHA), but it rejected the quantum of Rs 1,436 crore claimed by the company.Amazon had based its claim on "reliance loss," arguing that it should be compensated for the full value of its 2019 investment in FCPL including Rs 1,430 crore paid under the Share Subscription Agreement and Rs 5 crore in associated costs.However, the Tribunal found that even if all contractual agreements had been fully performed, Amazon would not have recovered its entire investment due to the declining financial condition of Future Retail Ltd (FRL) the ultimate beneficiary of Amazon's stake in FCPL.Citing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and FRL's deteriorating business value, the Tribunal observed that awarding full damages would unfairly shield Amazon from a commercial loss it was likely to incur regardless.'Such an award would essentially allow Amazon to escape a bad bargain,' the final award stated.Nonetheless, the Tribunal awarded Amazon total legal and related costs of Rs 77.3 crore and SGD 68,550.The Amazon-Future legal dispute began in October 2020, when SIAC's emergency arbitrator restrained Future Retail from proceeding with the Reliance deal. The Future Group had challenged the arbitration, citing the Competition Commission of India's 2022 suspension of the Amazon-FCPL deal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
30 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Outcry against Jeff Bezos, Lauren Sanchez wedding continues in Venice; authorities hail boost to local economy
In a final protest on Saturday, thousands of residents and activists across Venice continued their outcry against the million-dollar wedding of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and his bride, Lauren Sanchez. Activists stage a protest in Venice, Italy, denouncing the three-day celebrations for the wedding between Jeff Bezos and his wife Lauren Sanchez Bezos(AP) Bezos and Sanchez tied the knot earlier this week. The VIP wedding has 20 to 250 guests and costs around 47 to 56 million dollars. While this is not the first VIP wedding in Venice, it is the first to receive such major backlash, primarily due to Bezos' corporate and political role. Protests continued against the Bezos wedding due to growing complaints of over-tourism and exploitation of the Italian city by billionaires. As the two newlyweds tied the knot and hosted lavish parties, residents and protestors held banners which read slogans such as 'Kisses yes, Bezos, no' and 'No Bezos, no war,' as they filled the streets of the city. Another banner read 'No space for Bezos,' referring to the billionaire's space technology company - Blue Origin. Activists have also criticised the couple for flooding their ecosystem with high-pollution private jets and yachts. Ahead of the wedding, Bezos and Sanchez donated 1 million euros each to three Venetian institutions: CORILA, an academic consortium that studies the lagoon, UNESCO's local office, and Venice International University, a move which has been criticised by activists. Also Read: 'Eat the rich': Venice protests shadow Jeff Bezos' wedding Over the decades, due to over-tourism and a high cost of living, Venice's population has depleted from 100,000 to 50,000. Venetian authorities hail wedding for economic boost Amid the public outcry, politicians from Venice and the Italian government have welcomed the wedding and hailed it for the boost in economy. Local businesses have also hailed the event and referred to it as a major boost for the local economy. As per Reuters, Luca Zaia, the regional governor of Veneto around Venice, said the city should be proud of hosting the wedding. (With agency inputs)
Hans India
32 minutes ago
- Hans India
‘Edn institutions must improve standards and play a key role in nation's growth'
Vijayawada: Amid widespread concerns over declining standards in educational institutions, Rajya Sabha member and BJP leader Paka Venkata Satyanarayana has on Saturday underscored that educational institutions need to improve their standards to play a significant role in shaping the growing Indian economy. He said that India's annual budget volume had increased from Rs.14 lakh crore to Rs.50 lakh crore over the past one decade and exports from India were also increasing as 'Make in India' initiative had been yielding good results. Speaking as the chief guest at the Andhra Pradesh Technical Education Fair organized byThe Hans India, hmtvand RED FM 93.5 at the Siddhartha Academy of Higher education, Kanuru, here, the MP said that the government alone could not develop the country. Educational institutions should also be part and parcel of the economic development of the country and fulfill the future needs of the country by delivering quality education and upgrading the standards. He urged educational institutions to evolve as the concept of education had changed in recent years and economic relations were getting more important. Pro Vice chancellor of the Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education (Deemed to be University) Vijayawada AV Ratna Prasad and Pro Vice chancellor of the SRM University, Amaravati, Dr Ch Satish Kumar, Managing Director of The Hans India and HMTV K Hanumanta Rao and others were present. The organizers presented awards to the best colleges and best universities in Andhra Pradesh in nine categories. Faculty members and representatives from various engineering colleges and universities attended the awards presentation programme. Participating universities and colleges put up stalls for the two-day Technical Education Fair highlighting the courses offered by them, facilities available in their institutions and other details. The education fair concludes on Sunday. Satyanarayana congratulated The Hans India for taking the initiative to recognize the best educational institutions in the state and honouring them with awards. Pro Vice chancellors of the Siddhaartha Academy of Higher Education (Deemed to be University) Vijayawada AV Ratna Prasad also congratulated The Hans India for hosting the education fair 2025 and presenting the awards to educational institutions. SRM University Pro Vice Chancellor Dr Ch Satish Kumar thanked organizers for presenting awards to the university. Faculty members received the awards with great joy from the chief guest.
Indian Express
40 minutes ago
- Indian Express
How Prada-Kolhapuri controversy exposes the continued exploitation of artisan communities
(Written by Abhinandita N Kashyap) What if something that your grandfather wore as footwear, costing Rs 500, turned up on an international luxury runway as a contemporary sandal, which is priced at more than Rs 1 lakh — with no mention of where it actually came from? That's exactly what happened as Italian luxury fashion brand Prada recently listed a pair of flat leather sandals for about a lakh on their website. These sandals have a striking resemblance to India's age-old iconic Kolhapuris. The development has sparked debates about cultural appropriation, the economic struggles of Indian artisan communities, and the limits of global intellectual property (IP) protections. Kolhapuri chappals Kolhapuri chappals are handcrafted unisex leather sandals traditionally made by artisans in Maharashtra's Kolhapur district and parts of Karnataka. Believed to have originated centuries ago, these sandals are best known for their distinctive braided leather straps, intricate cutwork, durable construction and timeless craftsmanship. Once adorned by royalty and later popularised across India for their rustic charm, Kolhapuris are not merely footwear. These sandals are a marker of regional identity and craftsmanship involving a manufacturing process that is entirely manual, involving vegetable-tanned leather and indigenous techniques passed down from generation to generation. In 2019, after sustained advocacy by artisan groups and craft researchers, Kolhapuri chappals were granted a Geographical Indication (GI) tag under India's Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999. A GI tag helps protect products originating from a specific region, known for their unique features attributable to their geography, materials, and traditional know-how. However, Kolhapuri artisans have continued to struggle with shrinking markets and competition from factory-made imitations. According to a report by The Voice of Fashion, there are currently an estimated 15,000-20,000 artisans involved in Kolhapuri chappal production, a sharp decline from previous decades. Artisans told the magazine that while luxury fashion profits from their craft's cultural cachet, their own communities remain invisible, underpaid and excluded from global markets. Prada's cultural appropriation At the heart of the controversy lies the concept of cultural appropriation. Typically cultural appropriation refers to when elements of culture, particularly those of historically oppressed or colonised societies, are adopted by dominant groups without consent, attribution, or compensation. In the world of fashion, this often translates to luxury brands borrowing indigenous motifs, crafts, and garments for profit. Indian designers, fashion historians and cultural commentators pointed out that the design of Prada's sandals was unmistakably Kolhapuri in construction and aesthetic. To make things worse, the brand did not mention India, Kolhapur, or the craft's artisan legacy. Another major contention for criticism was the price disparity. Prada is reportedly planning to sell the product for over Rs 1 lakh — Indian artisans sell a pair for under Rs 1,000. Note that Prada is not the first brand to exploit indigenous artisans for their benefit. In 2015, Isabel Marant, a French designer, faced backlash in Mexico for selling a blouse identical to the traditional embroidery of the Mixe community in Oaxaca. Christian Dior, in 2019, used designs resembling traditional Mexican horsewomen attire for its Cruise collection. In India, brands like Louis Vuitton have previously featured Banarasi motifs and Indian embroidery styles in collections without direct collaboration with artisan communities. These controversies raise persistent questions about cultural equity, economic justice, and who profits from indigenous heritage in the global luxury market. Limits of global IP protections India's Geographical Indications Act (1999) protects products like Kolhapuris within Indian territory, preventing commercial use of the term 'Kolhapuri Chappal' by unauthorised producers. However, this protection fails to extend beyond India's borders. Internationally, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is currently having discussions about protecting traditional cultural expressions and geographical indications. However, as of now, there is no binding international framework that prevents the aesthetic imitation of indigenous designs unless it involves trademark, copyright, or patent infringement. And this very legal grey zone allows luxury brands to replicate indigenous designs, so long as they avoid using protected names or misleading branding. That's why after the Prada-Kolhapuri controversy, there have been fresh calls for the Indian government to push for stronger international protections for GI-tagged products, and for luxury brands to adopt fair trade collaborations with artisan groups. The significance The outrage over Prada's move arrives amid a growing global conversation about decolonising fashion, ethical consumption, and the rights of indigenous artisans. As the world increasingly prizes sustainable, handmade, and heritage products, ensuring that the benefits of such trends reach their original creators is no longer just a cultural concern, but a matter of economic justice. The latest controversy is a window into the ongoing power imbalances in the global fashion industry and a reminder of how cultural heritage, when divorced from its communities, becomes another commodity for profit. For India, it signals the continuing need to safeguard not just the products of its artisan economy, but the dignity and livelihoods of those who create them.
