Barclays becomes second UK bank to quit industry's net zero group
HSBC became the first British institution to leave the alliance earlier this month in the wake of several major US banks.
Campaigners called Barclays' decision to step away 'incredibly disappointing' as it marks a fresh blow to international efforts to co-ordinate climate action.
Assembled in 2021 by the UN Environment Programme's finance initiative but led by banks, the NBZA commits members to align their lending, investment and capital markets activities with cutting planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050.
In a statement published online on Friday, Barclays said: 'After consideration, we have decided to withdraw from the Net Zero Banking Alliance.
'With the departure of most of the global banks, the organisation no longer has the membership to support our transition.'
The bank said it remains committed to its ambition to be a net zero bank by 2050 as well as its targets to cut financed emissions, and to mobilise 1 trillion US dollars of sustainable and transition financing.
'We continue to work with our clients on their transition, finance the transition and scale climate tech, while helping to ensure energy security for our customers and clients,' the lender said.
'This is an important commercial opportunity for Barclays; in 2024, we generated approximately half a billion pounds in revenues from sustainable and transition-related activity.'
The bank made the announcement three days after it published an update to its climate transition plans, which reiterated its green commitments.
Jeanne Martin, co-director of corporate engagement at ShareAction, which campaigns for responsible investment, said Friday's announcement has therefore sent 'mixed signals' to governments and companies around the world.
'Barclays' decision to leave the NZBA is incredibly disappointing and a step in the wrong direction at a time when the dangers of climate change are rapidly mounting,' she said.
'As the financial risks of global heating multiply and climate impacts like heatwaves, floods and extreme weather events become more intense and frequent, we cannot afford half-measures.
'Responsible investors will be watching closely and raising the pressure on the bank to protect long-term economic prosperity and the livelihoods of people everywhere.'
The corporate world's retreat from diversity policies and green commitments has accelerated since Donald Trump's return to the White House.
Six of the largest US banks – JP Morgan, Citigroup, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs – all left the NZBA following his election in November.
But UK banks had stuck with the alliance until HSBC announced its departure this month.
With Barclays now leaving, British lenders listed as NBZA members as of Friday afternoon still include Lloyds, NatWest, Standard Chartered and Nationwide.
The alliance said its members have been making 'important progress' with well over 100 banks setting individual and independent science-based targets for their financed emissions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump envoy to visit Moscow this week before deadline for ending Ukraine war
Donald Trump has said he will dispatch his special envoy to Moscow this week before his Friday deadline for progress to be made on ending the war in Ukraine. Trump said Steve Witkoff would visit Moscow on Wednesday or Thursday. When asked on Sunday what message Witkoff would take to Russia and what Vladimir Putin could do to avoid new sanctions, the US president answered: 'Yeah, get a deal where people stop getting killed.' In Kyiv, there is little expectation that Witkoff will make a breakthrough with Putin, but a hope that Trump's changed rhetoric and tougher stance on Moscow may lead to a real change in US support for Ukraine. Trump came into office convinced he could do a deal with Putin, but in recent weeks appears to have become increasingly frustrated with Russian actions. On Thursday he described Russia's continued attacks on civilian areas in Ukraine as 'disgusting' and on Sunday said that two nuclear submarines that he ordered to be deployed after online threats from the former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev were now 'in the region', without giving further details. Trump had initially announced in July a 50-day deadline for Russia and Ukraine to end the war, but said last week he said he no longer believed Russia was serious about ending the war and shortened it to '10 or 12' days, later clarified as this Friday, 8 August. Trump has previously said the new measures he has in mind if the deadline is not met could involve 'secondary tariffs' targeting Russia's remaining trade partners, such as China and India. Mykhailo Podolyak, an aide to Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said if Russia did not change its course by Friday, Kyiv expects the 'irreversible logistics' of secondary sanctions on Russian oil exports to be set in motion. 'After that he'll look whether this is helping to bring about the end of the war or not, and if not then he will move to the next step,' said Podolyak, in an interview in Kyiv. The next move, he said, could be further sanctions, and the increased militarisation of Ukraine. 'Trump has already said he's ready to sell Europe as much weapons as they want [to pass to Ukraine]. Before he didn't say that … This is already a different conception of the world,' he said. Before that, though, all eyes will be on Witkoff's visit to Moscow. On previous trips, he has held long one-on-one meetings with Putin and has spoken of his warm feelings for the Russian leader. On one occasion Putin gifted him an oil painting of Trump, on another, Witkoff arrived without an interpreter and used a Kremlin-provided translator. The camaraderie has left both Kyiv and other US allies wondering whether Witkoff is capable of delivering harsh messages to Moscow, although his visit this week will be the first since Trump's rhetoric on Ukraine became noticeably harsher. The Kremlin said on Monday it was 'always happy to see Mr Witkoff in Moscow' and a meeting with Putin was possible, spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters. Putin said on Friday that he was in favour of 'a lasting and stable peace on solid foundations that would satisfy both Russia and Ukraine, and would ensure the security of both countries'. Despite periodically making such statements, Putin has also made clear that Russia's maximalist war goals remain essentially unchanged, demanding as a minimum control over four Ukrainian regions to which Moscow has laid claim, and a commitment that Ukraine will never join Nato. Direct talks between Russia and Ukraine have taken place in Turkey, with the third round in Istanbul last month, but the last set of talks broke down in less than an hour and the only substantive outcome from the meetings has been a series of agreements on prisoner exchanges. Zelenskyy said on Sunday that a new exchange agreed at the last meeting in Istanbul would result in 1,200 Ukrainian troops returning home. Zelenskyy has said he wants to meet directly with Putin, with Trump or Turkey's Recep Tayyip Erdoğan as a mediator, but the Russian president has said he sees no point in a meeting until the outline of a ceasefire has been drawn up. However, the delegation he sent to Turkey, led by former culture minister and patriotic author Vladimir Medinsky, suggests the Kremlin is not serious about a deal. 'Those countries who thought Russia was ready for talks, and that the war could end at any moment if Ukraine would only agree to negotiations, they can now see that Russia is not ready for any real talks,' said Podolyak. Russia continues to target Ukraine with almost nightly drone and missile attacks. Last week was one of the deadliest for some time in terms of civilian casualties, with one set of attacks on Kyiv killing 31 people including five children. Both sides continue to target infrastructure in the opposing country with drones. Russia's ministry of defence said on Monday that its air defences had intercepted 61 Ukrainian drones overnight.
Reuters
41 minutes ago
- Reuters
South Africa outlines support measures in response to US tariffs
JOHANNESBURG, Aug 4 (Reuters) - South Africa on Monday outlined support measures for local companies that will be hit by a 30% U.S. tariff this week, including exemptions from some competition rules and financial support facilities. It also dismissed speculation that its failure to negotiate a lower tariff was because of its local affirmative action policies, which U.S. President Donald Trump has criticised. Africa's biggest economy has tried for months to negotiate a deal with Washington, offering to buy U.S. liquefied natural gas and invest $3.3 billion in U.S. industries in a "framework deal" proposed to Trump's team. But the effort was unsuccessful, even after Pretoria made a last-minute attempt to improve its offer. South African officials say the U.S. tariff could cause tens of thousands of job losses, especially in the agriculture and carmaking industries, as Trump pushes to reshape global trade in favour of the United States. Addressing a press conference, South Africa's trade and foreign ministers said a "block exemption" from some aspects of the Competition Act was being developed that would allow competitors to collaborate and coordinate. They said the exemption would be published by the end of this week. The government is also working on a support programme, which will include a working capital facility and plant and equipment facility, and ways to cushion the impact of job losses via the Unemployment Insurance Fund. The ministers said South Africa posed no "trade threat to the U.S. economy nor its national security," emphasising that its exports supported the U.S. industrial base and often do not compete with U.S. products. Foreign affairs minister Ronald Lamola did not want to focus on speculation the country faces such a high tariff because of points of tension with the U.S. like its policies to address racial inequality or genocide case against Israel at the World Court, which Trump opposes. He said South Africa would continue to engage with U.S. counterparts on the basis of the framework deal it had submitted. Trade officials said an export support desk would try to help companies enter new markets by linking them up with embassies and potential buyers. A more detailed set of support measures will be discussed at a cabinet meeting on Wednesday.
Reuters
41 minutes ago
- Reuters
Explainer: What happens next in the US court battle over Trump's tariffs?
WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - A federal appeals panel on Thursday appeared skeptical of U.S. President Donald Trump's argument that a 1977 law historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets gave him the power to impose tariffs. Regardless of how the court rules, the litigation is almost certainly headed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Here is what you need to know about the dispute, which Trump has called "America's big case," and how it is likely to play out in the months ahead. The litigation challenges the tariffs Trump imposed on a broad range of U.S. trading partners in April, as well as tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico. It centers around Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives the president the power to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. Trump has said that trade imbalances, declining manufacturing power and the cross-border flow of drugs justified the tariffs under IEEPA. A dozen Democratic-led states and five small U.S. businesses challenging the tariffs argue that IEEPA does not cover tariffs and that the U.S. Constitution grants Congress, not the president, authority over tariffs and other taxes. A loss for Trump would also undermine the latest round of sweeping tariffs on dozens of countries that he unveiled late Thursday. Trump has made tariffs a cornerstone of his economic plan, arguing they will promote domestic manufacturing and substitute for income taxes. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments on Thursday in the case. The panel of 11 judges sharply questioned the government about Trump's use of IEEPA, but did not rule from the bench. The Federal Circuit has not said when it will issue a decision, but its briefing schedule suggests it intends to move quickly. Meanwhile, the tariffs remain in effect after the Federal Circuit paused a lower court's ruling declaring them illegal. A Federal Circuit ruling would almost certainly not end the litigation, as the losing party is expected to appeal to the Supreme Court. If the Federal Circuit rules against Trump, the court could put its own ruling on hold while the government appeals to the Supreme Court. This approach would maintain the status quo and allow the nine justices to consider the matter more thoroughly. The justices themselves could also issue an "administrative stay" that would temporarily pause the Federal Circuit's decision while it considers a request from the Justice Department for more permanent relief. The Supreme Court is not obligated to review every case appealed to it, but it is widely expected to weigh in on Trump's tariffs because of the weighty constitutional questions at the heart of the case. If the Federal Circuit rules in the coming weeks, there is still time for the Supreme Court to add the case to its regular docket for the 2025-2026 term, which begins on October 6. The Supreme Court could rule before the end of the year, but that would require it to move quickly. There is no consensus among court-watchers about what the Supreme Court will do. Critics of Trump's tariffs are optimistic their side will win. They point to the Supreme Court's decision from 2023 that blocked President Joe Biden from forgiving student loan debt. In that ruling, the justices limited the authority of the executive branch to take action on issues of "vast economic and political significance" except where Congress has explicitly authorized the action. The justices in other cases, however, have endorsed a broad view of presidential power, especially when it comes to foreign affairs. If Trump loses at the Supreme Court, importers are likely to seek refunds of tariffs already paid. This would be a lengthy process given the large number of anticipated claims. Federal regulations dictate that such requests would be first heard by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. If that agency denies a refund request, the importer can appeal to the Court of International Trade. There is precedent for tariff refund requests being granted. Since May, CBP has been processing refunds to importers who inadvertently overpaid duties because of tariff "stacking" — where multiple overlapping tariffs are applied to the same imports. And in the 1990s, after the Court of International Trade struck down a tax on exporters that was being used to finance improvements to U.S. harbors, the court set up a process for issuing refunds. That decision was upheld by both the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court. Trump has used the threat of emergency tariffs as leverage to secure concessions from trading partners. A loss at the Supreme Court would hamstring Trump in future negotiations. The White House, however, has other ways of imposing tariffs, like a 1962 law that allows the president to investigate imports that threaten national security. Trump has already used that law to put tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, and those levies are not at issue in the case before the Federal Circuit. Some legal experts say a loss for Trump at the Supreme Court would not impact bilateral trade agreements the U.S. has already inked with other countries. Others say that the trade deals alone might not provide sufficient legal authority for taxes on imports and may need to be approved by Congress.
