
Trump's ‘Golden Dome' missile defense is costly, ambitious — and necessary
President Donald Trump this week took important steps to advance his 'Golden Dome' missile-defense system — and not a moment too soon.
For years, administrations of both parties have failed to devote sufficient resources to missile defense, even as China and Russia have sprinted to develop new ways to threaten the American homeland.
Our margin of safety has badly eroded in the face of these adversaries' 'ballistic, hypersonic, and cruise missiles capable of striking the homeland with either conventional or nuclear warheads,' as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday.
Advertisement
A new Defense Intelligence Agency assessment this month pointed in particular to Beijing's and Moscow's aggressive efforts to field new hypersonic glide vehicles, 'engineered to complicate US defenses in the event of a conflict.'
Trump, who heralded the project in an Oval Office press conference Tuesday, promised it would cost about $175 billion and would be 'fully operational' by the end of his term in January 2029.
Advertisement
It's likely to be more expensive than that — and take much longer to field — but the president's vision for better homeland missile defense is a laudable and necessary effort.
The massive undertaking aims to build on America's modest existing homeland ballistic missile defenses with a modernized and greatly expanded architecture to detect, track and engage inbound cruise, ballistic and hypersonic missile threats.
In his January executive order, Trump directed that the system include space-based sensors and interceptors and the capability to defeat missile attacks before launch, as well as in their boost and terminal phases.
This week he named Gen. Michael Guetlein, currently vice chief of space operations for the US Space Force, to lead the 'Golden Dome' effort.
Advertisement
That's a smart decision: Gutlein has significant experience in acquiring space and missile-defense capabilities and has served in key positions at the National Reconnaissance Office and the Missile Defense Agency.
Trump also signaled that Canada could partner in the effort — news that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney confirmed Wednesday.
That's smart, too. Canada already plays a vital role in the North American Aerospace Defense Command, and dozens of radars in Canada help provide Americans early warning of incoming missiles.
The 'big, beautiful' budget reconciliation bill that passed the House early Thursday morning includes $25 billion in 'Golden Dome' funding — but that would be just a down payment.
Advertisement
Trump's Tuesday statement was aspirational.
'The Golden Dome will be capable of intercepting missiles even if they are launched from other sides of the world, and even if they're launched from space,' he promised.
But while the effort is vital to Americans' security, neither Trump's three-year timeline nor his $175 billion cost estimate is at all realistic.
To be sure, some initial, valuable capabilities can be fielded in that time frame — but 'Golden Dome' has both a short-term and a long-term component, and 'full operational' capability by 2029 for the system Trump described Tuesday is not going to happen.
Consider the cost just to deploy and operate a constellation of space-based interceptors over the next 20 years.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated this month that the lowest-cost version of such a system would ring in at $161 billion — and the priciest alternative would cost at least $542 billion.
And SBIs will be an important part of 'Golden Dome' — but only one part.
Advertisement
Innovative efforts, including dirigibles and unmanned aircraft, could mitigate the significant costs of the large network, but the overall cost of 'Golden Dome' will far surpass $175 billion.
Hegseth said Tuesday that the Defense Department is working to develop a complete funding plan and will do so before the budget for fiscal year 2026 is finalized.
That is important: If past is prologue, the failure to provide sufficient funding will guarantee that 'Golden Dome' falls short.
Unfortunately, the base defense budget that Trump requested for next fiscal year is the same as the current year's amount — and does not even keep up with inflation.
Advertisement
The result, in effect, is a declining defense budget even as threats to the United States grow.
President Trump won't be able to achieve a 'peace through strength' foreign policy, or a successful 'Golden Dome,' on a Biden defense budget.
As Trump's Tuesday display made clear, his 'Golden Dome' vision is a major defense priority for this administration.
Advertisement
The focus on homeland missile defense is long overdue.
Now we need a detailed plan that can be accomplished at the speed of relevance — and at a cost Americans will support.
Bradley Bowman and Rear Adm. (Ret.) Mark Montgomery are senior directors at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, where they lead the Air and Missile Defense Program.
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Djokovic dragged into disqualification storm as tennis world erupts over 'shameful' act
Tennis fans are crying foul over an incident involving Lorenzo Musetti at the French Open that has been compared to Novak Djokovic's infamous disqualification at the 2020 US Open. Musetti reached his first semi-final at Roland Garros with a 6-2 4-6 7-5 6-2 win over American Frances Tiafoe, but the victory was overshadowed by drama after he kicked a ball that hit a female line judge in the chest. The Italian took out the opening set but cut a frustrated figure in the second stanza and lashed out by kicking a ball towards the line judge between points. The female official was only standing about three metres away when the ball struck her in the chest, leaving Tiafoe stunned at the other end of the court. The American gestured towards the chair umpire to take action against Musetti, who was eventually issued a code violation over the incident. But many thought the Italian should have been disqualified, with Tiafoe making his feelings clear about the ruling after the match. "I mean, obviously he did that and nothing happened. I think that's comical, but it is what it is," the American said. "Nothing happened, so there's nothing really to talk about. Obviously it's not consistent, so it is what it is." The incident had more than a few similarities to the one at the 2020 US Open that saw Djokovic disqualified after he hit a ball that struck a female line judge in the throat. Unlike Djokovic though, Musetti avoided being defaulted, with angry fans taking to social media to accuse tennis officials of double standards. Djokovic accidentally hits a line judge — defaulted does the same, no action it were Novak, media would erupt, narratives would burn, and he'd be tennis' villain of the double standards aren't just real, they're loud.@DjokerNole #Djokovic — Shane (@Shanegupta22) June 3, 2025 I love Musetti, but if we're enforcing rules the same 4 everyone, this is 100% a default. That said, I don't believe he should be, just like Djokovic SHOULDN'T have in 2020, but he was, & this is a textbook example of a double standard. #RolandGarros — Rodney 🐊 (@RottenKnee23) June 3, 2025 No. And unfortunately as an Italian, as much as I like his tennis I am ashamed. I hope @atptour does something about it. As much as I don't love Djokovic, he got disqualified for something much less intentional — an exploded view (@anexplodedview) June 3, 2025 Perhaps what saved Musetti was the fact the line judge was not injured after being struck by the ball and continued to officiate for the rest of the match. In Djokovic's infamous case though, the official was in clear discomfort after the ball struck her throat and required fairly lengthy medical attention. Even still, the rule around disqualifications is far from clear. Musetti admitted that he feared being defaulted but was quick to apologise for what he described as an unfortunate accident. "Honestly, it was a really unlucky coincidence. I was a little bit, honestly, scared, because I really didn't want to harm (anybody), of course," he said. "So I immediately went to the line umpire, and I of course said, 'Sorry, I apologise to everyone. It was right to have a warning, but I think the umpire saw that there was no intention about that, and that's why probably (he) let me continue." Musetti didn't let the incident derail him as he regrouped from losing the second set to take the next two and extend his French Open record to 13-4. Two of those losses on the Roland Garros clay have come against former champion Novak Djokovic, with one against reigning champ, Carlos Alcaraz, who he meets in the semi-final. Alcaraz powered his way past American 12th seed Tommy Paul in a completely dominant win in their quarter-final. The Spanish World No.2 lost just five games in another one-sided 6-0 6-1 6-4 victory against Paul, who was unable to produce his best tennis with a heavily strapped right thigh. "I'm sorry you wanted to watch more tennis. I had to do my work," Alcaraz told the Court Philippe-Chatrier crowd. with agencies
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil prices slip as rising OPEC+ output, tariff fears weigh on outlook
By Yuka Obayashi TOKYO (Reuters) - Oil prices edged lower in early Asian trade on Wednesday, weighed down by a loosening supply-demand balance following increasing OPEC+ output and lingering concerns over the global economic outlook due to tariff tensions. Brent crude futures dipped 5 cents, or 0.1%, to $65.58 a barrel by 0040 GMT while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $63.32 a barrel, down 9 cents, or 0.1%. Both benchmarks climbed about 2% on Tuesday to a two-week high, supported by worries over supply disruptions from Canadian wildfires and expectations that Iran will reject a U.S. nuclear deal proposal that is key to easing sanctions on the major oil producer. "Despite fears over Canadian supply and stalled Iran-U.S. nuclear talks, oil markets are struggling to extend gains," said Tsuyoshi Ueno, senior economist at NLI Research Institute, adding that OPEC+ production increases were capping the upside. Ueno said hopes for progress in U.S.-China trade talks were overshadowed by profit-taking, as investors remained cautious over the broader economic fallout from tariffs. U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping will likely speak this week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Monday, days after Trump accused China of violating an agreement to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions. As the Trump administration pressed U.S. trading partners to provide their best offers by Wednesday, the protracted negotiations and moving deadlines have led economists to scale back growth forecasts. On Tuesday, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) cut its global growth forecast as the fallout from Trump's trade war takes a bigger toll on the U.S. economy. Meanwhile, scores of wildfires have swept across Canada since the start of May, forcing thousands of evacuations and disrupting crude oil production in the country. U.S. crude stocks fell by 3.3 million barrels in the week ended May 30, market sources said, citing American Petroleum Institute figures on Tuesday. Gasoline inventories rose by 4.7 million barrels and distillate stocks rose by about 760,000 barrels. [API/S] A Reuters poll of nine analysts estimated an average draw of 1 million barrels in crude stocks. [EIA/S] Official inventory data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is due on Wednesday.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
20 stocks primed for rapid growth while trading at half of Nvidia's valuation
When selecting investments, it is easy to get hung up on a particular metric, such as a dividend yield or a price ratio, but investors need to look deeper or they might miss opportunities. Inc. AMZN provides an example: Its stock has typically traded at a high price-to-earnings ratio. Investors tend to look at a stock's forward P/E ratio, which is the price divided by analysts' consensus estimate for earnings per share over the following 12 months. Over the past 10 years, Amazon's stock has traded at an average forward P/E of 79.5, while the S&P 500 SPX has traded at an average forward P/E of 18.7, according to FactSet. But Amazon's stock was up 855% for 10 years through Friday, while the S&P 500 returned 235% with dividends reinvested. My daughter's boyfriend, a guest in my home, offered to powerwash part of my house — then demanded money What on Earth is going on with the American consumer? My father-in-law has dementia and is moving in with us. Can we invoice him for a caregiver? 'The situation is extreme': I'm 65 and leaving my estate to only one grandchild. Can the others contest my will? 20 stocks primed for rapid growth while trading at half of Nvidia's valuation It turns out that for Amazon's management team, bottom-line earnings traditionally weren't a focus. The emphasis was on reinvesting most of the cash being generated to expand the business in multiple directions. So the Amazon story was about revenue growth, rather than EPS growth. And that brings us to Nvidia Corp. NVDA. Last week Laila Maidan looked into Nvidia's relatively high forward P/E and explained why the stock might still be considered a bargain for long-term investors, based on analysts' expectations for the company's revenue growth. Nvidia's stock traded at a forward P/E of 28.1 at Friday's close, while the S&P 500 traded at a weighted forward P/E of 21.4. It is not a surprise to see Nvidia trading at a P/E valuation that is 31% higher than that of the index. But based on consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet, Nvidia is expected to increase its sales per share at a compound annual growth rate of 41.7% through 2026, versus an expected sales-per-share CAGR of 5.5% for the S&P 500. All such estimates in this article are adjusted by FactSet to match calendar years; about 20% of companies in the S&P 500 have fiscal reporting periods that don't match the calendar. For Nvidia, investors pay a premium for the higher expected growth rate. And that sets the stage for a stock screen. Which companies trading at low P/E multiples are also expected to increase revenue quickly? For this screen we are looking at revenue growth projections — specifically sales per share. We are using the per-share numbers because they reflect expected dilution to a company's share count if it issues new shares to help fund an acquisition. Merging with a competitor will obviously make revenue increase. But if the share count rises significantly, sales per share will be lower. The per-share numbers help investors to understand whether or not a company might have overpaid for an acquisition. Starting with the S&P 500, we narrowed the list to companies trading at forward P/E ratios of 14 or less — half Nvidia's valuation. Actually, we rounded down, so the list was confined to stocks trading at a forward P/E of less than 14.5. Then we sorted the list by expected sales-per-share CAGR from calendar 2024 through 2026, based on consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet. Here are the 20 stocks in the S&P 500 with the highest expected sales-per-share CAGR through 2025 among those trading at a P/E of less than 14.5: Company Ticker Industry Forward P/E Expected sales-per-share CAGR from 2024 through 2026 Expand Energy Corp. EXE Integrated Oil 12.0 39.6% Super Micro Computer Inc. SMCI Computer Processing Hardware 14.1 31.9% EQT Corp. EQT Integrated Oil 13.6 26.0% Micron Technology Inc. MU Semiconductors 9.4 23.2% Coterra Energy Inc. CTRA Integrated Oil 8.3 21.2% First Solar Inc. FSLR Solar Power Equipment 8.7 20.5% Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. NCLH Hotels/ Resorts/ Cruiselines 7.9 15.9% Incyte Corp. INCY Pharmaceuticals 10.7 15.5% Seagate Technology Holdings PLC STX Computer Peripherals 12.4 15.0% Gen Digital Inc. GEN Software 11.1 13.0% DaVita Inc. DVA Medical/ Nursing Services 11.6 12.0% Oneok Inc. OKE Oil & Gas Pipelines 14.2 11.8% Molina Healthcare Inc. MOH Managed Healthcare 11.7 11.8% Aptiv PLC APTV Electrical Products 9.0 10.9% UnitedHealth Group Inc. UNH Managed Healthcare 12.5 10.7% Elevance Health Inc. ELV Managed Healthcare 10.5 10.4% Dell Technologies Inc. Class C DELL Computer Processing Hardware 11.4 10.2% American International Group Inc. AIG Multi-Line Insurance 12.2 10.2% HCA Healthcare Inc. HCA Hospital/ Nursing Management 14.4 9.9% Ball Corp. BALL Containers/ Packaging 14.3 9.7% Source: FactSet You may need to scroll the table to see all of the data. It is a varied list. Super Micro Computer SMCI ranks second, with a 31.9% CAGR expected for sales per share through 2026. The stock soared last month after President Donald Trump announced investment agreements with Saudi Arabia to build data centers in the U.S., which lifted suppliers of related equipment. Read: Super Micro's stock keeps surging. Here's what might come next. It might surprise you to see UnitedHealth Group UNH on the list, in light of the company's numerous difficulties. These have included higher-than-expected costs in its Medicare Advantage business, reports of a government investigation into possible healthcare fraud and the departure of Chief Executive Andrew Witty. But with the stock having tumbled 40% this year through Friday, with dividends reinvested, analysts working for brokerage and research firms believe the worst is over, with 21 out of 29 analysts polled by FactSet rating UnitedHealth a buy or the equivalent. Only three of the analysts rate the stock a sell or the equivalent. Leaving the companies passing the screen in the same order, here is a summary of analysts' opinions about the stocks: Company Ticker Share buy ratings Share neutral ratings Share sell ratings May 30 price Consensus price target Implied 12-month upside potential Expand Energy Corp. EXE 90% 10% 0% $116.13 $128.45 11% Super Micro Computer Inc. SMCI 47% 41% 12% $40.02 $40.69 2% EQT Corp. EQT 72% 24% 4% $55.13 $60.63 10% Micron Technology Inc. MU 85% 12% 3% $94.46 $123.95 31% Coterra Energy Inc. CTRA 83% 17% 0% $24.31 $33.41 37% First Solar Inc. FSLR 78% 20% 2% $158.08 $202.43 28% Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. NCLH 72% 28% 0% $17.65 $23.65 34% Incyte Corp. INCY 45% 52% 3% $65.06 $73.95 14% Seagate Technology Holdings PLC STX 59% 36% 5% $117.94 $119.88 2% Gen Digital Inc. GEN 45% 55% 0% $28.48 $31.83 12% DaVita Inc. DVA 9% 83% 8% $136.26 $167.14 23% ONEOK Inc. OKE 67% 33% 0% $80.84 $106.75 32% Molina Healthcare Inc. MOH 42% 47% 11% $305.04 $356.93 17% Aptiv PLC APTV 68% 23% 9% $66.81 $75.76 13% UnitedHealth Group Inc. UNH 73% 17% 10% $301.91 $376.05 25% Elevance Health Inc. ELV 75% 25% 0% $383.84 $491.94 28% Dell Technologies Inc. Class C DELL 81% 19% 0% $111.27 $136.52 23% American International Group Inc. AIG 55% 45% 0% $84.64 $90.88 7% HCA Healthcare Inc. HCA 59% 34% 7% $381.39 $387.95 2% Ball Corp. BALL 61% 33% 6% $53.58 $61.23 14% Source: FactSet Any stock screen has its limits and should only be used as a tool as part of your own research if you are selecting individual companies for investment. Click on the tickers for more about each company. Read: Tomi Kilgore's detailed guide to the information available on the MarketWatch quote page 'You never know what might happen': How do I make sure my son-in-law doesn't get his hands on my daughter's inheritance? Strategists forecast a sizzling summer for small-cap stocks 'I am getting very frustrated': My mother's adviser has not returned my calls. He manages $1 million. Is this normal? My life partner is 18 years my senior. He wants to leave his $4.5 million fortune to me — not his two kids. Do we tell them? 'I'm afraid to ask her': My stepmother won't show me my father's will. What now?