Pet fur found in songbird nests contains high levels of pesticides, study finds
Researchers surveying nests for the harmful chemical found in pet flea treatments found that it was present in every single nest. The scientists from the University of Sussex are now calling for the government to urgently reassess the environmental risk of pesticides used in flea and tick treatments and consider restricting their use.
Cats and dogs are widely treated with insecticides to prevent against fleas. Vets often recommend regular flea treatments as a preventive measure, even when dogs and cats do not have the pest. But scientists now recommend animals should not be treated for fleas unless they actually have them.
It was already widely known that the chemicals in the treatments were affecting life in rivers and streams after pets swam in them, but the discovery of songbird nest contamination will add to the pressure.
Cannelle Tassin de Montaigu, the lead author of the research paper, said: 'No nest was free from insecticides in our study, and this significant presence of harmful chemicals could be having devastating consequences on the UK's bird populations.
'Our research shows that based on the chemicals detected, veterinary flea and tick drugs are the most likely source of contamination. We undertook our research when it was safe to do so at the end of the breeding season, so the problem could in fact be much worse. This raises questions about the environmental impact of veterinary drugs and calls for a comprehensive environmental risk assessment of veterinary treatments.'
The study, published today in Science of the Total Environment, shows that the fur used by birds to build the inner lining of their nests contained chemicals used in pet flea treatments, such as fipronil.
The researchers collected 103 blue and great tit nests that were lined with fur, finding that 100% of the nests contained fipronil, which is banned in the UK and EU for agricultural use, and 89% contained imidacloprid, which was banned in the EU as a plant protection product in 2018. Both are still widely used in pet flea treatments. The UK government is drawing up plans for a total ban on imidacloprid in agriculture but not for pet treatments. The researchers also detected 17 out of the 20 insecticides they were testing for.
The scientists found a higher number of unhatched eggs or dead chicks in nests where there was a higher incidence of insecticide.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
Recent research has found that these flea treatments also enter rivers, killing the wildlife within, and that pet owners using them risk contaminating their hands with the chemicals for at least 28 days after the treatment has been applied.
Sue Morgan, the chief executive of SongBird Survival, said: 'We are a nation of pet lovers and bird lovers, and it is extremely concerning to see the alarming levels of toxic pesticides in bird nests from veterinary drugs. Pet owners will be upset to hear that in trying to do the right thing to support their pets with fleas and ticks, they could be harming our ecosystem, resulting in dead newborn chicks and unhatched eggs. As pet owners, we need to have confidence that we are keeping our pets well, without devastating impacts on our wildlife.
'Our UK songbirds are in crisis. More than half of our UK songbirds are threatened or already in decline, which is why this latest research shows the importance of taking action as soon as possible. We want the government to undertake a more comprehensive environmental risk assessment of veterinary drugs.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Half of UK councils still use pesticides in public places, research finds
More than half of councils in the United Kingdom continue to use pesticides in parks, playgrounds, pavements, playing fields and housing estates, research revealed on Wednesday. But increasingly, local authorities are taking action to end or reduce their use of pesticides, according to research by the Pesticide Action Network. The most widely used pesticide by local authorities is the weedkiller glyphosate, which has been linked to cancer. The overuse of pesticides has also been linked to major declines in wildlife, including birds, bees and hedgehogs. PAN sent freedom of information requests to councils across the UK and had responses from more than 90%. Of the 368 local authorities who replied, 165, or 45% were taking action to end or reduce their use of pesticide. Nick Mole, a policy manager at PAN UK, said: 'While there is still work to do, this survey shows that the pesticide-free movement is growing. A decade ago, no one even knew that pesticides were used in villages, towns and cities. Now we have more than 100 councils taking action to protect the health of residents, wildlife and pets.' PAN released polling on Wednesday that showed the public was supportive of moves to reduce or end pesticide use in public places. Two-thirds of those surveyed (65%) agreed that 'schools, parks, playgrounds and other public spaces in their local area should be pesticide-free', with a third (33%) strongly agreeing. The research showed some councils were doing better than others to end pesticide use. Of the councils that responded, almost half (47%) said they did not use pesticides on playing fields; about a third (34%) kept cemeteries pesticide-free, and about a quarter (26%) managed their parks and green spaces without pesticides. London is leading the way in the movement to have pesticide-free public spaces, which are already the norm in Paris. Of the capital's 33 councils, 23 said they had either ended their pesticide use or were moving in that direction. 'The UK public is largely onside and countries like France and Denmark – which have banned urban pesticide use nationwide – are showing every day that we simply don't need chemicals to maintain public spaces,' said Mole. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion Councils said they used 354 tonnes of pesticides in 2024. This was four times the figure from government data of 84 tonnes of pesticides used by local authorities, the research suggested. A number of councils have already banned pesticides, including Lambeth, Glastonbury and Lewes. Brighton and Hove council banned pesticides in 2019, but in 2024, after complaints about weeds (56, according to later reporting), announced that it would be using the controlled droplet application of glyphosate in specific areas and would reduce usage to the lowest amount possible. A bill, tabled by the Green MP Siân Berry, is going through parliament to end pesticide use in public spaces.
Daily Mirror
3 days ago
- Daily Mirror
'I swapped student life in the UK for Caribbean island - and saved myself £88k in tuition fees'
Tamara Leslie's five-year medical degree in Anguilla costs £8,000 a year A student has moved to a Caribbean island for university - saving herself £88k in tuition fees in the process. Tamara Leslie, 20, started a biomedical course at the University of Sussex but quit after a week - when she discovered she could get the same qualification for less. The student, who is originally from Papua New Guinea but has been living in Eastbourne, East Sussex, would have forked out £16k-a-year in tuition fees in the UK as an international student. She would have spent £128k on a three-year undergraduate degree and a further five years in medicine - as she did not initially get into medical school. She looked into other options and realised she could study medicine on a five-year course at New Anglia University, Anguilla - costing roughly £8,000 a year. Tamara is currently doing a year on a pre-med course before a four-year medical degree. She packed up her life to move 4,220 miles and loves the "freedom" and "independence" it has given her. Tamara said: 'You have those moments where you just think about your whole life and you plan everything. 'All my friends are going to finish university and I'll still be there. I understand medicine is an arduous course but I thought that surely there must be another way to get this done a bit quicker. Ultimately the money and the time and everything coming to New Anglia just won me over." Tamara had to pay more for her tuition fees in the UK as she is not a UK citizen. As she did not get accepted onto a medicine course initially, she was completing a three-year undergraduate course in biomedical science first. She said: "I was a permanent resident in England at the time but I wasn't a citizen so obviously it wouldn't have applied to me to have normal tuition fees as a home student." But Tamara quickly worked out the course was not for her in September 2024. She said: 'Class size is definitely a big influence on it. In my classes in Brighton it felt like it was 100 to 150 of us. I couldn't really raise my hand because I felt I would waste other students' time so everyone just keeps quiet." Tamara contacted SME, Study Medicine Europe, and went through various university options with an agent after starting at Sussex. She said: "She gave me all these options of European universities to start next September, but this was the only option to start early in January. 'I submitted my application, and I think I got accepted the next day, so I dropped out of university and then I came here." Tamara said the Caribbean appealed because of the " weather and location". She said: "It reminded me of my home country. It kind of felt familiar to me. "I think your environment influences you a lot, so it would be helpful for me to be somewhere nice and sunny rather than somewhere just cold." The degree will be recognised everywhere as it meets the GMC criteria - a set of standards for those who train to become doctors. To start with she was the only person on her pre-med course, which allows her to experience 'a more personal relationship with your teacher'. Despite having no family in the Caribbean, the people there have made her feel welcome and a part of the community. Tamara said: 'Every time you walk into stores everyone says good morning. "It's just so cheery and happy. I feel like that's why I didn't get a chance to be homesick - because it didn't take me too long to connect with people. 'When I travelled to the UK for the first time as a kid, people were a bit closed off and it took me a while to make friends. Here, time isn't a factor - you can click with someone immediately.' Tamara pays "roughly the same" same for her student accommodation but gets more bang for her buck. She pays $500 a month for rent. She said: "I remember looking at accommodation when I was going to Sussex and the cheapest was roughly £400 per month. With the money I'm paying here I definitely wouldn't be able to get this with whatever I would have paid in the UK. "Here we've got a balcony, an outdoor sofa, a living room. It's crazy. It's also roughly about a six minute drive to campus." She has a part-time job working at a beach bar, which helps her fund daily expenses in Anguilla. Because her course is aimed at her getting her qualifications as quickly as possible, her timetable is 8am to 3pm every week day - instead of having lectures spread out like it is in the UK. She said: 'It can get hard sometimes in the sense that school can get quite tasking but I think it all depends on how you manage your time. I've been balancing it pretty well so far.' Tamara plans to complete her final two years of her course in the UK to do her clinical rotations, as New Anglia University offers these in the UK. She said: 'It's worth my money to be here, but when it comes to it, I'd rather shadow the NHS because the healthcare here is a bit slow. 'I think we, as humans, get so stuck in a cycle which we're so used to, but I think it's best to go out of your shell because it's the best way to grow as an individual. My biggest advice is to go for it.'
The Guardian
25-07-2025
- The Guardian
Closing classroom windows does not cut air pollution, study finds
Keeping the classroom window closed is not the answer to reduce the amount of pollution coming into schools, a recent study has found. A project called SAMHE (Schools' Air quality Monitoring for Health and Education) operated air pollution monitors in nearly 500 classrooms for an academic year and found that days with high outdoor pollution led to higher pollution inside the classrooms. The Imperial College London researchers found that 6% of school days had outdoor particle pollution above the World Health Organization's daily guidelines and these days contributed 17% of the annual classroom pollution. A project called SAMHE, led by at Imperial College London, operated air pollution monitors in nearly 500 classrooms for an academic year, and found that days with high outdoor pollution led to higher pollution inside the SAMHE classrooms. Six percent of school days had outdoor particle pollution above the World Health Organisation's daily guidelines, but these days contributed 17 percent of the annual classroom pollution. Dr Alice Handy of the SAMHE team said: 'Reducing ventilation will not stop outdoor PM2.5 entering classrooms. We saw high levels of particle pollution in classrooms during the weekends around fireworks night when schools and classrooms were closed. Ventilation is also really important to lower carbon dioxide in classrooms, which is linked to attention and can reduce the risk of spreading infections.' The good news is that school classrooms did provide a degree of protection against air pollution with average particle pollution measuring 30% less than outdoor air. Handy added: 'Relatively little of the particle pollution in classrooms seems to be generated there, most comes in from outdoor air.' Over the school year, about 80% of the classroom pollution came from outside. At home, children can breathe in particle pollution from sources that include cooking, personal care products, wood burners and cigarettes. Pollution in schools can also be lower than on the journey to and from school. Research in London has shown that children who walk along busy roads or travel by car to school have the greatest exposure to traffic pollution. Handy said: 'Our results show how important it is to continue with initiatives such as no-idling zones, school streets, and efforts to burn fewer fossil fuels, to clean up the air both inside and outside schools.' The team tested out air filters and sensors in an additional 300 classrooms and found they reduced particle pollution by 29% compared with nearby schools in the main part of the SAMHE study. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion Dr Samuel Wood of the research team said: 'We saw significant reductions, but outdoor air quality was still the leading driver of classroom particle pollution, even with filters installed. Air filters may be able to mitigate against some of the effects of poor outdoor air quality, but they are unlikely to remove them altogether.'
