The Lens: Tensions escalate between Cambodia and Thailand
Praveen Sathappan Narayanan, 11, Island School
Praveen Sathappan Narayanan attends Island School. Photo: Handout
Tensions are high between Cambodia and Thailand following the death of a Cambodian soldier in May in a disputed border area between the two countries.
I believe the long-term implications of this situation could lead to increased conflict, economic strain from trade restrictions and regional instability. Additionally, it may result in heightened discrimination against Cambodian immigrants in Thailand, exacerbating social issues.
To reach a compromise, both countries should engage in bilateral talks to address the situation, possibly involving neutral parties or organisations, such as the United Nations, to help ease tensions.
I think Cambodia's decision to take the incident to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) was appropriate, as involving a third party could help mitigate tensions.
However, I believe Cambodia should have prioritised bilateral talks with Thailand before engaging with the ICJ, as the court's involvement further complicates the situation.
Recently, Thailand has imposed border restrictions on Cambodia as a means of exerting economic pressure.
At the same time, Cambodia has responded by banning Thai dramas, closing a popular border checkpoint and cutting internet bandwidth from Thailand.
I disagree with both countries' actions, as these measures, presented as being in the interest of national welfare, ultimately harm their citizens.
Cambodia and Thailand must prioritise immediate dialogue despite their historical disputes.
While involvement with the ICJ can provide some relief, constructive dialogue is essential. Trade bans only exacerbate the situation and negatively impact citizens.
Collaborative efforts are crucial for fostering peace and stability in the region.
Read up on this issue in last week's The Lens
Thank you for your participation in The Lens!
Thank you for your participation in The Lens!
The Lens is a way for students to connect with global issues and topics. It encourages you to think critically and articulate your opinions. The Lens lets us step out of our bubble in Hong Kong and learn about problems around the world.
The Lens will not be featured in the summer editions of Young Post. But we are grateful for the dozens of amazing submissions and responses from our Junior Reporters.
But don't worry – Young Post always has plenty of opportunities for budding journalists! You can still write for other columns this summer, such as Face Off!
If you want to be even more involved, you can apply to become a Junior Reporter using this link.
We look forward to seeing more of your writing in the coming school year!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- South China Morning Post
US tariffs put Asia's small businesses on road to ruin: ‘ultimately some will go under'
In boardrooms and backstreets from Singapore to Hanoi, owners of Asia's small and medium-sized enterprises had barely got over the shock of the pandemic's economic upheaval when another disruption arrived – this time from Washington, in the form of new tariffs that risk upending cross-border commerce and livelihoods. Following a series of hard-fought trade negotiations with the Trump administration, many Southeast Asian nations now find themselves confronting US tariffs ranging from 19 to 20 per cent, alongside additional, sector-specific duties targeting industries such as steel and semiconductors Compounding the challenge, US President Donald Trump 's government has imposed a separate 40 per cent punitive levy on transshipments – goods routed from high-tariff countries through low-tariff nations before being re-exported to the United States – in a move likely to hit Asian exporters reliant on Chinese components especially hard. 'A tariff-economy shock soon after a pandemic-economy shock will be disastrous for many enterprises,' warned Henrich Greve, academic director of the Centre for Entrepreneurship at INSEAD. Economic shocks are not supposed to come so frequently and with such strength Henrich Greve, INSEAD business school 'In a normal economy, economic shocks are not supposed to come so frequently and with such strength. Small and medium enterprises are much more vulnerable to tariffs than larger firms.'
South China Morning Post
3 days ago
- South China Morning Post
6 pillars for peace to end wars in Asia
For a time, it seemed that economic interdependence had put an end to war between states. When Canadian psychologist Steven Pinker declared in 2011 that such wars had 'almost vanished', many believed the arc of history was bending towards peace. But from Ukraine to the recent Thailand-Cambodia conflict , the resurgence of wars in recent years has shown that we must look deeper at what sustains harmony between nations – and why some regions are so much better at it than others. Southeast Asia, though seen today as a relative oasis of stability and economic dynamism, does not enjoy the same freedom from conflict as North America , for example, where the prospect of war between neighbours is virtually unthinkable. Scholars have long argued that economic integration, particularly through trade, lessens the risk of conflict. There is truth in this. Since World War II, trade has indeed proven a powerful force for peace and prosperity. But in a rapidly changing world, trade alone is no longer enough to guarantee security. New, more robust mechanisms are needed to ensure that tensions between nuclear powers, especially, are contained. There is cause for hope. The European Union and North America are living proof that deep integration can bring lasting calm. Realistically, there is little to no prospect of armed conflict between the states that make up these regions. But can the rest of the world replicate this? And if so, how? European Union flags fly in front of the the seat of the European Commission in Brussels. Photo: dpa Six pillars for integrated peace
South China Morning Post
4 days ago
- South China Morning Post
Seoul rules out unification of North Korea by ‘absorption', pushes for peace
South Korea 's new liberal President, Lee Jae-myung, said on Friday he will seek to restore a 2018 military agreement with North Korea aimed at reducing border tensions and urged Pyongyang to respond to Seoul's efforts to rebuild trust and revive dialogue. Speaking on the 80th anniversary of Korea's liberation from Japanese colonial rule, Lee's overture came amid soaring tensions fuelled by North Korean leader Kim Jong-un 's nuclear ambitions and deepening ties with Russia over the war in Ukraine. The 2018 military agreement, reached during a brief period of diplomacy between Kim and South Korea's former liberal president Moon Jae-in, created buffer zones on land and sea and no-fly zones above the border to prevent clashes. South Korea's previous conservative government suspended the deal in 2024, citing tensions over North Korea 's launches of trash-laden balloons towards the South, and moved to resume frontline military activities and propaganda campaigns. The step came after North Korea had already declared it would no longer abide by the agreement. 'To prevent accidental clashes between South and North Korea and to build military trust, we will take proactive, gradual steps to restore the [2018] September 19 military agreement,' Lee said in a televised speech. Lee said his government affirms 'our respect for the North's current system' and that the wealthier South 'will not pursue any form of unification by absorption and has no intention of engaging in hostile acts'. Lee said South Korea remains committed to an international push to denuclearise North Korea and urged Pyongyang to resume dialogue with Washington and Seoul. Amid a prolonged diplomatic stalemate with its rivals, Kim's government has made clear it has no intention of giving up the weapons it sees as its strongest guarantee of survival and would reject any future talks on denuclearisation.
