Alimentation Couche-Tard earns US$442.3 million in Q4 amid decline in revenue
LAVAL – Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. says it earned US$442.3 million during the fourth quarter, down from US$454.5 million during the same quarter last year.
The Laval, Que.-based company, which keeps its books in U.S. dollars, reported that net earnings attributable to shareholders came in at US$439.4 million during the quarter, compared to US$453 million during the same period last year.
Earnings per diluted share came in at 46 cents US during the fourth quarter, compared with 47 cents US during the same period last year.
Revenue came in at US$16.3 billion during the fourth quarter, down 7.5 per cent on an annual basis.
The company said in a release that the decline in revenue was due partly to softer fuel demand in the U.S.
Alimentation Couche-Tard CEO Alex Miller said the company held the line on U.S. same-store sales amid economic and geopolitical challenges.
He added it also saw strong positive results for same-store sales in Canada and Europe.
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025.
Companies in this story: (TSX:ATD)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada News.Net
2 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
FDA cracks down as illegal flavored vapes flood American shelves
LONDON/NEW YORK/CHICAGO: In suburban Chicago, just 15 minutes from O'Hare International Airport, a small customs brokerage quietly became a major player in a booming underground market: helping unauthorized Chinese-made vapes reach American shelves. According to a Reuters analysis, the firm, run by Jay Kim, handled 60 percent of all U.S. vape and vape-part shipments from China registered with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2024. Speaking from his office in April, Kim claimed, "A lot of them have FDA authorization." But FDA data tells a different story, revealing shipments included banned brands like Lost Mary and Geek Bar. The FDA has classified these products as illegal to import or sell, warning that their fruity, candy-like flavors appeal to children. Health officials say nicotine can harm developing brains, impairing attention, learning, and mood in teens, who are particularly vulnerable to addiction. While a spokesperson for Lost Mary denied links to Kim's firm and argued that flavored vapes help adults quit smoking, the maker of Geek Bar declined to comment. The illicit pipeline begins in Shenzhen, China—the world's vape capital. Chinese customs recorded over US$3.6 billion worth of vape exports to the U.S. in 2024, but U.S. customs data reflected just $333 million in imports. Experts say a 90 percent discrepancy is far beyond normal and signals that many shipments are misdeclared or misvalued. According to the FDA, illegal vapes are often disguised as unrelated goods—like toys or shoes—to slip through customs. Reuters' investigation, drawing on data, regulator interviews, and insider accounts, traced a network of U.S.-based middlemen—customs brokers, importers, and distributors—who help funnel these products into the country, sometimes taking steps to avoid detection. In February, authorities seized $34 million worth of unauthorized vapes in Chicago. The shipments used vague product descriptions and incorrect declared values. That same month, the FDA sent letters to 24 middlemen in the vape supply chain—importers and brokers—warning them that making false statements is a crime and asking how they ensure compliance with tobacco laws. Reuters could not confirm if Kim received such a letter. He did not respond to detailed questions about the shipments his firm handled. Kim claimed he exited the vape business last year and said a former employee had introduced him to vape clients, then took those customers when she left. However, FDA records show vape shipments tied to his firm continued well into 2025. Customs brokers don't sell or buy goods themselves—they manage import paperwork for clients. But failing to perform due diligence could put them in legal jeopardy, said Lenny Feldman, a partner at trade law firm Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg. The network remains elusive. Six of the top ten U.S. recipients of vape shipments in 2024 were little-known companies formed in the past two years, some operating from residential homes with no public web presence or contact details. At one such house in north Chicago, a woman told Reuters the address had no link to the vape business. New York Attorney General Letitia James filed lawsuits in February against 13 U.S. vape distributors, accusing them of working directly with Chinese manufacturers to flood the market with illegal flavored products. "All have engaged in reprehensible, illegal conduct and aim to addict youth to their products," the complaint said. Former FDA official Mitch Zeller echoed that view. "There's only a handful of middlemen... responsible for getting [illegal vapes] into interstate commerce," he said. Despite FDA approval for just 34 vaping products—none of them flavored—unauthorized devices now account for an estimated 70 percent of U.S. vape sales, worth over $8 billion last year. U.S. officials say they're stepping up enforcement, including using AI to track suspect shipments. But for now, the supply chain that feeds the nation's youth nicotine habit continues to operate, primarily in plain sight.
Canada News.Net
6 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Musk eyes nationwide rollout after robotaxi test in Austin
NEW YORK CITY, New York: Elon Musk is taking a big step toward making his long-promised robotaxi dream a reality. Over the weekend, Tesla began testing a small group of self-driving taxis in Austin, Texas. If this trial goes well, Musk plans to expand the service to other cities later this year. The pilot program is modest for now. Only about 10 to 12 Teslas are being used, and they operate within a limited area of Austin. Each ride costs a flat fee of US$4.20. The cars are monitored remotely, and a person is sitting in the passenger seat for safety in case anything goes wrong. Musk has been promising self-driving robotaxis since 2019, saying they would be on the roads "next year." Each year, the promise was repeated but never fulfilled. In 2023, he said there would be over a million robotaxis by 2024. Now, that goal still seems far away. Meanwhile, competitors like Waymo have already launched driverless taxi services in several U.S. cities and recently completed 10 million paid rides. Unlike Tesla, Waymo uses more advanced and costly technology, including radar and laser sensors, to help its cars navigate. Tesla has faced several challenges recently. Political controversies involving Musk have affected the company's image and hurt car sales. Some investors were alarmed when $150 billion was wiped off Tesla's stock value after Musk got into an argument with the U.S. president. Although the stock has since recovered, confidence remains shaky. Still, many investors continue to back Musk, remembering how Tesla's stock has grown over the years. A decade ago, Tesla shares were $18; now they're over $300. Some experts remain cautious. Garrett Nelson, an analyst at CFRA, said the current rollout is very small, and it's unclear how quickly Musk can scale up. Seth Goldstein from Morningstar believes it could take until 2028 before robotaxis are widely available. Musk has also faced criticism for overstating the ability of Tesla's "Full Self-Driving" (FSD) system. Despite its name, the system still requires the driver's attention and is not fully autonomous. The U.S. government has investigated the system after several accidents, and Tesla has faced lawsuits, some settled and others dismissed. Despite all this, Musk remains optimistic. He says the new robotaxis will run on an improved FSD system and that Tesla cars already on the road could be converted into taxis through a software update. That, he claims, could help Tesla grow its robotaxi network quickly across the country. However, Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities and a strong supporter of Musk, believes Musk might succeed this time thanks to Tesla's ability to scale rapidly. Even skeptics like Morningstar's Goldstein admit that Musk does sometimes deliver — and when he does, it's often in a big way. "Maybe his timelines aren't realistic," Goldstein says, "but he can develop futuristic technology products."
Canada Standard
7 hours ago
- Canada Standard
Enbridge Says It Would Pitch New Alberta-B.C. Pipeline Only Under Right Conditions
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has expressed confidence that one or more private-sector pipeline operators will come forward with a plan to ship oilsands crude to the Port of Prince Rupert in British Columbia, and test the federal government's new regime to speed along projects deemed in Canada's national interest. But if pipeline companies are keen on proposing a new West Coast pipeline in the near future, they're not saying so publicly, reports The Canadian Press. "We've been in active conversations with many pipeline companies, and I feel like we're pretty close to having either one or a consortium come forward," Smith told reporters June 24. Enbridge Inc. is Canada's biggest shipper of crude oil with a vast cross-border network. It's also the company behind the scrapped Northern Gateway oilsands pipeline to the B.C. port of Kitimat, south of Prince Rupert and further inland. The company said in a written statement June 25 that it would explore market-diversifying projects, provided the demand is there from customers. It would also take "real provincial and federal legislative change" around climate policy, regulatory timeliness, and Indigenous participation. "We will be there to build what is needed for our shippers, for Alberta and for Canada-that's our job, our mission as a company-but only when the conditions make sense and the right framework is in place," Enbridge said. Meanwhile, South Bow Corp. would only say it "carefully evaluates all opportunities, especially those that complement our current assets and strengthen our existing corridor." South Bow has no infrastructure in B.C. Its Keystone system serves U.S. Midwest and Gulf Coast refineries. The CEO of federally owned pipeline operator Trans Mountain Corp. told reporters earlier this month that his company is among those Smith has spoken to about spearheading a new pipeline. But Mark Maki said "optimizing the existing kit" is a priority over building something new for now. Trans Mountain flows to the B.C. Lower Mainland is currently the only way Alberta producers can meaningfully access Asia-Pacific markets. The new pipeline Smith envisions would ship one million barrels of oil per day, and would be the "anchor tenant" on a corridor that houses other infrastructure. B.C. Premier David Eby said Wednesday that the focus should be on shovel-ready projects that are ready to go-in excess of $50-billion worth, by his tally. "Some of my frustration about this issue is that there is no proponent. There is actually no project here," Eby said of Smith's B.C. pipeline ambitions. Richard Masson, an executive fellow at the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy, said it's hard to see how Smith can entice a private company to get on board. "She's pushing to be seen to be doing something and to try and take advantage of the mood in the country," he said. "And my concern is that if you only put one option on the table and that option has lots barriers to being realized, you're going to end up with a lot of disappointed people later." He adds it would take two to three years of engineering, environmental and consultation work before a proposal is ready to be filed. So even if Ottawa's two-year review limit holds, its' five years until shovels hit the ground in a best-case scenario. For Enbridge, Masson said one stumbling block would be how a potential new West Coast system may affect the economics of its Mainline system, which on any given day is the largest-single conduit for Canadian crude flowing by pipeline to the United States. A new pipeline would likely have to be underpinned by decades-long commitments from customers to pay to use it, whereas the Mainline is more flexible, he said. If customers are already locked into paying to use any potential West Coast system, there's more incentive to move crude on that before the Mainline. "That means volumes that would be going down the Enbridge Mainline get pulled off and put on to the new system," Masson said. "So Enbridge seems like an unlikely company unless there is some kind of industry or government support, so that they weren't worse off on the Mainline system." South Bow, which was spun off last year from TC Energy, is a smaller company and is unlikely to have the capacity for such an undertaking, Masson said. Trans Mountain-a Crown corporation-delivered its expansion last year at a massively higher cost than when it was first proposed. "So, not easy to see that happening unless the federal government says, 'We want you to do it, so do it,'" Masson said. As for other Canadian energy infrastructure players like Keyera Corp. and Pembina Pipeline Corp., a crude pipeline wouldn't be a fit as they're more geared toward natural gas, he added. "Their investors would be unhappy if they got into it because it's such a big project compared to the size of the company and it's outside their core expertise." Another major obstacle is the federal government's tanker ban on the West Coast. During the pitched debate over Northern Gateway, First Nations and environmental groups were vehemently opposed to crude oil tankers sailing along the rugged, island-dotted northern B.C. coast and raised alarm over the ecological damage that could result from a spill. Smith and industry players have been pushing Ottawa to lift the ban, but to date there's no sign the Liberal government will oblige. "This is simply not an area where we can have a pipeline," said Anna Barford, oceans campaigner with Stand. Earth in Vancouver. "When Alberta says pipelines, for us that means tankers." This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025. -With files from Chuck Chiang in Vancouver. Source: The Energy Mix
