Putin says NATO rearmament not a 'threat' to Russia
Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday (June 19, 2025) that NATO's push to ramp up defence spending was not a 'threat' to Russia, days before the alliance was set to sign-off on a plan to boost its military capacity across Europe.
In a late-night press conference, the Russian leader also said his troops would not stop pushing forward in Ukraine and sought to undermine his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
The Western military alliance will hold a crucial summit in The Hague next week to discuss increasing defence spending to five percent of GDP, under pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump.
Mr. Putin has cast his offensive in Ukraine as part of a wider conflict between Russia and U.S.-led NATO, which has been Ukraine's staunchest backer since Russia launched its offensive in February 2022.
'We do not consider any rearmament by NATO to be a threat to the Russian Federation, because we are self-sufficient in terms of ensuring our own security,' Mr. Putin said at a televised press conference in Saint Petersburg.
Russia is 'constantly modernising our armed forces and defensive capabilities,' Mr. Putin said, adding that it made 'no sense' for NATO to spend more money on arms.
Though he conceded higher spending by NATO would create some 'specific' challenges for Russia, he brushed them off.
'We will counter all threats that arise. There is no doubt about that,' Mr. Putin added.
Kyiv is seeking security guarantees from NATO as part of any deal to end the fighting, more than three years after Russia ordered its full-scale military offensive.
Zelenskyy meeting?
Moscow has shown little willingness to back down, with Mr. Putin saying Thursday (June 19, 2025) that Russia had the 'strategic advantage' on the battlefield.
'Our troops are advancing along the entire line of contact. Every day, more or less, but every day they go forward. And the advance will continue,' he said.
Mr. Putin also sought to justify his three-year campaign against Ukraine, questioned Mr. Zelenskyy's legitimacy and dismissed civilian deaths from Russia's daily aerial attacks.
He said he was ready to meet with his Ukrainian counterpart, but only during a 'final phase' of negotiations on ending the three-year conflict.
He also suggested Mr. Zelenskyy had no right to sign a peace agreement given his five-year mandate had expired, a notion Kyiv has dismissed as baseless propaganda.
'We need to find a solution that would not only put an end to the current conflict, but also create conditions that would prevent similar situations from recurring in the long term,' Mr. Putin said.
'I am ready to meet with everyone, including Mr. Zelenskyy. That is not the issue – if the Ukrainian state trusts someone in particular to conduct negotiations, for God's sake, it can be Mr. Zelenskyy,' the Russian leader said.
'We don't care who negotiates, even if it is the current head of the regime,' Mr. Putin said.
But he added that this would only happen at a 'final phase, so as not to sit there and divide things up endlessly, but to put an end to it.'
Mr. Putin has rejected Mr. Zelenskyy's calls for a face-to-face meeting to agree a peace deal.
Moscow has also rejected proposals for a full and unconditional ceasefire and outlined a raft of hardline peace demands – including that Kyiv cede more territory and renounce Western military support.
Kyiv has dismissed them as 'ultimatums' and accused Moscow of deliberately sabotaging peace efforts to prolong the conflict.
Russia has escalated its aerial attacks on Ukraine amid the stalled talks.
Russian strikes on the Ukrainian capital killed at least 28 people on Wednesday (June 19, 2025), Kyiv said.
Despite widespread evidence of massive civilian deaths amid the campaign and the destruction of apartments, schools, hospitals and other sites, Mr. Putin on Thursday (June 19, 2025) claimed that his forces did not target civilian areas.
Hours earlier, AFP journalists in Kyiv had watched rescuers carry body bags with victims out of a destroyed apartment block across piles of debris.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
31 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
This book illustrates how a robust cultural milieu in the 19th century modernised Calcutta
Modernity needs a crucible and a tree, the former where seminal ideas and practices germinate and the latter where they flower. If there was one crucible of art in India in the 19th century, it was Calcutta. Calcutta could be looked upon as a crucible of modernity, where over the past centuries, it has been a melting pot for various currents. They were ignited by economic, social, and cultural transformative forces that shaped the urbanisation of Calcutta. In the popular and intellectual terms of discourse, modernity implies the production and adoption of new ideas and ways of thinking that defy or depart from the traditional lifestyle and ideas. In this sense, modernity reinvents itself and changes its shape with every stage in the socio-economic transformation of society, and can therefore be ancient and contemporary. Modernity in Calcutta introduced the concepts of freedom, equality, and fraternity, which helped frame democratic and egalitarian forms of political governance in the modern Western world in the 19th and 20th centuries. This was also felt in Calcutta. Calcutta in the 19th century became the locus of exchange between the British metropolis and its Indian colony. Its port, built by the British, served to export native raw materials to England to grease its industrial wheels. It also served to import Danish Christian preachers who set up the first printing press in Srirampore, near Calcutta. It also brought an Englishman named David Hare to Calcutta, where he opened a school to teach English to Bengali students. The Hindoo College set up in 1819, employed a brilliant young teacher, Henry Derozio (son of a Portuguese father and an English mother, who was born in Calcutta). He imparted the ideas and thoughts of contemporary Western philosophy and political science to his Bengali students. Thus a new generation of Bengali intelligentsia was produced which approximated to the role of modernity, by both interrogating the sanctity of their past indigenous tradition, as well as challenging the authority of the current colonial order. One of the students of Hindoo College, Kishorichand Mitra was to describe the spirit of modernity of those days in the following memorable words: The youthful band of reformers who had been educated at the Hindoo College, like the tops of Kanchanjunga were the first to catch and reflect the dawn. These students, along with leading intellectuals and social reformers like Rammohan Roy, Radhakanta Deb, Dwarkanath Tagore, Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar, as well as business entrepreneurs like Ramdulal Dey and Motilal Sheet, played a pivotal role in introducing the ideas of a cosmopolitan modernity, and encouraging practices in society and culture in conformity with that contemporary global concept of modernity. Calcutta subverted the concept of colonial modernity that was sought to be imposed by the British rulers. By using the same tools of knowledge that were given to them by these rulers, they constructed a different concept of modernity. The British rulers wanted to mould a generation of Bengalis, a class of persons, Indian in blood and colour, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and in intellect. They groomed this class in the hierarchal order of barristers, civil servants, and army personnel to be trained in Britain, followed by the next subordinate group of Bengalis, who were trained in Calcutta to operate as teachers, lawyers, medical practitioners, and junior employees in the administration, as deputy magistrates and clerks, to serve their British bosses. But such transactions between the rulers and the ruled in colonial Calcutta led to a new conceptualisation of modernity by these Bengali middle classes. Modernity was no longer a monopoly of Western colonial powers. Many among the Bengalis who were trained in Lincoln's Inn as barristers, or as civil servants in London, came back to Calcutta with ideas of modernity to which they had been exposed during their stay abroad, ideas of democracy, parliamentary elections, judicial independence, accountability by the rulers, local selfgovernance, and right to self-determination. They began to assert their rights as Indian citizens on these lines, some within the colonial order, some daring to break out from it. It is in Bengali culture that Calcutta has played a major role in introducing modernity. The term modernity here suggests the ability of indigenous litterateurs and artistes to respond to extraneous new thoughts and styles and techniques, and reinterpret and use them in their own creative ways. From the nineteenth century onward to today, Calcutta has remained a crucible, where the exciting encounter between local and traditional Bengali ideas and forms, and their counterparts from the West, has led to a succession of creative output in literature and the arts. We are familiar with the rise of the Bengali novel with Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay, the multi-faceted contributions of Rabindranath Tagore to modern Bengali culture, the founding of the Bengal School of Art under the auspices of Abanindranath Tagore, and still later the Calcutta Group of painters like Rathin Maitra, Gopal Ghose, Paritosh Sen. But, it is important to note in this context that it was not only these members of the educated middle classes, who participated in this encounter between the East and the West. Calcutta's lower orders created a distinct culture of their own in the nineteenth century by adopting the technology of contemporary modernity, and interpreting the new ideas of modernity in their own way. We thus find urban folk singers, like kobiwalas, panchali-singers, and jatra actors, learning to use newly introduced musical instruments, like the violin, harmonium, and clarinet, to sing songs that lampooned the manners and habits of the westernized Bengali babus who imported these same instruments to Calcutta. We find traditional scroll painters coming to Calcutta and discovering the importance of paper, which was easily available due to the setting up of paper manufacturing mills by British entrepreneurs. They began to use paper to paint both the traditional religious themes, and also to depict the new urban environment. They came to be known as Kalighat pats, since these painters settled down near the Kalighat temple in Calcutta. Jamini Roy was the urban patua who built a bridge to modernity with his iconic painting. Similarly, poets and writers from the lower orders in nineteenth-century Calcutta made use of another form of modernity, the newly introduced printing press. Some among them set up printing presses in the Battala area of north Calcutta, which opened up a wide avenue for the publication and distribution of popular literature, and also woodcuts.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump Keeps World Guessing, Moves U.S. Ships And Jets As Iran Warns Of Firm Retaliation
'Stay Out!': Putin Aide Hints At Russia Joining Iran-Israel War If Trump Bombs Tehran's Nukes Russian deputy foreign minister Sergei Ryabkov has said that the U.S. should neither provide nor think about sending military assistance to Israel in war against Iran. His comments follow the ones made by Russian envoy to UN Vassily Nebenzya. He said on Tuesday that the U.S. should stay out of the Iran-Israel conflict militarily. Watch for more details. 648.2K views | 10 hours ago
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Putin says ‘don't even want to discuss' possibility of US, Israel killing Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei
Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed hope that the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel could end with a resolution that suits both the parties. He also offered to help broker a deal between the two nations engaged in trading strikes for almost a week now. While talking about Israel and the United States' plan to potentially kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Putin said that he did "not even wish to discuss" such a possibility. "I do not even want to discuss this possibility. I do not want to," said Putin. Track live updates of Israel-Iran conflict here. "We see that today in Iran there is a consolidation of society around the country's political leadership," AFP news agency quoted him as saying. "This is a delicate issue, and of course we need to be very careful here, but in my opinion, a solution can be found," he added. Putin, speaking at a roundtable session with senior news leaders of international news agencies, said that Moscow could help negotiate a deal that allows Iran to pursue a peaceful atomic program while also addressing Israel's security concerns. Also read: US getting ready for striking Iran, possible this weekend: Report "This is a delicate issue, and of course we need to be very careful here, but in my opinion, a solution can be found," Putin said, reported AFP. He added that Russia has shared its proposal to reach a resolution with Iran, Israel and the United States. 'We are not imposing anything on anyone, we are simply talking about how we see a possible way out of the situation. But the decision, of course, is up to the political leadership of all these countries, primarily Iran and Israel,' Associated Press quoted Putin as saying. Also read: Stuck in Tehran, Lucknow man misses final goodbye to mother Israel struck multiple nuclear and military sites across Iran last Friday under 'Operation Rising Lion', triggering the ongoing conflict. Justifying its actions, Israel said that Iran was close to developing nuclear weapons, which poses an existential threat to Israel. Rebuffing Putin's offer to help mediate the ongoing Middle East conflict, United States President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that he should work on ending his own conflict with Ukraine first. "I spoke to him yesterday and... he actually offered to help mediate, I said 'do me a favor, mediate your own,'" Trump told reporters at White House. 'I said, 'Vladimir, let's mediate Russia first. You can worry about this later,'' Trump added. With agency inputs.
