Insurance claims for wild weather damage this year already exceed 2024 total
NRMA Insurance said it had received 32,000 claims for wild weather-related damage to both vehicles and property between January and May this year, including cyclones, devastating floods, damaging winds and storms. While unusually high, it did not surpass the 53,716 claims in the first five months of 2022 for damage from widespread floods and an east coast low.
Climate Change Authority chair Matt Kean said Australia needed to reduce emissions to limit further climate warming, while also mounting a strong national adaptation effort to protect the nation against the risks that were already here.
'It's no surprise the damage bill is mounting,' Kean said. 'This underscores the need for practical action like updating building codes and extending cyclone construction standards further down the coast.'
Loading
The Albanese government has invested $27.4 million in Australia's first-ever National Climate Risk Assessment and a related National Adaptation Plan, but it is yet to be released. The Climate Change Authority will on Thursday publish a report examining the perils of climate change for home owners, including the implications of ex-tropical Cyclone Alfred and expectations of more southerly cyclones.
CSIRO research suggests every $1 invested in climate resilience saves up to $11 in recovery costs.
Alfred was the first cyclone to threaten South East Queensland and northern NSW in 50 years. Peter Chan, a meteorologist and executive manager with NRMA's natural perils team, said back in 1974 when Cyclone Zoe and Cyclone Wanda hit, there were 2 million people living in South East Queensland and now there were 4 million. By 2046, the population of the region is expected to grow to 6 million.
NRMA Insurance covers every state and territory except Victoria, where IAG insurance is sold by RACV. Chan said Queensland experienced its worst season for wild weather claims back to at least 2017 – and that it took just 66 days for the state to surpass its total claims due to weather damage in 2024.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Labor's 'dead horse' green hydrogen gamble slammed by energy expert Jude Blik as the govt urges Fortescue to repay funds
Labor's 'attempt to appear fiscally prudent' by urging Fortescue to repay handouts for a failed green hydrogen plant has come under fire, as the Albanese government continues to 'bet our future' on the fuel which has been labelled a 'dead horse'. Industry and Innovation Minister Tim Ayres has urged the energy and mining giant to reimburse the government for the millions of dollars it gave Fortescue for the defunct Gladstone plant. The Queensland operation received about $60m in federal and state government support and was canned about 12 months after it opened. The recent shift is a blow to Labor's net-zero plans, which include a Hydrogen Production Tax Incentive as part of its Future Made in Australia Act. More than $6.5 billion will go toward the scheme, which provides $2 per kilogram of renewable hydrogen produced between 2027-28 and 2039-40. Centre for Independent Studies energy analyst Jude Blik said the latest failure was 'no surprise given green hydrogen was never feasible'. 'Green hydrogen is the panacea that Australia's Net Zero hopes and dreams have been pinned on,' Mr Bilk told 'Yet it has never been economic – even for the most basic use cases in chemical manufacturing, let alone for hare-brained green energy export schemes. 'Labor's attempt to appear fiscally prudent in recovering funds is odd given they are still throwing good money after bad with billions still committed to green hydrogen projects. 'Green hydrogen is a dead horse - yet the government continues to bet our future on it.' He said that Fortescue, in principle, should return the taxpayer funds as the funds 'should be used to deliver public benefit'. However, Mr Blik acknowledged that it was not clear whether Fortescue should repay the funds without knowing the terms of the grant. A Fortescue spokeswoman said the company has been 'upfront with the government and will return funds where required under the grant agreement". Creating green hydrogen has proved extremely difficult for local industry despite massive government subsidies. Mr Blik said analysis from the CIS showed a 'realistic price' of green hydrogen was $10/kg – well above the $2/kg price for hydrogen from natural gas. 'This means that for any project to be successful it will either need to find a buyer at $10/kg, or achieve subsidies of $8/kg – both of which are completely unrealistic,' he said. 'The notion that there is a 'technology curve' that we need to be ahead of is naively optimistic, which would be forgivable if we weren't betting our nation's future on it.' The failure of the Gladstone project, alongside another US plant in Arizona, will blow a US$150m ($227m) hole in Fortescue's financial results. On the US project's failure, Fortescue chief executive of growth and energy Gus Pichot told analysts the shift away from green energy under US President Donald Trump hurt the project's viability. 'A shift in policy priorities away from green energy has changed the situation in the US,' Mr Pichot said. 'The lack of certainty and a step back in green ambition has stopped the emerging green energy markets, making it hard for previously feasible projects to proceed. 'As a result, we cannot proceed with our investments as they stand, and will explore future opportunities for our site in Arizona.'
Perth Now
3 hours ago
- Perth Now
West is best economically as eastern states left behind
West is best again in economic circles but big gains made on the other side of the Nullarbor have surprised economists and left eastern states languishing. A boost in housing construction has propelled South Australia to second position, above Queensland and Victoria, in CommSec's latest State of the States report released on Monday. Western Australia remains the nation's top performer for the fourth straight quarter with strong returns on retail spending and business investment, but an upheaval could be on the horizon. "We are seeing Western Australia lose a little bit of momentum," CommSec chief economist Ryan Felsman told AAP. "It's been growing at a breakneck speed the last two or three years, and the reason for that is population growth has been the highest for some time." The report ranks Australian states' economic performance based on eight key indicators including economic growth, retail spending, unemployment, population growth and dwelling commencements. Some states, such as WA and Queensland, have natural resource advantages over the others, while smaller jurisdictions such as Tasmania and the Northern Territory have naturally lower economic capacity due to their smaller populations. The report gauges how each state economy is performing relative to its long-term average. Leading the nation in construction and dwelling starts propelled SA past the eastern states, where housing affordability problems continue. Dwelling investment in NSW, Victoria and the ACT remains roughly the same as it was a decade ago, but Mr Felsman said general improvements in the economy should improve prospects nationwide. "Heavily mortgaged households are feeling the benefits of two interest-rate cuts, with more on the way," he said. "If you add to that better real wages growth, cost-of-living pressures are easing and that should lead to a pick-up in household consumption." Queensland maintained its third-place standing but its growth was hampered by reduced coal and agriculture exports due to the impacts of Tropical Cyclone Alfred. Higher relative unemployment pushed Victoria from second to fourth, while Tasmania, NSW, the ACT and the Northern Territory rounded out the rankings respectively. STATE OF THE STATES RANKINGS 1st: Western Australia, unchanged 2nd: South Australia, up from fourth 3rd: Queensland, unchanged 4th: Victoria, down from second 5th: Tasmania, unchanged =6th: NSW, down from equal fifth =6th: ACT, up from seventh 8th: Northern Territory, unchanged * All changes compared to the CommSec April quarter report
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Cheaper medicines and HECS top parliamentary agenda as tax debate ramps up
The Albanese government will try to keep attention on its election promises as the new federal parliament returns for its second week, but will face further scrutiny about what new policies it plans to unveil at next month's economic roundtable. Labor will introduce legislation to cut the price of PBS medicines to $25 and will also seek to pass the HECS loan cuts introduced last week in what Anthony Albanese said was a deliberate prioritisation of cost-of-living measures. "What we've done very clearly in the first fortnight is concentrate on measures that make a difference to people's money in their pocket. We make no apology for that … That was the basis on which we were elected," he told the ABC's Insiders on Sunday. The $25-per-script price would start in the new year and reduce annual user costs by an estimated $200 million. The $7.70 script price for pension and concession card holders, frozen until 2030, would be unchanged. The policy was matched by the Coalition during the election campaign, so it is unlikely to be controversial, with the opposition also signalling it will likely support the HECS cuts. But there is no timeline for Labor to re-introduce its stalled proposal to double the earnings tax on superannuation balances for those with balances over $3 million, controversial because it would include the "unrealised" earnings of assets. Mr Albanese on Sunday dismissed the Treasury's advice that taxes would need to be raised to fix the budget, reported by the ABC earlier this month, and including an option identified by the department to "build on" the super tax. "Treasury, of course, will put forward advice to government from time to time. That's not government policy … Our starting point is the positions that we took to the election." But the government will face fresh questions this week about its plans to go beyond its election platform in the August roundtable led by Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who has already declared openness to tax changes as part of a reform package. Unions, business groups, and economists are already jostling to propose ideas for the three-day discussion forum to be held in late August before the next parliamentary sitting, where Mr Chalmers and Mr Albanese say they are open to any ideas. The Business Council (BCA) has this week revealed one of its main proposals, to increase the generosity of the tax credit for research and development spending, with the greatest concessions for Australian research commercialised in Australia. In a joint report with Australian companies Atlassian and Cochlear, who are among the biggest users of the tax credit with a combined $316 million spend in the most recent year of data, the BCA has called for an 18.5 per cent flat-rate incentive. "Empowering businesses to make research and development investments is critical to making our economy more productive and innovative, and for delivering greater prosperity for all Australians," the lobby's chief executive, Bran Black, said. "If we don't act now, then we will keep losing innovators, capital, and ideas to other nations." Support for lower company taxes, which appeared to be echoed in Treasury advice, was also on display at a pre-roundtable roundtable convened last Friday by independent MP Allegra Spender. Former treasury secretary Ken Henry and ANU tax professor Bob Breunig, both of whom will attend Mr Chalmers's roundtable, told the forum that company taxes should be reconsidered to tax rents such as mining income more, but entrepreneurship less. Mr Breunig, a noted sceptic of tax incentives for research and development who has argued there is little evidence they spur on research that would not have occurred otherwise, instead proposed a tax deduction for investing in businesses. "If you invest in a company and you make a modest rate of return … that return would be tax-free … Kind of like a tax-free threshold for corporations," he suggested. The forum saw dozens of tax and budget proposals raised, with general agreement that budget sustainability would require some combination of spending cuts, higher taxes, and policies to support economic growth, consistent with Treasury advice. Suggested targets for raising taxes included the petroleum resources rent tax, further changes to super tax concessions, higher capital gains tax, and increasing the GST, although the treasurer and PM have appeared reluctant to consider that move. On the spending side, Michael Brennan of the e61 Institute identified what he called a "capital binge" on infrastructure projects, including at the state level. "There's a lot of value destruction going on in these mega-projects where the benefits are nothing like the value of the cash being [spent]," Mr Brennan said. Participants agreed the government should consider a large package doing multiple things at once, a "grand bargain" rather than "piecemeal" reform. "Tax reform cannot be done piecemeal," Mr Henry said. "This is the lesson that I take from Australia's tax reform adventures of the last 40 years. If it's going to be successful, it's going to have to be big." While Mr Chalmers has embraced suggestions he could pursue ambitious changes, Mr Albanese has seemed more reticent and on Sunday again emphasised the roundtable's focus on economic growth rather than tax changes, branding it a "productivity summit". "[It] is about how do we get that economic growth in the future? And what the productivity summit is about is identifying ways, including [industry investment program] Future Made in Australia. "How do we fix housing? How do we fix these issues in a way that is fiscally responsible?" The Coalition has sent early signals that it would likely oppose any tax reform package that increased the overall tax take, but is likely to be distracted again this week by internal disagreement about net zero. The WA Liberal Party's state council passed a motion calling to drop the net zero by 2050 target, effectively backed in the aftermath by the two most prominent federal frontbenchers from the state, conservatives Andrew Hastie and Michaelia Cash. "We recommitted to emissions reduction, but we will not do that like Mr Albanese legislating a net zero target by 2050," Senator Cash told Sky News on Sunday. "Let's be honest here, the WA Liberal Party have been very, very clear we will not crash the economy in doing so … And we will make sure we do not impose any unnecessary costs on them."
