South Korea to raise concerns to US over potential curbs on chipmakers' China operations
SEOUL, June 22 (Reuters) - South Korea's top trade negotiator said on Sunday he would raise concerns about potential U.S. restrictions on chipmakers in China when he meets U.S. officials in Washington this week for the third round of technical discussions in tariff talks.
"I will pass on the concerns among those in the industry and take utmost care," South Korean Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo told reporters before leaving for Washington, when asked to comment about concerns the U.S. may adopt policies to make it difficult for foreign chipmakers to operate in China.
Yeo also said Seoul may not stick to the July deadline, suggesting talks may continue beyond July 8 amid political and economic uncertainties in the U.S.
South Korea, currently subject to a blanket 10% tariff with a 25% country-specific duty on pause for 90 days, agreed with the U.S. in their opening round of trade talks in late April to craft a trade deal reducing tariffs by July 8.
Yeo was appointed to the role this month by President Lee Jae Myung, who won a snap election on June 3 and said during his campaign that there was no need to rush into a trade agreement with the United States.
On Sunday, Yeo added he would reach out to officials at the White House and the U.S. Congress to discuss various trade issues, including Washington's request for South Korea to loosen rules on imports of U.S. beef.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
Taiwan is 'of course' a country, president says in rebuke to China
TAIPEI, June 22 (Reuters) - Taiwan is "of course" a country and China lacks both the historical evidence and legal proof to back up its sovereignty claims, President Lai Ching-te said on Sunday in a strong rebuke to Beijing and its stepped up political and military pressure. China says democratically-governed Taiwan is "sacred" Chinese territory that has belonged to the country since ancient times, and that the island is one of its provinces with no right to be called a state. Lai and his government strongly reject that view, and have offered talks with China multiple times but have been rejected. China calls Lai a "separatist". Giving the first of 10 speeches in a series called "uniting the country", Lai drew on Taiwan's history, including the millennia-long connection of its indigenous people to other Austronesians, like native Hawaiians, to show what he said was Taiwan's separate and distinct development from China. Taiwan's people have a record of opposing invasion, like uprisings against Japan's 1895-1945 colonial rule, and under the last imperial Chinese dynasty, the Qing, Taiwan was only considered a Chinese province for eight years, he added. "Of course Taiwan is a country," he said at a speech to a Taiwan branch of Rotary International, pointing also to its presidential elections. "But China says no, that Taiwan is not a sovereign country." China's Taiwan's Affairs Office did not respond to a request for comment outside of office hours. China says the 1971 United Nations resolution, which took away Taipei's seat in the body and gave it to Beijing, is one of the legal bases of its claims. Lai, who in March called China a "hostile foreign force", said it was "totally wrong" for Beijing to say that U.N. resolution had anything to do with Taiwan's sovereignty as it was only about which government was represented at the body. China's threat to Taiwan is real, added Lai, pointing to its daily military activities around the island. "Taiwan's future can only be decided by its 23 million people - does everyone approve of this?" he said, to a round of applause. The defeated Republic of China government fled to Taiwan in 1949 after losing a civil war with Mao Zedong's communists, and that remains the island's formal name.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Stealth bombers' 37-hour mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear fortress
The order was given just before 7pm in Washington to drop the heaviest conventional bombs ever used in combat. A fleet of B-2 bombers had been airborne for nearly 37 hours, having taken off from the Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri on Friday and refuelled several times mid-air. As the bombers – their advanced stealth capacity making them virtually invisible to Iranian radar – closed in on their targets, guided-missile submarines from the US Navy also moved into position. Somewhere in the Arabian Sea, a fleet of converted Ohio-class vessels, each capable of carrying up to 154 warheads, stood ready. Everything now awaited the final order from the commander-in-chief. Donald Trump had been here before. In 2019, the US military was 'cocked and loaded' to strike Iran. Bombers were in the air, missiles on US warships locked onto their targets. Then, with 10 minutes to spare, the president called it off – an unprecedented, very public reversal of a major military operation. This time, there was no such hesitation, at least visible to the public. The dial of history turned. Mr Trump, often more cautious on foreign policy matters than his bluster suggested, had just made the biggest gamble of his presidency – one that may yet come to define it. If he has made the right call, he may just have exorcised the Iranian nuclear spectre that has haunted Israel and the Sunni Arab states of the Middle East for decades. If wrong, the decision could plunge the region into violent and prolonged turmoil, mire the United States into the kind of 'forever war' he once campaigned against and cause a rupture with his most fervent domestic supporters. Little wonder tension was etched on the faces of those gathered in the White House's Situation Room, where Mr Trump had convened his military commanders and closest political allies – minus Tulsi Gabbard, his director of national intelligence, reportedly ostracised after suggesting Iran was 'not building a nuclear weapon.' The departure of the stealth bombers had not gone unnoticed. Independent analysts tracking their flight paths suggested they were heading to the US base on the soon-to-be Mauritian territory of Diego Garcia – a staging post, perhaps, for a future attack. Just 24 hours earlier, Mr Trump had declared a fortnight's pause in direct US involvement in Israel's war with Iran. That, it turned out, was a feint, and the apparent Diego Garcia stopover may have been a decoy.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘I feel completely drained': young professionals swamped by ‘infinite workdays'
It is 10pm in Seoul, South Korea, but Hyun Jin Lee is not heading home. The recent college graduate – an employee in the IT industry – is at a mandatory team dinner. 'I end up working late almost every day,' laughs Lee. 'By the end of the day, I feel completely drained, like I've used up all my energy [and] I can't really do anything on weekdays after work.' She begins the workday at 9.30am and ends most days at 10pm, sometimes pushing to midnight. On a single workday, Lee receives about 200 messages. With constant meetings and collaborative work filling the day, evenings are often the only time Lee has to catch up on individual tasks. This is far from unusual, according to new research. Microsoft's 2025 work trend index report found that many workers are increasingly grappling with 'infinite workdays', which start before sunrise and stretch late into the night. They are interrupted by some 270 pinging notifications along the way, about one every two minutes. Many young professionals are struggling with this new reality. 'If I pushed myself [too] hard one day, I try to leave work early the next day to get some rest,' Lee said. 'There's usually this unspoken pressure not to work from home, even if it's allowed, but I do it anyway because I have so much work, [so] commuting feels like a waste of time, and I am just exhausted.' This traditional work culture is disillusioning gen Z as 94% of the generation are prioritizing work-life balance over climbing the corporate ladder, according to research by Deloitte. Sal, a New York-based compensation specialist who declined to provide his full name for privacy reasons, believes his generation is facing new hurdles in the workplace such as rising mental health concerns, and stagnant wage increases in the face of inflating living costs. Despite these challenges, Sal, 24, said he is still expected to conform to an outdated working structure, putting in long hours without the payoff older generations had. 'We're graduating with a high amount of debt [from university] and then working a job that is burning us out, and it's not even paying for this debt,' he said. 'A lot of people my age are job hopping because they're burnt out or cannot find longevity in their roles.' Sal's first year in his current role led him to seek therapy because the workload seemed to be a 'constant queue' and he felt perpetually anxious despite 'being in a spot that is better than most people in my generation'. He was diagnosed with a general anxiety disorder. Even in South Korea, a country known for its notoriously long working hours, gen Z is rejecting this lifestyle. 'Young people really value their free time after work, and prefer having enough rest, flexible work environmentsand more freedom,' said Lee. 'The younger generation believes working overtime, too, often can sometimes be seen as a sign of poor time management, so people don't think working long hours is always a good thing.' For some, long working hours are inevitable. Others are choosing to endure them temporarily, in the hope of buying back their time later. Jane, who also declined to disclose her surname, is working two full-time jobs with the goal of escaping corporate life in four years, when she turns 30. Based in Toronto, she splits her 70-hour workweek between a 9-to-5 marketing manager role and a 5-to-11 call service representative position. Both are remote. 'My first 9 to 5 internship experience in university was so horrible that it made me very anti-career and anti-work, to the point where I wouldn't do this until I was 65,' Jane said. 'The older management clearly expected employees to make work their entire life.' In Jane's previous marketing role with a different company, she drowned in infinite workdays which ultimately led her into a spiral of depression. The management team scheduled meetings off-the-clock, chastised employees who left on time, and expected workers to check messages 24/7, including on holidays like Christmas. 'I would just be very anxious all the time, and I would lose sleep over it,' Jane explained. 'I feel like getting sucked into work and over-obsessing while thinking that that's your life is definitely the wrong approach. Work-life balance is so important.' Jane experienced burnout numerous times since entering the workforce after college. However, she now sets firm working boundaries and communicates her bandwidth to her team. She refuses to work off-the-clock and prioritizes time with loved ones instead. 'What I've realized is that the only way to fix burnout is to leave the company, because if the environment makes you stressed, you cannot fully mentally protect yourself,' Jane said. 'I'm working to live, not living to work.'
