logo
China's aircraft carriers push into waters long dominated by US

China's aircraft carriers push into waters long dominated by US

NZ Herald17-07-2025
This was the first time that two Chinese carriers had ventured together past the 'first island chain' — the barrier of islands east of China that includes the Japanese island of Okinawa, where US Marines are based, and Taiwan — and towards Guam, a US military hub, said Christopher Sharman, the director of the China Maritime Studies Institute at the US Naval War College.
Guam is part of what is called the 'second island chain,' which stretches from Tokyo to south of Palau.
The Chinese naval activities near or past the second island chain signal that US forces 'operating in the vicinity of Guam could be at greater risk', Sharman said.
'These aircraft carrier operations are a harbinger of what is to come,' said Sharman, a former US Navy attache in Beijing.
China 'wants its carriers to be capable of operating independently at remote locations from the mainland, in both peacetime and wartime,' he said.
'That means training for longer periods of time and at increasing distances from China.'
China's Navy said last month that the two carriers and accompanying warships were practicing 'far-sea defence and joint operations'.
The two carrier groups also squared off against each other in a simulated confrontation, said Xinhua, China's official news agency.
Some jet fighters that took off from the carriers flew perilously close to Japanese surveillance aircraft, Japan's Defence Ministry said.
The exercises were not just for show.
Operating aircraft from carriers is demanding and risky, Sharman said.
By training far out in the Pacific, the carriers and accompanying vessels gained 'valuable operating experience in unfamiliar waters, thereby providing the crew with skills that are applicable to future operations elsewhere in the world', he said.
In the coming years, China may deploy aircraft carriers and accompanying naval vessels to bolster its claims in the South China Sea or in territorial disputes with South Korea or Japan.
China could also send carriers to more distant parts of the world as a show of force to defend its economic and security interests.
China has only one significant overseas military base, in Djibouti, but carriers give it 'the option of carrying out myriad aviation missions anywhere its navy sails', said Timothy Heath, a senior researcher at Rand, an organisation that provides analysis for the Pentagon and other clients.
'The most important routes are those to the Middle East along the Indian Ocean.'
Still, the carriers are not a guarantee of Chinese regional maritime dominance.
In a toe-to-toe confrontation between China and the US, each side's carriers could be vulnerable to the other's torpedoes or missiles.
Given those risks, carriers may play a limited role, at least initially, in any potential clash over Taiwan, the self-governed island that China claims as its territory, several military experts said.
And because Taiwan is close to mainland China's coast and its many air bases, the aircraft carriers would not be crucial for trying to dominate the skies in a war over the island, said Oriana Skylar Mastro, a fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University who studies Chinese military strategy.
China could send its carriers farther out into the Pacific to fend off US forces steaming to Taiwan's aid, though the carriers would then be much more exposed to US attacks, Mastro said.
But China could also deploy the carriers as part of an effort to choke Taiwan off from the world.
'Chinese aircraft carriers will be useful in imposing a blockade on Taiwan,' said Narushige Michishita, a professor at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies in Tokyo who studies China's military.
'Aircraft carriers can [be used for surveillance over] large areas and put coercive pressure on both military and commercial ships and aircraft.'
China now has three carriers, all running on diesel and generally less advanced than America's 11 nuclear-powered carriers.
By 2040, China may have six carriers, according to US Navy estimates. China appears to be building a fourth carrier, which analysts say may use nuclear power. That would give it far greater range without the need to refuel.
President Xi Jinping appears to have decided that the country must have more carriers, and other big military assets, to cement its position as a global power.
After the two Chinese carriers finished training in the Pacific this month, one of them, the Shandong, docked in Hong Kong, and selected members of the public were allowed to tour the vessel.
'Politically, they are one of the ultimate status symbols for any country,' Heath said of aircraft carriers.
China's enthusiastic publicity about the carrier manoeuvres in the Pacific indicated that its 'leadership highly values the political symbolism of owning such a powerful warship', Heath said.
Decades ago, Chinese leaders had resisted acquiring aircraft carriers, deciding that they were too costly at a time when China's economy was much smaller.
That began to change after 1996, when the US deployed two carrier battle groups to the waters near Taiwan to deter Beijing from further escalating tensions with the island.
China had been firing ballistic missiles near Taiwan's main ports, hoping to scare voters inclined to support President Lee Teng-hui, who Beijing saw as pushing pro-independence policies.
Two years after that crisis, a Chinese businessman bought a rusting, unfinished ex-Soviet carrier that was owned by Ukraine.
China later bought and finished the ship, which debuted in 2012 as its first carrier, called the Liaoning.
These days, budget limits are not such a worry for China's Navy. But its leaders are not rushing headlong into carrier expansion.
The Shandong — China's second carrier and its first built at home — was launched in 2017. The latest, the Fujian, was launched in 2022 and has still not been placed into active service.
The Fujian uses an electromagnetic catapult system to launch aircraft, which is more technically challenging than using a deck with a ski slope-like ramp, but makes it possible to fly heavier, better-armed planes.
'Chinese carrier operations are still in a rudimentary phase,' Michishita said. China, he said, is 'taking a steady step-by-step approach to improve their capabilities'.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Written by: Chris Buckley and Marco Hernandez
©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Right Questions For A Planet On Fire
The Right Questions For A Planet On Fire

Scoop

time3 days ago

  • Scoop

The Right Questions For A Planet On Fire

Four years ago the 'Dixie Fire' burned nearly a million acres (half a million hectares) over a huge wilderness area extending into Lassen Volcanic National Park. It's the second largest wildfire in California history, and it turned the national park from a pristine sanctuary into a multi-generational burn scar. Lassen is one of the least visited national parks in the United States. Yet beyond seeing the aftermath of the fire, the future of the Earth, without a revolution in human consciousness, was painfully present driving through the park. Gazing down upon the devastation from the highpoint of 2500 meters felt funereal. Forests for as far as you could see looked like matchsticks stuck in brown dirt. By the end of the day, the contrast between moments of shocking devastation and overwhelming beauty was almost too much to bear. The moments of ineffable beauty included a magnificent, slender-winged hawk flying down a powerful mountain stream, and then returning and circling a half dozen times directly overhead. Or the sight of snow-streaked Lassen, with the few cumulus clouds casting fleeting shadows on its gray, bare face. The bad signs outnumbered the good however. Such as a dozen souped-up road-racing cars, replete with numbers and insignias, roaring by repeatedly after stopping in large parking areas like Bumpass Hell before continuing their egregious road rally. Or dozens of Chinese tourists in rented vans stopping on the highway, or crossing it oblivious to everything but their chatter and photos. Advertisement - scroll to continue reading The misnomer of the Camp Fire two years before the Dixie Fire, which was also started by a faulty Pacific Gas and Electric power line, killed 85 people and incinerated the ironically named foothill town of Paradise in a single day. There's now a distinction with little difference between a wildfire that destroys lives and property and one that burns up forests. Both result from and contribute to an accelerating planetary climate crisis that is devastating localities around the world. Superficial diagnoses and prescriptions like Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson's 'Abundance,' which 'forensically examines the ways the overlay of bureaucracy and compliance have hindered development in the United States,' sweep across porous and increasingly irrelevant borders in declining democracies. To applaud America-focused wonks like Klein and Thompson, while lauding 'in an Australian context' what 'some of the wisest policy brains in the country have been saying in relation to the energy transition,' is to remain fixed in orbit around a Trumpian America, which is incrementally replicating a Putinesque putsch. Clearly, 'first there is a need to better define the core purpose.' But it's myopic to then insist 'crafting an agenda and an idea of the nation that is forward-looking is now the challenge.' Though the phrase 'existential crisis' has become a cliché when applied to America, Australia, New Zealand or any other national context, it's apt when applied to humankind as a whole. From that perspective, which must be the first perspective, it seems rather absurd to ask questions like, 'What is scarce that should be abundant? What is difficult to build that should be easy? What inventions do we need that we do not yet have?' Such questions have little to do with the core purpose of a nation, much less a global society and economy. Even somewhat deeper questions like, 'What sort of economy do we want? What comparative advantages do we have? How can we maximise our human capital and improve quality of life?' miss the mark by seeing the core purpose in terms of a single nation. Besides, there is an insurmountable contradiction between 'what kind of economy do we want?' and 'how can we improve our quality of life,' and the profit and progress-driven mindset of 'comparative advantages' and 'human capital.' Right questions seamlessly and non-separatively yield insight, understanding and right action. And insight doesn't just lead to transformation. When allowed to be, and not applied to extending knowledge, insight is transformation. So what are the right questions? What does it mean to be a human being when traditions have eroded into irrelevance and the billionaire bros openly pursue 'AI singularity,' when computers plus robots cognitively and manually perform every job better than humans? Does changing the basic, disastrous course of man require creating new authentically global (as contrasted with international) institutions, or will a non-organised psychological revolution percolate and transform national governments and international institutions? And given that all people now irreversibly live in a global society, what will a true global civilisation look like? One thing is certain – the polycrisis cannot be addressed, much less remedied within national contexts or international/multilateral conferences and agreements that are worth less than the paper they're written on. National frameworks have their place, but if 'my country' continues to be psychologically, philosophically and politically primary, the fragmentation of the Earth, humanity and our diminishing nations will continue unabated. Martin LeFevre - Meditations Scoop Contributor Martin LeFevre is a contemplative and philosopher. His sui generis 'Meditations' explore spiritual, philosophical and political questions relating to the polycrisis facing humanity. lefevremartin77@gmail

'Disaster waiting to happen': Carbon farming stokes pest, fire fears
'Disaster waiting to happen': Carbon farming stokes pest, fire fears

Otago Daily Times

time3 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

'Disaster waiting to happen': Carbon farming stokes pest, fire fears

By Alexa Cook of RNZ The increasing number of farms being planted in trees for carbon farming is raising fears about the spread of pests and fire risk. Some farmers are spending tens of thousands of dollars a year on pest control to prevent deer and pigs eating their crops, while also forking out for higher insurance premiums due to the risk of fire. Out near Porangahau in Central Hawke's Bay, farmer James Hunter is worried about the future of his farm. His neighbour's 2000 hectare Motere Station has just been planted in pine trees, after it was sold last year to Chinese forestry company K&A Sustainability Ltd. "If we think it's so good to offset our carbon by planting pine trees, why do I have to carry the cost with everything I hold precious being destroyed?" he asks. The Hunter family has farmed Rangitoto Station for more than 170 years. The rolling to steep hill country offers unbeatable views of Pacific Ocean, while inland the farm's many valleys are filled with canopies of poplar trees to prevent erosion. For the past 40 years, Hunter has been on a mission to create kilometres of wetlands on the farm, regenerate many hectares of native bush, and fence off special areas that are now protected under QEII National Trust covenants. "It's such a buzz," said Hunter. His eyes lit up as he explained how the wetlands naturally filtered and cleaned what ran off the land, collecting sediment so the water that ran out to the rivers and oceans was clean. It has taken countless hours of work and substantial investment, but he feared these precious habitats were at risk of pests from the new forestry plantation. "What's bothering me is that all of this work that I've done - the deer are going to destroy it, and if it's not the deer, the pigs will come out and eat the lambs," he said. The Hunters' farm early in the 1990s (above) before wetlands and native bush were established, compared with today (below) where the farm has about 15 hectares of wetlands filtering the run off. Photos: RNZ Forest Owners Association chief executive Elizabeth Heeg told RNZ that pest control was part of regional council management plans. She said the association did not collect data on how much forestry owners spent on pest control, but it varied depending on the region and size of forest. "They take these issues seriously for their communities. We are having more trouble with pigs in recent years than we'd had previously. "Deer numbers in some places are expanding, we need to have good game management out there and think about where these populations have expanded to a point where they need professional intervention to be knocked back," she said. Another risk that farmers were worried about was wildfire. Hunter has lived through many severe droughts and told RNZ that with an increasing number of pines being planted in the area, he was seriously concerned about the fire risk. He said there was a lack of responsibility from forest owners to mitigate them. "The forest people are not putting in anything to control fires. If there's a big fire and the only good dam out here is my water supply dam, and it's the middle of a drought and they drain it, where does that leave me? "Why should I have to carry the cost of firefighting, when they've done nothing other than plant every available inch, even though they were told not to plant the airstrip... they did," he said. It was rural communities like his that he had seen decimated by the forestry industry, as Hunter said once the trees were planted there was no employment opportunities until harvest, or if it was a carbon farm then it was locked up and left. He is among many who are warning that this rural way of life - of living off the land and mustering stock with horses and dogs - is disappearing. "It's the dream - and if we plant New Zealand, we're going to shut out people's dreams. We're going to shut out the opportunity to progress. "There are so many issues attached to forestry and you can't unwind it," he said. 'It's a disaster waiting to happen' Fellow Hawke's Bay farmer Bruce Wills has had a lifetime of farming next to forestry. His family farmed at Trelinoe Park in Te Pohua from 1955 to 2018 and witnessed the boom of forestry after Cyclone Bola in 1988, when pine trees were touted as the solution to controlling erosion. Bit by bit his farm was surrounded in forestry, which Wills said resulted in a flood of pests eating his crops, costing him tens of thousands of dollars a year in pest control alone. "We spent an enormous amount of time and effort and money controlling possums, goats, deer, pigs that poured in from the forestry and grazed on pastures overnight. "These are the sort of challenges that New Zealand hasn't woken up to yet with the proliferation of carbon farms," he said. Having forestry neighbours on every boundary also carried a huge insurance cost because of the fire risk. "Certainly towards the the latter years when we were fully surrounded and had the significant risk all around us... we doubled and sometimes more, our public liability insurance. "So we were carrying $10 million plus of cover for public liability because of that pine tree risk to our business if a fire escaped from our property," he said. Wills said in his experience, many forest owners were not prepared for fire and he believed many people underestimated the fire risk of forestry. "Most New Zealanders are complacent to this risk and it will come and bit us now with this increased risk of pine tree fuel ready to be ignited. "It worries me a lot, and in the climate that we've got. It's a disaster waiting to happen," said Wills. 'There are still ongoing issues we need to manage' - forestry management company PF Olsen manages more than 160,000 hectares of forestry in New Zealand, including the K&A Sustainability Ltd owned block next to Hunter. Managing director Scott Downs told RNZ that forest owners were working with Fire and Emergency to develop fire risk management plans. However, he said what each forest spent on fire mitigation varied hugely depending on their location and size. "I think fire is a few years away in terms of risk, so they haven't necessarily started thinking fully about that yet... but it will definitely be on the agenda," he said. Downs said PF Olsen met regularly with landowners, such as farmers, and were always available to discuss their concerns. "We're a local company so we have local people on the ground who can go out and visit these sites regularly. We're not a faceless corporation or entity that they have no contact with or struggle to get hold of," he said. As for pest control, PF Olsen said while it did not have exact figures on what its forest owners spent, it was a cost that was included in the forest management budgets. "Obviously there is a lot more pest control in the first four years or so when the trees are growing, then it reduces after that. "But there are still ongoing issues there that we need to manage, in terms of we don't want to be a harbouring site for pigs and deer that create havoc with neighbours, because we want to be a good neighbour," said Downs. 'We are all concerned about increasing fire risk' Figures from Fire and Emergency New Zealand (Fenz)show the annual average for vegetation fires is about 4350. Between July 2023 and June 2025, Fenz attended 547 vegetation fires where some of the area burned was recorded as having land cover in exotic forest, and 78 of those fires were more than one hectare in size. The Forest Owners Association said many of its members did take responsibility for managing their land properly. Chief executive Elizabeth Heeg said $21 million a year was spent on fire protection. "We really encourage all rural landowners that forests to engage with our guidelines on our website. "It's really important we are all up to speed on what the current practice is," she said. When asked if there were any mandatory requirements for forest owners to reduce the risk, Heeg told RNZ there were forest service levies and some legal requirements. "If someone is not managing that risk effectively, then Fenz can come in with a range of responses. "We are all concerned about increasing fire risk, and that's why it's really important that we are working together on how we are going to manage fires, and fire prevention," she said. Fenz Hawke's Bay community risk manager Nigel Hall agreed that forestry was a big fire risk, and said Fenz was always talking to forestry owners. He said the fire service had extensive maps of forests which included the age and type of trees, topography of the land, access tracks, and water supply locations. "They're doing all they can to mitigate fires within their own forests and they are putting fire breaks around key infrastructure , for example powerlines that go through forests," said Hall. He said for carbon forests, which are usually not pruned like the timber production forests, the fire risk can be greater because there was more fuel. "They are higher risk once they are going... but potentially they are lower risk to start with because they are greener underneath. "But for any forest, the likelihood of us actually going in to the forest to extinguish it, we just won't be doing that. Once a fire has taken hold the only way we can fight it is with helicopters," he said. Since 2017 Fenz has established Service Level Agreements with forest owners, and Fenz national manager risk reduction Jonathan Tan said there were currently 14 Service Level Agreements in place with forest owners, with four to be completed. "Many forest owners either had wildfire capabilities prior to 2017 or have since invested in firefighting resources, including Forest Rural Firefighting appliances, water tankers, and trained personnel within their workforce," he said.

History buffs seek family of intriguing military man
History buffs seek family of intriguing military man

Otago Daily Times

time09-08-2025

  • Otago Daily Times

History buffs seek family of intriguing military man

Hidden away under a giant, spreading pine tree in a steeply sloping section of the Southern Cemetery lies the grave of an intriguing military man. Major-general Alexander Irvine, whose long and storied career in the British Army included service in India during the time of the British Raj, is a person of great interest for the Otago Military History Group (OMHG). Group co-chair Peter Trevathan said Maj-gen Irvine's grave, which had slumped due to the weight of its marble top slab, was in need of restoration and repair. "We would also be keen to tell the story of Maj-gen Irvine's career during an interesting period of British history," Mr Trevathan said. As planning begins on the project, the group is keen to contact descendants of Maj-gen Irvine to get their support and input. As he had three sons and four daughters, it is hoped there might be a large extended family. Alexander Irvine joined the British Army's 24th Regiment in 1844 and was sent to India in 1845, where he quickly earned a field commission to the rank of lieutenant. He was involved in the army's response to the Indian Mutiny in the 1850s and 1860s, rising further in the ranks to captain (1857), major (1867), lieutenant-colonel (1871) and colonel (1875), before retiring as major general in 1877. "It was very unusual in those days for men to become officers on merit — officer commissions were usually purchased," Mr Trevathan said. After his retirement from military service, Maj-gen Irvine moved to Hobart in Tasmania, where he and his wife raised their family. In 1884 he came to Dunedin, and died in 1890. "So Maj-gen Irvine was definitely an interesting character, and it would be good to learn more from family members," he said. OMHG co-chair Marlene Pooley said the grave project would be a focus for the group next year, so it would be good to gather as much information as possible in the meantime. The group had been involved in several projects so far in the year, including the design of the new Hillside Workshops memorial and presenting an event as part of the Otago Medical School 150th anniversary celebrations. The group was also in discussions with family members of Leading Signalman Campbell Buchanan, who died from wounds received during the sinking of the Japanese Submarine I-1 by HMNZ ships Moa and Kiwi in the Solomon Islands during World War 2, she said. • Any interested members of the Irvine family are invited to contact the OMHG by emailing Mr Trevathan at petebond058@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store