Russian cyber attack on hospitals ‘contributed to patient death'
King's College Hospital, in south London, said that a patient died 'unexpectedly' during the cyber attack.
And an investigation into the death found a 'number of contributing factors' including a 'long wait for a blood test result due to the cyber attack'.
Pathology services provider Synnovis was the victim of a ransomware attack by a Russian cyber gang in June last year.
As a result more than 10,000 appointments were cancelled at the two London NHS trusts that were worst affected.
And a significant number of GP practices in London were unable to order blood tests for their patients.
A King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust spokesperson said: 'One patient sadly died unexpectedly during the cyber-attack.
'As is standard practice when this happens, we undertook a detailed review of their care.
'The patient safety incident investigation identified a number of contributing factors that led to the patient's death.
'This included a long wait for a blood test result due to the cyber attack impacting pathology services at the time.
'We have met with the patient's family, and shared the findings of the safety investigation with them.'
Earlier this month health officials confirmed that 170 patients have suffered harm as a result of the attack.
Mark Dollar, chief executive of Synnovis, said: 'We are deeply saddened to hear that last year's criminal cyber attack has been identified as one of the contributing factors that led to this patient's death.
'Our hearts go out to the family involved.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'Our deepest sympathies are with the family of the patient.
'This tragedy is a reminder of the threat Russia poses to our day-to-day life and how serious the consequences of these attacks can be to our critical infrastructure.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
You're using plasters WRONG! First aid myth is triggering nasty infections, doctor warns
It's an age-old first aid adage that many swear by: It's important to let a wound breathe. But now, a TV doctor has revealed 'airing out' a cut rather than covering it with a plaste can not only prevent healing, but also result in potentially serious infections and scarring. Dr Zoe Williams, an NHS GP working in London and resident doctor for ITV 's This Morning, warned forgoing plasters for even a short while is one of the biggest mistakes you can make. Even tiny cuts can get infected with germs and bacteria during everyday activities like showering or swimming, she said in a fresh alert. In worst-case scenarios, these infections can spread to other areas of the body, and even trigger life-threatening sepsis. The best way to treat a wound is to apply a plaster, which ensures it has a clean and moist environment, she advised. 'This is not only important for rapid healing, but also to minimise scarring.' But she added that it is important to clean a graze before applying a plaster to the wound. If you try and naturally 'air out' your wound it can prevent it from healing as well as cause infections and scarring Dr Zoe Williams warned This can be done by washing your hands, rinsing the wound with clean water or wound spray and gently drying it with a clean cloth first. Dr Williams' advice comes as a poll of 2,000 adults by the plaster company Elastoplast found 42 per cent believed the myth letting a wound breath is the best way for it to heal. Only 14 per cent of respondents knew that keeping a cut moist would help it to repair faster. The poll also found a third of the adults had touched a wound before washing the hands. While it isn't clear if it is because of how they treated their wounds, the adults reported scarring (19 per cent), infections (17 per cent) and swelling (16 per cent). The doctor recommended hydrocolloid plasters which can help the cut 'maintain a moist environment' and offer pain relief and longer wear. But if you have an allergy to plasters you can still cover up your wound with dressing like a bandage or pad, which can be bought from pharmacies, she added. The most common ways adults got cuts, grazes and injuries were indoor DIY work (39 per cent), hiking or walking (27 per cent), playing team sports (23 per cent) and cycling or mountain (19 per cent), the survey revealed.
Western Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Matt Hancock back at Covid inquiry for probe into pandemic impact on care homes
Mr Hancock, who resigned from government in 2021 after admitting breaking social distancing guidance by having an affair with a colleague, has given evidence to the inquiry multiple times. He will return on Wednesday to face questions specifically about the adult social care sector. Right from the start, we've tried to throw a protective ring around our care homes Matt Hancock, May 15 2020 In a previous appearance before the inquiry he admitted the so-called protective ring he said had been put around care homes early in the pandemic was not an unbroken one and insisted he understands the strength of feeling people have on the issue. At a Downing Street press conference on May 15 2020, Mr Hancock said: 'Right from the start, we've tried to throw a protective ring around our care homes.' Bereaved families have previously branded this phrase a 'sickening lie' and a 'joke'. When the pandemic hit in early 2020, hospital patients were rapidly discharged into care homes in a bid to free up beds and prevent the NHS from becoming overwhelmed. However, there was no policy in place requiring patients to be tested before admission, or for asymptomatic patients to isolate, until mid-April. This was despite growing awareness of the risks of people without Covid-19 symptoms being able to spread the virus. Former health secretary Matt Hancock has given evidence to the Covid inquiry multiple times (Jordan Pettitt/PA) A lawyer for the families from the Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice (CBFFJ) campaign group described Mr Hancock's appearance as a 'seminal moment of the Covid inquiry that many of our clients have been waiting for'. Nicola Brook, from Broudie Jackson Canter which represents more than 7,000 families from CBFFJ, said: 'While Mr Hancock has given evidence to the inquiry before, this is the first time that he has been called early in a module, meaning he won't be able to simply respond to others' evidence. 'I only hope that he tells the truth about what he knew about the decision to discharge Covid-infected patients into care homes, which was the biggest scandal of the whole pandemic. Only then will our clients be able to get some form of closure.' From Monday, module six of the inquiry will look at the effect the pandemic had on both the publicly and privately funded adult social care sector across the UK. Among the issues to be examined will be decisions made by the UK Government and devolved administrations on moving people from hospitals into adult care and residential homes in the early stages of the pandemic. The module will also consider how the pandemic was managed in care and residential homes, including infection prevention and control measures, testing for the virus, the availability and adequacy of personal protective equipment (PPE), and the restrictions on access to such locations by healthcare professionals and loved ones. Caroline Abrahams, charity director at Age UK, said many older people in care homes 'had a truly terrible time during the pandemic'. She added: 'Those older people who survived and are still with us, and their families, have waited a long time for the pandemic inquiry to focus on their experiences but now their turn has finally come, so it's a big moment for them and for the inquiry too.' What happened in the care sector during the pandemic is a national scar. To fail to learn the right lessons now would compound the injustice and place future lives at risk CBFFJ letter The CBFFJ group has written to inquiry chairwoman, Baroness Heather Hallett, to express their concern at some 'key decision-makers' not expected to be called in this module, including former prime minister Boris Johnson. They said: 'Without those who were responsible for critical policies like discharging untested hospital patients into care homes, the inquiry cannot deliver a full or credible account of what happened.' They insisted the module must be 'a turning point' rather than 'an afterthought'. 'What happened in the care sector during the pandemic is a national scar. To fail to learn the right lessons now would compound the injustice and place future lives at risk,' they added. Public hearings for the care sector module are expected to run until the end of July.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Angela Rayner pays tribute to veterans as Newsnight airs Nuked Blood special
A Newsnight report on the Nuked Blood Scandal led to questions in Parliament as Angela Rayner paid tribute to veterans Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has paid tribute to survivors of Britain's nuclear weapons experiments after Newsnight featured their story for the first time. Veterans Brian Unthank, 87, and John Morris, also 87, appeared on a special edition of the BBC's flagship political programme alongside veteran's son Steve Purse, 51, and Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham. Mr Burnham told presenter Victoria Derbyshire that serving politicians "should be embarrassed" and "risk being complicit" if they do not act to end the injustice of a seven-decade cover-up off biological monitoring of troops who were deliberately exposed to radiation. Brian and John, who have more than 100 cancers between them, told how the results of the monitoring had subsequently been removed from their medical files, denying them war pensions and answers about the illnesses which have blighted their families. "It's heartbreaking to listen to. Why, after all these years, should they have to sit here and plead for the basic truth about what happened to them?" asked Mr Burnham. "It goes to the hart of the British state. They can blame the police for for Hillsborough, the NHS for infected blood, the Post Office for the Horizon scandal. here, what has happened is that at the heart of Whitehall, British policy was basically a preordained, systematic, brutal policy to put tens of thousands of British servicemen in the line of radiation without their knowledge, without their consent, without personal protective equipment, and then they conducted secret tests on them and denied it for decades." The programme was followed yesterday by questions in Parliament, with Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs demanding ministers take action to deliver compensation and apologies. * You can watch the programme HERE Salford MP Rebecca Long-Bailey told Prime Minister's Questions: "Last night, Newsnight covered the Daily Mirror's 3-year investigation into the Nuked Blood Scandal, in which thousands of troops had their blood and urine monitored, even chest x-rays, during nuclear weapons tests but the results were with from their medical records, and their suffering denied for decades. As a fierce supporter of these men and their families, who she's met with me, will the Right Honourable lady agree... that time is of the essence, and these elderly veterans deserve answers, justice, and an apology?" Angela Rayner, who was deputising for Keir Starmer, replied: "I commend her on the campaigning she's done on this issue, and I have met with some of those affected and I know the strength of feeling on this and I've heard their deeply personal testimony and experiences. "I pay tribute to all of the nuclear test veterans and their enduring contribution to our nation's security, especially during Armed Forces Week, and we're looking into unresolved questions regarding their medical records... as a priority." Tewkesbury MP Cameron Thomas told the Commons: "In 1957, my constituent Ronald Clark was among 22,000 UK personnel exposed to nuclear testing on Christmas Island. These veterans and their descendants have suffered various cancers, crippling illnesses, and deformities, but the MoD has never accepted liability. Noting the Deputy Prime Minister's response to her honourable friend, it doesn't quite go far enough. Time is running out. Will she meet with me, my constituent and these veterans to determine appropriate compensation?" Ms Rayner replied that "the Minister for Veterans will be happy to meet with him and the veterans to discuss this issue". A records review was ordered in November after a million people saw a devastating BBC documentary on the scandal. But despite two meetings with Veterans Minister Al Carns, and more than 19,000 documents examined already, the review has no budget, no deadline, and no results. The Mirror's investigation has uncovered thousands of pages of evidence about blood and urine tests, testing data, and the names of servicemen ordered to take part in the experiments, on a secret database at the Atomic Weapons Establishment. They were classified as state secrets, with officials refusing access to veterans, relatives, and even lawyers. That database, along with misleading statements given to courts and Parliament, is now the subject of a police complaint. A £5bn civil lawsuit is also underway. An anti-scandal law promised by Keir Starmer is expected to include "a huge carve-out" for matters of military and national security, which would enable public officials in those areas to lie without any criminal sanction.
