Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell questioned by DOJ about 'everything,' lawyer says
For a day and a half, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche questioned Maxwell about Epstein and others possibly involved in the notorious sex-trafficking operation. The interviews were held in Tallahassee, Florida, where the former British socialite is serving a 20-year prison sentence for helping Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls.
It's unclear what exactly came of the closed-door interviews, but David Markus, an attorney representing Maxwell, said his client answered all of the government's questions, including those of about 100 different people.
"She answered questions about everybody and she didn't hold anything back," he said. Markus did not name anyone who was mentioned, and he declined to say whether President Donald Trump was the focus of any of the Justice Department's questions.
Talks between the Justice Department and Maxwell came as the Trump administration faces mounting pressure to reverse its pledge not to release any more documents related to the Justice Department investigation into Epstein, a move that prompted fierce backlash from the president's most loyal followers.
On July 23, a federal judge in Florida rejected a bid from the Justice Department to unseal grand jury testimony from 2005 and 2007 tied to a federal investigation into Epstein, who hanged himself in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges, an autopsy concluded.
Maxwell is seeking to overturn her conviction and has filed a petition with the Supreme Court, which the Justice Department has opposed. Her attorney said he believes Ghislaine deserves relief, but said no such offer has been made.
When asked if he would consider pardoning Maxwell, Trump told reporters 'It's something I haven't thought about."
Ghislaine Maxwell 'answered questions about everybody,' lawyer says
Markus told reporters after a second day of questioning that Ghislaine Maxwell answered questions "about 100 different people" during her meeting with the Justice Department.
"She literally answered every question," he said. "She was asked about maybe about 100 different people. She answered questions about everybody and she didn't hold anything back."
Markus did not say who was discussed at the meeting and did not provide any additional details about the talks. He added that the Justice Department's questions touched on "everything."
What has Ghislaine Maxwell said before?
Maxwell didn't testify in her criminal trial, but she was deposed in 2016 in a civil case brought by Epstein-victim Virginia Giuffre, who has since died by suicide.
In that deposition, Maxwell denied ever seeing "inappropriate underage activities" with Epstein and ever recruiting girls for sex activities with him. She refused to answer questions about what she described as possible consensual adult sex.
DOJ asked Supreme Court days ago to reject Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal
Less than two weeks before a top Justice Department official met with Ghislaine Maxwell to discuss the Epstein case, the department asked the Supreme Court to reject the sex trafficker's appeal seeking to overturn her conviction.
Maxwell in April filed a petition with the the nation's highest court. In the filing, her attorneys argued that Maxwell's conviction was invalid because an agreement federal prosecutors struck with Epstein in Florida shielded her and other associates from criminal charges.
In a filing on July 14, a Justice Department official urged the justices to reject Maxwell's appeal, saying that for 10 years she 'coordinated, facilitated, and contributed" to Epstein's abuse of young women and underage girls. The Justice Department also called Maxwell's arguments "misplaced" and "implausible."
In September, the justices are expected to consider whether to take up the appeal.
What is Trump's relationship to Maxwell?
Trump and Epstein were friends for many years, including when Maxwell was very close to Epstein.
'He's a lot of fun to be with," Trump told New York magazine of Epstein in 2002. "It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."
Maxwell was arrested in July of 2020, while Trump was serving his first term as president. When he was asked by a reporter that month if Maxwell might turn in powerful men, potentially to cut a deal with prosecutors, he said he didn't know, but that he had warm wishes for her.
"I don't know. I haven't really been following it too much. I just wish her well, frankly," Trump said. "I've met her numerous times over the years, especially since I lived in Palm Beach."
Maxwell compiled a leather-bound book for Epstein's 50th birthday in early 2003 that included a lewd letter from Trump, according to a Wall Street Journal report. Trump denies he wrote the letter and has sued the Journal for libel.
Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyer says she has 'no reason to lie'
Markus, a Miami attorney representing Maxwell, said he hoped for 'another productive day' as he arrived July 25 at the U.S. Courthouse in Tallahassee.
'You know, Ghislaine has been treated unfairly for over five years now,' he said. 'If you looked up scapegoat in the dictionary, her face would be next to the dictionary definition of it. So we're grateful for this opportunity to finally be able to say what really happened – yesterday and today.'
Markus said he hopes Maxwell will be heard 'with an open mind, and that's what Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has promised us. Everything she says can be corroborated and she's telling the truth. She's got no reason to lie at this point.'
Trump says he hasn't thought about pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell
President Donald Trump denied ever visiting Epstein's island and said he hasn't considered pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving 20 years for conspiring to sexually abuse minors.
'I have nothing to do with the guy,' Trump told reporters of Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 after being charged with sexually trafficking minors.
Lawmakers and others who followed the case have continued to push for the release of the investigative files in the case.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met July 24 and 25 with Maxwell to ask what more she could say about the case. This led critics to question whether Trump would pardon her for cooperating.
'It's something I haven't thought about,' Trump said.
– Bart Jansen
What did Ghislaine Maxwell do, according to prosecutors?
According to prosecutors, Maxwell helped Jeffrey Epstein recruit, groom, and abuse minor girls from about 1994 to about 2004, including girls as young as 14 years old.
When was Ghislaine Maxwell arrested?
Maxwell was arrested in July of 2020, while President Donald Trump was serving his first term as president.
She was initially charged with conspiring to entice and transport minors for criminal sexual activity and actually enticing and transporting a minor for that purpose, as well as with perjury. A later, updated indictment added sex-trafficking charges.
Where is Ghislaine Maxwell serving prison sentence?
For the last three years, Maxwell has lived at FCI Tallahassee, a low-security women's prison that has faced scrutiny in recent years due to reports of dilapidated conditions and staff shortages.
The prison houses over 1,200 inmates altogether, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons. A surprise inspection in 2023 revealed "alarming" conditions, including inmates being served moldy or rotten food and living with "black substances" on walls and ceilings.
Inspectors also saw "likely evidence of rodent droppings," spotted leaks in the housing unit roofs and reported "concerning" staffing shortages.
Inmates housed inside the federal institution have access to a variety of "leisure time activities" and classes, including yoga, Pilates and a range of outdoor sports as well as arts and crafts programs, according to FCI Tallahassee's handbook.
DOJ's first meeting with Maxwell was 'very productive,' lawyer says
Markus, the Miami attorney representing Maxwell, described the first meeting between the former socialite and the Justice Department as "very productive."
Markus spoke with reporters outside the U.S. Courthouse in Tallahassee after he and Maxwell met for hours behind closed doors to field questions from Blanche about the Epstein case. He thanked Blanche for meeting with them and 'for being so professional with all of us.'
'He took a full day and asked a lot of questions, and Ms. Maxwell answered every single question,' Markus said. 'She never stopped. She never invoked her privilege. She never declined to answer. She answered all the questions truthfully, honestly and to the best of her ability.'
Prosecutors left through a back entrance without taking questions, and Maxwell was returned to FCI Tallahassee, the low-security women's prison where she has been incarcerated for the last three years.
Contributing: Josh Meyer, USA TODAY; Elena Barrera, Tallahassee Democrat; Reuters
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Ghislaine Maxwell answered questions 'about everybody,' lawyer says
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AICPA backs SAFE Act to aid tax filing for domestic abuse survivors
The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) has announced its support for the bill introduced by Senator John Fetterman that aims to provide a critical tax filing option for individuals who have experienced spousal abuse or abandonment. The Survivor Assistance for Fear-free and Easy Tax Filing Act of 2025 (SAFE Act), identified as S. 2129, proposes that survivors of domestic violence or spousal abandonment be allowed to file their taxes as if they were single. Currently, the tax code mandates that married individuals file under one of two categories: married filing jointly or married filing separately. These requirements can compel survivors to engage with an abusive or absent spouse, complicating the filing process. The SAFE Act intends to empower survivors by enabling them to file their tax returns independently, thereby granting them access to tax benefits such as credits and deductions without being financially linked to their abusive or absent partners. This legislation seeks to enhance the autonomy of survivors in managing their tax obligations, thereby reducing the influence that abusive or absent spouses may have over their financial matters. AICPA Tax Policy & Advocacy senior manager Daniel Hauffe said: 'Many tax practitioners have one or more clients to which this legislation is applicable in some form and they are restrained due to current law in how to best help these clients. 'This legislation addresses a critical gap in the US tax system that affects survivors of domestic abuse or spousal abandonment. 'This is a practical step toward tax equity and survivor protection, ensuring that the tax system does not unintentionally perpetuate harm or dependency in abusive situations. We are grateful to Senator Fetterman for his leadership on this issue and ask that other members of Congress join us in supporting this bill.' "AICPA backs SAFE Act to aid tax filing for domestic abuse survivors" was originally created and published by The Accountant, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats use obscure law to seek release of Epstein files
Democrats moved Wednesday to force Donald Trump to release files from the investigation into notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, invoking an obscure law to keep up the pressure on an issue that has roiled the US president's administration. The White House has been facing increasingly intense demands to be more transparent about the disgraced financier, who died in federal prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. The president raised further questions about his past relationship with Epstein on Tuesday when he told reporters he fell out with his former friend after the disgraced financier "stole" employees from the spa at his Mar-a-Lago resort. The Justice Department angered Trump supporters earlier this month when it said Epstein had died by suicide and had no "client list" -- rebuffing conspiracy theories about the supposed complicity of high-profile Democrats that leading figures in Trump's MAGA movement had been pushing for years. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and the Democrats on the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee wrote to the Justice Department asking for the materials under a section of federal law known as the "rule of five." The measure -- introduced a century ago but rarely used -- requires government departments to provide relevant information if any five members of the Senate's chief watchdog panel request it. It is not clear if it could be enforced in court but even if the effort fails it keeps the spotlight on an issue that has upended Trump's summer, dividing Republicans and leading to the early closure of the House of Representatives. Trump has urged his supporters to drop demands for the Epstein files, but Democrats in Congress -- with limited Republican support -- have been seeking a floor vote to force their release. House Oversight Committee Democrats, backed by some Republicans, approved a subpoena last week for the Justice Department to hand over the documents, although the demand has yet to be sent. Lawmakers have also been seeking testimony from Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving 20 years in prison for her role in his crimes. Maxwell's lawyer has said she would speak to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee if granted immunity for her testimony. "The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms. Maxwell's attorney soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony," a spokesman for the panel said. Democrats have also sought to attach votes on the Epstein files to unrelated bills multiple times, prompting Speaker Mike Johnson to send lawmakers home for the summer a day early last week rather than risk them succeeding. "Donald Trump promised he would release the Epstein files while he was on the campaign trail. He made that promise, and he has yet to do it," Schumer said in a speech Tuesday on the Senate floor. ft/dw


UPI
6 minutes ago
- UPI
The Jeffrey Epstein saga: a new national security threat?
U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Geoffrey Berman speaks during a news conference about the arrest of American financier Jeffrey Epstein in New York on July 8, 2019, on sex trafficking charges, File photo by Jason Szenes July 30 (UPI) -- The sordid saga of the long dead and convicted predator Jeffrey Epstein not only poses a threat to Donald Trump's presidency, but it also conceivably threatens the credibility of the U.S. political system. Yet, an even more sinister and potentially dangerous threat lurks for the United States and its friends. The two threats are linked, ironically, by Epstein's ghost. Trump's MAGA base is furious that the promised Epstein files have not been released. What's worse is that that Attorney General Pam Bondi apparently informed Trump his name was in the file -- high-test fuel for that blaze. And, now, possibly to deflect attention, Trump and his director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, have accused former President Barack Obama of treason by interfering in the 2016 election with Russian help. In a nation as politically divided as America, any spark could ignite a political firestorm. Beijing, Moscow and others with malicious intent are intensely watching this saga. One conclusion must be that even greater opportunities exist today to interfere in United States and Western politics, not just exploiting this debacle. More importantly, creating new crises that manipulate and fracture political and social cohesion is a formidable danger. The U.K.'s Brexit is an example of manipulation. In the effort to withdraw from the European Union -- the Leave campaign -- former Prime Minister Boris Johnson and his key adviser, Dominic Cummings determined that 1 million or so Britons lacked party affiliation. Then, using social media, this group was targeted with Leave propaganda generated by Cummings. That swung the vote to leave. Cummings was not alone. Substantial evidence exists that Moscow helped influence Brexit and the Leave campaign to weaken the Atlantic Alliance. And Moscow also interfered in the 2016 U.S. elections. Consider the infamous Steele Dossier. Among the allegations, the dossier accused Trump of lewd sexual behavior in Moscow. Suspend reality and imagine Vladimir Putin intervened to help elect Hillary Clinton as president in 2016. Following Cummings' lead, Russian trolls would have filled the Internet with deep-fake photos and invented stories exaggerating or inventing Trump's misconduct. One wonders who might have been elected 45th president. China and Moscow have significant interests in manipulating and fracturing American and Western cohesion. Putin is focused on winning in Ukraine, minimizing sanctions, and in the process, weakening Western solidarity. China is keen on reducing American economic and political influence, as well as annexing Taiwan. It would be negligent to not assume China and Russia are identifying critical weaknesses and potential future fracture points in the United States and elsewhere. In that event where might they focus? National political systems, given the Epstein debacle and national infrastructures, are the two most obvious candidates. Regarding the United States, the Constitution and its system of government based on checks and balances and a division of power among three co-equal branches are the best targets. A super-majority of Americans is highly distrustful and disdainful of government. Exploiting this distrust would not be difficult using the ubiquity of social media and the propensity of Americans to embrace conspiracy theories. Epstein and the Steele Dossier are two examples of how possible future fractures can be invented to sow political, social and economic disruption. The difference is that these effects could be even more destructive. Regarding infrastructure, Israeli and Ukrainian infiltration of two societies with seeming control of their borders and people to launch surprise attacks deep into Iran and Russia underscores how potentially vulnerable military bases and installations are to drones. And even more susceptible to drone attacks are electric generation and power grids, which could cause nationwide disruption. Kinetic attacks on military and civilian infrastructure are fraught with risk. But perceived threats are not. The strategy would be to use a variant of Orson Welles' provocation of massive public and psychological panic in his radio broadcast of War of the Worlds in 1938. Consider future Wellesian scenarios on steroids that threaten catastrophic events or apply fake news reports of spreading epidemics or environmental, financial and other disasters to induce fear and disruption. Concocting new and credible conspiracy theories would be part of this disruptive strategy. None of this is new. The USSR used the Comintern, Cominform and KGB to misinform, disinform, disrupt and provoke. The United States and the U.K. employed similar techniques principally against the Nazis in World War II. However, today is different because social and other media can turn these activities into political weapons of mass disruption. The United States will survive Epstein. Against determined adversaries who intend to create and exploit new political fractures, are the United States and the West ready? That answer is sadly no. Harlan Ullman is UPI's Arnaud de Borchgrave Distinguished Columnist, senior adviser at Washington's Atlantic Council, chairman of a private company and principal author of the doctrine of shock and awe. His next book, co-written with Field Marshal The Lord David Richards, former U.K. chief of defense and due out next year, is Who Thinks Best Wins: Preventing Strategic Catastrophe. The writer can be reached on X @harlankullman.