King and Queen begin Holyrood Week under guard of ceremonial female bodyguards
Charles and Camilla began their official stay in Scotland – known as Holyrood Week – by carrying out solo engagements in Edinburgh and later hosted a garden party together.
Earlier when the Queen opened Ratho library, she told her hosts the weather was 'cooler' than conditions in England and described the weather in Scotland as a 'drop in temperature'.
Scots from a range of backgrounds from NHS workers to the military and charity volunteers were invited to the Palace of Holyroodhouse, the King and Queen's official residence in the Scottish capital, for the garden party.
Annabel Biddulp was one of four female members of the Royal Company of Archers, the Sovereign's Body Guard in Scotland, on duty at the social event with their bows.
She described herself as the sixth generation of her family to be an Archer, with her father and uncle also on duty, and said the historic moment was 'absolutely wonderful, so many of my family have been part of the Archers for generations'.
Ms Biddulph was going to celebrate with a 'jolly good party tonight' and said the King mentioned the trusty bow she was holding.
'He asked 'are you a dab hand at that' to which the answer was yes'.
The garden party was staged in Holyroodhouse gardens, overlooked by Holyrood Park where Republic had staged a protest spelling out the words 'Not My King' with what appeared to be large pieces of white card that was visible by guests.
Charles also chatted to Second World War veteran George McLeod, aged 99, who served as a private with the 4th Battalion, King's Own Scottish Borderers.
Mr McLeod was joined by his daughter Jan McLeod who said: 'The King spoke about the VE Day events in London and said it was very important to keep the memories alive and how sad it was we were losing veterans.'
She added her father was in the German city of Bremen when the war ended in 1945: 'He was in communications and the first to hear the war was over, he's a bit of a joker, and no one believed him at first.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
36 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Edinburgh books festival has a few questions to answer
'Fury over £300k for Sturgeon book fest' was the splash headline over pictures of the former First Minister and her ex-aide Liz Lloyd. Ms Lloyd was appointed a director of the Edinburgh International Books Festival in May, the paper reported. In June, the Scottish Government announced it had given the festival £300,000. Meanwhile, Ms Lloyd's old boss had been given a plum spot at the festival to publicise her new memoir, Frankly. My nose twitched. The eyebrows went skywards, but why? Here's the Sunday Mail again: 'The book festival said it would be 'spurious' and 'misleading' to suggest any link between Lloyd's appointment and the announcement of the cash, which it said had been planned for months.' Interesting choice of words there, particularly 'spurious'. It's the kind of ten-dollar word a lawyer might use when a simple 'wrong' would have done. It is there to send a message: nothing to see here folks, so let's all just shuffle on. Read more It is true. On the face of it, there is nothing wrong. As the festival said when news of Ms Lloyd's appointment emerged, she was appointed following 'a fully advertised recruitment process'. I could have applied, you could have applied, but we didn't. Moreover, she would bring 'valuable experience in communications, leadership and public affairs'. It has been more than the regulation two years since Ms Sturgeon and Ms Lloyd held positions in public life, the former as FM and the latter as her strategic adviser. Ms Sturgeon has carried on as an MSP, controversially as she has not been seen much in the Scottish Parliament. Those memoirs won't write themselves, you know. But Lloyd is different. She is a free agent, able to do what she wants, no permission required or sought. She has every right to earn a living by selling her skills wherever she pleases. Hence the application to the books festival. The same goes for her appointment to a firm called Flint. On its website, Flint says it 'helps businesses and investors succeed in an increasingly complex world'. Its CEO is James Purnell, former Labour MP, former minister under Blair and Brown, ex-BBC and think-tanker. Click through and you will eventually meet the Flint team, which now includes Ms Lloyd. Listed as a specialist partner with expertise in devolved administrations, operations team, policy and political analysis, her work for the FM is outlined in glowing terms. It's impressive stuff. She's an impressive woman. Once again, she's doing nothing wrong. Countless former aides, and elected representatives, have gone the same route, using what they learned in the public sector and applying it in the private. Put your knowledge and experience to work. Everyone who ever progressed in a career has done likewise. To summarise, Ms Lloyd was appointed a director at the Edinburgh International Book Festival. Nothing wrong in that. She advises businesses and investors using the expertise acquired while working for the First Minister. Nothing wrong in that. As for her book festival appointment coinciding with the award of a £300k Scottish Government grant, remember the latter had been 'planned for months', according to the event organisers. The Scottish Government said the same thing when it announced the money at the end of June: the deal had been signed off months before by ministers but was not publicised. What I would like to know, as a taxpayer if nothing else, is exactly when Ms Lloyd was appointed books festival director, and whether anyone at the festival knew that the £300k was in the pipeline. Why was the Government announcement held back? The money is part of a larger package of help given to the event by the Scottish Government, and there is a lot more to come. Again, were those involved in the appointment of Ms Lloyd aware of this? It's a matter of public record, after all. Once again, nobody has done anything wrong. That happens a lot in Scotland, particularly when the Scottish Government, and the current administration in particular, is involved. You can pass any number of faces on the stairs, familiar ones like John Swinney, and swear they had a case to answer for something or other, but when it comes to holding them to account, there is nobody there. Ferries, education, NHS waiting times, growth - you name it, no one is taking the blame for failure any time soon. You will never see any of these faces take the sort of pasting handed out last week to Professor Iain Gillespie, former principal of the University of Dundee, by the Education Committee. Yes, ministers have been questioned, but not like that. One of the unfortunate principal's mistakes was to fail downwards when the done thing in Scottish public life is to fail upwards. Move on, move up, take the rewards but accept zero blame unless there is no other option. It was and is the Westminster way and it has transferred to the Scottish Parliament. We'll be seeing it a lot more of this moving on as the elections approach. Get ready to hold your nose as departing MSPs, and their aides, compete for jobs in the public and private sectors. And if the SNP should win a majority again, despite their record, the failing upwards can carry on as normal. I wonder if Ms Sturgeon will address the subject of failure when her much-anticipated session at the books festival comes to pass. If she is up for it, I would like to hear Ms Lloyd's thoughts as well. Now that she is a festival director and in what they call 'a public-facing role', there shouldn't be a problem. John Swinney too - all are welcome. Until then, I'll keep wrinkling my nose. Bewitched, no. Bothered, plenty. Alison Rowat is a Herald feature writer and columnist
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Anas Sarwar backs Labour welfare cuts but insists they wouldn't do same Scotland
The Scottish Labour leader claimed it is 'factually wrong' to say people will have their benefits 'cut' under measures proposed by Keir Starmer's government, because the overall welfare budget is still set to rise. Sarwar added that Labour are now in a 'much better place on welfare reform than a week ago', before they scaled back proposals to avoid a defeat in the House of Commons on Tuesday evening. Last week, more than 120 Labour MPs signed a 'reasoned amendment' to the Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill after it was revealed it would cut around £5 billion per year from disability benefits. READ MORE: Scots back independence as Keir Starmer's popularity at record low, new poll finds Ministers hope a partial U-turn by Starmer on the plans, which will protect existing claimants of personal independence payments (Pip) and the health element of Universal Credit, will be enough to win over Labour rebels. However, not all of the changes will directly impact people in Scotland as Pip is being replaced by the Adult Disability Payment. The Scottish Government has promised not to make similar cuts in Scotland, with the Social Justice Secretary warning that even the Prime Minister's concessions do not go far enough. Shirley-Anne Somerville called on Labour to scrap all of their proposals, pointing to the UK Government's own analysis which shows they could plunge 150,000 people into poverty. Sarwar has argued that the figure did not take into account other Labour measures to help people get back into work, or economic policies. Asked if he would cut benefits for disabled people in Scotland if he wins next year's Holyrood election, he told the PA news agency: 'No, absolutely not'. The Scottish Labour leader insisted his party is 'on the same wavelength' and agrees that reforms to the welfare system are needed. But he said claims that benefits are being cut are not true, as the welfare bill is still set to grow. 'We all accept the principle of reform,' Sarwar said. He added: 'We all accept that we have to prioritise work, and that work is the best route of poverty. 'We all accept that. Those that can work should work. 'We also all accept that those who can't work should get the support they need, and also accept those that need support to get into work should get that support too.' Responding to Sarwar's claims SNP MSP Colette Stevenson said the Scottish Labour leader wouldn't stand up for Scotland and would "rubber stamp anything his Westminster bosses tell him to". She said: "When Keir Starmer proposes cutting support for disabled people, it's Anas Sarwar who stands by him every step of the way. "From the Winter Fuel debacle, to failing the WASPI women, to supporting the two-child cap, to backing cuts to disability payments, Labour's record in one short year says it all. "SNP-run Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is going down rather than up, we're scrapping the two-child cap, and we're protecting disabled people by maintaining the Adult Disability Payment here in Scotland, rather than passing on Labour's proposed cuts in England. "Anas Sarwar has proven he won't stand up to Starmer - he'll rubber stamp anything his Westminster bosses tell him to."
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Nigel Farage's Reform charging potential MSPs £200 to stand for party in 2026 election
Reform UK is charging Holyrood hopefuls who want to stand in next year's election - partly to fund their own vetting checks. Nigel Farage is charging Holyrood hopefuls £200 to apply to stand for his party - with some of the money funding their own vetting checks. Reform UK is asking members who want to put themselves forward for the next Scottish Parliamentary elections to pay to apply and for training. The party leader previously said Reform was sabotaged by a professional vetting firm in the general election run-up and threatened to sue. He claimed the company had been handed £144,000 to probe potential candidates and had produced nothing. A raft of negative stories later appeared about candidates, including those who made racist online posts. Despite promising to "rigorously" vet future candidates, more extremist social media posts have emerged from some of the party's 677 new councillors elected in the English local elections. Experts have said the party needs to tackle vetting and put forward serious candidates. In a recruitment email to members, Reform's head of campaigns said running for Holyrood was a "once in a lifetime opportunity" and they wanted "the best of Scotland to come forward". Those interested must "complete a short application form and pay a £50 fee to cover vetting and admin costs", and if successful they're charged £150 attendance fee for a "one-day, in-person Parliamentary Assessment Centre". It said it would "consider hardship waivers in some cases". None of Scotland's main political parties charge candidates to apply to stand. For Westminster elections, Lib Dems charge £75 for selection and assessment while the UK Tory party has previously charged £250 for an assessment centre day and £115 for "due diligence". The Scottish Tories charge a fee for attending an assessment centre day to "cover tea and coffee", according to a party source. Tom Brake, of campaign group Unlock Democracy said: "Politicians should be as representative of the population as possible. "Charging prospective candidates a fee to cover the cost of their vetting and assessment will act as a significant barrier for some, and risk reducing the talent pool of potential MSPs." Reform's application process asks candidates for details of all their social media accounts and usernames and if they have ever been members of online forums or newspaper comment sections. It also asks if they have been a "member of a proscribed organisation" such as "the BNP or Britain First" and if they have criminal convictions. After filling out the online form, prospective candidates must pay a £50 non-refundable fee to submit applications. Reform has previously come under criticism due to the way the party is structured. Unlike other major political parties, Nigel Farage registered Reform as a business in 2018 with himself, deputy Richard Tice and Zia Yusuf listed as shareholders. After complaints from members, party chiefs relinquished their shares in February, renaming the company Reform 2025 Ltd. Its overall owner is Reform UK Party Ltd, which has no controlling person, according to Companies House. Its directors are still Farage and Tice. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. A Reform UK spokesman insisted it was normal for political parties to charge candidates and said: "All political parties charge for their parliamentary lists, we are just more honest. "If no party does it in Scotland that is just a sign that they don't treat the Scottish Parliament as seriously as they treat Westminster. The £50 covers vetting - something the other parties don't do. "The £150 is for a full day event assessment centre so we can ensure only the highest quality candidates are put forward, showing how seriously we take the Scottish parliament. "As a party we also offer hardship waivers so that anyone can apply and we are fair to all of our members regardless of their personal financial situations." "Reform are looking for those who can dig into their wallets and hand over a wad of cash."
