Court halts auction of father's car amid paternity dispute
Image: File
A father received a temporary lifeline during an urgent application when the court stopped his R300,000 car from being auctioned off over R21,000 outstanding maintenance debt.
The man told the Limpopo High Court, sitting in Thohoyandou, that he is disputing that the child for which he has to pay maintenance, is in fact his. He reasoned that if his car is auctioned off to foot the bill for the outstanding maintenance towards a child which is not even his, he will suffer irreparable harm.
The man and his wife are embroiled in divorce proceedings and the husband was ordered by a court to pay interim maintenance. As the husband is disputing his paternity to the child he stopped paying the interim maintenance as per the court order.
He claimed that the maintenance order had been obtained fraudulently as his wife maintained that he is the father. He said there is a court application pending, where the issue of paternity will be addressed. He said a grave injustice will be done if the car is sold before the pending application.
Following his non-payment, the Sheriff removed the vehicle of the First Respondent upon the instruction of his wife's attorney for purposes of selling it on a public auction. The husband submitted that he would suffer irreparable harm if the application was not heard on an urgent basis and the Sheriff were to proceed with the selling of his vehicle on a public auction, seeing that the amount to be repaid in terms of the warrant of execution is R21,000,00 whereas the value of the motor vehicle is approximately R300,000,00.
The wife, on the other hand, said she and the applicant entered into a valid customary marriage and that he has accepted the child to be his. She argued that there is a maintenance order in place and he should thus pay-up. She said the court is the upper guardian of all children and therefore should protect the rights of the child.
The court said everyone has the right to have any dispute that can be resolved by the application of law decided in a fair public hearing before a court. It noted the fact that the amount owing being a mere R21,000,00 and the value of his vehicle being about R300,000,00 and said should it be sold on a public auction his loss would be inordinate in relation to the amount owing.
He would never be able to recover the loss if it is found that he is not the father and does not need to pay maintenance, the court said in granting him the interdict. It also noted that the child has the right to know who her biological father is. The interdict will thus remain in place until the finalisation of the maintenance and paternity battle. The Sheriff was in the meantime ordered to hand the vehicle back to the man.
[email protected]

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Eyewitness News
11 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Family trust of suspended IDT CEO Tebogo Malaka believes she's been set up to lose her job
CAPE TOWN - The family trust of suspended CEO of the Independent Development Trust (IDT) Tebogo Malaka said she's part of an orchestrated campaign to remove her from her job. The Malaka family trust said the scandal that has erupted over her alleged attempts to bribe a journalist to stop investigating her was a trap. On Thursday, Public Works Minister Dean Macpherson laid a criminal complaint against Malaka for collusion, bribery and corruption - a week after she was suspended in connection with irregular tenders for oxygen supply to hospitals. But her family trust insists she's part of a set-up between the minister and journalist, Pieter-Louis Myburgh. ALSO READ: Macpherson says he suspects a wider network of corruption within IDT The Malaka family trust is questioning the legality of the hidden cameras that captured the meeting between Malaka, IDT spokesperson Phasha Makgolane and Myburgh on a wine farm in Stellenbosch. In explaining what is widely viewed from the extracted footage as a bribe being offered, Malaka said there was none, since no offer was made, no agreement was reached, and no money changed hands. Her family trust is demanding that all the footage of the meeting be released and an investigation be carried out into who installed the cameras and under what authority. 'Ms Malaka is being vilified not for wrongdoing, but for standing her ground. She deserves due process - not public trial by edited video and political theatre,' said family spokesperson, Ayanda Jele. According to the Regulation of the Interception of Communication Act - communication can only be intercepted if the person doing so, is party to the communication. Malaka's family is instead throwing Makgolane under the bus, saying he produced the R60,000 in cash and set up the meeting. 'Edited video and innuendo are not evidence. They are tactics of defamation,' reads the family statement. They said Malaka's only offence is clashing with Macpherson over the board and alleged administrative interference. Malaka said he's the one that must be investigated for allegedly colluding with journalists.

The Star
15 hours ago
- The Star
'She was set up' -Malaka Family Trust defends IDT CEO in bribery allegations
The Malaka Family Trust has dismissed the allegations against IDT CEO Tebogo Malaka saying it is a politically motivated campaign aimed at removing her from the Independent Development Trust (IDT). Malaka and the IDT spokesperson Phasha Makgolane allegedly attempted to bribe investigative journalist Pieter-Louis Myburgh with R60,000 to suppress a corruption exposé. On Thursday, Public Works and Infrastructure Minister Dean Macpherson opened a criminal case at the Cape Town Police Station. This follows the release of a video that appears to show Malaka and Makgolane offering a bribe to Myburgh. Speaking to the media on Thursday, Macpherson said, 'Watching the video of Ms Malaka allegedly offering Mr Myburgh a bribe of R60,000 made me sick to my stomach and left me in disbelief. It's one thing to hear about corruption. It's another to see it take place so blatantly and with a feeling of impunity.' He went on to describe the incident as 'not just a criminal act but an assault on the institutional framework of government to provide services to the people of South Africa, especially in the social infrastructure space that the IDT is responsible for.' In a statement, the Trust expressed full support for Malaka, asserting that 'these attacks are not grounded in truth,' and form part of 'an orchestrated attempt to damage her reputation.' 'Let us be clear. Ms. Malaka did not offer a bribe, did not suggest one, and did not take out or authorise any money. The cash in question was produced by the IDT spokesperson, not Ms. Malaka. She did not invite the journalist, did not know him before the meeting, and did not select the venue or arrange the setup,' the statement reads. The Trust described the incident involving hidden cameras as 'a trap engineered by others and designed to entrap her,' questioning the legality and ethics of the recording. 'Which raises the most critical, unanswered question: Who set up the hidden cameras, and why? The public deserves to know who orchestrated this recording and whether it was done legally, ethically, or as part of a political operation.' Dismissing the allegations as baseless, the Trust said: 'In law, there is no such offence as 'intending to bribe,' especially when no offer was made, no agreement was reached, and no money changed hands. Edited video and innuendo are not evidence. They are tactics of defamation.' The Trust further claimed Malaka is being targeted for resisting political interference, particularly in her reported clashes with Minister Macpherson.

IOL News
20 hours ago
- IOL News
'She was set up' -Malaka Family Trust defends IDT CEO in bribery allegations
The Malaka Family Trust has rejected bribery allegations against IDT CEO Tebogo Malaka, calling them politically motivated and demanding an independent inquiry into hidden cameras and alleged media-political collusion. Image: Supplied The Malaka Family Trust has dismissed the allegations against IDT CEO Tebogo Malaka saying it is a politically motivated campaign aimed at removing her from the Independent Development Trust (IDT). Malaka and the IDT spokesperson Phasha Makgolane allegedly attempted to bribe investigative journalist Pieter-Louis Myburgh with R60,000 to suppress a corruption exposé. On Thursday, Public Works and Infrastructure Minister Dean Macpherson opened a criminal case at the Cape Town Police Station. This follows the release of a video that appears to show Malaka and Makgolane offering a bribe to Myburgh. Speaking to the media on Thursday, Macpherson said, 'Watching the video of Ms Malaka allegedly offering Mr Myburgh a bribe of R60,000 made me sick to my stomach and left me in disbelief. It's one thing to hear about corruption. It's another to see it take place so blatantly and with a feeling of impunity.' He went on to describe the incident as 'not just a criminal act but an assault on the institutional framework of government to provide services to the people of South Africa, especially in the social infrastructure space that the IDT is responsible for.' In a statement, the Trust expressed full support for Malaka, asserting that 'these attacks are not grounded in truth,' and form part of 'an orchestrated attempt to damage her reputation.' 'Let us be clear. Ms. Malaka did not offer a bribe, did not suggest one, and did not take out or authorise any money. The cash in question was produced by the IDT spokesperson, not Ms. Malaka. She did not invite the journalist, did not know him before the meeting, and did not select the venue or arrange the setup,' the statement reads. The Trust described the incident involving hidden cameras as 'a trap engineered by others and designed to entrap her,' questioning the legality and ethics of the recording. 'Which raises the most critical, unanswered question: Who set up the hidden cameras, and why? The public deserves to know who orchestrated this recording and whether it was done legally, ethically, or as part of a political operation.' Dismissing the allegations as baseless, the Trust said: 'In law, there is no such offence as 'intending to bribe,' especially when no offer was made, no agreement was reached, and no money changed hands. Edited video and innuendo are not evidence. They are tactics of defamation.' The Trust further claimed Malaka is being targeted for resisting political interference, particularly in her reported clashes with Minister Macpherson. 'Ms. Malaka's real offence, it seems, was her refusal to submit to political pressure. Her clashes with Minister Dean Macpherson, including board disruptions and administrative interference, are well documented. It is no coincidence that this manufactured scandal emerges in the midst of that power struggle.' Allegations that the journalist involved may have coordinated with the Minister have also been raised by the Trust. ''Allegations of coordination between the journalist and the Minister must now be taken seriously. These claims, raised by civil society and multiple political parties, require immediate and independent investigation." The Malaka Family Trust has issued several demands in response to the controversy, calling for the 'full, unedited release of the video footage,' the 'disclosure of all communications between the journalist and IDT officials,' an 'independent inquiry into political interference and media collusion,' and a 'full investigation into who installed the cameras and under what authority.' 'Ms. Malaka is being vilified not for wrongdoing, but for standing her ground. She deserves due process, not public trial by edited video and political theatre,'' the Trust said. [email protected] Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL Politics