logo
Alberta farmers pleased, anxious after province pauses new on-farm slaughter sale limits

Alberta farmers pleased, anxious after province pauses new on-farm slaughter sale limits

CBC10-07-2025
Alberta animal farmers are pleased but anxious for updates after the provincial government paused new limits on annual on-farm slaughter sales.
Under Alberta's on-farm slaughter program, licensed producers can sell cows, pigs, chickens and other animals directly to consumers and avoid going through commercial meat inspection rules.
The program gives farms, especially smaller operations, access to markets they wouldn't otherwise have, while giving consumers a way to buy meat in bulk and directly support local producers.
Alberta launched the program in 2020 and last week introduced new rules limiting annual sales per farm to roughly 2,250 kilograms — or 5,000 pounds — of live animals.
The government's website says that limit could mean roughly four cows, 76 goats or 150 chickens per farm.
For Norwin Willis's family farm near Sexsmith, in northern Alberta, that would mean a roughly 70 per cent cut to his target slaughter sales this year.
"We were quite shocked, let's put it that way," said Willis, who mainly sells chickens but also some pigs and cows.
"It would take out a huge chunk of what we are currently doing."
Brooke Vanderkley, a farmer near Sylvan Lake, south of Edmonton, is in the same boat. She sells about 600 chickens per year as well as a handful of cows with plans to grow beef operations.
"There's a lot of providers, us included, who have built how we run our business and how we run our farm in accordance with the program as it was currently standing," Vanderkley said.
The limits would have applied to all new on-farm slaughter operations licensed after July 2, while existing operations would operate limit free until they need to renew their licence, which is valid for five years.
'Unintended consequences'
On Tuesday, Alberta's Agriculture Ministry published a notice saying it had heard concerns from producers about the "unintended consequences" of the changes and the new rules would be put on ice for more consultation.
Both Vanderkley and Willis said they appreciated the province taking their concerns seriously, but they were unsure about celebrating.
"The word pause makes me a little bit hesitant for what's to come," said Vanderkley.
"It's not a full retraction."
Agriculture Minister R.J. Sigurdson said in a statement Wednesday that the intention behind the limit was to protect public health, as it would reduce the amount of uninspected meat circulating in Alberta.
"This change would help to minimize the risk of food-borne illness and outbreaks and maintain Alberta's reputation as a safe source of high-quality meat," Sigurdson said.
In 2023, nearly 450 people were infected after a substantial E. coli outbreak in Calgary, which was traced back to a commercial kitchen company supplying meat to daycares. Thirty-nine children and an adult were hospitalized.
Officials said the company only used meat purchased from an inspected source and not directly from an on-farm slaughter operation.
RCMP have said the illegal slaughter and sale of uninspected meat has increased in recent years, and in a few cases charges have been laid.
Sue King, a farmer in Crooked Creek, northwest of Edmonton, said she thought the government's proposed limit would just punish farmers following the rules.
"A huge portion of us are following the rules, and with anything there's going to be people that don't," said King, who runs an on-farm slaughter operation while also providing a butcher service to other producers.
"If there are issues specifically to [do with] food safety, if that's what their concern is, they need to address those specific operations."
Vanderkley agreed. She said the government already has rules in place to protect public health, such as prohibiting producers like her from selling meat commercially or from selling more than a certain number of animals to the same person each year.
She suggested the province beef up its inspections of on-farm slaughter operations as a licence condition or make licence holders take a food safety course.
Sigurdson didn't have a firm deadline for when the new round of consultations would be finished but said it would take the time that's needed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why CoreWeave Stock Skyrocketed Last Week
Why CoreWeave Stock Skyrocketed Last Week

Globe and Mail

time2 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

Why CoreWeave Stock Skyrocketed Last Week

Key Points CoreWeave stock saw big gains in connection with news that its buyout of Core Scientific could be blocked. CoreWeave has entered into terms to buy Core Scientific in a $9 billion all-stock deal. Shareholders of both companies have some reservations about the acquisition deal. 10 stocks we like better than CoreWeave › CoreWeave (NASDAQ: CRWV) stock recorded huge gains over the past week of trading. The artificial intelligence (AI) company's share price soared 24.4% higher across the stretch. CoreWeave's big stock rally arrived in conjunction with the news that one of the company's big strategic initiatives could face major hurdles. According to reports, CoreWeave's $9 billion deal to buy Core Scientific could wind up being blocked -- but many investors actually seem to be happy with the news. What's next for CoreWeave? CoreWeave announced on July 7 that it had entered into an agreement to purchase Core Scientific at a $9 billion valuation. Even before the deal was officially announced, rumblings of a potential acquisition were met with negative reactions from CoreWeave shareholders. Some big Core Scientific shareholders are also apparently unhappy with the deal. While terms for the potential buyout have already been agreed to, Core Scientific's shareholders still need to approve the acquisition. Along with bullish valuation momentum for the broader AI space, hopes that the buyout could be scuttled helped power big gains for CoreWeave stock this week. What's next for CoreWeave? If CoreWeave were to complete its acquisition of Core Scientific, it would help the company reduce roughly $10 billion in lease expenses. On the other hand, the all-stock deal would result in a substantial amount of share value dilution for current stockholders -- and some investors and analysts are wondering whether the buyout is in the company's best interest. While news about the potential Core Scientific acquisition will probably continue to play a significant role in CoreWeave stock's near-term performance outlook, the AI cloud computing company has strengths that could allow it to deliver strong returns regardless of how the buyout situation resolves. Should you invest $1,000 in CoreWeave right now? Before you buy stock in CoreWeave, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and CoreWeave wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025

Saskatchewan's Parents' Bill of Rights back in court today, here's a timeline of events
Saskatchewan's Parents' Bill of Rights back in court today, here's a timeline of events

CTV News

time3 hours ago

  • CTV News

Saskatchewan's Parents' Bill of Rights back in court today, here's a timeline of events

WATCH: Saskatchewan's new Parents' Bill of Rights was back in court on Wednesday. Donovan Maess has the details. More than a year after the Government of Saskatchewan introduced the pronoun policy, the constitutionality of it continues to be questioned. Eventually introduced as Bill 137, the Parents' Bill of Rights was legally challenged by UR Pride Centre for Sexuality and Gender Diversity. On Monday morning, the two sides will go to the Court of Appeal to have their arguments heard by a judge. Here is a timeline laying out the events leading up to this point. Aug. 22, 2023 The Government of Saskatchewan introduced policy changes in schools, which include requiring parents to be informed of third-party education and being able to opt their children out of sex-ed. This particular policy change stemmed from the provincial government banning Planned Parenthood in schools following the distribution of 'ABC sex cards' to Grade 9 students in a Lumsden, Sask. school. The Sask. United Party, who took a considerable amount of votes in a by-election in the constituency of Lumsden-Morse earlier in August, campaigned on the controversy sparked by Planned Parenthood. The day after that, Premier Scott Moe holds a news conference where he said the ruling Saskatchewan Party heard a 'message' by voters. Ultimately, Planned Parenthood is suspended, leading to the pause of other third-party groups in schools. The new policy announced by then Education Minister Dustin Duncan also requires students under 16 years of age to have parental permission before they could change their pronouns or names in school. A similar decision made by the Government of New Brunswick earlier in August limited the use of preferred pronouns, which led to significant backlash. Aug. 23, 2023 Saskatchewan was not exempt from the backlash, as the Saskatchewan Advocate for Children and Youth announces an immediate review of the changes the following day, noting that the potential impact of the policy is 'deeply troubling.' As well, several school boards collectively ask the government for a 'reasonable pause' on the sudden policy change. Advocates who work with trans and gender-diverse youth in the province also say the policy shift could pose safety risks. Other third-party groups who present in schools, including the Regina Sexual Assault Centre, voice their concerns, saying their material is age appropriate and focused on assault prevention and safety. Aug. 29, 2023 UR Pride Centre for Sexuality and Gender Diversity, a group within the University of Regina, prepares to take legal action against Saskatchewan's new policy for students' names and chosen pronouns. Represented by advocacy group Egale Canada and law firm McCarthy Tétrault LLP, UR Pride prepares to file a lawsuit against the policy at Saskatchewan's Court of King's Bench, citing violations of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. UR Pride asks the provincial government to suspend the policy by 5 p.m. on Aug. 30 and threatens to file an injunction to block the policy from coming into effect if the deadline is not met. The government does not suspend the policy, so UR Pride files the injunction. Sept. 28, 2023 Justice Michael Megaw issues the injunction, which effectively presses pause on the policy until the court rules on the legal challenge put forth by UR Pride. In his decision to grant the injunction, Megaw references testimony of an expert witness who pointed out potential harms of the policy. 'On the whole of the evidence, I am satisfied that those individuals affected by this policy, youth under the age of 16 who are unable to have their name, pronouns, gender diversity, or gender identity, observed in the school will suffer irreparable harm,' Megaw wrote. However, in defiance of the King's Bench ruling, Premier Scott Moe issues a statement to say the Legislative Assembly would be recalled early to 'to pass legislation to protect parents' rights.' Premier Moe says he will turn to the notwithstanding clause of the Canadian constitution, which would delay potential Charter challenges after the policy becomes law. This was met with backlash from the NDP opposition, who said the policy will harm vulnerable students. Oct. 12, 2023 Premier Moe recalls the Legislature two weeks early, and the policy, thus known as Bill 137 or the Parents' Bill of Rights, is introduced and read for the first time in the Saskatchewan Legislature. The bill invokes the notwithstanding clause to override certain sections of the Charter and the Saskatchewan Human Rights Codes to ensure parents must consent if their child wants to change their gender identification in school. The introduction of the bill receives unanimous support by Saskatchewan Party MLAs and Saskatchewan United Party Leader Nadine Wilson. It was also unanimously opposed by all Saskatchewan NDP MLAs who are present for the vote. Oct. 19, 2023 The second reading of the Parent's Bill of Rights is passed in the Saskatchewan Legislature. Since Bill 137 is introduced, members of the opposition NDP take turns speaking for hours at a time in an attempt to stall the legislation. Oct. 20, 2023 The third and final reading of the Parents' Bill of Rights is passed in the Saskatchewan Legislature, it becomes law after being immediately granted Royal Assent. Oct. 26, 2023 During an intervention application at the Court of King's Bench, the government reveals what was known as the 'pronoun policy' has been rescinded since the Parents' Bill of Rights has become law. Egale Canada, one of the two organizations representing UR Pride, vows to continue legal action against the Parents' Bill of Rights. Feb. 16, 2024 Justice Megaw rules that UR Pride should still get the chance to challenge the law under the Charter. Megaw's decision would allow UR Pride and the government to present all their evidence and arguments in court. The judge would then be able to decide his next steps. The legal challenge is scheduled to be heard in court in ten days time on Feb. 26. The Saskatchewan government continues to defend the Parents' Bill of Rights and says the law may go to the Supreme Court. Feb. 26, 2024 The Saskatchewan government turns to the Court of Appeal to intervene which halts the legal battle. Attorney General Bronwyn Eyre says the Court of Appeal has agreed to hear the court's case. July 26, 2024 Saskatchewan's Court of Appeal denies a political group that opposes so-called 'gender ideology' intervener status in the legal dispute. Aug. 29, 2024 Nearing the start of the school year, school divisions say they are preparing to enforce the law. The Saskatchewan government prepares to make its case before the Court of Appeal in September, arguing that its use of the notwithstanding clause should prevent a judge from reviewing the law. Saskatchewan will be joined by the attorneys general of Alberta and New Brunswick in making its case to exclude the courts from the law. Eleven parties in total join as intervenors on the side of UR Pride, including labour groups, Amnesty International, and civil liberties organizations. Sept. 23, 2024 The legal battle is taken to the Court of Appeal. --With files from Josh Lynn, David Prisciak, Drew Postey, Laura Woodward, Rory MacLean, and the Canadian Press.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store