'Don't Be Fooled': Govt's Freshwater Reforms Means More Pollution In Your Water & Commercial Control Of Public Resources
Freshwater campaigners are saying 'don't be fooled' by the Coalition Government's rhetoric in today's freshwater policy announcement. What it really means for New Zealanders is more pollution in rivers, lakes, and drinking water sources and the handing over of more power to commercial interests to control a fundamental public resource.
The Coalition Government made its long-awaited announcement on freshwater policy reform today and Choose Clean Water's spokesperson Tom Kay says it confirms what has been feared.
'Ministers are using comforting words like 'balance' but the details of this policy demonstrate that this is not about balance or protecting the public. The Government is proposing to remove existing bottom lines and change the long overdue prioritisation of the health of people and waterways provided by Te Mana o Te Wai.'
'Don't be fooled, this is a massive blow for the health of our water and the health of our communities.'
Te Mana o te Wai is a vastly improved decision-making framework in the existing National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020. It requires regional councils to provide for the protection of the health of waterways and the health needs of people (i.e. access to safe, good quality drinking water) before commercial uses can be considered. It was strengthened following the failure of previous National Policy Statements in 2011, 2014, and 2017 to improve the health of freshwater in New Zealand, and widespread public support for the Government to act.
'What Te Mana o te Wai finally provided, in the 2020 version of our national freshwater policy, was sufficient weight to the public interest and need for healthy water. Before this, people's drinking water and waterways were regularly losing out to commercial pressures, which we saw result in sick rivers and lakes, the drying up of rivers and groundwater, and undrinkable water sources around the country.'
'In the 2020 national policy statement, it was finally recognised that communities couldn't continue like that—it was unstable, unsustainable, and unhealthy.'
The group says Minister Hoggard's ACT party has consistently misrepresented Te Mana o Te Wai and used race-baiting to generate misguided anger towards a policy that protects all New Zealanders.
Leader of the ACT Party, David Seymour, has stated that Te Mana o te Wai is 'the same as waving crystals over the water to drive out evil spirits, and it's truly bonkers.'
'This is not only nasty and insulting but it's also plain wrong,' says Kay.
'Te Mana o te Wai is simply a framework that says we have to ensure our water is healthy enough to support itself and our people before it can support commercial interests. It doesn't rule out business—it just says that business can't occur at the cost of our communities' health.'
Previous consultation on changes to freshwater policy under the Resource Management Act demonstrated most regional councils support Te Mana o te Wai.
'Not only that, groups from Water NZ to Seafood NZ to Forest & Bird to public health advocates support Te Mana o te Wai because it makes priorities clearer for decision makers and provides better protection for the health of waterways and people.'
Minister Hoggard and Minister McClay's announcement is consistent with the Coalition Government's approach to handing over more power to extractive commercial interests and removing basic protections for New Zealanders.
'Polluting industries have massively influenced this freshwater policy. The Government is following the requests of groups like DairyNZ who have asked the Government to remove bottom lines and for industry control of instruments like farm plans. This Coalition Government is captured by big industries, we saw it with tobacco and now we're seeing it with agribusiness.'
Choose Clean Water says it's important for the public to make submissions on the changes (these can be made until 27 July 2025) but it's just as important for the public to contact MPs and Ministers directly to voice their opposition.
'We have a good existing national policy statement for freshwater. It puts us all on the path to restoration and health over time and still allows for productive land use to support communities. The Coalition Government is making changes New Zealand simply doesn't need and that will take us backwards.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
6 hours ago
- 1News
Plan to seize Gaza City tipped Australia's hand on state recognition
Israel's plan to take over Gaza City helped spur Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state, the Prime Minister has revealed. Anthony Albanese on Monday confirmed Australia would join the UK, France and Canada in recognising Palestine at a United Nations General Assembly meeting in New York in September, following mounting pressure to take action to support the suffering people of Gaza. While the Federal Government had previously insisted that the recognition of Palestine was a matter of "when, not if", the announcement was a shift from those comments made less than two weeks prior. This was because Australia's decision was partially fuelled by the Israeli Government's decision on Friday to approve a plan to seize Gaza City, Albanese said. "We make assessments based upon the totality of what is before us," he told reporters in Melbourne on Tuesday. ADVERTISEMENT "The other thing that is occurring is... the decision by the Israeli Government to double down on its military solution... with the decision that they've made to go in and to occupy Gaza City. "We have seen too many innocent lives being lost. "The international community is saying that we need to stop the cycle of violence." In late July, Albanese stressed he would not be "driven by a time frame" on the recognition issue. But less than a week later, Foreign Minister Penny Wong revealed Australia was co-ordinating with other countries on the issue amid concerns "there will be no Palestine left to recognise". Recognition could be used to "isolate Hamas" — a line the Government has continued to lean on — she added, referring to the designated terrorist group that controlled Gaza and was in a fight to the death with Israel. Senator Wong has said practical steps for recognition would be tied to commitments made by the Palestinian Authority, which exercised partial civil control in the West Bank. ADVERTISEMENT The commitments included assurances that Hamas would play no role in any future government. More than 140 of the 193 United Nations member states already recognised Palestine. Australia Palestine Advocacy Network president Nasser Mashni has warned recognition was "nothing but a veneer that allows Israel to continue brutalising Palestinians". Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the decision "does not deliver a two-state solution, it does not improve the flow of aid, it doesn't support the release of the hostages and it certainly doesn't put an end to the terrorist group Hamas". Former Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison, whose government controversially recognised West Jerusalem as Israel's capital before Labor reversed the decision, branded any recognition of Palestine as a "hollow gesture". The crisis in Gaza began when Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1200 people and taking about 250 hostage. Israel's military response has since killed more than 61,000 people, according to Gaza's health authorities. ADVERTISEMENT French President Emmanuel Macron praised Australia's decision. But Israel said recognition would be counterproductive to peace in the Gaza Strip and its demands for the release of the remaining hostages. More than two million Palestinians faced severe food insecurity, based on UN projections. Israel has denied the Gazan population was suffering or dying from starvation, even though it throttled the flow of aid to Gaza for months, international human rights groups have said.
Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
Christopher Luxon Shrugs Off Polls Showing Tight Electoral Race
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has shrugged off two polls showing a tight electoral race, promising to stay the course with the coalition's plan to fix the economy. The Taxpayers' Union-Curia poll on Monday showed Labour overtaking National as the most popular party and no clear path to power for either side. TVNZ's 1News-Verian poll was more forgiving to the coalition parties, returning them to government. But it also saw Luxon sink to just 20 percent as preferred prime minister, a two-year low. On his way into a morning caucus meeting on Tuesday, Luxon told reporters the polls would not be a topic of conversation in the meeting, nor should they be. "No, no, not at all," he said. "I'm not focused on polls or talking about myself. What I'm focused on is New Zealanders and making sure we've got the right long term economic plan in place." Luxon said his MPs continued to be provided internal polling through "a regular process" and discussed them "from time to time" in line with "normal practice". Asked whether he was meeting his own high standards, Luxon said the government was dealing with a challenging international environment. "We've inherited a really difficult recession," he said. "It's a very difficult time, but we are very, very clear minded and very, very focused on fixing the economy." Luxon said global confidence had been knocked by the United States' tariff regime but New Zealand had to "power through that". The faltering economy and cost-of-living crisis featured in both polls as key concerns for voters. Recently, the Auckland Chamber of Commerce has advocated a cut to the corporate tax rate, while the Taxpayers' Union is calling for an emergency mid-year Budget. Luxon previously dismissed such calls, and on Tuesday, he maintained the coalition's current focus on manufacturing and construction was the right approach. "We are doing everything we can. If you think about $6 billion worth of infrastructure projects starting before Christmas, that is a lot of jobs, it's a lot of tradies." He also pointed to relief on the horizon with the Reserve Bank expected to deliver further interest rate cuts this year. What's the alternative? Speaking on Tuesday morning, Labour leader Chris Hipkins said the polls demonstrated New Zealanders were losing faith in National's ability to deliver on its promises. He accepted, however, that Labour had more work to do, given neither poll had returned the party to the Beehive. Asked whether the party's support was helped or hindered by Labour's lack of policy, Hipkins said the government "would desperately love more things to attack". "We'll put further policy out there, but my focus right at the moment is holding the government accountable for their promises." Any comprehensive fiscal plan would have to wait till after next year's Budget, he said, but Labour's tax policy would be released this year. Hipkins said a final decision on tax had yet to be resolved but: "consensus is emerging." He repeatedly refused to give any details, including whether the proposal would be revenue neutral or possible parameters. "I've always said that I don't think the family home should be taxed, but I'm not announcing a policy that we haven't announced." National's campaign chairperson Chris Bishop said it was very easy for Labour to insist life should better when they had no policy solutions to offer themselves. "Life's easy when you're able to throw rocks from the side. Actually, we're the ones... in the arena, making the tough decisions across planning, across education, across infrastructure, across red tape, across fiscal policy to get this economy back on track." Bishop said the poll numbers reflected a "tough winter" but stressed that the election was not until next year: "People want the economy to be fixed. And I get that. But there is no silver bullet." He said any talk of replacing Luxon as leader was "just silly". Luxon: Palestine question is "not a race" Luxon declined to say whether the caucus would discuss the question of Palestinian statehood on Tuesday, but acknowledged there would be "nuances and differences" within the team. Foreign Minister Winston Peters on Monday confirmed Cabinet would come to a formal decision in September over whether to recognise a state of Palestine at an upcoming United Nations summit. All three opposition parties have castigated the government for failing to make a decision, pointing out that New Zealand is now out-of-step with its like-minded partners: Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and France. But Luxon said the complex question needed careful consideration. "It's not a race," Luxon said. "It deserves a serious weighing up of our position, and that's exactly what we're going to do." Luxon declined to say whether he would be comfortable with either coalition partner opting to "agree-to-disagree" on the decision. "I'm not going to get into hypotheticals... It's all very easy to jump to a bumper-sticker outcome or decision and not think through the consequences." Pressed on what conditions could be attached, Luxon said he would not presuppose a position but made clear Hamas would have to release hostages and disarm: "There is absolutely no role in any future Palestinian state for a terrorist organization like Hamas."
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
The House: Bills this week
Debating Chamber in Parliament Photo: RNZ / Diego Opatowski After a week off, MPs are back in the capital for a two-week sitting block, in which a smorgasbord of bills are scheduled to be debated. To make up time, there is another extended sitting on Thursday morning from 9 am (earlier than the normal 2pm start). Parliament's agenda this week is a hodgepodge of bills at different stages in their legislative journey. Let's start with the new bills. The first bit of Government business up for the week is the Regulatory Systems (Internal Affairs) Amendment Bill, which the House got its first go at debating last week, before the first reading was interrupted with five speeches still remaining. Regulatory Systems Amendment Bills are omnibus bills, which means they amend a suite of relevant legislation rather than just a single Act. They are a way for government agencies (in this case, Internal Affairs) to make small technical changes to regulatory systems that those agencies oversee. For Internal Affairs, these include things like gambling; births, deaths and marriages; and censorship of objective material. The bill has the tentative support of the opposition Labour and Green parties, with Te Pāti Māori yet to speak on the bill. The Antisocial Road Use Legislation Amendment Bill aims to discourage road users from participating in, as the name of the bill suggests, 'antisocial' conduct while operating a vehicle. This could include intimidating convoys, boy-racer meet-ups, fleeing from police, or dirt-bike gatherings, which are apparently becoming more common. Tuesday's first reading is the first chance the public gets to hear what MPs have to say about it. The final first reading of the week is the Constitution Amendment Bill, which is the less contentious bill relating to elections in recent weeks. This bill follows a recommendation from both the Electoral Commission and the Justice Committee (from their inquiry into the 2023 General Election), to remove the '28 day rule' - the period in which Ministers of the Crown can continue to remain in office even after they cease to be MPs (at the close of polling day). In the unlikely event of a delayed return of the writ (the official election results), this change would allow continuity of Government. The Public Works (Critical Infrastructure) Amendment Bill is back in the House after being examined by the Transport and Infrastructure Committee for just shy of three months. It seeks to simplify the process whereby the Crown, local authorities, and network utility operators acquire land for 'critical' infrastructure projects that fall under either Schedule 2 of the Fast-Track Approvals Act 2024, or the list of Roads of National Significance. During the first reading, Labour cautiously lent its support to the Bill, while the Greens and Te Pāti Māori voted against it, citing concerns about Māori and other land owners potentially having fewer rights to appeal an acquisition. The Customs (Levies and Other Matters) Amendment Bill is an omnibus bill that intends to improve the collection of revenue from goods crossing our borders. It would replace the current fee-based regime with a levy payment system. Customs Minister Casey Costello said the change would "provide a more balanced approach that reflects the risks and costs that classes of levy payers create". Being quite an esoteric, technical change, it's relatively uncontroversial. The second reading debate of the Crimes (Countering Foreign Interference) Amendment Bill will pick up from where it left off, with nine speeches remaining. The bill addresses gaps in criminal law concerning foreign interference intended to harm New Zealand. Spy novel ideas like treason, and inciting mutiny or espionage-all on behalf of foreign actors-would be introduced as new offences. Only the Green Party voted against the Bill at its first reading, although Te Pāti Māori were absent for the vote. The Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill is the second of the government's three-phased approach to replacing the Resource Management Act. This Bill would make changes in the areas of infrastructure and energy, housing growth, farming and the primary sector, natural hazards and emergencies, seeking to streamline consenting and investment. Wellingtonians in particular may also be interested to hear that it streamlines the listing and delisting of heritage buildings. In fact, the Minister in Charge of the Bill, Chris Bishop, said an amendment paper would be put forward during the committee stage this week that would specifically make the demolition of the Gordon Wilson Flats on The Terrace a permitted activity. While the RMA was well-intentioned, most MPs agree that over time it became unfit for purpose. Opinion diverges over what to replace it with (this being the second attempt in two Parliaments). Labour supported this bill to committee, albeit with reservations. The Greens and Te Pāti Māori reckon this isn't the right approach to RMA reform - expect opposition filibustering practitioners to try and drag this one out. The Local Government (Water Services) Amendment Bill will resume its committee stage this week. The Bill is part of the scrapping of the sixth Labour Government's Three Waters policy, and sets up a new regulatory framework for water services delivery. All three opposition parties are against the bill, with the House still yet to debate parts 4 and 5. Interestingly, the Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana Marine Protection Bill is collaborative in that it was introduced by the previous government, and continued by the current one. It aims to promote the restoration of the Hauraki Gulf, which has been facing recent ecological decline. Te Pāti Māori did not support the Bill at its second reading. The Privacy Amendment Bill reaches the end of its legislative journey on Thursday, with nine speeches to go in its third and final reading. It has unanimous support. It seeks to improve public transparency regarding the gathering of private information, notably requiring agencies to notify someone when it collects their personal information indirectly. The Leader of the House's office also intends to get to the third reading of the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill this week following Tuesday evening's committee stage, which they hope will be completed before the House adjourns. RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, its legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
