US Senate blocks bid to limit Trump's Iran war powers
The US Senate has voted down a Democratic-led effort to restrict President Donald Trump's ability to take further military action against Iran, just hours after Mr Trump indicated he might order additional bombings.
The resolution, aimed at requiring congressional approval for any new hostilities, was defeated 53 to 47, largely along party lines.
Only one Democrat joined Republicans in opposition, while one Republican sided with Democrats in supporting the measure.
Senator Tim Kaine, chief sponsor of the resolution, has tried for years to wrest back Congress' authority to declare war from both Republican and Democratic presidents.
Kaine said his latest effort underscored that the US Constitution gives Congress, not the president, the sole power to declare war and requires that any hostility with Iran be explicitly authorised by a declaration of war or specific authorisation for the use of military force.
'If you think the president should have to come to Congress, whether you are for or against a war in Iran, you'll support Senate Joint Resolution 59, you'll support the Constitution that has stood the test of time,' Kaine said in a speech before Friday's vote.
Lawmakers have been pushing for more information about weekend US strikes on Iran, and the fate of Iran's stockpiles of highly enriched uranium.
Earlier on Friday, Mr Trump sharply criticised Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, dropped plans to lift sanctions on Iran, and said he would consider bombing Iran again if Tehran is enriching uranium to worrisome levels.
'Sure, without question, absolutely,' the president said at a White House news conference.
He was reacting to Khamenei's first remarks after a 12-day conflict with Israel that ended when the United States launched bombing raids against Iranian nuclear sites.
Members of Trump's national security team held classified briefings on the strikes for the Senate and House of Representatives on Thursday and Friday. Many Democratic lawmakers left the briefings saying they had not been convinced that Iran's nuclear facilities had been 'obliterated,' as Mr Trump announced shortly after the raid.
Opponents of the resolution said the strike on Iran was a single, limited operation within Mr Trump's rights as commander-in-chief, not the start of sustained hostilities.
Senator Bill Hagerty, a Tennessee Republican who served as ambassador to Japan during Mr Trump's first term, said the measure could prevent any president from acting quickly against a country that has been a long-term adversary.
'We must not shackle our president in the middle of a crisis when lives are on the line,' Hagerty said before the vote.
Mr Trump has rejected any suggestion that damage to Iran's nuclear program was not as profound as he has said. Iran says its nuclear research is for civilian energy production.
Under US law, Senate war powers resolutions are privileged, meaning that the chamber had to promptly consider and vote on the measure, which Kaine introduced this month.
But to be enacted, the resolution would have had to pass the Senate as well as the House of Representatives, where Speaker Mike Johnson, a close Trump ally, said this week he did not think it was the right time for such an effort.
During Mr Trump's first term, in 2020, Kaine introduced a similar resolution to rein in the Republican president's ability to wage war against Iran.
- with Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
US president says he could bomb Iran again, as 3,200 Australians and family members register with DFAT
US President Donald Trump has warned Iran he would order another bombing raid on its nuclear sites, if Tehran resumes efforts to develop a nuclear weapon. Speaking to media in the White House on Friday US-time, Mr Trump said he would "without question, absolutely" consider more military action if necessary. His comments came as approximately 3,200 Australians and family members in Iran registered with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) crisis portal, with some wanting help to leave the country. On the advice of DFAT, some Australians in Iran travelled to the Iran-Azerbaijan border hoping leave Iran last week but got knocked back by Azerbaijan officials in part because they didn't have a special code, the ABC reported on Thursday. Late on Friday, a DFAT spokesperson said the backlog of Australian requests for border crossing codes had been resolved. DFAT is supporting Australians who wish to leave Iran secure seats on commercial flights that have begun operating out of the country, the spokesperson added. Iranian-Australian Maryam lives and works in Melbourne but is concerned for her mother, brother and his family who are in Iran. "The possibility of war would take everything away, you know, and you worry about what would happen to them and just how we could support them in in all of this," said Maryam. Maryam's mother is not an Australian citizen and while she has previously held visitor visas, she does not have a visa that is currently valid. DFAT allows people who are citizens or their close relatives to register for emergency assistance. Maryam said Australia backing the US strikes against Iran, and Israel's right to defend itself, did not sit well with many Iranians in Australia. "I think every Iranian I talk too, they felt very disillusioned," she said. "You're working here. You're paying tax. We are trying to contribute to this society." There are more than 85,000 Iranian-born people living in Australia, according to Home Affairs. Australian-Iranian Soroush, a civil engineer who works in fly-in fly-out jobs in West Australia, arrived back in Australia last week after leaving Iran via Turkiye. Soroush was in Iran visiting his parents and sister for the first time in two years, but his trip got cut short by the Israel-Iran war. Soroush said the trio drove from Tehran to the Iran-Turkiye border to "escape" the situation and faced chaotic situations trying to get out of the country. He had tried to register with DFAT but couldn't get through the process because of a lack of internet access in Iran. "I couldn't even phone my friends to tell them to do this for me, and then when I decided to exit from Turkiye … I thought if I get stuck somewhere I will continue registering," he said. As a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran continued to hold, there was further heated rhetoric from Mr Trump on Friday US-time in response to comments from Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, last week. Mr Trump scoffed at Ayatollah Khamenei's warning to the US not to launch future strikes on Iran, as well as the Iranian supreme leader's assertion that Tehran "won the war" with Israel. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi hit back at Mr Trump in a post on X early on Saturday. He said a potential nuclear deal was conditional on the US ending its "disrespectful tone" toward the supreme leader. "If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers," Minister Abbas Araqchi said on X. Iran has rejected a request by the UN's nuclear watchdog to visit sites bombed by the US and Israel, saying it suggested malign intent. Martin Hodgson is a senior advocate with the Foreign Prisoner Support Service, which works to get Australians detained or otherwise in jeopardy overseas back home. He said he was currently assisting "more than 10" Australians seeking to leave Iran who feared not only Israeli bombs but also Iranian authorities, who he said many suspected were using the war as cover to detain those viewed as unfriendly to the regime. This could include Iranian Australians who were known to be secular intellectuals, people of the Kurdish ethnicity, and Sunni Muslims, he said. Iran's theocratic regime and most of its population are of the Shia sect of Islam. Iranian authorities said on Wednesday (Tehran time) they had executed three men they accused of spying for Israel. Amnesty International's deputy director for the Middle East and North Africa, Hussein Baoumi, said calls from Iranian officials for expedited trials and executions of those accused of collaborating with Israel showed an effort to "weaponise the death penalty to assert control and instil fear". "The authorities must ensure all those detained are protected from enforced disappearance, torture and other ill-treatment, and afforded fair trials at all times, including during armed conflict," he said. Reuters/AP
The Australian
an hour ago
- The Australian
US Senate effort to restrain Trump's war powers fails
An effort by US Senate Democrats to prevent President Donald Trump from taking further military action in Iran without congressional approval was blocked by Republicans, who argued the commander in chief was within his rights to launch strikes on nuclear sites a week ago. The measure failed with 47 in favour and 53 opposed on Friday, largely along party lines, shy of the required simple majority in the GOP-controlled chamber. Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania sided with Republicans in voting against the measure, while GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky sided with the Democrats in backing it. The US launched pre-emptive military strikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities last Saturday, citing Tehran's progress toward completing a nuclear weapon. Trump characterised the attacks as a complete success and later announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran that has halted the conflict for now. Democrats and some Republicans said Trump should have come to Congress before attacking, arguing Iran didn't present an imminent threat to America. They said they were also leery of the US potentially stumbling into another overseas war, following long fights in Iran and Afghanistan. 'Wars are easy to start. But they are hard to end, and that's why the founders wanted us to debate them before the American people,' Sen. Jeff Merkley (D., Ore.) said in a speech on the Senate floor. The resolution, sponsored by Sen. Tim Kaine (D., Va.), would have ordered the removal of US troops 'from hostilities against' Iran and made it clear that Congress needs to approve further attacks. 'War is too big an issue to leave to the moods and the whims and the daily vibes of any one person,' Kaine said in a Senate floor speech prior to the vote. Paul, in explaining his vote, said that ordering US military troops into war 'is the most consequential and humbling responsibility that Congress is entrusted with,' he said in a speech on the Senate floor prior to the vote. But most Republicans said Trump, as the US military's top leader, was within his authority to launch the strikes. Some, including House Speaker Mike Johnson (R., La.), said this week that they believe that the War Powers Resolution, the 1970s law that attempts to rein in the president's powers, is unconstitutional. Sen. Bill Hagerty (R., Tenn.) called the Kaine resolution ill-conceived and said that had Trump consulted Congress, the element of surprise would have been lost. 'I cannot and I will not support a resolution that removes the ability of the president of the United States to act decisively in defence of national interests, our allies and our armed forces,' he said. Senators were briefed on the Iran strikes on Thursday. Emerging from the closed-door briefing, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) said that the country's 'operational capability was obliterated.' Sen. Tom Cotton (R., Ark.) said 'it's safe to say that we have struck a major blow' against Iran's nuclear program. Democrats said they agreed that the sites were significantly damaged but said they needed more information to be convinced that Iran's nuclear program was set back by more than a few months and that Trump had a longer-term plan. 'We all agree that Iran must not obtain a nuclear weapon, but bombing is not the best, most sustainable way of achieving that goal, and nothing I heard yesterday at the intelligence briefing changes that assessment,' said Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D., Md.). Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) said he left the briefing with more questions than answers. 'There is no coherent strategy, no end game, no plan,' he said. Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D., N.Y.) have criticised Trump for waiting days to send US intelligence officials to share classified details about the operations with lawmakers. Neither lawmaker was extensively briefed prior to the strikes. Dow Jones Newswires Read related topics: Donald Trump The Wall Street Journal Only a select few researchers have the skills for the hottest area in tech. Mark Zuckerberg and his rivals want to hire them, even if it takes pay packages of $US100 million. The Wall Street Journal The US President calls Canada a 'very difficult country to trade with' and ends talks over tariffs on dairy products and what he called an egregious digital-services tax on US tech companies.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Trump warns US could bomb Iran again if uranium enrichment resumes
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said in a post on X in the early hours of Saturday: 'If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers.' Trump also said he had been working on the possible removal of sanctions on Iran in recent days, to give the Middle Eastern country a chance for a speedy recovery. But, he said, he had now abandoned that effort. 'I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred and disgust, and immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more,' he said. The president said on Wednesday that the US and Iran would talk next week and 'may' sign an agreement. Tehran has denied that discussions are scheduled to resume. Strikes 'without question' Trump said at a White House news conference that he did not rule out attacking Iran again when asked about the possibility of new bombing of its nuclear sites if deemed necessary. 'Sure, without question, absolutely,' he said. Trump said he would like inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) – the UN nuclear watchdog – or another respected body to inspect the nuclear facilities after they were bombed last weekend. The president has rejected any suggestion that the damage to the sites was not as profound as he has said. Loading IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said this week that ensuring the resumption of inspections was his top priority as none had taken place since Israel began attacking Iran on June 13. The IAEA reported in May that Iran had amassed 409 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 per cent – an almost 50 per cent increase from the volume recorded three months prior. Iran maintains that its nuclear program has no military dimension. But on June 12, the IAEA said Iran had breached its responsibilities to co-operate with inspectors and that the agency was unable to determine whether the country's nuclear program was 'exclusively peaceful'. The location of Iran's highly enriched uranium is now an open question. According to Grossi, it was last seen by agency monitors a few days before the start of Israel's bombing campaign, which provoked a halt to inspections. At that point, the stockpile was at the Isfahan Nuclear Technology and Research Centre, a hub for chemical processes that turn uranium ore into feedstock that can be enriched. This facility in central Iran was targeted by Israel and later the US. Iran said in a note circulated at the IAEA and dated three weeks before Israel's first strike that in the event of such an attack, Iran would take 'special measures' to move the highly enriched uranium to a fortified location. After the bombardment began, Grossi said he received a letter from the Iranian foreign minister, saying those measures had been implemented. Iranian authorities have not responded to Grossi's demands to inform his inspectors of the new location, and on Wednesday, Iran's parliament approved moves to suspend such inspections. Araqchi also indicated on Friday that Tehran might reject any request by the head of the agency for visits to Iranian nuclear sites. The risk is that Iran's already near-weapons-grade uranium could be hidden away indefinitely. According to the IAEA, the amount of uranium Iran is known to have can be stored in 16 cylinders measuring 91.4 centimetres in height, about the size of a large scuba-diving tank. Each one would weigh about 25 kilograms – light enough to be carried on a person's back.
