Call to end postcode lottery in children's social care after Sara Sharif tragedy
Sara was just 10 years old when she was murdered in her own home by her father and stepmother in 2023, despite being known to social services her whole life.
Liberal Democrat peer Lord Mohammed of Tinsley has tabled amendments to the Children's Wellbeing And Schools Bill that aim to give a 'basic level of protection' to every child.
The former youth worker told the House of Lords on Thursday: 'Every child, no matter where they live or what challenges they face, should be guaranteed a basic level of protection.'
One of his amendments, dubbed Sara's Law, would introduce national standards for accessing and receiving support through 'children in need plans' to help reduce regional variations in the type, frequency and duration of support provided.
A second amendment would establish the Child Protection Authority, a body that would work to improve child protection practices, advise Government and the sector, and conduct inspections.
Lord Mohammed told peers: 'Neither of these proposals are theoretical. Both are urgent responses to real-world system failures, failures that we have seen repeated with devastating consequences across our country…
'We cannot ignore the repeated failures of the current framework.
'The names of Sara Sharif, Arthur Labinjo-Hughes and Star Hobson will remain etched in our nation's conscience for years to come.
'Each of these children were known to professionals. Each was failed by a system that saw the risk, but lacked the clarity, coordination and accountability to prevent harm.'
Section 17 of the Children's Act 1989 places a duty on local authorities to safeguard and promote the welfare of children 'in need', those whose health or development would suffer without additional support.
However, thresholds are set at a local level, which results in a 'stark regional disparity', Lord Mohammed added.
He told peers: 'In the absence of a national threshold or quality standards, this power is deployed in a deeply inconsistent way…
'It creates a system in which access to help is determined, not by a child's vulnerability, but by their postcode.'
He added that the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) found that existing child protection mechanisms are 'fragmented, inconsistent and insufficiently accountable'.
The former MEP concluded: 'This isn't about removing local flexibility levels, it's about setting a national baseline for protection so that a child's right to support is not dependent on what they have.'
Children's Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza has declared her support for the national thresholds proposed by Lord Mohammed, a move that aligns with her own recommendations.
Dame Rachel said ahead of the debate: 'Sara Sharif died when she became invisible to local services.
'All the warning signs were missed – a history of domestic abuse, bruises on her body, being removed from school – because her circumstances did not warrant help or support from professionals in Surrey, despite having been known to the local authority since birth.
'As the Children's Wellbeing And Schools Bill returns to Parliament, I urge peers to support the proposed amendment to set national thresholds for triggering an assessment by social care, ending the postcode lottery in children's social care that is putting young lives at risk.
'I also urge them to take this opportunity to give children equal protection from assault, which Sara was cruelly denied.
'My own research shows alarming variation in how and when different areas step in to protect and support a vulnerable child – no child's safety should be determined by inconsistent local decisions.
'The time to act is now, and this amendment is a huge step forward in making sure no child slips through the net.'
Responding, education minister Baroness Smith of Malvern said: 'Prescriptive national criteria with automatic referrals would risk narrowing the cohort of children, actually limiting local flexibility in providing support.'
She said the existing legislation on providing services to children in need gave local authorities discretion.
Lady Smith added: 'A danger of being specific in the way suggested here is that groups are left out, narrowing the cohort who receive support, exactly in fact, what the amendment is seeking to avoid.'
The minister also insisted that there was national guidance to local areas on safeguarding children.
She added: 'This Government is absolutely committed to protecting children from significant harm, providing the right support at the right time, and ultimately improving outcomes so that all children can thrive.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Galleries warn they will be ‘crippled' by new policy which allows people to visit for free
Britain's leading heritage organisations have urged the government to close a 'loophole' in new consumer rights legislation, warning it could 'cripple them'. Heads of organisations including the National Trust, Tate, Historic Royal Palaces and Victoria & Albert Museum wrote to the government to highlight how the new rules could allow people to abuse their membership schemes. The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act (DMCCA) will allow consumers a 'two-week cooling off period' after purchasing a charity membership scheme. This means they could obtain the membership, use its perks to enjoy paid-exhibitions or visits for free, before cancelling and getting a full refund days later. The letter, seen by The Times, asks the prime minister to ensure charities are treated differently to commercial businesses to protect this vital revenue stream. A National Trust spokesperson told The Independent: "Up to now membership has been treated as a charitable donation by law and this is part of a long-held recognition that UK charities are fundamentally different from commercial businesses. 'Charities are currently facing sustained financial pressures, due to the difficult economic climate. This legislation would add to that cost burden and see more charities having to reduce their vital services. 'Just last month the Government made a firm commitment through the Civil Society Covenant to support our sector: closing this loophole would be a clear demonstration of that commitment." The DMCCA was introduced by the previous Conservative government but has been put into place under this government. It is intended to protect consumers following growing concerns around 'subscription traps'. However, heritage organisations and galleries have become increasingly reliant membership schemes for vital funding in recent years. 'The proposed cooling-off period would create a loophole that could allow people to join charities as members and enjoy benefits, such as free entry to sites, for a two-week period before claiming substantial refunds for the rest of the year,' their letter to the government reportedly reads. 'This threatens to cripple the very future value of membership itself as a functional model of income generation for charities with visitor models — currently worth hundreds of millions [of pounds] to charities across the UK every year.' Under the rules, someone could hypothetically buy a National Trust family membership for £168.60 before visiting several sites within two weeks - which could cost upwards of £100 for the family. They could then cancel their membership, receiving a full membership refund, having not paid for their visits. A similar concern applies to galleries, who sometimes offer members free access to paid exhibitions. A government spokesperson said it was engaging with charities on the issue and added: 'The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act does not change the definition of what constitutes a consumer contract. 'Our plans to protect consumers from rip-off subscriptions will not unfairly affect charities, and we continue to engage closely with them to understand their concerns.'
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Scottish Labour MSP Colin Smyth arrested and charged over indecent images
MSP Colin Smyth has been arrested and charged in connection with possession of indecent images, prompting his suspension from Scottish Labour. The South Scotland MSP was arrested on Tuesday and is due to appear in court at a later date. He was first elected as an MSP in 2016 and returned to Holyrood again at the 2021 election. The Scottish Parliament website now lists him as an Independent. A spokesperson for Police Scotland said: 'On Tuesday, August 5, 2025, officers executed a warrant at a property on Marchfield Avenue, Dumfries. 'A 52-year-old man was arrested and charged in connection with possession of indecent images. He is due to appear at Dumfries Sheriff Court at a later date.' A spokesman for Scottish Labour said: 'The whip has been removed from Colin Smyth MSP, pending an investigation. 'We cannot comment further on this matter while the investigation is ongoing.' It is understood the MSP was administratively suspended by Labour after the party became aware of the police investigation.
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The only way to solve England's water crisis is state control
The behaviour of private water companies is widely recognised as unacceptable: they flout regulations, cause significant environmental harm, neglect their responsibilities, and still pay enormous sums to directors and shareholders. Ofwat's rulings and fines appear ineffective, often penalising consumers (Letters, 18 August), while renationalisation is dismissed as prohibitively expensive. We propose an alternative means of controlling private-sector companies – replace Ofwat's monetary fines with state-owned voting shares of equivalent value. This approach would have several immediate benefits. By exercising shareholder rights, the state – on behalf of the public – could directly influence company policies; the public purse would gain revenue from dividends; and over time, as the state's shareholding increased, full nationalisation would become financially Ruth Sinclair and Dr Jill VincentLoughborough, Leicestershire Your article says that not a single reservoir has been built since water privatisation (How can England possibly be running out of water?, 17 August). But close to 100 were built in the 35 years prior to privatisation. The plundering of our public services and natural resources is a national disgrace. Public ownership is the only way to end this grisly LockwoodCarshalton, London Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
