logo
Why more Canadians are landing in emergency departments with cannabis-induced vomiting

Why more Canadians are landing in emergency departments with cannabis-induced vomiting

Ottawa Citizen5 hours ago

Emergency departments are seeing a spike in visits owing to a once unusual, highly unpleasant and, in rare cases, potentially life-threatening side effect of chronic cannabis use: severe bouts of vomiting lasting hours, even days.
Article content
As pot becomes more potent and more convenient to purchase, emergency doctors are reporting more cases of cannabis hyperemesis syndrome, or CHS, a gastrointestinal condition that can affect people who use cannabis frequently (several times a week, if not daily) over months or years.
Article content
Article content
Article content
In addition to 'cyclical' vomiting, other signs include morning nausea, intense abdominal pain and 'relief through compulsive hot showers or baths,' Western University researchers recently wrote. It's increasingly affecting teens and young adults, they report. 'Yet few people — including many clinicians — know it exists.'
Article content
Article content
Emergency department visits for CHS increased 13-fold in Ontario after the legalization of recreational cannabis in 2018, one study found. While weed's legalization wasn't associated with a sudden or gradual change in cases, pot's commercialization — unlimited number of stores, more products — overlapping with the COVID-19 pandemic, was associated with an immediate bump in rates.
Article content
The potency of THC, or tetrahydrocannabinol, the main psychoactive compound in cannabis, is also off the charts, said Western's Jamie Seabrook, rising from about three per cent in dried cannabis in the 1980s to, according to Health Canada, 15 per cent in 2023. Some strains have as high as 30 per cent THC.
Article content
Article content
'When I talk to youth, they can easily access strains that are upwards of 25 per cent. And that's huge,' said Seabrook, a professor in the department of epidemiology and biostatistics, and the department of pediatrics. The human brain continues to develop up to around age 25, he said. THC exposure over this period has been linked with problems with attention, memory and learning, as well as increased risks of paranoia, psychosis and, more recently, schizophrenia.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Korea ratifies treaty aimed at safeguarding international adoptions
South Korea ratifies treaty aimed at safeguarding international adoptions

Winnipeg Free Press

time2 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

South Korea ratifies treaty aimed at safeguarding international adoptions

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — After years of delay, South Korea has ratified the Hague Adoption Convention, an international treaty meant to safeguard international adoptions, marking a significant policy shift decades after sending tens of thousands of children to the West through an aggressive but poorly regulated adoption system. The government's announcement Tuesday came as it faces growing pressure to address widespread fraud and abuse that plagued its adoption program, particularly during a heyday in the 1970s and 1980s when the country allowed thousands of children to be adopted every year. Many adoptees have since discovered their records were falsified to portray them as abandoned orphans, carelessly separated or even stolen from their birth families. South Korea's Foreign Ministry and Health and Welfare Ministry, which handles adoption policies, issued a joint statement saying the country submitted the necessary documents to ratify the Hague Convention to the Dutch Foreign Ministry, the treaty's depositary. The treaty, which requires countries to strengthen state oversight and safeguards to ensure international adoptions are legal and ethical, will enter effect in South Korea on Oct. 1. South Korea signed the Hague Convention in 2013, but ratification was delayed by more than 10 years as the country struggled to bring adoptions under centralized government authority, as required by the treaty, after allowing private agencies to control international child placements for decades. 'Going forward, intercountry adoptions will be permitted only when no suitable family can be found in his or her state of origin, and only if deemed to serve the child's best interests through deliberation by the adoption policy committee under the Ministry of Health and Welfare,' the ministries said. The statement said the ratification was a significant step toward safeguarding children's rights and 'establishing an advanced, internationally compliant intercountry adoption system in Korea, reinforcing the government's commitment to upholding state responsibility across the entire adoption process.' A 2023 law also mandates the transfer of all adoption from private agencies to the National Center for the Rights of the Child by July, aiming to centralize processing family search requests from adoptees who have returned to South Korea as adults seeking their roots. International adoptions from South Korea have plummeted in recent years, with only 58 in 2024, according to government data. During the 1980s, South Korea sent more than 6,000 children abroad each year, under a previous military government that viewed adoption as a way to reduce mouths to feed and curry favor with Western nations. Authorities specifically targeted children deemed socially undesirable, including those born to unwed mothers or impoverished families, and granted extensive powers to private adoption agencies to dictate child relinquishments and custody transfers, allowing them to send huge numbers of children abroad quickly. Much of South Korea's recent reforms have focused on abuse prevention, including a 2011 law reinstating judicial oversight of foreign adoptions that led to a significant drop in international placements. But officials are at a loss over how to handle the huge numbers of inaccurate or falsified records accumulated over past decades, which have prevented many adoptees from reconnecting with their birth families or obtaining accurate information about their biological origins. In a landmark report in March, South Korea's Truth and Reconciliation Commission concluded the government bears responsibility for facilitating a foreign adoption program rife with fraud and abuse, driven by efforts to reduce welfare costs and enabled by private agencies that often manipulated children's backgrounds and origins. The commission's findings broadly aligned with a 2024 Associated Press investigation, in collaboration with Frontline (PBS), which detailed how South Korea's government, Western countries and adoption agencies worked in tandem to supply some 200,000 Korean children to parents overseas, despite years of evidence that many were being procured through questionable or outright unscrupulous means. South Korea's government has never acknowledged direct responsibility for issues related to past adoptions and has so far ignored the commission's recommendation to issue an apology. Some adoptees criticized the truth commission's cautiously worded report, arguing it should have more forcefully acknowledged the government's complicity and offered more concrete recommendations for reparations for illegal adoption victims. The commission's investigation deadline expired in May, after it confirmed human rights violations in just 56 of the 367 complaints filed by adoptees since 2022.

Breakenridge: Premier in lockstep with U.S. 'failure of policy and science'
Breakenridge: Premier in lockstep with U.S. 'failure of policy and science'

Calgary Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Calgary Herald

Breakenridge: Premier in lockstep with U.S. 'failure of policy and science'

Article content As parts of the U.S. — much like Alberta — continue to grapple with measles outbreaks, the American Health and Human Services secretary has been making some unfortunate statements about the measles vaccine. Article content Although Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tepidly endorsed the vaccine earlier this year, he more recently claimed that vaccine-induced immunity is short-lived and that the vaccine hadn't been 'safety-tested' — both of which are untrue. This is the same man who previously falsely claimed that the polio vaccine had killed more people than polio itself. Article content Article content Article content The same man, now the agency's secretary, has fostered chaos and uncertainty around vaccines by abruptly firing the entire vaccine advisory panel at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control. Article content Article content It is dismaying to see what is unfolding south of the border, but it is alarming to see Alberta's government taking its cue on these matters from this administration. I don't think the premier has jumped on the 51st state bandwagon, but it's unclear why we're deferring to the Americans on any issue. Article content In a late Friday afternoon news dump last week, the Alberta government abruptly announced a massive overhaul of the administration of COVID-19 vaccines. Article content Essentially, it means that Albertans who are not immunocompromised or who do not receive certain provincial social benefits will have to pay out-of-pocket for the vaccine. Accessing the vaccine will be more difficult, as it will only be offered in public health clinics. Article content Article content The government claims it is 'committed to ensuring Albertans who are at highest risk' still have access to vaccines. However, that does not include pregnant women nor does it include those who work in health-care settings. It should be noted that the standing guidance from Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommends a vaccine for at-risk groups, including both pregnant women and health-care workers. Article content Article content But apparently, Alberta's government is more interested in RFK's guidance than NACI's. Friday's news release notes that 'recently, the Federal Drug Administration in the United States stopped recommending routine COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women and healthy children.' There is no mention of any standing recommendations from any Canadian bodies or officials. Article content It could be a coincidence, but it's interesting to note that the executive director of the premier's office has previously praised Kennedy, saying it's 'hard not to cheer for this man' and that he 'seems to possess great character.'

UK lawmakers consider decriminalizing abortion amid concern about increasing prosecution of women
UK lawmakers consider decriminalizing abortion amid concern about increasing prosecution of women

Winnipeg Free Press

time4 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

UK lawmakers consider decriminalizing abortion amid concern about increasing prosecution of women

LONDON (AP) — British lawmakers are preparing to debate proposals to decriminalize abortion amid concerns that police are using antiquated laws to prosecute women who end their own pregnancies. The House of Commons on Tuesday is scheduled to consider two amendments to a broader crime bill that would bar the prosecution of women who take steps to end their pregnancies at any stage. Tonia Antoniazzi, the Labour member of Parliament who introduced one of the amendments, said change is needed because police have investigated more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortions over the past five years, including some who suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths. 'This is just wrong,' she said ahead of the debate. 'It's a waste of taxpayers' money, it's a waste of the judiciary's time, and it's not in the public interest.' Doctors can legally carry out abortions in England, Scotland and Wales up to 24 weeks, and beyond that under special circumstances, such as when the life of the mother is in danger. Abortion in Northern Ireland was decriminalized in 2019. Changes in the law implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic allow women to receive abortion pills through the mail and terminate their own pregnancies at home within the first 10 weeks. That has led to a handful of widely publicized cases in which women were prosecuted for illegally obtaining abortion pills and using them to end their own pregnancies after 24 weeks or more. A second amendment would go even further than Antoniazzi's proposal, barring the prosecution of medical professionals and others who help women abort their fetuses. Anti-abortion groups oppose both measures, arguing that they will open the door to abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy. 'Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers,' said Alithea Williams, public policy manager for the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, which describes itself as the U.K.'s biggest pro-life campaign group.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store