logo
Bill Clinton reveals key White House details in murderous new political thriller

Bill Clinton reveals key White House details in murderous new political thriller

Yahoo06-06-2025
WHITE PLAINS, NY – Most former presidents write memoirs after they leave the White House. Former President Bill Clinton has been there, done that. First on his literary agenda now? Writing political thrillers.
Clinton is a thriller reader himself, but more than that he just really wanted a chance to work with bestselling author James Patterson. Their third novel, "The First Gentleman" is out now from Little, Brown and Company.
Sitting down for an interview with USA TODAY, the prolific pair catch up like a couple of old friends – Clinton shares a story of tourists he spotted reading his wife's book while in Korea and gives Patterson the name of a new author to check out.
"He reads everything," Patterson tells me. Both love S.A. Cosby, Michael Connelly and Lee Child.
In their latest novel, the fictional Madame President Wright's husband is on trial for murder, a potential crime uncovered by journalist couple Brea and Garrett. Not only is it harmful to the White House image for the first gentleman and former Patriots player to be accused of murder, but it threatens to upend the carefully crafted economic "Grand Bargain" the president is nearly ready to announce. It's a twisty thriller with plenty of inside jobs, political sabotage and many, many deaths.
Clinton and Patterson take us inside their writing process, revealing how they weave details pulled from real life with fictional characters to create the next big nail-biter.
This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.
Question: How has your collaboration changed over three books?
Patterson: I don't think it's changed. Other than, I will say, I think this turned out really, really well. If somebody's looking to read a book with really good characters and great story or if they want to find out sort of how Washington really works, I think this is really cool for either one of those kinds of people. But initially we had, it was a little bit of a problem in terms of getting the characters real. They weren't working and we just kept going at it.
Clinton: We had this just gut-wrenching conversation because in the beginning, we were excited – what would it be like to write a book that was from the point of view of the first gentleman, the first woman president's husband? It had all kinds of fascinating ramifications. But then something happened while we were doing it and I realized we hadn't created anybody you could like.
Patterson: We have these two (reporters) and they weren't working, either, in the beginning. When people think of my writing, they go "short chapters," but the whole thing is character. Alex Cross is, in my opinion, a great character. Lindsay Boxer is a really good character. The characters in "First Gentleman," there are four of them, are really good characters, and that's the key. Obviously (Clinton) was key in terms of making those characters work, especially in the White House.
Clinton: People (in the White House) struggle to maintain some measure of normalcy, however they define it. Even though you have to be ambitious to be elected president and disciplined to execute the job, you're still a person. We all react differently to different things that happen. So we try to capture that.
Patterson: The humanity. I wish we could get back to the understanding that whatever party you're with, (we are) human beings. I'll give you one quick example: Last year, the president called the house and my wife and he said, put it on (FaceTime). And there he was with his grandkids, and he was in a tiger suit with only his face showing. Human being!
Right, and in this book, all the first gentleman wants to do is go on a run with no one bothering him.
Patterson: President Clinton used to go on runs.
Clinton: I went running every morning for years. I still have the M&M's box that I was given by the head of my security detail on my 100th run when I was president. I loved it.
Patterson: Once M&M's get 20 years old you don't eat them anymore.
Are there any other signature Clinton White House details that made it into the book?
Patterson: You have a relationship with a man and a woman, and obviously, it would've been possible at one point for President Clinton to be the first gentleman.
Clinton: It's the only job I ever wanted that I didn't get.
Is that why you chose to make a female president in this book?
Clinton: I had thought a lot about, long after I left the White House and Hillary was running, and I thought about it. This character, he and his president wife, they're closer to the age Hillary and I were when we actually served. So I was thinking about, even though he was a pro football player and macho guy, he was really proud of his wife. He wanted her to succeed. He wasn't threatened by her being president, but he could be threatened by people making certain assumptions about him, like he was a dumb jock, which he's not.
Patterson: But is he a murderer?
Clinton: We keep that hanging a long time.
In the book, President Wright is trying to pass legislation to address Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare. How did you come up with the "Grand Bargain"?
Clinton: I knew what the drivers of the debt are and what the politics pushing against real change are, and so I tried to think of the things we could do to get it under control that would be the most bearable, both for people and politically.
Patterson: It's a fascinating thing. How do you solve the problem with Social Security and Medicaid? And there is, you know, there's in the book, there is a solution. It's complicated, which is kind of cool. You don't hear anything (today), about, well, how do we solve these problems? I'd like to hear that right now. Yes, there is a problem.
Clinton: Medicaid pays for about 40% of all childbirth and pays for an enormous percentage of senior citizens' health care and a lot of other stuff. It's really important. So this bill that's just been presented cuts Medicaid in order to help pay for a tax cut for millionaires and billionaires. In all respect, (Patterson) and I don't need a tax cut. We'd rather have people with health care. So these are choices, and unless people understand that these choices are being made, they can't know clearly whether they're against or for whatever's being proposed.
Patterson: This lays out that there is an alternative to that which makes sense and we don't have to cut things off for people who really need help.
What was it like crafting fictional presidential addresses?
Clinton: I imagined what I would say if confronted with the challenges she was confronted with. If you really want to change something, people like to hear about it in speeches and imagine it, but it almost always requires a mind numbing, detail-written piece of legislation – not always, but mostly. So, I tried to figure out how to sell it in the speech and describe how complicated the legislation would be without putting people to sleep. I found it difficult, but I think it's important, because one thing I learned the hard way is if you can't explain it, you can't sell it, and if you can't sell it and it's hard, you're going to get creamed.
The problem we describe is something like what really exists today. Except today, it's in many ways more severe. It's just that our economy has been, for the last 20 years, or now 30 years, stronger than any other one in the world.
Patterson, were there any details about the presidency or White House that Clinton added that surprised you?
Patterson: A lot of little things. I might set a scene and he'd go: "It can't happen in that room. That room is so small, there's not room for three people in that room." And anytime it pops up: "The Secret Service wouldn't act like that. They would act like this." A lot of the thriller writers that we all like, they just make stuff up. When you're working with a president, you just can't make it up, because he'll go: "No, it wouldn't work that way. Here's how it could work." One of the beauties of this book, and the three that we've done, is that it's a really good story with really good characters, but it's also authentic.
Did you have a favorite character to write?
Patterson: Favorite character for me is Brea – she just develops, she gets stronger and stronger for a lot of reasons, and there is one big twist in there, and that really propels her as a character.
Clinton: I agree with that, and one of the reasons I liked her is that she's smart and brave and good and honest, but in the beginning of the book, she thinks something that's very wrong about a big issue, and when she knows she's wrong, she turns on a dime and does the right thing. You don't see that much in Washington.
Patterson: Or in general.
Clinton: There are people that think that you never admit error. You accuse other people of doing what you're doing, and you roll along. The worst thing you can do is admit that she made a mistake. I like her because she's playing in the big leagues − her whole life is on the line, and she still does the right thing.
Patterson: We've sold this in Hollywood and ... the production companies go, "Well, maybe we should cast (First Gentleman) Cole." I'm going like, no, you better cast Brea, because Cole, he's a good character, but Brea, she's real, and Garrett, her partner, they are really key characters. And the president herself, but Cole, eh, I don't know. Not as big a character.
Who would be your dream actor to play her? (Brea, the protagonist, is Black.)
Patterson: There's so many. I mean, that's the beauty right now − one of the nice things that's happened in Hollywood, especially with Black actors, so many have been discovered. There are so many choices.
What are you excited for readers to see in this story, especially fans of your last two thrillers?
Clinton: I'm excited for them to see, first of all, that there's still room for citizen activism that can make all the difference in the world, from people who just want to do the right thing, like Brea and Garrett. Secondly, I want them to see that a president and her husband are people. No matter what's going on, she's still got to go to work every day. If she thinks (Cole) machine-gunned half a dozen people, she's still got to go to work. Nobody else can make these decisions. I want them to see how staff behaves, senior staff, and when they're honorable and when they're not, and what a difference it can make, because you can't be president unless you can trust them. You have to have some people you trust.
Clare Mulroy is USA TODAY's books reporter, where she covers buzzy releases, chats with authors and dives into the culture of reading. Find her on Instagram, subscribe to our weekly Books newsletter or tell her what you're reading at cmulroy@usatoday.com.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Bill Clinton, James Patterson new book is a murderous, twisty thriller
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Putin kept claims Hillary Clinton had physical, ‘psycho-emotional' problems under wraps because he thought she would win 2016 election: Gabbard
Putin kept claims Hillary Clinton had physical, ‘psycho-emotional' problems under wraps because he thought she would win 2016 election: Gabbard

New York Post

time7 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Putin kept claims Hillary Clinton had physical, ‘psycho-emotional' problems under wraps because he thought she would win 2016 election: Gabbard

WASHINGTON — Russian intelligence obtained damaging information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's health amid her 2016 presidential campaign — including evidence that she had 'psycho-emotional problems' that were being treated with severe sedatives — but Vladimir Putin chose not to release it before that year's election because he thought the Democrat would win. The astounding revelations were contained in a 2020 House Intelligence Committee report which reviewed purported Russian influence on the presidential contest and was declassified and made public Wednesday by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Russia's intelligence service 'possessed DNC communications that Clinton was suffering from 'intensified psycho-emotional problems, including uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression. and cheerfulness,'' the report stated. Advertisement A 2020 House Intelligence Committee report detailing Russia's knowledge of damaging information about Hillary Clinton's health amid the 2016 Presidential election was released Wednesday. Getty Images 'Clinton was placed on a daily regimen of 'heavy tranquilizers' and while afraid of losing, she remained 'obsessed with a thirst for power.'' Moscow's foreign intelligence service, the SVR, also 'possessed a campaign email discussing a plan approved by Secretary Clinton to link Putin and Russian hackers to candidate Trump in order to 'distract the [American] public' from the Clinton email server scandal.' Advertisement Putin chose not to release this information as he believed Hillary was sure to win the 2016 election. The revelations, which were taken from emails hacked from Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee accounts, even found that the Russians concealed details about Clinton shaking down religious organizations for campaign donations by pledging more favorable treatment by a future Democratic State Department. The Post reached out to the Clinton Foundation for comment.

'The Hunting Wives' Ending, Explained
'The Hunting Wives' Ending, Explained

Cosmopolitan

time38 minutes ago

  • Cosmopolitan

'The Hunting Wives' Ending, Explained

If you managed to rip through Netflix's latest drama, The Hunting Wives, then welcome to the club. The Big-Little-Lies-meets-Texas-Republican series is filled with plenty of juicy secrets and shocking twists that keep you wanting more. It follows the story of Sophie O'Neil (played by Brittany Snow) who moves from Boston to Texas with her husband and son. As she gets pulled into the world of socialite Margo Banks and her uber-rich husband, she gets tangled up in lies, affairs, and even a murder case. We're left for episodes on end trying to figure out who is responsible for the death of Abby, a high schooler and the girlfriend of the son of one of Sophie's new friends. The finale finally reveals the murderer and so much more, so let's get into all the twists and turns in the last episode of The Hunting Wives. We go through quite a few suspects for Abby's murder. Of course, Sophie is immediately a suspect since it was her gun that was used to kill Abby. And then there's Pastor Pete, who, in the penultimate episode, is found to have drugged and kidnapped two other teenage girls. One of the victims tells police that Pete had Abby's sweater in his possession and that he seemed to have an interest in her. This leads Officer Salazar to think Pete's guilty, but as it turns out, he was in the drunk tank the night of the murder, so he couldn't have done it. The focus then comes back to Sophie, and the cops arrest her and put her in jail. Meanwhile, Margo and Callie go over to Jill's house and find that she's killed Abby's mom, Star. She says Star, who believes Jill killed Abby after finding out Jill's son, Brad, got Abby pregnant, showed up with a gun and was threatening her, so she killed Star in self-defense. Jill then points her gun at Margo. Callie tells her to put the gun down, but when she doesn't listen, Callie shoots Jill, killing her. Of course, the cops (and seemingly everyone else) now think Jill is responsible for Abby's murder. Sophie is released from prison and heads back home to see her husband, Graham. She tells Graham she needs some time alone to figure out who she is and what she wants. She then heads over to Margo's house and she soon becomes not so sure that Jill is the murderer. It wasn't Pastor Pete, Sophie, or Jill who killed Abby—it was Margo. Sophie, while looking for a moisturizer in Margo's bathroom, finds a box of tampons. She asks Margo why she has them when she told Sophie the first time they met that she can't use tampons. Margo denies saying that, but when Sophie leaves, she Googles what would cause someone to not use tampons and one of the top answers is an abortion. Sophie goes to talk to Brad and he tells her that he never specifically told Pete that Abby had gotten pregnant and had an abortion. He just said "my girlfriend," but turns out he didn't mean Abby. Sophie, having seen Margo and Brad hooking up before, is even more suspicious of Margo. After doing some more digging, she discovers that Margo's biological father is the doctor in town—the same one who provided her alibi the night of the murder. Now sure that her suspicions are right, Sophie goes to confront Margo, who admits she did it. She says Abby threatened to ruin her life and that killing her was a drunken mistake that she never meant to happen. Margo doesn't get caught by the end of the series, but she's not exactly in a great position either. She admits to her husband, Jed, that she broke their rule and had slept with another man (Brad). She tells him about the pregnancy, the abortion, and Abby finding out, and he doesn't exactly take it well. He slaps her and tells her to get out of the house. With nowhere left to go, Margo goes back to the trailer park where her brother still lives to stay with him. The next day, she heads out to see Callie and tells her she wants them to be together again. But it all seems to be a ploy so that she can see whether Callie's husband (the chief of police) has spoken to Sophie since Sophie found out she killed Abby, the answer to which was no. Sophie may have figured out who did it, but she's not in a great spot at the end of the series. Her marriage is basically in the toilet, and her former best-friend-turned-lover is now officially a murderer. But things get worse when Margo's brother, trying to take things into his own hands to silence Sophie, follows Sophie as she leaves her home at night, cutting her off on a remote road, and demanding she get out of her car. Sophie tries to back away, but as she sees Margo's brother seemingly reach for a gun, she runs him over. She gets out of the car and sees he's very much dead, so she drags his body into the woods and pushes him off a ledge into the lake down below. And that's where the show ends, with Sophie and Margo now in some very precarious positions, both responsible for a death but not having been caught.

Trump's Epstein problem grows: Even his voters want more files released
Trump's Epstein problem grows: Even his voters want more files released

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Trump's Epstein problem grows: Even his voters want more files released

Jeffrey Epstein is one of the rare issues where Trump appears to be out of step with his base by questioning why public interest remains in the case. Loretta Duchesne doesn't have much faith in the government, and that's part of the reason she cast a ballot last November for Donald Trump. The 35-year-old makeup artist from northern Louisiana said she felt Trump would be 'transparent' and 'expose corruption.' She's disappointed that the Trump administration isn't releasing all the records in the Jeffrey Epstein case. 'It feels now more like he's protecting someone or something if he won't reveal it,' said Duchesne, an independent who once voted for President Barack Obama. Duchesne likes Trump policies such as his stance on the border and doesn't regret voting for him. But when it comes to Epstein, she said she doesn't accept the official narrative about the wealthy financier who died in prison awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges and also believes the administration is making a mistake and undermining its credibility by holding material back on the years-old criminal case involving alleged underage victims. Most Trump voters interviewed by USA TODAY share Duchesne's desire to see more Epstein records released, illustrating why the case has become so problematic for a second-term president who has a long, documented history of associating with Epstein and recently has publicly questioned why there remains such a deep interest in a man who died six years ago. Epstein is one of the rare issues where Trump appears to be out of step with his base. USA TODAY spoke with seven Trump supporters, and most believe there is more to be revealed about Epstein and want to see the government be more forthcoming with its documentation of his case. Their suspicions persist despite the Department of Justice releasing a memo July 7 that tried to close the book on the Epstein saga. New York's chief medical examiner ruled Epstein's death a suicide, but some – including many Trump loyalists – have questioned that finding and whether the government is shielding Epstein's potential clients from public view. The DOJ memo reaffirmed the finding that Epstein died by suicide, said there is no 'incriminating client list' and no evidence he blackmailed prominent people. But instead of dispelling speculation about the case, the memo only inflamed things further, putting the administration in the hot seat. Utah resident Shar Kynaston, 75, said she doesn't think Epstein killed himself and believes "he probably had a preferred, high-paying list' of clients. 'I think that there is a cover-up, but I don't know the extent of it,' said Kynaston, a retired federal worker who voted for Trump in all three of his presidential races in 2016, 2020 and 2024. Kynaston wants the Epstein files released, but she still likes Trump. The same goes for Victoria Rivas, 20, a Miami University student and vice president of the Ohio college's Republican club. 'I do think we deserve transparency,' Rivas said. Trump recently pushed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the release of Epstein grand jury testimony, which the DOJ is doing. But that's just a portion of the records that haven't been released and it's not enough for Rivas, a Trump voter who attended the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee last year when he officially became the party's nominee, just days after he was shot in an assassination attempt. 'That's very picky and choosy,' Rivas said of just releasing grand jury testimony, adding that all the Epstein records should be released. Rivas views the first six months of Trump's second term as 'a lot of promises made and a lot of promises kept,' but on Epstein she said he's falling short. Part of the problem for Trump is that those around him, including high-profile figures in his administration, spent years hyping up the potential for bombshell revelations in the Epstein files. "Show us all the Epstein client list now!!!' Trump's eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., posted on X in 2023. 'Why would anyone protect those scum bags? Ask yourselves this question daily and the answer becomes very apparent!!' The president was more circumscribed in his Epstein comments. Responding in June 2024 to a Fox News interviewer who asked whether he would declassify the files, Trump said: 'Yeah, yeah, I would. I guess I would.' But he added: 'I think that less so, because you don't know − You don't want to affect people's lives if there's phony stuff in there, because there's a lot of phony stuff in that whole world. But I think I would.' Some Trump supporters who spoke to USA TODAY said there was an expectation that more would be revealed. 'It all has to come out,' Rivas said. The backlash Trump is receiving on Epstein has raised questions about whether it will dent his image among his base and could potentially be a drag for Republicans in the 2026 midterm election. Rivas doesn't see the issue as "a top concern for our country," and other Trump supporters said the same. Pennsylvania home builder Mark Bass, 65, said he doesn't think Epstein killed himself, doesn't accept that there isn't a client list and believes the administration should release more information. Still, Bass is 'ecstatic' about Trump's presidency. 'I think he's done a fantastic job, he's done more than he's said he's going to do, and I don't think this will make any difference whatsoever,' said Bass, a Republican who voted for Trump in each of the last three elections. Trump has struggled to shake off the Epstein issue, though, and after initially lashing out at supporters who questioned his administration's handling of the case, the president and his team have been seeking ways to placate critics. DOJ officials announced July 22 that they will seek to interview Ghislaine Maxwell, an Epstein associate found guilty of aiding his abuse. Duchesne, the Louisiana makeup artist, said she's moderately disappointed in Trump's handling of the Epstein case. If the truth is so 'vanilla' then why not just release the records, she wondered. 'It makes me look at you sideways,' she said. 'You're deflecting. Why aren't you just releasing?' Contributing: Aysha Bagchi

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store