How Shane O'Farrell's family spent 14 years searching for the truth after fatal hit-and-run
he was the victim of a hit-and-run near his home in Carrickmacross, Co Monaghan
. A law graduate, he had just submitted his master's thesis and was enjoying a carefree cycle on that August evening in 2011.
Questions around how the crash happened soon turned to who was behind the wheel. It was Lithuanian Zigimantas Gridziuska, a man known to the Garda and the courts.
During his time in Ireland he had been before the courts many times and accumulated many convictions.
On the day he killed Shane and drove off, he had more than 40 convictions, including some in Northern Ireland.
READ MORE
So how was he free to go out and kill? He had breached his bail conditions many times so why was he not in prison? And where was the justice for Shane when Gridziuska was before the court for the fatal hit-and-run but walked free, allowed return to his family in Lithuania?
Since 2011, the O'Farrell family has been seeking answers and has worked tirelessly to understand how the justice system failed their son and brother. His parents Lucia and Jim, and his sisters, Hannah, Pia, Gemma and Aimee were in Leinster House last Tuesday to hear Minister for Justice
Jim O'Callaghan
give a State apology to the family 'for the fact that the criminal justice system did not protect him [Shane] as it should have'.
Gemma O'Farrell tells In the News about the family's long campaign, how they were stonewalled and disrespected by branches and agencies of the State that should have helped them and how they persisted despite all that.
There are, however, still questions to be answered around the institutional failures in the justice system – not only how they relate to their brother's case, but to others.
Presented by Bernice Harrison. Produced by Suzanne Brennan and John Casey.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on climate policy: Government must avoid backsliding
Methane arising from agriculture and the fossil fuel industry is a notorious greenhouse gas, contributing significantly to global warming. While it breaks down relatively quickly in the atmosphere – unlike carbon dioxide – it is a serious threat to climate stabilisation. The quicker it is reduced, the more global average temperatures can be cut. Much can be done to reduce methane releases in oil and gas production, but it is much more challenging in agriculture. Livestock exporting countries like Ireland and New Zealand are supporting a new approach to classifying methane which is gaining political traction. This is based around achieving national 'temperature neutrality', also known as 'no additional warming'. The Government has yet to take a formal position on the concept. Significantly it got the backing of the Climate Change Advisory Council, its key advisory body. It chose to interpret Ireland's legally-binding climate neutrality obligations in terms of temperature neutrality – rather than the more onerous target of 'net zero emissions'. An international study , published in the Environmental Research Letters journal this week, has questioned this approach. It says that it 'grandfathers high emissions from wealthy, livestock-exporting nations', shifts the burden of cutting emissions to others, and limits space for lower-income countries to grow food systems. The approach fails on food security grounds, with trade data showing most exports serve high-income markets. This risks locking in inequality and misses 'a critical opportunity to reduce peak warming'. READ MORE The most concerning finding was highlighted by lead researcher Dr Colm Duffy of the University of Galway: 'If every country adopted a temperature neutrality target, we'd seriously jeopardise the Paris agreement's goal of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees or even 2 degrees.' The Government is in a bind on this. How methane is regarded in policy terms has big implications for carbon budgets up to 2040, which must be signed off on soon. Climatologist Prof John Sweeney has argued that the shift, which reduces the required emissions reduction target, is not aligned with scientific recommendations and could hinder Ireland's ability to meet its climate goals. The study emphasises that governments must set targets that are internationally credible and farmers need to be supported within a national framework, rather than targeted for blame. The bottom line is that Ireland will not meet the global climate challenge by redefining climate targets. Ireland has yet to deliver an honest appraisal of what a genuinely climate-neutral, sustainable and resilient agricultural sector could look like in coming decades. Avoiding this issue would amount to backsliding on vital climate action.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Airport security man demoted for kissing colleague should get job back, says WRC
Airport chiefs have been urged to give a security worker his old job as a supervisor back after he was demoted for kissing a subordinate while they were at work together on a screening line two summers ago. The decision to demote the worker from airport search supervisor to a junior position on the airport search unit was 'excessive', a Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) adjudicator decided in a non-binding recommendation under the Industrial Relations Act 1969. The tribunal heard the supervisor had more than five years' service on the airport search unit, screening passengers and baggage, with two years as supervisor, when he was placed under investigation in September 2023 and suspended. The employer said it considered the complainant to have committed gross misconduct by 'kissing a colleague during active operational duties' on the two days before his suspension. READ MORE The other worker, a more junior airport search unit officer, had been operating an x-ray machine on one occasion, and was working in a 'premium services area' under the supervisor on the other occasion. The outcome of the disciplinary process was that the complainant was demoted from his €46,000 a year supervisor post and placed on a final written warning. The decision reflected the 'safety-critical nature of the breaches, the worker's leadership responsibilities and the need to preserve the integrity of security operations', the employer submitted. The disciplinary officer's view was that the kissing 'had the potential to compromise both safety and the employer's reputation'. The demotion and warning were upheld on appeal, an internal appeals officer taking the view that the sanction was 'consistent with those issued in comparable cases', the tribunal heard. Joseph Ateb of the Siptu Workers' Rights Centre, who appeared for the worker, said his client had appealed the decision as being 'excessively harsh' and contended that his previous good record in employment was not given due consideration. The final written warning had expired by the time the WRC heard the case, leaving only the demotion as an issue, the tribunal noted. Adjudicator Breiffni O'Neill wrote that the employer's decision not to consider transferring the supervisor to another department 'calls into question the true extent of the safety concerns'. 'This inconsistency undermines the credibility of the employer's rationale and suggests a lack of proportionality,' he wrote. 'In light of the worker's unblemished prior record, his acceptance of responsibility and the employer's failure to consider a less punitive and reasonable alternative, I find that the additional sanction of demotion was excessive,' Mr O'Neill wrote. His recommendation on the dispute was that the demotion be rescinded and that the worker be reinstated as a supervisor 'with full restoration of duties and remuneration' within a week. The recommendation was published without the names of either the worker or his employer, in line with the WRC's usual practice under the Industrial Relations Act's voluntary arbitration process.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Inquest into prisoner's death delayed after DPP ‘mislaid' file, court hears
An inquest into the death of a prisoner has been adjourned for a further three months after a file for the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) was 'mislaid', a coroner's court sitting has heard. Michael Devlin absconded from the Shelton Abbey open prison in Arklow, Co Wicklow, in 2020 and remained on the run until he was detained again in January 2024. He died about a month later in Cloverhill Prison. He died from complications associated with supraglottitis, an acute bacterial infection that can cause severe airway obstruction. At a preliminary hearing at Dublin District Coroner's Court on Wednesday morning, Det Insp Brian Hanley sought a further adjournment of three months, as a file has been submitted to the DPP concerning the death. READ MORE Upon questioning from Michael Finucane, representing Mr Devlin's family, Det Insp Hanley said a file was initially submitted in hard copy form in May. 'Following an inquiry after this date, it became apparent that the file had been mislaid. It was resubmitted approximately two weeks ago,' he said. The DPP subsequently requested the postmortem report, which was not included with the file. This was requested by gardaí last week. 'I am mystified as to why a file would be submitted to the DPP in relation to a death in custody without the postmortem report,' Mr Finucane said. Mr Finucane said he had several questions relating to the 'expeditious nature of the investigation or lack thereof'. These included the delay in requesting a postmortem and the delivery and subsequent mislaying of the file for the DPP. Coroner Dr Clare Keane said the questions were 'reasonable' but would not hear such evidence during a preliminary hearing and adjourned the case until November. In a separate case, the family of a 38-year-old man who died in a workplace-related incident in December 2019 said they are 'in limbo' after a request was made for a further adjournment. Health and Safety Authority (HSA) inspector Frank Kearns sought an adjournment of six months as a file concerning Karl McKeon's death remains with the DPP. 'I understand the last time I was here, six months ago, it was also with the DPP then,' he said. Family members present said they were unaware the case would be pushed out again and expressed frustration that they have been waiting almost six years for answers. 'Karl's five and a half years dead, and it's destroying our family. We don't know why he died or how he died,' his mother, Mary, said. Noting she has been in hospital three times since her son died, she said: 'I don't know if I'm going to live to find out what happened to my son.' 'The HSA had it for a very long time and now it's been in the DPP's hands and I think at this stage, we should be having answers and maybe we'd be able to go up to Karl's grave and know why he's lying in the grave,' she said. 'I've actually rung the DPP myself,' she said, adding that she has 'given up'. 'It's heartbreaking and I can't do it any more,' she said. Dr Keane asked the HSA inspector to contact her office if updates arise, and another preliminary hearing will be listed 'immediately'. She adjourned the case for a further three months. Separately, the case of John Murphy, a 41-year-old who died after sustaining extensive burn and blast injuries in an industrial incident at the Stryker plant in Carrigtwohill, Co Cork, has been adjourned for a further six months. Mr Murphy died at St James's Hospital in Dublin almost two months after the incident in June 2023. Mr Kearns said the death is still under investigation by the HSA, but a file will be submitted to the DPP.
