logo
‘Last resort': Scott Morrison backs US attack on Iranian nuclear sites

‘Last resort': Scott Morrison backs US attack on Iranian nuclear sites

News.com.au5 hours ago

Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison has backed US President Donald Trump's decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities as 'a last resort', urging Australia to now speak with clarity about why the US had to act.
Describing the bombing as 'a necessary event', Mr Morrison stressed that the United States had launched a targeted mission and was not proposing regime change.
Speaking on Sky News, he said it reflected the fact the US was the only ally of Israel with the military hardware to penetrate Iran's underground nuclear bunkers.
'There were no other options available to the President,'' Mr Morrison said.
'I think President Trump has been very clear about seeking to get an agreement with Iran.
'This was completely rejected, and made it very clear that there was no negotiation now there was the opportunity for complete capitulation and that was not offered, and they are the only military in the world that is capable of doing what it has just done, and that is what has happened.'
But in a barbed observation on the conduct of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong he urged Australia to now speak with 'clarity.'
'Well, it's time for some clarity. I think there's been far too much ambiguity about this from Australia, far too much ambiguity,'' he said.
'And it's time for clarity. And the clarity is we were dealing with a theocratic authoritarian state that sponsored an attack on a close friend in Israel back on October 7.
'They have shown their true colours. And Iran is not a friend of Australia. It's not a friend of Australia's interests. This is not a conflict not with the people of Iran who are wonderful people.'
Mr Morrison said that President Trump would have been a reluctant convert to involving the US military in the conflict.
'The President came to office with a peace through strength doctrine, and we have now seen what that means when all other avenues fail,'' Mr Morrison said.
'This is a President that I think doesn't wish to rush to these outcomes or to use these capabilities, but if necessary will. And as a result, a massive blow has been struck against Iran's nuclear capability.
'This is not something that I believe he wants to see widened, but this hopefully resolves that question of their nuclear capability, which is something that has been sought for a very long time.'
The big issue to understand Mr Morrison said was that only the US had the capability to drop a bomb that could target Iran's underground nuclear bunker.
'I think obviously, if Israel had been capable of doing this, then, then that would have been the preferred option, no question other than to evolve, you know, the direct defensive capability of the United States, that would not have been a preferred option, as I said, it became the necessary option,'' he said.
'Now Israel will make its own decisions about how it continues to prosecute its conflict with Iran, the US has played, I think, a very specific role here which only they could have, only they could have done. I think that needs to be underlined. That was the only reason I believe that this would have drawn the US directly into this.'
Mr Morrison said it was not about 'regime change' in Iran.
'This is not the place that President Trump would rather be. He has not rushed towards this and further. This is not about the US trying to oppose some sort of regime change,'' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

World braces for what Iran might do next after US attacks three nuclear sites
World braces for what Iran might do next after US attacks three nuclear sites

Daily Telegraph

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Telegraph

World braces for what Iran might do next after US attacks three nuclear sites

Don't miss out on the headlines from World. Followed categories will be added to My News. Israel has shut down schools and banned gatherings across the country, and American troops are bracing for counter-attacks, as the world waits to see how Iran will respond to today's US strikes. Iran has already launched missiles at Israel as its Tel Aviv citizens scramble to shelter with reports of some casualties. President Donald Trump said the US 'successfully' carried out air strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, 'obliterating' the Fordow facility as well as those in Natanz and Isfahan. After the attacks, Hossein Shariatmadari, a representative of Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said the Islamic republic was ready to respond. 'Now it is our turn to, without wasting time, as a first step, fire missiles at the US naval fleet in Bahrain and at the same time close the Strait of Hormuz to American, British, German and French ships,' he said in the Iranian Kayhan newspaper. Later, an official statement from the Iranian Foreign Minister warned 'the United States has launched a dangerous war' and would be 'fully responsible' for the 'consequences'. Israeli air defence system fires to intercept missiles during an Iranian attack over Tel Aviv, Israel, Saturday, June 21, 2025. (AP Photo/Leo Correa) Mr Trump told Iran the US was willing to continue its aerial campaign on Iran, including 'greater' future attacks, if it did not comply with peace efforts. 'Any retaliation by Iran against the United States of America will be met with force far greater than what was witnessed tonight,' he said in a late-night post to Truth Social. As the world waits to see how the Iran will respond, US military leaders are reportedly warning troops to brace for potential retaliatory strikes. There are more than 40,000 US troops and civilians working for the Pentagon across the Middle East, according to figures from the New York Times, in nations such as Iraq, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emitrates. US President Donald Trump addresses the nation, alongside US Secretary of State Marco Rubio (R) from the White House in Washington, DC on June 21, 2025, following the announcement that the US bombed nuclear sites in Iran. Picture: Carlos Barria / NewsWire POOL Experts all agreed that Iran would retaliate against the US and Iran's foreign minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi hinted on social media that nothing was off the table. He described the US attack as 'outrageous' and one that 'will have everlasting consequences'. 'The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations,' he wrote on X. 'The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences. Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behaviour.' 'In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defence, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people.' This handout satellite image provided by Maxar Technologies shows the Isfahan nuclear enrichment facility in central Iran on June 14, 2025, after it was hit by Israeli strikes. President Donald Trump said June 21, 2025 the US military has carried out a "very successful attack" on three Iranian nuclear sites, including the underground uranium enrichment facility at Fordo. Picture: Satellite image ©2025 Maxar Technologies / AFP Retired US army officer John Spencer told ABC News that Iran could respond to the conflict via an 'irrational route'. 'It could go with Hezbollah, which still has a lot of capabilities, against Israel, (and where) there are hundred of thousands of American citizens,' he said. 'It could (activate) Shia-backed militia groups in Iraq to attack American bases. It's ballistic program, which is about 50 per cent destroyed, it could make that fatal mistake of launching ballistic missiles at American bases within its range.' Meanwhile Omar Rahman, from the Middle East Council on Global Affairs, told the ABC that Iran had its 'back to the wall' and it's only option was to retaliate to ensure the regime's credibility. 'I think you're going to see some sort of military response here against US assets and military installations in the region,' he said. 'That could be against aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf, it could be against any number of the bases and tens of thousands of US soldiers stationed in the region.' Chillingly, others have warned that the US attack good push Iran to develop a nuclear weapon and this was likely the beginning of the war, rather than the end. A picture of the destruction at site of an Iranian missile attack in a residential area in Beersheba in southern Israel, on June 20, 2025. Israel and Iran exchanged fire again on June 20, a week into the war between the longtime enemies. (Photo by MAYA LEVIN / AFP) Israel, meanwhile, is bracing for further Iranian retaliation. Shortly after Mr Trump confirmed the US strikes, the Israel Defence Force's Home Front Command declared all schools across the country would close, social gatherings were banned and only essential businesses were allowed to operate, effective immediately. Israeli military spokesman Avichay Adraee, who heads the IDF's Arab media unit, issued an update to security restrictions in Israel. 'It was decided to move all regions of the country to the level of essential work,' he wrote on X. 'The instructions include prohibiting educational activities, gatherings, and work centres, with the exception of essential work areas.' People sit outside pitched tents as they take shelter at a bus station in Tel Aviv on June 21, 2025 amid fears of an Iranian missile attack. (Photo by AHMAD GHARABLI / AFP) Around the world some are sounding the alarm that the escalation of the war could result in dire consequences. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned the US strikes on Iran were a 'dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge – and a direct threat to international peace and security.' 'There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control – with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world,' he said. 'At this perilous hour, it is critical to avoid a spiral of chaos. There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy. The only hope is peace.' Originally published as World braces for what Iran will do next

World braces for what Iran will do next
World braces for what Iran will do next

News.com.au

time24 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

World braces for what Iran will do next

Israel has shut down schools and banned gatherings across the country, and American troops are bracing for counter-attacks, as the world waits to see how Iran will respond to today's US strikes. Iran has already launched missiles at Israel as its Tel Aviv citizens scramble to shelter with reports of some casualties. President Donald Trump said the US 'successfully' carried out air strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, 'obliterating' the Fordow facility as well as those in Natanz and Isfahan. After the attacks, Hossein Shariatmadari, a representative of Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said the Islamic republic was ready to respond. 'Now it is our turn to, without wasting time, as a first step, fire missiles at the US naval fleet in Bahrain and at the same time close the Strait of Hormuz to American, British, German and French ships,' he said in the Iranian Kayhan newspaper. Later, an official statement from the Iranian Foreign Minister warned 'the United States has launched a dangerous war' and would be 'fully responsible' for the 'consequences'. Mr Trump told Iran the US was willing to continue its aerial campaign on Iran, including 'greater' future attacks, if it did not comply with peace efforts. 'Any retaliation by Iran against the United States of America will be met with force far greater than what was witnessed tonight,' he said in a late-night post to Truth Social. As the world waits to see how the Iran will respond, US military leaders are reportedly warning troops to brace for potential retaliatory strikes. There are more than 40,000 US troops and civilians working for the Pentagon across the Middle East, according to figures from the New York Times, in nations such as Iraq, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emitrates. Experts all agreed that Iran would retaliate against the US and Iran's foreign minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi hinted on social media that nothing was off the table. He described the US attack as 'outrageous' and one that 'will have everlasting consequences'. 'The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations,' he wrote on X. 'The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences. Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behaviour.' 'In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defence, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people.' Retired US army officer John Spencer told ABC News that Iran could respond to the conflict via an 'irrational route'. 'It could go with Hezbollah, which still has a lot of capabilities, against Israel, (and where) there are hundred of thousands of American citizens,' he said. 'It could (activate) Shia-backed militia groups in Iraq to attack American bases. It's ballistic program, which is about 50 per cent destroyed, it could make that fatal mistake of launching ballistic missiles at American bases within its range.' Meanwhile Omar Rahman, from the Middle East Council on Global Affairs, told the ABC that Iran had its 'back to the wall' and it's only option was to retaliate to ensure the regime's credibility. 'I think you're going to see some sort of military response here against US assets and military installations in the region,' he said. 'That could be against aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf, it could be against any number of the bases and tens of thousands of US soldiers stationed in the region.' Chillingly, others have warned that the US attack good push Iran to develop a nuclear weapon and this was likely the beginning of the war, rather than the end. Israel, meanwhile, is bracing for further Iranian retaliation. Shortly after Mr Trump confirmed the US strikes, the Israel Defence Force's Home Front Command declared all schools across the country would close, social gatherings were banned and only essential businesses were allowed to operate, effective immediately. Israeli military spokesman Avichay Adraee, who heads the IDF's Arab media unit, issued an update to security restrictions in Israel. 'It was decided to move all regions of the country to the level of essential work,' he wrote on X. 'The instructions include prohibiting educational activities, gatherings, and work centres, with the exception of essential work areas.' Around the world some are sounding the alarm that the escalation of the war could result in dire consequences. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned the US strikes on Iran were a 'dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge – and a direct threat to international peace and security.' 'There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control – with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world,' he said. 'At this perilous hour, it is critical to avoid a spiral of chaos. There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy. The only hope is peace.'

Trump's Iran strike restores US role in global security
Trump's Iran strike restores US role in global security

AU Financial Review

time29 minutes ago

  • AU Financial Review

Trump's Iran strike restores US role in global security

Last Thursday, Donald Trump said he would make a decision about the United States joining Israel's air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities 'within the next two weeks'. In the end, he waited just three days before launching Sunday's surprise B-2 Spirit stealth bomber attack on three nuclear sites in Iran. It's another example of Trump's erratic style that is not ideal from the leader of the free world. The president was seemingly weighing up the domestic response from the isolationist wing of his America First base if the US became involved in the Iran-Israel conflict.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store