logo
EXCLUSIVE The poignant reason Brooklyn Beckham has decided to set up home in LA with wife Nicola Peltz is revealed as couple's £11m Hollywood mansion exposes new twist in family feud

EXCLUSIVE The poignant reason Brooklyn Beckham has decided to set up home in LA with wife Nicola Peltz is revealed as couple's £11m Hollywood mansion exposes new twist in family feud

Daily Mail​5 hours ago

The poignant reason behind Brooklyn Beckham 's decision to give up his life in London to set up home in LA has been revealed, after his new £11 million mansion exposed a shocking new twist in the family feud.
The chef, 26, and his wife Nicola Peltz have been in the midst of an escalating feud with his parents after the couple were absent from all of the former footballer's 50th birthday celebrations.
Sources previously claimed that Brooklyn has severed any ties to the UK by splashing out £11 million on a new home with Nicola in LA, sparking concerns it could deepen his feud with his parents.
However, an insider has told MailOnline that the decision has 'nothing to do with family dynamics,' with Brooklyn simply more at-home in LA after spending much of his childhood living in the US.
A source shared: 'This house has nothing to do with family dynamics. David and Victoria also own property in the US, this is no different.
'Both Nicola and Brooklyn's careers are based in Los Angeles, and Brooklyn spent part of his childhood there while his father played for LA Galaxy.
'During that time, he attended school in LA for several years and built a life and friendships in the city. LA has always felt like home to him.'
These revelations came as it's reported that the financial aspect of Brooklyn's new home that has sparked some tensions between his parents, and Nicola's father, billionaire Nelson Peltz.
The Sun are reporting that Brooklyn does not entirely own the five-bedroom mansion, with a majority of the property owned by Nicola.
Sources are now claiming that David and Victoria now feel their son is 'trapped,' especially after he signed an iron-clad prenup before he and Nicola married in 2022.
However, the Peltzs have accused the Beckhams of being 'tight' and failing to support their son.
It's thought that Brooklyn and Nicola's new home was largely paid for using her trust fund money, but as the creator of the fund, Nelson had to sign off releasing the funds, and the couple also contributed work savings when buying the property.
Referencing David and Victoria, a source said: 'When it came to buying this house, of course they weren't just going to hand their son millions of pounds — what sort of message does that send?
'Nelson Peltz, on the other hand, is a billionaire investor and he and his wife Claudia regard Nicola, their little girl, as the apple of their eye.
'Understandably, they want to indulge her and ensure she never struggles — they expected the Beckhams, worth half a billion themselves, might match them penny for penny. Or, at least, chip in with financials as and when.
'That hasn't always happened, so they are annoyed and telling people it's a bit tight, which would utterly enrage David and Vic if they knew.'
A source close to David and Victoria has disputed this, branding it 'nonsense.'
And another close to Brooklyn has also hit back at claims by his parents that his 'trapped' by the arrangement
They told MailOnline: 'It's disappointing—and frankly absurd—that anyone would try to twist Nicola and Brooklyn's marriage, and this meaningful milestone of home ownership, into something toxic.
'Their relationship is grounded in love, respect, and commitment.
'The suggestion that Brooklyn is 'trapped' isn't just false—it's a deliberately cruel and baseless narrative aimed at undermining a strong, loving marriage.'
MailOnline has contacted representatives for Brooklyn Beckham, and David and Victoria Beckham for further comment.
It comes after Brooklyn appeared to fail to publicly acknowledge Father's Day, despite his parents publicly reaching out.
David had told his children: 'I will always be there, no matter what' in an emotional Father's Day Instagram post.
He shared pictures of Victoria and their four children Brooklyn, 26, Romeo, 22, Cruz, 20, and Harper, 13, laughing and looking cheery in happier times.
Subtly reaching out to his eldest son, David insisted he will always be around to support all his children, even if times get tough.
He wrote: 'My most important & favourite job in life is being a dad... I'm so proud of all of you and like daddy ( sorry boys ) tells you every single day I will always be here for you no matter what...
'Mummy thank you for doing the most important part and making me a father there is no greater gift in life than making me a dad... Happy Father's Day... I love you kiddies more than you could imagine.. @victoriabeckham @brooklynpeltzbeckham @romeobeckham @cruzbeckham #HarperSeven @tedbeckhamdavid.'
David continued marking the day by sharing throwback snaps of his children to his Instagram stories, including Brooklyn, and tagged him in each individual capture.
Brooklyn's brother Romeo's ex-girlfriend Kim Turnbull had been at the centre of the row after Nicola reportedly claimed that she felt uncomfortable around her, with sources close to the US heiress saying that Kim had dated Brooklyn when they were teenagers, which she has now denied in a statement.
Sharing a statement on her Instagram page on Monday, Kim said: 'I've avoided speaking on this topic to prevent adding fuel to the fire, however it's come to a point where I feel the need to address it so I can move on.
'I will not continue to receive harassment or be embarrassed on the basis of lies, to fit a certain narrative.
'I have never been romantically involved in ANY capacity at ANY point with the person in question.
'Nothing between us has occurred further than a school friendship at age 16. I would like to remove myself from the ongoing conversation & set the record straight for the sake of everyone involved.'
Things came to a head when Brooklyn and Nicola were no shows at any of David's 50th birthday celebrations last month, with The Mail revealing that Kim has been made the 'scapegoat' in the feud.
They failed to attend any of football legend David's five celebrations to mark his milestone birthday, including celebrations in Miami, London, Paris the Cotswolds and a boys fishing trip to Scotland.
Brooklyn then seemed to fail to publicly acknowledge his father's Knighthood for his services to sport and charity as part of the King's Birthday Honours list.
David, 50, said over the weekend: 'It's been an emotional week I must admit. For me and for my family. It's obviously very special.
'It's a huge honour, but one that has been shared with myself and my family and so, it's been emotional.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What uncomfortable detail links the weddings of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle with Edward and Wallis Simpson? Royal biographer Robert Hardman reveals all on new Mail podcast
What uncomfortable detail links the weddings of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle with Edward and Wallis Simpson? Royal biographer Robert Hardman reveals all on new Mail podcast

Daily Mail​

time43 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

What uncomfortable detail links the weddings of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle with Edward and Wallis Simpson? Royal biographer Robert Hardman reveals all on new Mail podcast

Podcast All episodes Play on Apple Spotify On the latest episode of Queens, Kings and Dastardly Things, Royal biographer Robert Hardman reveals a striking parallel between the weddings of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle and Edward and Wallis Simpson. The episode, the second instalment in a new podcast miniseries examining the 'objectionable' lives of the first celebrity Royal couple, focuses on how the British establishment turned its back on Edward and Mrs Simpson following the King's abdication. Edward abdicated under the mistaken belief that he and his twice-divorced bride would be permitted back into the Royal fold. The Duke of Windsor expected his new wife to receive the royal titles and privileges due to a former King's bride. During preparations for their June 1937 wedding, it became apparent that Mrs Simpson would never gain full Royal status and that the couple faced complete exile from the family. The Wedding of Edward and Wallis Simpson After failing to convince the government and Commonwealth to accept Mrs Simpson as Queen, Edward abdicated on December 11, 1936. Simpson was deemed unacceptable because she was an American divorcée with two living ex-husbands, which violated both the Church of England's stance on divorce and the constitutional requirement that the monarch be the head of that church. The crown passed to Edward's brother George VI, who made him Duke of Windsor. Edward then fled to Europe while Simpson's divorce from Ernest Simpson was finalised. The former King reportedly felt relieved, 'liberated' from the great burden of the crown. As Mail Columnist Robert Hardman explained: 'Winston Churchill was said to have been in tears when he listened to the announcement of the abdication on the radio. 'One man who was not in tears was the King himself. His view was that the crown had been a terrible burden and that now, he was, in a sense, liberated. 'Edward believed he could continue being much loved without any of the hassle of going about his Royal duty.' 'He was definitely deluded – Edward failed to understand that the nation moves on quite quickly. They were a serious threat to the institution they had left behind.' Planning his wedding to Mrs Simpson, any hopes Edward had of retaining some form of Royal power were dashed. George VI forbade his brother from returning to England, forcing the couple to celebrate their union in France. The Church of England also refused to sanction the marriage, leaving an obscure clergyman, Robert Anderson Jardine, to conduct the service. On top of this, the new King, on the advice of the government, pressured members of the Royal family and aristocracy not to attend the wedding. 'Edward hoped to have lots of members of his family there', Hardman began. 'But he's told – they are not coming at all. George VI and Queen Elizabeth send a telegram – but that's it. They told all the other Royals they were not to attend. 'Dickie Mountbatten, always trying to ride two horses at once, writes to Edward saying he does want to be there, but the King won't let him. 'Even members of the aristocracy are told they cannot turn up. For example, Ulik Alexander, keeper of the Privy Purse and a great friend of Edwards is told he will lose his position if he attends. 'There's a lot of establishment pressure to completely boycott and ostracise this event. In the end, only seven British guests are in attendance.' The government's opposition to senior British establishment figures attending was not solely born out of spite. Officials knew that within Britain and across the Empire, there would be outrage at the prospect of Simpson being honoured as a full Royal. If the wedding resembled a state occasion, there were fears it might embolden Mrs Simpson to use the title Her Royal Highness. Hardman told the podcast: 'There is very strong pressure, from the other realms and dominions – that people do not want Simpson given Royal status. 'If she's made Her Royal Highness, people would have to curtsy to her. That cannot happen.' The event was equally poorly attended on the bride's side, leading the Royal biographer to draw a comparison with Harry and Meghan's wedding some 80 years later. Hardman said: 'Wallis had one member of her family there, her aunt Bessie. This slightly echoes Harry and Meghan's wedding in 2018, where only Meghan's mother attended.' To hear more stories of historical Royal gossip and court intrigue, listen to Queens, Kings and Dastardly Things now, wherever you get your podcasts. New episodes are released every Thursday.

The Waterfront review – this Dawson's Creek for grownups is perfect summer nonsense
The Waterfront review – this Dawson's Creek for grownups is perfect summer nonsense

The Guardian

time43 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

The Waterfront review – this Dawson's Creek for grownups is perfect summer nonsense

Do you miss Dawson's Creek now that you're all grown up? Kevin Williamson sees you. And he has reinvented his late-90s/early-00s tale of a close knit community round a watery area for an adult market. Not adult-adult, you understand – we're talking drug-running and crumbling family empire rather than sauce – but the main ingredients of his first TV hit are all here. Namely, masses of plot and some lightly sketched characters to keep it moving swiftly enough that nobody has time to stop and say 'Hang on, fellas – I simply don't believe a word of this!' Those of us who sat through several young women choosing Dawson over Pacey are only here for the second part of the phrase 'credible drama'. The Buckleys and their fleet have long dominated the small fishing town of Havenport, North Carolina. They are rich and troubled. More so the latter as they become less of the former because business is getting tougher and mighty patriarch Harlan (Holt McCallany, charismatic, humourless) took his hand off the tiller to have two heart attacks and left his inadequate son Cane (Jake Weary, uncharismatic, humourless) to run things for a bit. Cane decided the best way to do this was to start shifting illegal narcotics for wodges of cash and an unseen gangster called Owen. Alas, we open with a set of Cane's smuggling crewmen being offed by a gang of armed men, and Owen's $10m shipment going missing. Cane asks his cousin Lynette (Bethany DeZelle), at whatever the nautical equivalent of the DVLA, North Carolinian office is, to amend some paperwork to say that he sold the murder boat three months ago. I am sure this is a foolproof cover and that nothing will escalate. The Drug Enforcement Administration descends – but the family is so steeped in internecine warfare that they hardly notice. Harlan returns to the office to beat the living daylights out of Cane and advise the clan that the problem lies not in drug smuggling but in not drug smuggling enough. They need to cut the middle men out of the picture and take hold of the supply line themselves. OK, grizzled boomer. Cane's mother, Belle (Maria Bello), is secretly cutting a deal to sell a stretch of Buckley land to a developer. But! This stretch of land is sacred to the memory of Harlan's late mother, and he won't be grizzly pleased when he finds out. And! The developer wants to develop Belle's site too, if ya know what I mean. She is considering the offer. Meanwhile! Cane's sister Bree (Supergirl's Melissa Benoist, flying here too – albeit metaphorically – and, like Bello, improving the show with every scene she is in) has been given a job in the family bar and restaurant after rehab for alcohol and pill addiction. She is keen to get back to proper work but the Buckleys don't think she is ready. She has also lost custody of her son, Diller (Brady Hepner) to her cruddy ex-husband and is trying to repair their relationship on the boy's weekend visits. Unfortunately, Diller is unforgiving of her catalogue of sins – which I suspect goes back to naming him 'Diller' – and progress is slow. Harlan gives Diller a job in the restaurant, putting Bree in near-permanent breach of a court order to stay 300 feet away from anyone she has nomenclaturally abused since infancy, so, you know, that's a worry. Meanwhile, again! On top of the multimillion dollar drug debt, Cane is tormented by the return of his first love/high school sweetheart/soulmate, who is a totally differently pretty brunette from his wife and also married. His wife is called Peyton (Danielle Campbell) and his former girlfriend is called Jenna (Humberly González). That's really all there is to say about them. Twists and reveals come thick and fast. You'll never guess who Bree is seeing on the down-low, or where they met! You'll never guess which character played by an established character actor whose part initially seems too small for him turns out to be a double-crossing major player in the whole caboodle! You'll never guess how efficient and uninspiring the script is! You'll never guess which issues it nods towards so you don't feel like you're entirely wasting your time! Toxic masculinity, generational trauma, the father-son bond, class divides and the problems of the one per cent in a coastal location? Oh, you CAN guess – well done! You get the idea. It is escapist summer nonsense with – God, I hope – no pretensions to being otherwise. Dive into the adult creek and wallow in nostalgia as the waves of absurdity sweep towards shore. The Waterfront is on Netflix now.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store