Judge extends migrant status protections for 60,000 people from Central America and Nepal
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem determined that conditions in their home country no longer warranted protections.
Temporary Protected Status designations for an estimated 7,000 from Nepal was scheduled to end Aug. 5. And protections allowing 51,000 Hondurans and nearly 3,000 Nicaraguans to reside and work lawfully in the U.S. for more than 25 years were set to expire Sept. 8. The secretary said both Honduras and Nicaragua had made 'significant progress' in recovering from 1998's Hurricane Mitch.
Temporary Protected Status is a temporary protection that can be granted by the Homeland Security secretary to people of various nationalities who are in the United States, which prevents them from being deported and allows them to work. The Trump administration has aggressively been seeking to remove the protection, thus making more people eligible for removal.
The terminations are part of a broad effort by the Republican administration to deport immigrants en masse, by going after people who are in the country illegally but also by removing protections that have allowed people to live and work in the U.S. on a temporary basis.
Noem can grant Temporary Protected Status to people of various countries already in the U.S. if conditions in the home country prevent a safe return, such as natural disaster or political instability.
The Trump administration has already terminated TPS for about 350,000 Venezuelans, 500,000 Haitians, more than 160,000 Ukrainians and thousands of people from Afghanistan, Nepal and Cameroon. Some have pending lawsuits at federal courts.
Lawyers for the National TPS Alliance argue that Noem's decisions were not based on objective analysis of conditions at home countries, but predetermined by President Donald Trump's campaign promises and motivated by racial animus. They say designees usually have a year to leave the country, but in this case, they got far less.
'They gave them two months to leave the country. It's awful,' said Ahilan Arulanantham, an attorney for plaintiffs at a hearing Tuesday.
The government argues that Noem has clear and unreviewable authority over the TPS program and that her termination decisions reflect the administration's objectives in the areas of immigration and foreign policy.
Justice Department attorney William Weiland said it is not a pretext to have a different view of a program that provides temporary safe harbor.
'It is not meant to be permanent,' he said Tuesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Britain's new immigration hotspots mapped: Up to one in 20 residents in some boroughs are migrants who came here last year - so what is the figure in YOUR area?
Up to one in 20 residents in parts of England and Wales are immigrants who moved here last year, new analysis suggests. It comes after Government statistics last week revealed that the total population of the two nations shot up by 700,000 in 2023/24. Immigration fuelled the surge – the second largest since WW2. The Daily Mail can reveal that net international migration – defined as the difference between the number of people entering the country and leaving – was positive in all but one of 318 councils. Newham, home to roughly 374,000 people, saw an influx of 17,200 immigrants in the year to mid-2024. That suggests new migrants arriving from abroad in the last year now account for 4.6 per cent of the London borough's total population – roughly one in 20 people. Luton (4.3 per cent) and Coventry (4.2 per cent) had similarly high figures, according to estimates published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Experts say current immigration levels, which have hit all-time highs, are piling even greater pressure upon on housing, schools and the NHS. Our postcode search tool - available to use below - shows how the situation in your area has changed over the last 12 months, tracking births and deaths as well as net international migration. Robert Bates, research director at the Centre for Migration Control, said mass migration is 'changing the very fabric of Britain'. He said: 'Assimilation has been made impossible by the sheer scale of mass migration and our national culture is damaged as a result. 'Stretched public services - from the NHS and GP surgeries to public transport and schools - are being further eroded by a low wage, low-skill immigration system. 'Politicians have ignored the concerns of voters due to a misguided belief that open borders benefit the economy. 'We fast need a government which rejects this dogma and starts work to scrap a whole raft of failed visa routes, end foreign nationals' access to the welfare system, and invests in skills for the British workforce.' There were an estimated 61.8m people in England and Wales in mid-2024, up from 61.1m in mid-2023, according to the ONS' estimates. That increase, of 706,881 people, was eclipsed only by the 821,210 population rise in the 12 months to mid-2023, with growth in both years driven almost wholly by record rises in the number of migrants. Some 1.1m people are thought to have immigrated in the last 12 months, countered by the 450,000 believed to have emigrated. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage yesterday claimed the figures were' disastrous for the quality of life for everyone in the country'. There were slightly more births (596,012) than deaths (566,030) in the year to mid-2024, which added just 29,982 to the population. In terms of raw numbers, the biggest local authorities, such as Birmingham (38,700) had the most international migrants arriving. Given the West Midlands city has a population of 1.2million, however, the effects of international migration aren't as stark as they are in Newham. The City of London technically had the highest share of its current population down to international migration in 2024 (10.8 per cent) – although it is home to only 15,000 people. Only one local authority, South Holland in Lincolnshire, experienced a negative sum, due to more international migrants leaving than arriving. The ONS said it had 557 arrivals from abroad last year, but 695 people emigrated. Movement around the UK – known as internal migration – is recorded separately. Alp Mehmet, chairman of Migration Watch UK, said: 'The latest ONS figures are another eye-opener. 'While there is no breakdown of migration into nationality, sex, age or immigration status - as the ONS should do in the future - overall, the population of England and Wales increased by over 700,000 (the equivalent of Newcastle.) 'Just 30,000 of this was from births exceeding deaths.' Mr Mehmet also branded the government's response to the rising rates as 'complacent'. He said: 'Most worrying, these latest figures show that the speed with which the nature of our society is changing has not let up, and that the ethnic minority proportion of our population will become the majority in 30-35 years. 'The government must take decisive action to stem the immigration tsunami if we are not to become the island of strangers the Prime Minister referred to a few months ago.' The ONS cautions there might be some overlap in the data, although it is unclear by how much because of the difficulties in examining population flow. For example, the same person could be classed as both an international immigrant and internal emigrant. They could also die, further confusing the picture. Tory shadow Home Office minister Katie Lam said the data showed the population is rising at 'an unsustainable pace'. She said: 'This isn't about numbers on a spreadsheet, it's about pressure on housing, NHS waiting lists, school places, wages and it's about community and our culture. 'Britain simply cannot plan or build fast enough to keep up. 'We must secure our borders and deliver a fair and sustainable immigration system that works for the British people.' However Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said yesterday the figures 'confirm the truth of the Tory legacy on immigration'. She added: 'Their failed open borders experiment resulted in net migration quadrupling to a peak of almost a million per year in 2023 even as they promised it would fall. 'Since the election, net migration has come steeply down, and as part of the Government's Plan for Change we have set out new measures in the Immigration White Paper and have already changed immigration rules to bring net migration down further. 'To be successful, effective and fair, our immigration system must be properly controlled and managed. Out of the chaos and failure of the Tory past, that is what this Government will deliver.' Keir Starmer unveiled a crackdown on immigration in May, warning that failure to control the system risked turning Britain into an 'island of strangers'. Downing Street was forced to deny angry comparisons from MPs that it was an echo of Enoch Powell's infamous 'Rivers of Blood' speech. Scrambling to blunt the threat of Reform, Sir Keir has vowed to give voters what they had 'asked for time and time again' as he announced a package to 'take back control of our borders'. However, the month after the speech Sir Keir went on to say he 'deeply regretted' it, despite polling showing most Brits had no problem with the language used. His package of long-awaited policies to curb immigration involved a hiking of the skills threshold for immigrants and a toughening of the rules on fluency in English. Migrants will also be required to wait 10 years for citizenship rather than the current five and face deportation for even lower-level crimes. Policymakers estimate the Government's package will bring down annual inflows by around 100,000. It comes after Sir Keir signed a deal with French president Emmanuel Macron in a desperate attempt to solve the small boat Channel crisis. The Prime Minister and his French equivalent announced a 'one in, one out' migrant swap deal, although it was far less ambitious than expected.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Texas homeowners sue Trump for border wall plans that'll ruin their picturesque walks and fishing spots
A group of Texas landowners are railing against President Donald Trump as he seeks to force them to sell parts of their property to build his long promised border wall. Residents in Starr County, in southern Texas, are being hauled to court to face off with high-powered administration lawyers who have filed eminent domain lawsuits. Eminent domain cases are used to force landowners to sell private property for public use, even if the owner does not want to sell. Alejo Clarke, who has lived in the county for 58 years, told The Wall Street Journal he is fighting back against the order. The Trump administration is seeking one acre of his land in order to erect the 18 foot wall. Trump was elected on a campaign promise to make America safer by securing the borders and conducting mass deportations. A spokesperson for the administration noted a border wall is 'the most safe and efficient way possible.' But Clarke claims doing so would cut him off from expansive plots of land where he has fished and hunted his entire life. 'I'm not gonna beat Trump - you know it and I know it,' he said. 'But if someone is going to kick your butt, are you just going to lie down?' Clarke maintained he has not noticed any security problems on his property, and said the billions of dollars the government has allocated to building the wall would be better spent helping farmers in the region bounce back from a water shortage. He claimed the government has offered just $3,000 in compensation for the land it plans to take. Clarke tried to fight a similar plan from the Trump administration during the first term in court by himself, but said that with only a seventh-grade education, he was out of his depth. Biden returned the land to him, but it's now once again at risk. He has hired a lawyer to help him fight the eminent domain lawsuit, but will struggle to afford the associated costs, he said. 'This is the piece they want to take out of me,' he said. 'My entrance y todo.' Raquel Oliva has found herself in a similar situation, fighting to keep land which has been in her family since 1798, growing crops of cotton, hay and tomatoes. The government filed proceedings in February to take over less than three acres of the family's land to construct a portion of the wall. But Oliva said the government's use of three acres would in turn block off access to more than 100 acres where her family has hunted, farmed and operated a gas well. The 75-year-old used AI to help her draft an objection letter to the government, arguing the wall would be detrimental to her family's work. She has requested a 16-foot access gate, an irrigation pipeline and more compensation. 'No one has a problem stopping illegal immigration or drugs, but we live on the border - it's always been like this,' Oliva said. 'Now it feels like an invasion of the government on us.' Since returning to power, the government has filed dozens of eminent domain lawsuits in Texas as the administration seeks to deliver on Trump's promise of securing US borders. These cases are often complex because they involve small patches of land with generations of owners and poorly documented titles. Some of the cases list upwards of 100 defendants who have ownership claims over tiny pockets of land, while others list 'unknown heirs' of late former owners. But Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said completion of the border wall is crucial to the government's policy and national security. ' Successful mass deportations mean nothing if we don't control the border and keep future illegal aliens out,' she recently wrote in a New York Post opinion column. 'That's why the BBB legislation also funds hundreds of miles of new border wall and water-based barriers in the Rio Grande, which will permanently secure the border for decades.' Trump is also ramping up a hiring spree for Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. The administration has carried out 239,000 deportations so far this year, according to data published by The Washington Post last lmonth.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Daughter of priest, 20, is arrested by ICE for overstaying her religious visa for two years
A Purdue University student and the daughter of a pioneering Episcopal priest has been arrested and placed in expedited deportation proceedings after attending what was supposed to be a routine immigration court hearing. Yeonsoo Go, 20, who arrived in the US from South Korea in 2021 on an R-2 visa, was taken into custody by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on July 31 outside the federal courthouse at Federal Plaza in Manhattan. The move has ignited fury across faith communities, civil rights groups, and Korean American advocacy organizations. Go's attorney insists her visa is active and valid through the end of this year, while the Department of Homeland Security says it expired more than two years ago. 'She was with her mother. She was heartbroken. And when she called me at night, later that day, she was breaking down,' said her boyfriend, Leo Chu to Fox 5. 'She was terrified. She didn't know what would happen next.' Go, a graduate of Scarsdale High School in Westchester County, moved to America when she accompanied her mother, the Rev. Kyrie Kim, a trailblazing Episcopal priest and first woman ordained in the Seoul Diocese of the Anglican Church of Korea, to New York under a dependent visa. Her attorney and family say her stay was legally extended in 2023 and that she is lawfully enrolled at Purdue University. Her next court date had already been scheduled for October, but ICE agents were waiting outside the courtroom. According to advocacy groups and church leaders, five plainclothes officers surrounded Go and detained her immediately after the judge adjourned her hearing. No warrant was presented at the scene, and she was not given the opportunity to speak further with her attorney before being taken away. 'This is simply an incomprehensible situation,' her mother, Rev. Kim, told Yonhap News Agency. 'I've been active in protecting the rights of Korean immigrants through the New Sanctuary Coalition, but I never imagined that my own family would become a target.' 'She was supposed to return to school,' said boyfriend, Chu. 'Now we don't know what's going to happen.' The family have set up a GoFundMe to help with expenses. Officials with the Department of Homeland Security offered a starkly different version of events. 'Yeonsoo Go, an illegal alien from South Korea, overstayed her visa that expired more than two years ago,' DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. 'President Trump and Secretary Noem are committed to restoring integrity to the visa program and ensuring it is not abused to allow aliens a permanent one-way ticket to remain in the US. ICE arrested her on July 31 and placed her in expedited removal proceedings.' But her attorney and supporters say that assertion is false. No warrant was presented at the scene, and Go was not given the opportunity to speak further with her attorney before being taken away 'She has a valid visa that expires in December 2025, and she has a pending application for extension,' said a legal representative for Go. 'The judge was satisfied enough to continue the case until October. There was no indication that she was to be taken into custody.' Since her arrest, Go has been held in an ICE holding facility at 26 Federal Plaza, a building that clergy say is unfit for human confinement. 'Her mother receives regular calls from Yeonsoo, and she's being held at 26 Federal Plaza, which, as we know, is not a facility with showers, beds or hot meals,' said Rt. Rev. Matthew Heyd, bishop coadjutor of the Episcopal Diocese of New York. 'These detentions are not only illegal - they're immoral.' Go's mother, devastated and unable to visit her daughter, said ICE told her Yeonsoo may be transferred to a separate detention facility, but refused to disclose when or where. The incident has triggered an immediate wave of protests and condemnation from across the religious and immigrant rights landscape. On Saturday, faith leaders, elected officials, and immigration advocates stood shoulder-to-shoulder outside the ICE building in lower Manhattan to demand her release. 'We call for the end of weaponization in our courts,' Bishop Heyd declared to a crowd of supporters and reporters. 'We stand up for a New York and a country that respects the dignity of every person.' The New York Immigration Coalition (NYIC) joined the Episcopal Diocese of New York and the Interfaith Center of New York to organize the press conference. Posters demanding Go's release were plastered on the courthouse fence, alongside flowers and handwritten notes of support from local high school classmates. 'Her fears have come true,' said Gabriella Lopez, a friend of Go's. 'She's been nervous about this, especially given the climate. And now this is happening - to her, to her family. It's terrifying.' Murad Awawdeh, president and CEO of NYIC, warned others with pending hearings to be vigilant. 'I think it's critically important that anyone who needs to go to an immigration court hearing call the New York State Office of New Americans and their hotline,' Awawdeh said. 'Make a family preparedness plan. If possible, work with a lawyer to set up a virtual hearing.' Korean American community leaders say the episode is part of a disturbing trend of rising enforcement actions targeting Korean nationals regardless of their legal status. Lee Myung-seok, president of the Korean American Association of Greater New York, called the arrest 'a clear violation of human rights' and vowed to file a formal letter requesting Go's immediate release. South Korea's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has also stepped in, stating that its diplomatic missions in the U.S. are providing consular support to Go. 'We are engaging in necessary communication with the US side regarding this issue,' a ministry official told The Korea Times. The case echoes the recent detention of Tae Heung Will Kim, a Korean green card holder and Texas resident who was taken into custody at San Francisco International Airport last month. Kim, a Ph.D. student, was held at the airport for more than a week before being transferred to an ICE facility in Arizona. His family has not received information about his condition or location. As outrage builds, activists are demanding urgent federal oversight and accountability for what they say is a pattern of unjustified enforcement.
