logo
Trump wants to mobilize troops in DC – it went horribly for him in Los Angeles

Trump wants to mobilize troops in DC – it went horribly for him in Los Angeles

Yahoo11 hours ago
Trump made a much-teased announcement on Monday that he would invoke a never-before-used presidential authority to seize control of Washington, D.C.'s police department from local control to his Attorney General Pam Bondi.
The president also announced he would deploy the National Guard on the streets of the nation's capital as a plan to 'rescue' the city from rampant crime, despite the fact that crime dropped in Washington by 35 percent last year after it spiked during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Trump had teased a federal takeover of Washington and has decried homelessness and graffiti in the city. Republicans have encroached on Washington, D.C's home rule for decades. The fact it is a majority Black city with a Black political establishment has also made it easy to attack the same way Trump has attacked Baltimore and other cities run by Black mayors.
Of course, this is not the first time that Trump has taken control of a major American city. Earlier this year, after protests against raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Trump deployed the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles without the consent of the governor of California or the city's mayor.
Trump may be hoping his actions will boost his approval ratings, which have been sagging in recent months. But a simple look at the numbers shows that it might backfire precipitously.
First, let's get to the kernel of truth in Trump's idea. Voters in Democratic cities did vote against their leaders partially because of crime. New York City elected Eric Adams, a former police officer, as mayor in 2021. Voters in San Francisco kicked out mayor London Breed and voters in Los Angeles and Alameda beat back progressive prosecutors for lax policies toward crime.
While almost no Democratic presidential candidate has supported defunding the police it became a tagline for Republicans use to hit at Democrats.
That being said, it's fairly clear that Trump's approval ratings took a hit after he dispatched troops and the National Guard to Los Angeles.
When Trump first came into office this year, and even after he began his tariff regime, Americans continued to support him on immigration. In February, according to an Economist/YouGov poll, he still cracked 50 percent approval on immigration.
That number began to dip in April, after Trump sent Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the immigrant based in Maryland, to El Salvador. In April, Trump's approval number on immigration went to 45 percent. But by May, the same poll showed his approval on immigration started to rebound to 48 percent.
That would go 'poof' in June once Trump began to send troops to Los Angeles. By the middle of June, a plurality of Americans thought that his response to the anti-ICE protests was too aggressive and 52 percent disapproved of his policies on immigration. By the end of June, 50 percent of Americans opposed Trump's policies on immigration. and his number has stubbornly stayed there.
Not only that, as The Independent reported last month, polling from CBS News and CNN bore that out as well. The CNN poll also found that 59 percent of Americans opposed the deployment of National Guard troops without the consent of the governor and 55 percent of respondents said protesters were justified.
While much of the attention when it comes to Trump's approval tends to focus on Jeffrey Epstein, it's clear that his approval began to collapse long before that scandal, when he began to deploy troops into the second-largest city in the United States.
Trump may be trying to bait protesters by having troops roving throughout Washington in hopes that it will create the type of unrest that happened in 2020 and in Los Angeles.
But the numbers show he might come to regret that. Voters may not like disorder and crime but they dislike overzealous responses from the government even more.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cantor Weighed Tariff Trades for Hedge Funds But Shut Them Down
Cantor Weighed Tariff Trades for Hedge Funds But Shut Them Down

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cantor Weighed Tariff Trades for Hedge Funds But Shut Them Down

(Bloomberg) -- Cantor Fitzgerald LP had internal discussions about facilitating trades for hedge funds based on the outcome of legal challenges to Trump administration tariffs, but shut down the idea before executing any transactions, according to people familiar with the matter. The New York brokerage and investment bank was run for three decades by US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, a key figure in the nation's trade policy, and is now led by his son Brandon. The younger Lutnick was asked in a letter from Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ron Wyden released Thursday to disclose transactions or agreements the firm has made relating to products that would let institutions effectively bet on the legality of President Donald Trump's tariffs. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets Cantor received a client inquiry about possibly facilitating such trades, which are done by larger Wall Street banks, and some staff discussed with potential clients about arranging them before the idea was rejected, said the people, who requested anonymity to describe internal deliberations. The firm takes no directional position on brokered trades, and only takes commission when it matches a buyer and a seller. 'We have not facilitated or executed any trades in that market,' Cantor spokesperson Erica Chase told Bloomberg by phone. Warren and Wyden had cited a late July report by Wired that alleged the financial services company created a 'litigation finance' product that allows it to bet that the courts will strike down the tariffs. In theory, such trades would connect a company vulnerable to US tariffs with a fund willing to bet that such tariffs might be reversed. 'Public reporting indicates that Cantor has offered companies the opportunity to trade their legal claim to a future tariff refund in exchange for 20 to 30% of the duties the company paid,' the letter said. 'In this scenario, if the courts determine that the tariffs are illegal, the company stands to recover hundreds of millions of dollars.' In reference to the cited story from July, Chase, the Cantor spokesperson, said 'what is being reported about our business is absolutely false.' Cantor's dealings have been a key area of focus for ethics watchdogs who are on alert for conflicts of interest, given Lutnick is a prominent figure in shaping Trump's policies and other potentially market-moving matters. Brandon Lutnick has said he wants the firm 'to be sitting at the heart of crypto,' an industry that has boomed under the current administration. Wyden, in an email to Bloomberg, accused Lutnick's son of 'brokering huge bets on policies the Commerce Secretary is personally directing.' 'When you've got the Commerce Secretary's son running the Commerce Secretary's old Wall Street firm,' Wyden wrote, 'you're going to face some tough questions about whether everything is on the level.' Among the questions the senators posed were how many tariff refund agreements Cantor has finalized, whether it created them at the request of a specific client and if anyone at the firm had communicated with people in the US government about the tariffs or related legal cases, including Trump and the Commerce secretary. (Updates with additional details throughout.) Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

Tim Walz Just Said What We're All Thinking About Trump's Smithsonian Plan
Tim Walz Just Said What We're All Thinking About Trump's Smithsonian Plan

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tim Walz Just Said What We're All Thinking About Trump's Smithsonian Plan

ABC News reports that Donald Trump is conducting a review of the Smithsonian Museum to make sure it aligns with his views of American History. Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said, "The Smithsonian is supposed to be a global symbol of American strength, culture and prestige. A place for families and children to celebrate American history and greatness. Instead, the exhibits have clearly been taken over by leftwing activists who have used the Smithsonian as yet one platform to endlessly bash America and rewrite / erase our magnificent story. These activists have obscenely defaced this beloved institution. The Trump Administration will proudly and diligently restore the patriotic glory of America and ensure the Smithsonian is a place that once more inspires love and devotion to this nation, especially among our youngest citizens." Related: Needless to say, people aren't comfortable with this audit! And now, Tim Walz's response to the news is going viral: "If you're trying to erase history, you're on the wrong side of it." Related: The comment section on his Facebook post is actually very funny... "Is he going to add planes to the revolutionary war section?" one person asked. Related: "…later this week he plans on personally surveying the museum and will be placing a McDonald's golden arches 'M' sticker of approval on every piece and or exhibit he approves of…" another person joked. And this is my personal favorite: "I'm excited for the interactive drinking bleach exhibit." Related: As this person said, "He must have read 1984 and got inspired." I guess we'll have to see what passes the Trump American history test. Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds:

Supreme Court allows enforcement of Mississippi social media age verification law
Supreme Court allows enforcement of Mississippi social media age verification law

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Supreme Court allows enforcement of Mississippi social media age verification law

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to block enforcement of a Mississippi law aimed at regulating the use of social media by children, an issue of growing national concern. The justices rejected an emergency appeal from a tech industry group that is challenging laws passed in Mississippi and other states that require social media users to verify their ages. NetChoice, which brought the lawsuit, argues the Mississippi law threatens privacy rights and unconstitutionally restricts the free expression of users of all ages. Mark Sherman, The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store