Is Utah's Legislature mounting a power grab or simply planning?
Whatever the outcome, SB337 has left a sour taste in the mouth of opponents who allege it is nothing more than a power grab that would be conducted under the 'shadowy' entity called the Beehive Development Agency made up of unaccountable board members who can do what they want with Utah land in the name of economic development.
'This horrible bill will bankrupt local governments by stealing tax revenues and defunding local services to give those funds to the shadowy lobbyists who prowl the hallways of the Governor's office and the Utah statehouse' said Zach Frankel, executive director of the Utah Rivers Council. 'If you think democracy is expensive, try communism' said Frankel.
Harsh words for a bill that seeks to streamline the development of big projects, with community buy-in — but opponents see it as a bulldozer to fast-track development in a veil of secrecy.
Senate Majority Leader Kirk Cullimore, R-Sandy, said the bill is designed to encourage 'big' projects and cut through red tape.
'It could be potentially a nuclear plant. It could be large manufacturing, or it could be really, really grand scale, mixed use developments. And what we're trying to address here is not not a new subdivision and a Walmart or something like that, but things that have large, large, significant impact on the state of Utah,' Cullimore said
But there were doubters in the committee hearing Tuesday, advancing the bill on a 3-2 vote.
'I've read through this several times, and of course, I've gotten a few emails messages, and I think they have a major problem when government kind of takes over. And you know, there's a lot of this about local control, and you said you take this preemption thing, but explain to me how, how you believe that this actually gets government out of the way. Because I've heard that argument on on the other side of this bill,' said Sen. John Johnson, R-North Ogden.
Cullimore said the bill is about consolidation and coordination of big projects.
'We have a lot of efforts like I mentioned, whether it's various development authorities, whether it's various housing programs, economic incentives, development incentives. And really, what this is doing is creating this development agency to coordinate all of these efforts, bring this together, so that, you know, we have one group over here working on something, and maybe the appropriate tools over here, and nobody's actually putting those things together. And so if we're going to have all these efforts, I think it's best that we do this in a coordinated fashion, so that we're making government more efficient in that respect, and making sure that the tools that we have are being effectively used.'
He added that the newly created Beehive Development Agency would entertain three projects a year, and would not be a wholesale assault on local control.
Others in the hearing disagreed.
'This bill is huge, something this broad, should never be brought out during the final week, when no one has the time to properly read and understand such a broad, sweeping bill and its implications,' said Kristin Richie with the Utah Eagle Forum.
Under the measure, the Governor's Office of Economic Opportunity would employ a new tool called the Beehive Development Agency. The catch is it would be an independent nonprofit with power over expansive bonding, land use and taxing authority.
The bill may have good intent and has powerful supporters, but that did not deter critics, with Marryann Christensen, executive director of Utah Legislative Watch, asserting it represents a tipping point for the public.
'I think that that confidence and trust in the Legislature is at an all-time low, and I think this bill will tip a lot of people over the edge. It's too much of a power grab, and after the inland port, the baseball stadium, the hockey arena, the Point at the Mountain development,' she said. 'And a lot of people have just had it with the legislature. They feel like you guys up here are not responsive. They don't want statewide control. They want local control. They don't want a new entity with taxing authority. '
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
California Republicans file suit to halt redistricting plan
California Republican legislators on Tuesday announced a state Supreme Court petition, an effort to stop Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) plan to redistrict House seats in the Golden State. 'Today I joined my colleagues in filing a lawsuit challenging the rushed redistricting process. California's Constitution requires bills to be in print for 30 days, but that safeguard was ignored. By bypassing this provision, Sacramento has effectively shut voters out of engaging in their own legislative process,' Assemblyman Tri Ta said on X. The petition cites a section of the state constitution that requires a month-long review period for new legislation. Democrats are working quickly to set up a special election that would let voters weigh in on the redistricting plan. Four state Republican legislators have signed on to the petition, according to a copy for a writ of mandate, shared by the New York Times. They're asking for immediate relief, no later than Aug. 20, and arguing that action can't be taken on the legislative package before Sep. 18. 'Last night, we filed a petition with the California Supreme Court to stop the California legislature from violating the rights of the people of California,' said Mike Columbo, a partner at Dhillon Law Group, in a Tuesday press conference alongside California Republicans. 'The California constitution clearly gives the people of California the right to see new legislation that the legislature is going to consider, and it gives them the right to review it for 30 days,' Columbo said. California Democrats swiftly introduced the redistricting legislative package when they reconvened after summer break on Monday, and are expected to vote as soon as Thursday. They have until Friday to complete the plan in time to set up a Nov. 4 special election. Columbo called that pace of action a 'flagrant violation' under the state constitution. Democrats are aiming to put a ballot measure before voters that would allow temporary redistricting, effectively bypassing the existing independent redistricting commission — which was approved by voters more than a decade ago and typically redistricts after each census — to redraw lines in direct response to GOP gerrymandering in other states. California Republicans have vowed to fight back. Democrats, on the other hand, are stressing that they're moving transparently to let voters have the final say on whether redistricting happens.
Miami Herald
13 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Trump wants to end mail-in voting. DeSantis says Florida's system is fine
Gov. Ron DeSantis said Tuesday that he doesn't think President Donald Trump's desire to ban voting by mail applies to Florida. Asked about Trump's vow on Monday to 'lead a movement' to end the use of mail-in ballots, DeSantis said he thought it only applied to states that send mail ballots to all voters. 'What he means by vote my mail, I think, just in my conversations, is the states like California and Nevada and others, where they just send all these ballots out into the ether,' DeSantis said during a news conference. He defended Florida's system, in which voters have to request a vote-by-mail ballot. 'I think what Florida has is absentee voting,' he said. He noted that county elections supervisors don't mail ballots to anyone who hasn't requested one. Trump's post on Truth Social made no such distinctions. He wrote that he would issue an executive order to bring 'honesty' to the 2026 elections by getting 'rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS' as well as 'Highly 'Inaccurate,' Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES.' 'It's time that the Republicans get tough and stop it, because the Democrats want it,' Trump later told reporters. Trump does not have the power to change voting laws. The Constitution gives states the power to set the 'times, places and manner' of elections. Trump's longstanding grievance with voting by mail — a method he has used to vote in Palm Beach County — has exposed rifts among Florida Republicans over the last few years. The state's GOP leaders have promoted the use of voting by mail over the last two decades, even changing the name from 'absentee' to 'vote by mail' to imply that voters don't have to be absent to make use of it. More than 3 million Floridians voted by mail in last year's election. But DeSantis and the party have had to bat down fringe elements who have embraced Trump's claims of widespread voter fraud, including with the use of mail-in ballots in Florida. Lawmakers have responded by making it harder to request, renew and submit mail ballots. DeSantis said Tuesday that voting by mail is 'popular' in Florida, and he questioned how banning it outright would work. 'Clearly, you would need some absentee [ballots] for military overseas [voters], right?' DeSantis said. 'I mean, so that's at a minimum, you'd need that.'
New York Post
13 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump's war on mail-in voting is futile — and could hurt the GOP
President Trump is threatening to wage war on mail-in ballots — and the GOP has to hope he thinks again before the 2026 mid-terms. In a Truth Social post, Trump said he is 'going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS,' and he'll start off with 'an EXECUTIVE ORDER to help bring HONESTY to the 2026 midterm elections.' Trump likes the idea of in-person, same-day voting, which has much to recommend it. Advertisement But mail-in and early voting are so ingrained and widespread that they aren't going anywhere. Most Republicans have concluded that there's no alternative to making use of these modes of voting, and crucially, they managed — most of the time — to get Trump on board in 2024. Advertisement This aided the Republican get-out-the-vote operation in a close election. Clearly, though, Trump believes that mail-in voting is a Democratic plot, and he also hates contemporary voting machines. Old-school paper ballots don't guarantee honesty, however: In an infamous instance of voter fraud, allies of Lyndon Johnson stuffed Box 13 with enough ballots to put him over the top in the very narrow 1948 Democratic Senate primary in Texas. Today's voting machines, moreover, were a reaction to the Florida fiasco in 2000, when punch-card ballots had to be painstakingly examined by hand with a presidential election at stake. Advertisement The fact is that vote-by-mail has been steadily growing since the 1980s, and it needn't favor one side or the other. In Florida, Republicans have long made it a priority to maximize mail voting. A study by the academic Andrew Hall of pre-COVID voting patterns in California, Utah and Washington found a negligible partisan effect as those states rolled out vote-by-mail systems. Advertisement Overall, turnout went up only very slightly, and 'the Democratic share of turnout did not increase appreciably.' Mail-in voting didn't change who was voting, but how they did it — encouraging, as you might expect, voting by mail rather than in-person. Vote-by-mail did have a strong partisan tilt in the COVID election of 2020, in part because Trump inveighed against it. In 2024, Republicans made a concerted effort to make up ground — and succeeded. The GOP went from 24% of the mail vote in the must-win swing state of Pennsylvania in 2020, to 33% in 2024. And Republicans outpaced Democrats in mail-in balloting in Arizona. The advantage to a party of getting people to vote early — whether in person or by mail — is that it takes high-propensity voters off the table. Then, a turnout operation can focus on getting lower-propensity voters to the polls. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters If no one votes until Election Day, party operatives waste time and money right up to the cusp of the election contacting people who are going to vote no matter what. Advertisement None of this is to say that all mail-in voting is equal. So-called universal mail-in voting, or automatically sending a ballot to every registered voter and scattering live ballots around a state, is a bad practice. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! The rules should be more stringent. Advertisement Georgia, for example, gets this right: You have to ask for an absentee ballot and provide your driver's license number or a copy of another form of valid ID. Ballots have to be requested at least 11 days before the election and must be returned by Election Day. The outer 'oath' envelope has to be properly completed or the ballot is subject to being rejected, although the county elections office will provide the voter a chance to 'cure' the envelope. Advertisement It's also important to count early and mail-in ballots quickly, something that too many states fail to do, with California — as usual — the worst offender. States should be expected to abide by whatever rules have been set prior to an election, rather than changing them on the fly, and they should ensure that voter rolls are regularly cleaned up. The real question about vote-by-mail isn't whether it is staying or going, but whether Republicans, too, will take advantage of it. Twitter: @RichLowry
