logo
Threats to immigrant children are a threat to Michigan

Threats to immigrant children are a threat to Michigan

Yahoo29-06-2025
A Cuban mother and daughter watch the sunrise while waiting to be being taken into custody by U.S. Border Patrol agents at the U.S.-Mexico border on December 07, 2021 in Yuma, Arizona. (Photo by)
Michigan's future relies on the resilience and resourcefulness of its children. But with net population decline projected by 2050 and sub-par educational outcomes among Michigan children, we need to be serious about creating a state where kids can get ahead. Immigrant families are critical to our state reaching its full potential.
In the past decade, immigrants have accounted for nearly 60% of the state's population growth, while contributing billions in state revenue and economic activity. Yet a new swath of regulations, largely aimed to deter immigration, could do irreparable harm to many of our state's youngest and most vulnerable residents.
In recent years, a surge of Unaccompanied Children (UCs) has crossed the southern border, entering Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) custody. These minors flee extreme circumstances where migration becomes an option of last resort. Michigan nonprofits serve children who made deadly journeys to earn money for their mothers' cancer treatments or escape coercive recruitment into criminal enterprises.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The Trump administration has characterized these vulnerable children — 67% of whom are aged 16 or younger — as a national security threat, directing ICE to specifically target them for deportation. A multi-agency review of 450,000 unaccompanied minors is underway, enabled by revoking the DHS sensitive locations policy that previously protected schools, churches and hospitals from immigration raids.
In February, ICE began conducting 'wellness checks' on immigrant children at schools — what the Young Center calls 'a pretext to locate, interrogate and deport children and families.' A new plan proposes mobilizing 21,000 National Guard troops to round up UCs.
The administration also targets children by attacking the adults they rely on. After arrival, UCs transfer to ORR custody for shelter and basic necessities. Most unaccompanied children are then released to the custody of a sponsor, usually a close family member, until their legal status is adjudicated. However, new policy changes enable ICE to obtain the legal status of sponsors from ORR, putting undocumented sponsors at deportation risk.
Central to this campaign is terminating the Flores Settlement Agreement — the backbone of child protections requiring the provision of food, water, clean clothing and medical care in government custody. While courts have historically upheld the Flores Settlement Agreement, successfully overturning it would enable indefinite detention of children in prison-like conditions.
Already, new Trump administration rules requiring stringent sponsor identification verification now keep children in shelters an average 217 days before family release — up dramatically from previous timelines.
On top of this, a proposed budget reconciliation fine could charge sponsors up to $8,500 per child, while other provisions impose $1,000 asylum application fees and $500 Special Immigrant Visa fees — visas UCs often need when aging out at 18. These barriers create pay-to-play systems, effectively holding children ransom from families.
Funding cuts are eliminating vital services. The Michigan Immigrant Rights Center (MIRC), the state's primary legal provider for unaccompanied minors, supporting 800 children, faced a March stop-work order cutting legal funding and forcing 72 layoffs. This leaves young children — including toddlers — to navigate the U.S. legal system alone.
Budget reconciliation threatens additional vital benefits for children. The proposed Child Tax Credit changes would require both parents to have Social Security numbers to qualify, potentially denying the $2,000 credit to 4.5 million American citizen children under age 17 based solely on their parents' immigration status. Cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) could affect 400,000 legal refugees and asylum recipients, while broader benefit reductions threaten extended family support systems that children depend upon.
When parents face deportation or detention, children experience toxic stress, which impairs brain development and increases risks of chronic mental health conditions, including depression and PTSD, plus physical conditions like cancer, stroke, diabetes and heart disease. Research shows most children experience at least four adverse behavioral changes following immigration-related parental arrests — such as chronic fear and disrupted eating and sleeping patterns.
These trauma responses directly undermine educational achievement and workforce preparation at a time when immigrants account for nearly 60% of Michigan's population growth over the past decade.
The cumulative effect could devastate Michigan families. With 300,000 Michigan children living in immigrant families — including 70,000 high schoolers representing 15% of the state's high school population — Michigan's economic future depends on these families' stability.
Michigan teachers and superintendents already report declining attendance among immigrant children, imperiling long-term development while families rush to create guardianships fearing deportations. By destabilizing families representing such a significant portion of Michigan's emerging workforce, these enforcement policies risk creating a traumatized generation while threatening the state's economic growth and development goals.
The Michigan League for Public Policy and our partners are working to make sure all kids have a chance to grow up strong and healthy in our state. We can't risk Michigan's future, or the lives of thousands of innocent kids who are looking for opportunity and family reunification, with shortsighted and harmful restrictions like these.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Critics Rock Trump Administration For Posting 'Delusional' And 'Backwards' Meme
Critics Rock Trump Administration For Posting 'Delusional' And 'Backwards' Meme

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Critics Rock Trump Administration For Posting 'Delusional' And 'Backwards' Meme

President Donald Trump has promised to revive the coal industry, and the Energy Department is serving notice that it's ready to move forward. The tweet on the Energy Department's official X feed shows a piece of coal and a Wendy Williams phrase that's become a meme: Trump has long promoted coal and other fossil fuels, and he has a grudge against most forms of clean energy. He famously despises windmills, but also isn't fond of solar ― nor does he like green-powered vehicles such as electric cars, despite briefly promoting former friend Elon Musk's Tesla vehicles at a White House event this year before the two fell out. Trump has also declared a national emergency to fast-track new energy production ― specifically nuclear, oil, gas, and coal. He seems to favor coal in particular, signing multiple executive orders to help the industry since taking office. Critics fired some clean burns back at the agency:

Trump hits Canada with 35 per cent tariffs
Trump hits Canada with 35 per cent tariffs

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump hits Canada with 35 per cent tariffs

WASHINGTON — Canada has been hit with 35 per cent tariffs after U.S. President Donald Trump followed through on his threat to increase duties if Ottawa didn't agree to a trade deal. The White House said the tariffs would not affect goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Prime Minister Mark Carney had tempered expectations of an agreement by Friday, saying Ottawa would only take the right deal for Canada. On Thursday, Trump gave Mexico a 90-day extension on trade negotiations but did not announce a similar offer for Canada. Trump's 50 per cent copper tariffs also came into effect just after midnight, but this latest duty exempts the raw input material. The copper tariffs are being added to a growing list of U.S. sectoral duties, which include duties on automobiles, steel and aluminum. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 1, 2025. Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press Sign in to access your portfolio

Trump pushed tariffs on Canada to 35 per cent, but a CUSMA carveout creates a shield
Trump pushed tariffs on Canada to 35 per cent, but a CUSMA carveout creates a shield

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump pushed tariffs on Canada to 35 per cent, but a CUSMA carveout creates a shield

WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump has increased tariffs on Canada to a staggering 35 per cent but a critical carveout is likely to shield most goods from the devastating duties. The White House has said the tariffs won't be applied to goods that are compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade, also known as CUSMA. Here's what that means for Canadian companies: What is CUSMA compliance? CUSMA was negotiated during the first Trump administration to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement. Companies can claim preferential treatment under CUSMA if they meet its rules of origin. While it is different depending on the product, generally it requires a specific amount of the goods be made of products or with labour originating from Canada, Mexico or the United States. About 80 to 90 per cent of Canadian goods might be able to comply with CUSMA's rules of origin, said Michael Dobner, the national leader of economics and policy practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers Canada. Not all exporters have filed the necessary paperwork to avoid the duties. There's been an increase in businesses claiming preferential treatment under CUSMA but it's not clear exactly how much of Canadian exports are currently compliant. Are any industries more at risk? Dobner said there's no specific industry that he expects to be hit the hardest. Certain companies may not be able to source input materials from North America to make their product. That means they would not be able to apply for preferential treatment under CUSMA and will face the 35 per cent tariff. But Dobner said "it's the minority of the exports of Canada to the U.S." What's the impact on small and medium-sized businesses? Small and medium-sized businesses may have not applied for CUSMA preferential status before Trump's tariffs because the process can be burdensome for enterprises of that size. Some small and medium-sized businesses might not meet CUSMA rules of origin requirements and don't have the financial flexibility to change their inputs to North American products. Dan Kelly, president and CEO of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, said many of these businesses were absorbing some or all of the costs associated with Trump's tariffs under the assumption that there would a resolution coming. Kelly said some small and medium-sized businesses facing the 35 per cent tariff may have to stop selling into the United States. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 1, 2025. Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store