logo
California Homeowner Slashes Asking Price By Half as Housing Market Struggles

California Homeowner Slashes Asking Price By Half as Housing Market Struggles

Newsweek5 days ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
A California home which was listed for sale at more than $3.5 million at the height of the pandemic finally sold for half its original asking price, as the country faces dwindling demand due to historically high mortgage rates and rising prices.
The property in Sonoma, one of the country's most important wine regions, sold for $1.9 million at the end of last month, according to Zillow, after the buyer apparently succeeded in negotiating a discount from the seller.
Why It Matters
The U.S. housing market has reached a breaking point, according to experts. Thanks to pent-up demand and lingering low inventory, home prices are still rising—but that is unlikely to go on for much longer.
Historically high mortgage rates—which are still hovering around the 7 percent mark—and growing economic uncertainty are discouraging buyers at the same time as more sellers are finally approaching the market, creating a mismatch between the two which experts say will finally cause prices to drop across the country.
This imbalance is particularly evident in Sonoma, which has experienced significant population declines since the pandemic—though the loss of residents has slowed down over the past year, according to recent data. Sonoma County's population peaked in 2015 at 141,530 people and declined by 194 in the past year, according to the California Department of Finance.
What To Know
The property, a single-family home with three bedrooms and four bathrooms sitting on 3,834 square feet of land in Sonoma, California, was built in 1973 and sold in 1994 for only $40,000—or about $10 per square foot.
Home values and prices have skyrocketed since then, especially in the years following the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, when many Americans moved from bigger, more expensive cities to smaller towns with a better quality of life and more affordable housing. Historically low mortgage rates sparked a homebuying frenzy, but a supply shortage in the U.S. housing market meant that buyers had to fight for a limited number of homes and agree to much higher prices to get the properties they wanted.
It is during this time, in April 2022, that the owners of the Sonoma home tried to sell the property for a staggering $3,545,000—a price tag nearly 9,000 percent higher than in 1994. The listing was removed a couple of months later and the property was relisted for a neat $3,500,000. But still it did not sell: the listing was removed and the price changed multiple times between 2022 and 2024, eventually settling for a sum below $2 million.
On May 27, according to Zillow, the Sonoma home sold for $1,860,000, or $485 per square foot. Records show that the price was 6.8 percent lower than the one asked originally by the seller in April, at $1,995,000, showing that the buyer managed to negotiate a lower price during the sale.
It is not a unique situation in the Sonoma market. According to Redfin, 22.7 percent of homes sold in Sonoma in April had price discounts, up 2.7 percent from a year earlier, while none sold above list price—down 16.7 percent from a year earlier.
A general view of a home advertised for sale in a residential neighborhood on August 15, 2024, in San Jose, California.
A general view of a home advertised for sale in a residential neighborhood on August 15, 2024, in San Jose, California.Only nine homes were sold in Sonoma that month, down 25 percent from a year earlier, after spending an average 56 days on the market before going under contract—19 days longer than they did in April 2024.
The median sale price of a home in Sonoma, according to Zillow, was $1,434,000 in April, up 12.7 percent from a year earlier.
What is happening in Sonoma is happening, with some local variations, all across the U.S. Inventory is growing, but buyers are either too cautious to get in the market or they cannot afford to.
According to BruingtonHargreaves, which helps people sell, buy or build homes in Sonoma County, inventory rose by a staggering 55.7 percent year-over-year in the first quarter of 2025 in the county, jumping from 490 to 764 average listings.
The increase was more significant in the market for homes under $2 million (64.1 percent) than over $2 million (31.2 percent). Despite these increases, the under $2m Sonoma County market is still in favor of sellers, BruingtonHargreaves said, while the market for over $2m homes is a strong buyers' market based on current demand.
What People Are Saying
Redfin Senior Economist Asad Khan said in a recent press release: "The balance of power in the U.S. housing market has shifted toward buyers, but a lot of sellers have yet to see or accept the writing on the wall. Many are still holding out hope that their home is the exception and will fetch top dollar
"But as sellers see their homes sit longer on the market and notice fewer buyers coming through on tour, more of them will realize that the market has adjusted and reset their expectations accordingly."
What Happens Next
The growth in inventory and the drop in sales reported across the country suggest that prices might come down this year as sellers across the country are forced to offer discounts and adjust their expectations to lure in reluctant buyers. But in order for affordability to significantly improve for buyers, mortgage rates will have to come down—something that experts do not expect to happen before throughout 2025 and 2026.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

President Trump sends harsh message to Federal Reserve on interest rate cuts
President Trump sends harsh message to Federal Reserve on interest rate cuts

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

President Trump sends harsh message to Federal Reserve on interest rate cuts

President Trump upped the ante on the Federal Reserve hours after the latest jobs report, angrily demanding Fed Chair Jerome H. Powell slash the federal interest rate to create greater demand for consumer loans and better terms for business investment. And POTUS wasn't shy about it. Related: Veteran fund manager resets stock market forecast amid Musk, Trump fallout The president pounded out a furious message to the central bank chair, once again calling him "Too Late" Powell in Truth Social media posts. The lashing included references to rate cuts in Europe, plus a debatable declaration that there is "virtually no inflation (anymore)." The President's June 6 comments came as the Department of Labor reported that hiring remained stable in May with employers adding 139,000 jobs, gains that were slightly higher than expected but down from April. The unemployment rate stayed the same at 4.2%, as expected by most economists. Image source:While stocks bounced on the jobs report and recession concerns eased a tad, there is still a strong sense of caution due to the recession and, in some corners, even stagflation concerns. The $36.21 trillion U.S. debt, one of the major points of debate of Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," now in the Senate, also made the president's screed. "If 'Too Late' at the Fed would CUT, we would greatly reduce interest rates, long and short, on debt that is coming due…Very Simple!!! He is costing our Country a fortune. Borrowing costs should be MUCH LOWER!!!,'' wrote President Trump. Related: Jobs report shifts Fed interest rate forecasts President Trump, just days before the June 6 jobs report, blasted the central bank chairman as "unbelievable" and a "disaster" on Truth Social for Powell's delay in lowering interest rates, a move Trump maintains is choking economic growth. Minutes from a meeting of the Federal Reserve Bank leaders, which was held in early May and released on May 29, show the central bank voted to undertake open market operations "as necessary" to maintain the federal funds rate in a target range of 4.25% to 4.50%. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System also voted unanimously in early May to approve establishing the primary credit rate at the existing level of 4.5%, meaning interest rates for lenders, consumers, and the rest of Americans likely won't fall in the short term. This led to Trump's increasing displays of frustration against Powell. Veteran fund manager Chris Versace wrote on TheStreet Pro that the market will likely rethink the three 25-basis point rate cuts expected per the CME's Fed Watch Tool. "With Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic signaling ahead of this data that he sees room for just one rate cut, the growing likelihood is more Fed heads will fall into that camp based on the aggregate data published this week." Versace says. " We also have to wonder if Bostic's comment helps lay the groundwork for the Fed's upcoming set of economic projections that it will publish alongside its next policy decision on June 18.'' Related: Analyst resets stocks, gold outlook after rally The chances of more than one rate cut in the second half of 2025 will likely increase if May CPI and PPI inflation data released this coming week support "May inflation data we've seen thus far and there is no meaningful progress on trade deals,'' Versace says. The president isn't buying it. "Too Late" at the Fed is a disaster! Europe has had 10 rate cuts, we have had none,'' Trump posted. Note that Europe has actually had eight central bank cuts recently, not ten. "Despite (Powell), our Country is doing great,'' Powell said. "Go for a full point, Rocket Fuel!" The "Rocket Fuel'' moniker is apparently a new one from the White House. A spokesperson for the Federal Reserve, responding to a comment about the full point cut, said, "We don't have anything to share here." Related: Veteran fund manager who predicted April rally updates S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Supreme Court allows DOGE staffers to access Social Security data
Supreme Court allows DOGE staffers to access Social Security data

UPI

time3 hours ago

  • UPI

Supreme Court allows DOGE staffers to access Social Security data

June 7 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court is allowing members of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency to access personal Social Security Administration data. On Friday, the Court's six conservatives granted an emergency application filed by the Trump administration to lift an injunction issued by a federal judge in Maryland. Opposing the injunction were the three liberal justices: Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. There are 69 million retirees, disabled workers, dependents and survivors who receive Social Security benefits, representing 28.75% of the U.S. population. In a separate two-page order issued Friday, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration for now to shield DOGE from freedom of information requests seeking thousands of pages of material. This vote also was 6-3 with no written dissenting opinions. In the two-page unsigned order on access, the court said: "We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work." The conservatives are Chief Justice John Roberts, and Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Three of them were nominated by President Donald Trump during his first term. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander, appointed by President Barack Obama, had ruled that DOGE staffers had no need to access the specific data. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Virginia, declined to block Hollander's decision. The lawsuit was filed by progressive group Democracy Forward on behalf of two unions, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the American Federation of Teachers, as well as the Alliance for Retired Americans. They alleged broader access to personal information would violate a federal law, the Privacy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act. "This is a sad day for our democracy and a scary day for millions of people," the groups said in a statement. "This ruling will enable President Trump and DOGE's affiliates to steal Americans' private and personal data. Elon Musk may have left Washington, D.C., but his impact continues to harm millions of people. We will continue to use every legal tool at our disposal to keep unelected bureaucrats from misusing the public's most sensitive data as this case moves forward." Social Security Works posted on X: "No one in history -- no commissioner, no president, no one -- has ever had the access that these DOGE minions have." White House spokesperson Liz Huston after the ruling told NBC News that "the Supreme Court allowing the Trump Administration to carry out commonsense efforts to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse and modernize government information systems is a huge victory for the rule of law." Brown Jackson wrote a nine-page dissenting opinion that the "Government fails to substantiate its stay request by showing that it or the public will suffer irreparable harm absent this Court's intervention. In essence, the 'urgency' underlying the government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes." She concluded her dissent by writing: "The Court opts instead to relieve the Government of the standard obligations, jettisoning careful judicial decisionmaking and creates grave privacy risks for millions of Americans in the process." Kathleen Romig, who worked as a senior adviser at the agency during the Biden administration, told CNN that Americans should be concerned about how DOGE has handled highly sensitive data so far. She said the personal data runs "from cradle to grave." "While the appeals court considers whether DOGE is violating the law, its operatives will have 'God-level' access to Social Security numbers, earnings records, bank routing numbers, mental and reproductive health records and much more," Romig, who now is director of Social Security and disability policy at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. When Trump became president again on Jan. 20, he signed an executive order establishing DOGE with the goal of "modernizing Federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity." Nearly a dozen DOGE members have been installed at the agency, according to court filings. In all, there are about 90 DOGE workers. DOGE, which was run by billionaire Elon Musk until he left the White House one week ago, wants to modernize systems and detect waste and fraud at the agency. "These teams have a business need to access the data at their assigned agency and subject the government's records to much-needed scrutiny," Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in the court motion. The data includes Social Security numbers, date and place of birth, gender, addresses, marital and parental status, parents' names, lifetime earnings, bank account information, immigration and work authorization status, health conditions for disability benefits and use of Medicare. SSA also has data-sharing agreements with the IRS and the Department of Health and Human Services. The plaintiffs wrote: "The agency is obligated by the Privacy Act and its own regulations, practices, and procedures to keep that information secure -- and not to share it beyond the circle of those who truly need it." Social Security Administration Commissioner Frank Bisignano, who was sworn in to the post on May 7, said in a statement: that"The Supreme Court's ruling is a major victory for American taxpayers. The Social Security Administration will continue driving forward modernization efforts, streamlining government systems, and ensuring improved service and outcomes for our beneficiaries." On May 23, Roberts temporarily put lower court decisions on hold while the Supreme Court considered what next steps to take. Musk called Social Security "the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time" during an interview with Joe Rogan on Feb. 28. The Social Security system, which started in 1935, transfers current workers' payroll tax payments to people who are already retired. The payroll tax is a mandatory tax paid by employees and employers. The total current tax rate is 12.4%. There is a separate 2.9% tax for Medicare.

Best Stock to Buy: Macy's vs. Dick's Sporting Goods
Best Stock to Buy: Macy's vs. Dick's Sporting Goods

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Best Stock to Buy: Macy's vs. Dick's Sporting Goods

While tariffs are a headache for retail, that doesn't necessarily mean the space should be avoided entirely. Dick's Sporting Goods has enjoyed a few years of growth in a turnaround from what was a stagnant business. Macy's, on the other hand, is struggling with weak annual top-line growth and it is shuttering stores. 10 stocks we like better than Dick's Sporting Goods › Retail is a confusing segment right now, with the price of goods impacted via increases in tariffs causing a tougher situation for not only consumers, but also sellers and producers. Let's take a look at two major retailers, Macy's (NYSE: M) and Dick's Sporting Goods (NYSE: DKS). In all, I think one of these two retail titans is showing more signs of life, whereas the other is being forced to shrink to improve its bottom line. Macy's saw an uptick in the few years following the COVID-19 outbreak but has since been in slow stagnation, with revenue declining over the last two years. Looking into 2025, the retailer's first quarter beat estimates, but the overall outlook underwhelmed. The company reported adjusted earnings of $0.16 per share versus estimates of $0.14 per share, while total revenue came in at $4.60 billion compared to expectations of $4.50 billion. From another perspective, things didn't look that great. While revenue came in above expectations, it trailed last year's total sales of roughly $4.85 billion. Operating income fell 24.8% year over year to $94 million, and net income declined 38.7% to $38 million. Diluted earnings per share declined from $0.22 in the first quarter of 2024 to $0.13 per diluted share this year. These year-over-year declines are something that is haunting Macy's and putting downward pressure on the stock. For this year, the company reiterated net sales guidance in the range of $21 billion to $21.4 billion. In comparison, it reported sales of $22.29 billion in 2024. All in all, Macy's cut its profit outlook for the year and expects to raise prices on products to offset the impact of tariffs on its goods. In contrast, Dick's Sporting Goods has done surprisingly OK. First-quarter results included a 5.2% year-over-year increase in sales revenue, to roughly $3.18 billion, while non-GAAP income was flat at $275 million. The company has been building sales annually and provided good guidance for 2025, reiterating its previous expectations of $13.80 to $14.40 in earnings per share. The high end of that range would beat out 2024, which finished with diluted earnings per share of $14.05. Net sales are expected to be in the range of $13.6 billion to $13.9 billion, which would outperform last year's revenue of $13.45 billion. Dick's is also looking to expand through its announced acquisition of Foot Locker for $2.5 billion. This drastically increases the company's position within shoes and sets up Dick's for future growth, as Foot Locker had been in the midst of a turnaround itself. This story is a comparison of a company that is shuttering stores in an attempt to become a leaner machine, relative to a company that seemingly is looking to grow. Though improvement is slow, Dick's has been reporting better year-over-year sales figures than Macy's, with plans to open new stores and even make an acquisition, whereas Macy's plans to close over 100 locations and raise prices. While the potential for tariffs to cause headaches for both of these companies is something to be mindful of, I think you have to go with Dick's Sporting Goods here. Its diversified offerings give it a broader consumer base, while Macy's is more heavily concentrated in clothing, perfumes, etc. Unlike a lot of tech, there's still some value in retail, with Dick's trading at a little over 12 times earnings and offering a 2.73% dividend yield. While the short term might be a bit choppy due to tariffs, long-term this company seems to be making the right moves. Before you buy stock in Dick's Sporting Goods, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Dick's Sporting Goods wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 David Butler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Best Stock to Buy: Macy's vs. Dick's Sporting Goods was originally published by The Motley Fool

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store