House GOP proposes all-out assault on Medicaid
Getty Images
Threats to Medicaid are mounting, with the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce unveiling a new, harmful plan this past weekend that would not only have a devastating impact on Michiganders' ability to access health care, but lead to a catastrophic ripple effect on our state's health care systems and economy. Under the plan, up to 512,000 adults in Michigan could lose coverage due to new, punitive work requirements.
This latest news comes at a time when Michiganders have sent a loud-and-clear message that they don't want cuts to Medicaid. In fact, according to new statewide polling results released last week, 83% of Michigan voters across political views and party affiliations want to see Medicaid spending either increased or kept the same. EPIC·MRA, with support from the Community Mental Health Association of Michigan, Michigan Association of Health Plans, Michigan Health & Hospital Association, Michigan Primary Care Association, and Protect MI Care, conducted the new statewide poll to determine where Michiganders stand on the proposed Medicaid cuts. The poll also showed that 82% of Michiganders oppose cutting Medicaid to pay for tax cuts and 80% said Medicaid is important in their communities.
More than 2.6 million Michiganders — including more than 1 million children — rely on Medicaid for their health care coverage. This includes 1 in 5 adults ages 19-64, 2 in 5 children, 3 in 5 nursing home residents, 1 in 6 Medicare beneficiaries and 3 in 8 working-age adults with disabilities.These are our family members, friends, co-workers and neighbors, and they live in every county in our state. Each and every one of them deserves to be able to access the care they need in order to live healthy lives.
Health care providers, advocates urge Michigan congressional delegation to vote no on Medicaid cuts
In addition to providing health care coverage to nearly half of Michigan's kids, Medicaid covered 45% of all babies born in our state last year and allows more than 270,000 older Michiganders to live safely at home or in caregiving facilities. It also serves as a lifeline for Michiganders seeking care at behavioral health and substance use treatment centers in rural and underserved areas, and, statewide, it protects families who otherwise couldn't afford care from serious health consequences and insurmountable financial burdens.
Medicaid is foundational to Michigan's health care delivery systems, providing an essential source of funding for hospitals, nursing homes, Community Mental Health Services Programs, schools and Emergency Medical Services. The program brings over $19 billion in federal funding to Michigan, supporting care, providers and thousands of jobs.
In addition to stripping health care away from hundreds of thousands of Michiganders, the implementation and administration of the House GOP's proposed work requirements would lead to exorbitant administrative costs, with Michigan taxpayers footing a potential $155 million bill in the first year alone. This is funding that would be put to much better use as a means to maintain and, better yet, increase health care coverage for the people who call Michigan home.
The plan also proposes tax 'reforms' that could result in a $3 billion annual loss in funding for our state, including a $2.3 billion decrease in payments to Michigan hospitals and upwards of $325 million in cuts to nursing homes. The closures of hospitals and other health care facilities are a real possibility under this plan, which would be deeply felt in rural and underserved areas where health care accessibility is already a major issue.
Let's be clear: this new plan is an all-out assault on Medicaid that would push families off coverage, overwhelm hospitals with uncompensated care and deepen workforce shortages in essential health care services.
We here at the Michigan League for Public Policy continue to stand strong in our fight to protect Medicaid, and we do not stand alone. We stand together with the majority of Michiganders and the more than 150 organizations that make up the Protect MI Care coalition. The stakes right now could not be higher, which is why the League is proud to have helped launch the Protect MI Care coalition in order to build a united front against any cuts or caps to Medicaid. The health and well-being of Michiganders and our state economy depend on it.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' losing momentum in Senate
The sprawling bill to enact President Trump's 'big, beautiful' agenda is losing momentum in the Senate in the face of blistering attacks from Elon Musk and outspoken opposition from conservatives. Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) warned colleagues at a special conference meeting Wednesday afternoon that there are two likely 'no' votes against the bill within the Senate GOP conference, which means just one more defection would derail the legislation, according to a senator who attended the meeting. 'Crapo just said, 'I think [there] are two of us who are pretty definite no's,' which means we can't lose anybody else,' the source said. Crapo did not name names, but colleagues assumed he was talking about conservative Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). Paul says he will vote against the bill because it includes language to raise the debt ceiling by $4 trillion, extending the federal government's borrowing authority past the 2026 midterm election. Johnson, meanwhile, has called for Senate GOP colleagues to scrap the House-passed bill and move a smaller measure that would focus on extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts, securing the border and banking on the spending cuts identified by House committee chairs. 'What I am rock-solid on is that I can't accept this as the new normal,' he said of projections that the annual federal deficit will reach $2.2 trillion in 2025 and grow to $2.7 trillion by 2035. 'We have our chance to reverse this,' he said of growing deficits. 'I will not be responsible for continuing this.' Paul and Johnson are stepping up their criticism of the bill just as Musk is urging lawmakers to 'KILL' the legislation, warning it will blow up the deficit. 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL,' Musk posted on his social platform X. The Congressional Budget Office projected Wednesday that the 1,116-page bill passed by the House will add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. Trump has set a July 4 deadline for Congress to get the bill to his desk. But some GOP lawmakers say that's looking increasingly unlikely because of a battle between Republican senators over cuts to Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the repeal of renewable energy tax incentives. 'It won't happen,' Johnson said. 'The sooner President Trump recognizes the reality of the situation, the sooner we can work on a smaller version of the bill, do the things that have to be done: Extend current tax law, increase the debt ceiling, provide border funding,' he said. He said the package could include spending cuts already passed by the House, such as a proposal to reduce federal subsidies to Medicaid by $698 billion and reduce SNAP spending by $267 billion. The expectation that Paul and Johnson will vote against the bill could give more leverage to Republicans who want to make other changes, further delaying the effort. Those moderates include Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), who are warning against Medicaid spending cuts that would affect benefits. Senate Republicans control 53 seats, which means they could only afford three defections and still pass the bill. Collins, Murkowski, Hawley and Moran say they are closely following the proposed reforms to Medicaid. 'I am evaluating those provisions,' Collins said of the changes to Medicaid. She said it's difficult to fully assess the bill until the Senate parliamentarian weighs in on what policy changes can remain in the legislation and which need to be stripped out for it to qualify for fast-track consideration on the floor. She said some of the most controversial provisions 'may fall out.' 'We still don't know exactly what we're looking at,' she said. Collins, who is up for reelection in a state that former Vice President Kamala Harris carried in the 2024 election, said she's concerned about changes to the SNAP program that would require Maine to shoulder more of its costs. She said the bill 'switches a lot of the administrative costs' for SNAP 'onto the state.' Murkowski said it will be 'hard' to meet Trump's deadline of passing the bill by July 4, noting that even after Republican senators reach a deal, many of the provisions will need to be vetted by the Senate parliamentarian. Moran said he's 'waiting for where we end up in the Ag [Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry] Committee' on reforms to SNAP. 'What we do will be different from the House. I'm analyzing and participating in the discussion,' he said. He said the negotiations over the nutrition program for low-income Americans are 'taking time.' Republicans at a special meeting Wednesday afternoon discussed expanding their search for savings to Medicaid, despite Trump's warning to House lawmakers last month not to 'f‑‑‑ with Medicaid.' And, notably, they raised the possibility of changes to Medicare. 'There's a legitimate debate about, 'Can we do more with Medicaid? Are we doing too much with Medicaid? How much waste, fraud and abuse is there in Medicare? Why don't we go after that?' I think we should,' Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) said after meeting with colleagues to discuss the bill. Cramer said senators talked about also examining waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare to further reduce future deficits. 'There was a lot of presentation and then debate, people throwing out other ideas, like, 'What about waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare?'' he said. But tackling waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare would be a time-consuming task and likely generate a lot of anxiety among GOP senators who are balking at cuts to Medicaid that they worry could impact benefits. 'Some people are making that case, other people are wringing their hands,' Cramer said of the internal debate. Updated at 8:37 a.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Vought grilled over DOGE, spending cuts in House hearing
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russell Vought was grilled by both sides of the aisle over the administration's sweeping cost-cutting plans as he testified before House appropriators Wednesday afternoon. Vought faced a wide-ranging list of questions during a budget hearing, as lawmakers pressed him over President Trump's latest spending cut requests, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), along with a major tax package of the president's priorities making its way through Congress. One area of bipartisan interest was leadership at DOGE, an effort Trump previously tapped tech billionaire Elon Musk for. Vought said the administration was 'in the midst of, with the last week or so, of establishing the leadership on an ongoing basis' following the exit of Musk. Other top officials at the department have also departed in recent days, including Steve Davids, whom Vought noted previously led the effort. He added that he partly thinks 'the vision for DOGE' is that it 'go and be far more institutionalized' at actual agencies and working 'almost as in-house consultants as a part of the agency's leadership. The OMB chief also faced questions over the president's budget request for fiscal 2026, which lawmakers have noted is incomplete. 'Where's the budget?' Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.), a spending cardinal asked him. 'We believe you have the budget,' Vought responded, after the White House released a 1,000-page budget document last Friday detailing more of its demands. 'We have a skinny budget,' Womack said. 'You have the skinny budget, discretionary budget in full,' the OMB director replied, which he said allows the House' funding 'to get the appropriations process moving forward.' Vought added that the administration has been focused at the same time on getting the president's tax plan to his desk, after it recently passed the House and faces changes in the Senate. He also faced heat from Democrats over other components of that plan, including reforms to Medicaid that Republicans have attached to the proposed tax cuts as an effort to save hundreds of billions of federal dollars over the next decade. 'The bill that you just said the White House supports is going to add, depending [on] who you talk to, 2.4 trillion to $5 trillion to the national debt,' Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) said. 'It's going to make somewhere between 11 and 16 million people lose their health care. 'I know you said on a Sunday morning show, no one will lose coverage as a result of this bill is that still your standing?' the lawmaker asked. Vought responded that the bill does 'not lead to less coverage for Medicaid beneficiaries.' They both went back and forth over the bill's impact on the program before Pocan needled Vought on the fiscal impact of the bill. The budget chief said, 'the bill will not increase the debt,' however, federal budget analysts estimate it would add more than $2 trillion to the nation's deficits in roughly a decade. Another notable moment from the hearing came when Vought was questioned by a Republican about proposed cuts to the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) pursued as part of the Trump administration's latest rescissions request. He defended the reductions as targeting items like 'teaching young children how to make environmentally friendly reproductive health decisions' and efforts he claimed were aimed at strengthening 'the resilience of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer global movements.' Rep. Mark Alford (R-Mo.) raised the question of PEPFAR cuts, later pressed Vought about whether prevention efforts would be impacted by the proposed reductions. 'Aside from the crazy woke programs, which I agree should be stripped,' Alford asked, 'is there any other prevention program, not treatment, but prevention program listed in this rescission package which is not of a woke nature?' Vought said in response that the administration seeks to scale 'down the program as it pertains to the types of organizations that are providing the examples of the waste, fraud and abuse.' But, he added, 'the prevention itself is where an analytical look needs to be done.' 'There's life saving treatment after you already have HIV, but there are prevention programs that PEPFAR does, which are not of the woke nature, which can prevent someone from getting HIV,' Alford countered. 'Are those programs going to survive?' 'It is something that our budget will be very trim on because we believe that many of these nonprofits are not geared toward the viewpoints of the administration, and we're $37 trillion in debt,' Vought said. 'So, at some point, the continent of Africa needs to absorb more of the burden of providing this healthcare.' Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, additionally grilled the budget chief at one point over the administration's takedown of a public website that showed how funding is apportioned to federal agencies. 'Your predecessor did comply with the law for over two years, and you followed this law for two months. What happened?' DeLauro asked Vought. 'Why did the website come down? Why do we not know what is happening? Why are we going back to those days of secret decisions being made by you and whomever else in terms of the spending of the dollars that we constitutionally enacted?' Vought responded that the administration 'had constitutional concerns with the provision' and 'it's something that degraded our ability to manage taxpayer resources.' DeLauro told the OMB director shortly after that she thought the 'level of your honesty on your claims [really] shines through on this topic' and accused him of making 'up constitutional issues.' 'We have no way of knowing if you are carrying out what we have lawfully required the executive branch to do,' the Connecticut Democrat said. 'That is our responsibility, and your responsibility is to carry out what it is that we have appropriated here.' 'You just can't pick and choose whatever the hell you want,' she added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Biden Breaks Cover to Torch Trump's ‘Ridiculous' Probe Into His Mental Fitness
Joe Biden has lashed out at President Donald Trump's 'ridiculous and false' claims that he was not making his own decisions while in the White House. The 82-year-old former president issued the rebuke after his successor launched a probe into Biden's alleged 'cognitive decline' while in office and whether his team took advantage of his diminishing mental state to sign off on a number of actions using an autopen. 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency,' Biden said in a statement distributed to multiple outlets. 'I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false.' He added: 'This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans, who are pushing disastrous legislation that would slash essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families—all to fund tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations.' Trump has ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi and David Warrington, the White House counsel, to lead the investigation into whether Biden's team 'purposefully shielded' the Democrat's declining mental acuity from the public. The order alleges, without evidence, that it has become 'increasingly apparent' that Biden's aides used the autopen to sign off on executive actions in order to 'conceal Biden's cognitive decline.' The autopen is a mechanical device that replicates a person's signature, allowing presidents to sign off on multiple executive actions. 'This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history,' the memo said. Trump has been pushing the theory that Biden didn't personally sign the sweeping pardons issued just before leaving office, including one for his son, Hunter Biden, and preemptive pardons for other family members. His new order also points to Biden's appointment of 235 federal judges and the commutation of sentences for '37 of the 40 most vile and monstrous criminals' on death row as vindication for the investigation. 'Given clear indications that President Biden lacked the capacity to exercise his Presidential authority, if his advisors secretly used the mechanical signature pen to conceal this incapacity while taking radical executive actions in his name, that would constitute an unconstitutional wielding of presidential power,' the memo said. The Justice Department is conducting its own review of Biden's pardons for his family and death row inmates. Pardon Attorney Ed Martin reportedly directed staff to examine whether Biden was 'competent' at the time or if others were 'taking advantage of him through use of AutoPen or other means.' Biden's mental and physical fitness once again came under scrutiny following bombshell claims in Original Sin, a new book by CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson. Biden also recently announced he had been diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer. Trump—who is just three years younger than Biden—suggested Biden's team manipulated him into pushing for an 'open border' policy as president, as this was in contrast to the Democrat's long-standing views. 'He didn't approve this stuff, because when Joe Biden was with it, he would never have approved it,' Trump told reporters at the Capitol on May 20. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Daily Beast.
