Kanwar Yatra: SC seeks UP government's response to plea against QR code mandate to food sellers
A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and N K Singh asked the state to file its reply in a week and fixed the matter for hearing next on July 22.
Though the counsel appearing for Uttar Pradesh sought two weeks to file a reply, Senior Advocate Shadan Farasat, who appeared for the applicants, contended that the Yatra will be over in the next 10-12 days.
The application cited news reports that the state administration had issued a directive making it mandatory for the eateries to display the QR codes. It also referred to a 'press note dated 25.06.2024 issued by the Chief Minister of U.P.' and said 'it expressly calls for shop keeper names to be clearly displayed during the Yatra'.
The application said that similar directives to display names of owners outside the shops along the Kanwar Yatra route were also issued last year, but were stayed by the Supreme Court.
The fresh directive, it said, 'couched under the garb of 'lawful license requirements' is a breach of privacy rights'.
The plea contended that 'the requisite license is a self-contained certificate, which although reveals the name of the owner, is displayed inside the premises at a place where it may be accessed. Equating this requirement to display a normal-sized license with the directive to display name of owner, manager and other employees on billboards outside, or to not give eateries names which do not reflect the religious identity of the owner are de hors the license requirements.'
It said that 'vague and overbroad directives deliberately mix up the licensing requirements with the other unlawful demand to display religious identity, and leave scope for violent enforcement of such a manifestly arbitrary demand both by vigilante groups and by authorities on the ground'.
The application sought a 'stay' of all 'further actions taken pursuant to or in furtherance of directives (whether oral, written or digital, including via QR codes) requiring or facilitating public disclosure of ownership/employee identity of food vendors along Kanwar Yatra routes in the States of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand…'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC declines plea to deregister AIMIM, suggests broader petition on communal appeals
The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to entertain a plea seeking directions to the Election Commission of India to deregister parliamentarian Asaduddin Owaisi-led All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Musalimeen as a political party. A bench of justices Surya Kant and justice Joymala Bagchi suggested that the petitioner could file a plea on the larger issue of political parties invoking communal statements. "We are not on communal parties , etc. Sometimes, regional parties invoke regional sentiments... So what should be done... There are parties who also invoke caste issues that are equally dangerous. Without criticising anyone, such issues can be raised," justice Kant said. The bench allowed the petitioner to file a fresh plea raising larger issues regarding the validity of political parties with religious objectives. The plea was filed by Tirupati Narasimha Murari , who alleged that AIMIM 's declared objectives were to serve the Muslim community alone, violating the principle of secularism, and hence it cannot be recognised as a political party. The bench, however, observed that as per the constitution of the party, its objective is to work for every backward section. The bench said the party's constitution is "for every backward class in society, including those belonging to minority community... backward both economically and in the field of education... that's what the Constitution professes". Justice Kant said, "There are certain rights guaranteed to minorities under the Constitution... party's political manifesto or constitution says it will work for the protection of those rights granted under the Constitution." The senior judge pointed out that India's Constitution grants protection to minorities. "Suppose a party says we will promote untouchability; that is absolutely offending. That must be struck down, that must be banned... Suppose a religious law is protected under the Constitution and a political party says it will teach that law, they will teach because it is protected under the Constitution... What is only within the framework of the Constitution (that may not be objectionable)," justice Kant said. SC advised the petitioner to file a "neutral" petition.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Indian Nurse Gets Last-Minute Relief As Yemen Postpones Nimisha Priya's Execution
The execution of Nimisha Priya, an Indian nurse from Kerala convicted of murder in Yemen, has been postponed amid renewed negotiations. Currently imprisoned in Sanaa, she faces the death penalty for the 2017 killing of Yemeni citizen Talal Abdo Mahdi. Talks, led by Sufi cleric Sheikh Habib Umar, are underway with the victim's family in Dhamar. A Yemeni judicial figure related to the victim has agreed to participate, according to sources. Centre informed the Supreme Court it is doing its best despite the absence of diplomatic ties with Yemen. Supporters continue raising 'blood money' under Sharia law to secure her release and save her life.#nimishapriya #yemen #indiayemen #bloodmoney #sharialaw #keralanurse #deathrow #toi #toibharat Read More
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
How Kerala Nurse Sentenced To Death In Yemen Got Reprieve
New Delhi: The life of Kerala-based nurse Nimisha Priya - who was facing execution in Yemen - has been temporarily spared thanks to the timely intervention of prominent religious figures across two countries. The Grand Mufti of India, Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad, had reached out to renowned Yemeni cleric Sheikh Umar bin Hafiz to intercede with the family of Talal Abdol Mehdi - Priya's Yemeni employer whom she killed inadvertently. According to Hussain Saquafi, Deputy Mufti and close aide to Sheikh Abubakr, Sheikh Umar bin Hafiz responded positively and dispatched his students to personally engage with Talal's family. Following rounds of intense negotiations, the victim's family eventually agreed to pause the execution for four hours, giving fresh hope to Priya and her legal team. Shia-Sunni Divide One of the critical factors that played in favour of the talks was the shared Sunni faith between the Yemeni victim's family and the Yemeni cleric. Despite Yemen capital Sanaa being controlled by Houthi rebels - who belong to the Shia sect - the respected Sunni cleric's influence cut through sectarian lines and helped secure the stay. Officials in the Ministry of External Affairs have confirmed that "continuous and quiet" efforts were underway behind the scenes. An embassy official posted in the Saudi embassy, who oversees Yemen affairs, led the outreach. "He remained in contact with Yemeni authorities for months. The Israel-Iran conflict had paused the dialogue briefly, but after tensions cooled, we re-engaged immediately," an official said. India has reportedly offered an extraordinary sum as "diyya" or blood money to the victim's family. "We said that if blood money is 2 crore, we will pay 20 crores and yet the family didn't agree," the source said. Hope For Future Though the execution has only been paused, not cancelled, officials believe this opens the door for renewed dialogue. Negotiations are in progress for a permanent resolution through blood money or legal reprieve. The breakthrough reflects how deep-rooted religious diplomacy and trans-national networks can sometimes succeed where political channels face limitations. Indian Strategy The fresh developments underscore how India quietly leveraged both official and unofficial routes, combining faith diplomacy with diplomatic groundwork, to save one of its own. The religious leaders, though, asserted their contribution. Deputy Mufti Hussain Saquafi said, "Mufti sahab intervened after the Government of India submitted an affidavit in the Supreme Court, expressing its helplessness in saving Nimisha. The Mufti was approached by different politicians of Kerala to speak to the Yemeni cleric, since both have been in good rapport or relations". Sources in the foreign ministry responded with an arch question -- "Can the hanging be stayed over a phone call in a day? It is obvious result of persistent efforts... we have been active for months". The Case Nimisha Priya, a nurse, had gone to in Yemen in 2008, looking for a lucrative job so she could support her parents back in Kerala. Initially, she worked in hospitals but later opened her own clinic and to comply with the local laws, she got a Yemeni business partner -- Talal Abdol Mehdi. But as Mehdi started harassing her - stealing her money and passport -- Priya had injected him with a sedative in 2017. She had planned to retrieve her passport once he became unconscious but Mehdi died and Priya was arrested while trying to leave Yemen. The case has gained traction across India, particularly in Kerala, where rights groups have demanded that the government intensify efforts to bring her home. For now, her execution is on hold - but her future still hangs in the balance.
