No personnel relocation decisions yet for Fort Eustis' Army training headquarters move
What that means for the thousands of men and women stationed at Fort Eustis has yet to be determined, Army officials said this week. But it's raised questions for congressional leaders representing Hampton Roads, who say they will be closely scrutinizing the plans.
No decisions have been made yet on relocating people stationed at Fort Eustis or any potential changes in its day-to-day operations, according to TRADOC spokesperson Col. Jeff Pray.
'We don't know,' Pray said. 'Obviously, there's going to be an impact to our command holistically, but that's for the planners and decision makers up at Army level to make.'
Pray added until further notice, Fort Eustis and the surrounding community will not be seeing any major shifts.
During testimony before the U.S. House Appropriations Committee's Defense Subcommittee this month, Gen. Randy George said TRADOC, which has been headquartered at Fort Eustis since 2011 and was previously stationed at Fort Monroe, was set to relocate to Texas to combine with the Army Futures Command to create a new Army Transformation and Training Command.
The move is part of a broader initiative by the Defense Department to streamline the military and create a more lethal deterrent against China, according to a memorandum from Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to Pentagon leadership. The memo describes the merger as an initiative to 'downsize, consolidate, or close redundant headquarters.'
Both TRADOC and the Futures Command are four-star commands. Hegseth, in a separate memo to Pentagon leadership earlier this month, ordered a minimum 20% cut in four-star positions. Under the reorganization, the four-star command will remain with the Futures Command in Austin, meaning TRADOC will report to command in Texas.
Congressional leadership from Virginia and Hampton Roads say they are keeping an eye on the TRADOC reorganization plans.
Sen. Tim Kaine, a Democrat, said in an emailed statement Army leadership has assured him Fort Eustis would see no significant personnel changes. Sen. Mark Warner added in a statement he has questions about how the plan will be executed.
'TRADOC is an asset to Virginia,' Warner, a Democrat, said in the statement. 'On the recently proposed merger, we have yet to see from the Army any hard data and specifics related to what this means for continued footprint and personnel numbers at Fort Eustis.'
Rep. Rob Wittman, a Republican who represents areas surrounding Fort Eustis including York County and Williamsburg, said in a statement that 'rigorous congressional oversight is critical' as the proposed merger goes forward and he'd oppose any plans that negatively impact TRADOC or Fort Eustis. Wittman said he has met with Army leadership, including George, to discuss operational impacts and potential legislative action. He said based on those discussions, TRADOC's presence will be preserved in Virginia but the impacts to positions and living quarters are unknown.
Rep. Jen Kiggans, R-Virginia Beach, who does not represent the Peninsula but is a Navy veteran, also called for congressional oversight of the reorganization plan.
'We owe it to our service members, civilians and communities to ensure decisions are grounded in strategic necessity, not convenience, and that the full operational and personnel impacts are clearly understood before moving forward,' Kiggans said in a statement.
Rep. Bobby Scott, a Democrat who represents Newport News where Fort Eustis is located, could not be reached for comment.
Devlin Epding, 757-510-4037, devlin.epding@virginiamedia.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Cornyn leans into Texas redistricting fight amid uphill reelection bid
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) is leaning into the Texas redistricting battle as he seeks to fend off a conservative primary challenge from Attorney General Ken Paxton (R). On Tuesday, Cornyn publicly called for FBI Director Kash Patel to assist in tracking down Democrats who fled the state in protest. Two days later, the senator and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) separately confirmed that the FBI was assisting in the effort. The move to get out in front of the redistricting battle allows Cornyn to ingratiate himself with the state's deeply conservative base, who have distanced themselves from the incumbent senator in his uphill primary battle against Paxton. 'I think this is a good opportunity for Cornyn to show that he's a fighter and that's willing to take on an issue that's a red meat issue that resonates with the base. When you see those opportunities, you have to take them,' said Brendan Steinhauser, Cornyn's former campaign manager and a Texas-based GOP strategist. 'In campaigns like this, you don't get to control events. You can only control how you react and respond to them,' he continued. 'This is exactly the kind of thing he needs.' Cornyn's allies have touted the senator's move. The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) rolled out a digital ad titled 'Cornyn Fights–Paxton Folds.' The incumbent senator and his allies have also taken a number of swipes at Paxton in the process, pointing out that the state attorney general was in Europe as the redistricting battle erupted. Paxton had previously traveled to Scotland at the end of July and met with Trump during the president's trip to his Turnberry golf course. 'Memo to @kenpaxtontx:Hey, Ken. Are you in the office today? It's kind of important. Let me know if you need the off the golf course in Scotland and do your job. President Trump and Governor Abbott need a focused AG. For once,' Cornyn said in a post on X earlier this week. An unnamed Republican strategist called Paxton's decision to stay in Europe 'a missed opportunity,' but added it was not 'necessarily a vulnerability.' 'Texas Democrats doing this wasn't a surprise,' said an unnamed GOP strategist.'I'm really surprised that Paxton didn't plan better and go 'You know what, I should probably do my visit with Trump and at least come back to Austin for a day and half.'' The same strategist argued that Cornyn's role as a federally elected official has forced him to 'cheer from the stands,' while it is easier for Paxton to get involved as a state elected official. 'It's such a state-centric issue,' the strategist said. 'If anybody, it would traditionally advantage Paxton over Cornyn just given his role in being able to use the Texas judicial system to chase these folks down.' And Paxton has emerged as a prominent voice in the fight. He initially criticized Cornyn's call for the FBI to intervene on Steve Bannon's 'War Room' podcast on Tuesday, saying it was 'purely a state issue.' But Paxton later reversed in a statement to The Hill, saying he was open to the FBI getting involved. 'I'm in full support of using every possible method to secure a quorum and hold lawless Democrat legislators accountable for abandoning Texans, including involving federal authorities and the FBI,' Paxton said. And as state attorney general, Paxton has used his office to take action against Texas Democrats. Paxton announced this week he would seek judicial orders 'declaring that runaway Democrats who fail to appear by the Speaker's deadline have vacated their office.' Additionally, Paxton said he is investigating whether former Rep. Beto O'Rourke's (D-Texas) political group is breaking laws by allegedly 'bankrolling' the state Democratic lawmakers out-of-state travel. 'It's more about the actions he takes, it's more about the statements, it's more about having a voice in this, and you don't necessarily have to be in the state to accomplish that,' Steinhauser said. The pro-Paxton Lone Star Liberty PAC compiled mainstream media coverage of the state's redistricting saga and Paxton's response, along with conservative media figures praising the state attorney general, into a digital spot released on Friday. The redistricting battle comes as Cornyn faces the biggest fight of his political life in his bid to hold onto his seat. Outside groups backing Cornyn have spent swaths of money boosting Cornyn in recent weeks. According to the Texas Tribune, the Senate GOP leadership-affiliated One Nation has spent over $4 million in advertising, while Texans for a Conservative Majority, another pro-Cornyn group, has spent $3.2 million. The pro-Cornyn Conservative Majority Project has spent roughly $500,000. 'They're just throwing everything at the wall possible to try to capture one poll that shows him with momentum and really gaining on Paxton,' the unnamed strategist said. 'They're doing it to get the president's attention.' Most polls have shown Cornyn consistently trailing Paxton in the polls, in many cases by double digits. Cornyn's team has maintained that there is plenty of time to close the gap by next year. There is also the hope that an endorsement from Trump, who has given no indication he will wade into the primary, would boost Cornyn. 'These skirmishes on redistricting and otherwise are just bigger parts of the play for Cornyn in a mad dash to try to do anything he can to take the lead in polling,' the strategist said.
Newsweek
9 minutes ago
- Newsweek
What Russia and Ukraine Are Demanding Ahead of Putin-Trump Alaska Meeting
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. With President Donald Trump's face-to-face meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin looming, there are still unanswered questions about how Ukraine will be involved, and whether the Republican can find a way to bridge the still-substantial distance between Kyiv and Moscow on a ceasefire deal. Trump said he would meet Putin in Alaska on August 15 for a "highly anticipated" summit. It will be the first time the Republican has met the Kremlin chief in person of his second term in office. Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov confirmed the meeting, saying on Saturday that the White House and the Kremlin would be "working vigorously hard" on the summit's agenda in the next few days. "The presidents will undoubtedly focus on discussing ways to reach a sustainable settlement to the Ukraine crisis," Ushakov said. The Trump administration is considering inviting Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky, U.S. media reported on Saturday. Many months of talks on a ceasefire deal for Ukraine have failed to yield an agreement inked by both Kyiv and Moscow. Ukraine agreed to a U.S. proposal in March, and Trump—historically reluctant to overly criticize Putin—has grown increasingly frustrated with the Kremlin chief. U.S. President Donald Trump, right, meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany, on July 7, 2017. U.S. President Donald Trump, right, meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany, on July 7, 2017. AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File What Does Trump Want? Trump, often known for to-and-froing, has been consistent in his calls for an end to the largest conflict on European soil since World War II. A substantial part of his foreign policy has been shaped by his desire to be known as both a dealmaker and a peacemaker. As Moscow increased its aerial assaults on Ukraine in recent months, Trump became more critical of the Kremlin, saying Putin was giving the White House "a lot of b*******." Trump has warmed to Ukraine since the infamous White House meeting with Zelensky in February, during which the president, along with several senior administration officials, berated the Kyiv leader in front of the world's cameras. But as Russia's reluctance to sign a deal continued, Trump greenlet more aid for Ukraine, including air defense supplies to defend the country from Russian attacks, and imposed a deadline of "10 or 12 days" for Russia to agree to a ceasefire deal in early August. This window closed on Friday, but the White House did not appear to institute new economic sanctions on Russia as threatened. "Putin is not interested in a true ceasefire," said Oleksandr Merezhko, the chair of Ukraine's parliamentary foreign affairs committee and a member of Zelensky's party. "He is using negotiations with Trump for only one purpose—to avoid serious sanctions, including secondary sanctions against those countries which buy Russian oil and gas," he told Newsweek. Russia's oil and gas industry is crucial to the country's economy, and Moscow was slapped with sanctions by Ukraine's backers after it launched its full-scale invasion of its neighbor in early 2022. Kyiv has also targeted Russian oil and gas facilities with long-range drone strikes in an attempt to curb the Kremlin's access to the resources propping up its military. Secondary sanctions target third-party buyers of Russian exports, like India and China. Trump became embroiled in a war of words with Russia's former President, Dmitry Medvedev, and deployed two U.S. Navy nuclear submarines after "highly provocative" statements from Medvedev. The former president is currently the deputy chair of Russia's Security Council and well-known for his inflammatory social media commentary. Where Does Ukraine stand? Ukrainian officials frequently say they are seeking an end to the war, but one that does not reward Russia or open the door for Moscow to restart attempts to seize territory from Kyiv. Ukraine has repeatedly said that ceding Ukrainian territory to Russia is off the table. It goes against the country's constitution, Zelensky said again over the weekend. "No one will deviate from this—and no one will be able to," Zelensky said in a post to messaging app Telegram on Saturday. "Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier." Ukraine has consistently said it needs security guarantees, and not to be bound by any limits on the size of its military. Kyiv also does not want to be labeled a neutral state, but one firmly on the path to NATO and European Union membership. Ukraine's memorandum, presented by Kyiv officials during rounds of direct talks with a Russian delegation in Turkey earlier this summer, also said it sought a "full and unconditional ceasefire in the sky, on land and at sea." Furthermore, Kyiv has said an agreement needs to look at humanitarian issues, such as an exchange of all prisoners and the return of children taken from Russian-controlled areas of Ukraine. And Russia's Perspective? Russia's demands have remained far away from what Ukraine appears willing to accept. During direct talks in Istanbul in June, Russia offered up two proposals for a 30-day ceasefire. "The first one is about how to reach a truly lasting peace," Vladimir Medinsky, Russia's chief negotiator, said at the time. "The second part highlights the steps to be taken toward a real ceasefire." One option would have Kyiv withdraw from the eastern regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, collectively known as the Donbas, as well as the southern Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions of Ukraine. Russia declared it had annexed these four mainland Ukrainian regions in fall 2022. It does not fully control these regions, although it has captured much of Luhansk and Donetsk. Moscow annexed Crimea, to the south of the mainland, from Kyiv in 2014. The alternative, Russia said, would be for Ukraine to stop building up its military and halt military aid deliveries, while lifting martial law and opening up to elections. Elections are banned in Ukraine while martial law is in place. A more comprehensive peace agreement would come later, Moscow said, adding no foreign military personnel should be allowed in Ukraine. Russia has pushed for the recognition of its control over the annexed regions, and for Ukraine to abandon its hopes of joining NATO in favor of neutrality. Moscow has also said it wants Kyiv to limit the size of its military and put the Russian language on equal footing with Ukrainian. How Does Europe Fit In? The U.K., France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen issued a joint statement on Sunday, reiterating their support for the "principle that international borders must not be changed by force." "We share the conviction that a diplomatic solution must protect Ukraine's and Europe's vital security interests," the governments said. European leaders have offered a "counterproposal" following a meeting between Putin and Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, The Wall Street Journal reported. This European plan rejected the idea Ukraine would cede territory it still holds in Donetsk and was presented to the U.S. on Saturday, according to the report.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Longtime Biden aide testifies in GOP probe that former president aged on job but remained ‘fully engaged'
One of Joe Biden's former top communications advisers told the House Oversight Committee that she watched the former president age on the job but that he was always in command. Anita Dunn, the former senior adviser to the president for communications, is the latest former Biden aide to voluntarily testify before the Republican-led panel in its probe of the former president's cognitive decline and possible efforts to conceal it from the public. 'While I observed that President Biden aged physically during his time in office, which is something that happens to every president, he remained throughout my interactions with him fully engaged and clear in his directions and supervision,' Dunn said in her opening statement, obtained by CNN. To address an ongoing allegation that Biden did not make his own decisions, Dunn added: 'I did not observe White House staff making key decisions or exercising the powers of the presidency without President Biden's knowledge or consent.' In the closed-door interview, Dunn discussed the decision to not give the former president a cognitive test, two sources familiar with the testimony told CNN. One source familiar with the interview said Dunn testified that Biden's inner circle came to a consensus he should not take a cognitive test, concluding it would offer no political benefit. A source close to Dunn added that even though the group came to that conclusion, Dunn stated in the interview that they all felt he would pass one. Dunn also discussed the decision to not have Biden participate in an interview around the Super Bowl last year because of the focus at the time around the former president's handling of classified records, the sources added. The source familiar with the interview said Dunn claimed the decision was made because of information in former special counsel Robert Hur's report, which led to no charges against Biden but described him as 'well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.' The source close to Dunn pushed back on that characterization and said Dunn articulated the decision was made for Biden to not participate in a Super Bowl interview before the Hur report was released, and said the decision to not do so was because the then-president's inner circle thought the main media coverage would be about what Biden did with classified records and not about his policy decisions. Dunn had departed the administration in the wake of Biden's decision to step down from the 2024 Democratic ticket. Her testimony to the committee comes as the panel has interviewed top Biden White House aides in recent weeks as part of its intensifying investigation. A number of the former aides have sat for voluntary interviews. On Tuesday, the panel met with former deputy chief of staff for policy Bruce Reed, and former Biden counselor Steve Ricchetti and onetime senior adviser Mike Donilon sat for transcribed interviews last week. Several other Biden aides, however, have declined to cooperate with the committee's investigation and, after being subpoenaed to appear, invoked their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. White House physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor, former assistant to the president and senior adviser to the first lady Anthony Bernal and former assistant to the president and deputy chief of staff Annie Tomasini have all pleaded the Fifth. This story and headline have been updated with additional developments.
