Young people in Singapore carrying weapons as ‘fashion accessory': Counsellor
SINGAPORE - Young people may be carrying weapons in public as a 'fashion accessory', and brandishing them during heated arguments, a counsellor who works with at-risk youth flagged.
Mr Narasimman Tivasiha Mani, co-founder of the charity Impart, said he has seen an increasing number of young people carrying weapons as accessories in the last 10 years.
'Some of these weapons look quite nice, so (young people) buy them and carry them around to show off,' he said.
Mr Narasimman, who said some of the weapons can be found on sale on platforms like Carousell, Telegram and Facebook, added that they would be used when these young people get into confrontations with others.
His comments come in the wake of a spate of incidents over the last year that saw young people linked to violent crimes.
In March, a 16-year-old was convicted of rioting with a deadly weapon after he brandished a flick knife at another teen during a group attack, which involved five others aged 13 to 17.
The teen, who has yet to be sentenced , had asked the victim if he wanted to 'try the knife'.
In September 2024, a 22-year-old man was charged with murder after a brawl in Kitchener Road. Three other men and two women were charged with rioting with a deadly weapon over the same incident.
In June 2024, a 19-year-old was charged with voluntarily causing hurt with a dangerous weapon. He had allegedly slashed a 20-year-old man with a chopper during a fight in Sembawang.
Mr Amalraj Thevar Manivannan, 27, is a friend of Mr Dhinessh Vasie, who died in the Kitchener Road brawl.
'He was so young and there was so much ahead for him,' said Mr Amalraj of the 25-year-old victim.
A father of a three-month-old girl, Mr Amalraj said he is concerned that young people may be carrying weapons in public.
' My worry is when my daughter starts going to school. Will there be enough advocacy against violence and use of such weapons, or will things be worse?' he said.
Official figures from 2019 to 2023 show that the number of offenders aged 10 to below 21 involved in offences under the Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act had climbed from 92 to 133.
Offences under the Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act involved mainly youth who were seen with offensive weapons such as knives.
The Straits Times checked and found weapons like karambit knives sold on online platforms like Carousell and Shopee, many with intricate designs and videos demonstrating how they could be used.
The karambit knife is a scheduled weapon.
Possession of a scheduled weapon – which includes flick knives, gravity knives and knuckle dusters – without lawful authority can result in a jail term of up to five years, with a minimum of six strokes of the cane for a first conviction.
Mr Narasimman said the use of weapons in the gaming world can play a part in influencing a young person to carry a weapon in real life.
'It becomes a thing for them to have a weapon, because in the game, a weapon increases the chance of them winning the fight. It conditions them to think that violence is an option,' he added.
MP for Ang Mo Kio GRC Darryl David had raised the issue in Parliament in September 2024 after a spate of rioting cases involving young people aged below 21 and deadly weapons.
Minister for Home Affairs K. Shanmugam said in a written reply that there was an average of 10 cases of rioting with deadly weapons every year between 2019 and 2023.
Slightly more than half involved offenders below 21 years of age.
Speaking with ST, Mr David said young people may be influenced by violent content they are watching on social media.
'When they have all this unfiltered content coming through without proper guidance, it could lead to acts of violence in real life.
'(The acts of violence) might also be due to the lack of adequate social and familial structures, and inability to manage anger, frustration and unhappiness,' he said .
Mr Narasimman said young people lack emotional regulation because their brains are not fully developed.
'Their executive functioning skills (at that age) might be poor, so they tend to act based on their emotions. Impulsivity is a huge trait among young people who use weapons.
'They don't know what to do when they feel threatened, and their need to fight back is strong, so they resort to using weapons,' he said, adding that childhood trauma and negative influences from friends might also contribute to their violent tendencies.
Mr David said educators and counsellors can help young people navigate the plethora of information available to them.
'As an educator, I believe that we've never had a generation exposed to so much information, with so little maturity.
'It's a very dangerous combination,' said Mr David, who was formerly deputy director of Temasek Polytechnic's School of Design.
He said more can be done to show young people that there are other avenues to share their fears and anxieties.
'With youth, we need to help them learn how to deal with fear and anxiety, and prevent these emotions from manifesting in acts of violence. We can teach them to manage their feelings, and find healthy channels for release,' he said.
When counselling at-risk youth, Mr Narasimman focuses on understanding their backgrounds and teaching them how to regulate their emotions.
These include equipping them with coping skills such as breathing exercises or clenching their fists to help them calm down in moments of anger.
As incidents of violence most commonly involve males, part of Mr Narasimman's work involves reshaping these young people's narratives of what it means to be a man.
He added: 'Many of them have been told not to cry, because boys must be harder and stronger.
'But when these youth are not in touch with their emotions, they bottle it up, and it may eventually burst.'
Claudia Tan is a journalist at The Straits Times covering the crime and court beat.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Online Citizen
5 hours ago
- Online Citizen
Sengkang Green Primary School suspends three students after death threats; mother disputes school's claims
A Primary 3 bullying case at Sengkang Green Primary School has escalated into public controversy after a student's mother, Ni Yin, revealed that she received graphic death threats shortly after reporting abuse her daughter allegedly faced for nearly six months. In a detailed Facebook post on 14 August 2025, which has since garnered thousands of shares and over 250,000 views, Ni wrote: 'I never imagined that one day I would have to seek justice for my daughter in this way… This is not only about my child – it could happen to any child in a Singapore family.' She claimed her nine-year-old daughter was the victim of repeated verbal and physical bullying by three male classmates since early 2025. The abuse reportedly included racial slurs, mockery, and shoving, with school staff allegedly taking no meaningful action despite multiple reports by the victim. Bullying escalated into death threats Ni reported that on 24 July 2025, her daughter came home from school visibly distressed and said: 'Mummy, I don't want to go to school anymore.' After coaxing her to open up, Ni said she discovered that her daughter had been placed in the last row of the classroom, seated beside two of the boys accused of bullying her. Her daughter was allegedly afraid to speak out earlier for fear of retaliation. Despite Ni's request to change her daughter's seat, the school allegedly rejected the move, citing confidentiality concerns. She expressed her disbelief, telling Lianhe Zaobao on 16 August: '难道我得上法庭才能把见男生家长吗?' ('Must I go to court just to be allowed to meet the parents of the boys?') On 26 July, just hours after Ni submitted a formal written complaint to the school, she began receiving harassing phone calls from unknown numbers. In one voice message, allegedly from one of the accused boys, a voice said: 'I might dissect her… I might dissect her into pieces like you. So which one do you want me to do? Dissect her? Or end her life in school? Choose one… I will kill you instead and your husband.' In a Facebook comment, Ni stated that during a meeting with the school management on 28 July, she showed the voice message to the Vice-Principal, year head, and form teacher. She wrote: 'After VP's investigation, I was told clearly by VP, it is one of the bully boy's mother who shared my phone number, and she admitted. I have evidence for this.' Another threat, as reported by Lianhe Zaobao, included a remark that the student wanted to 'find a knife and stuff her [the daughter] into a plastic bag.' Ni reported the incident to the police, Ministry of Education (MOE), and their Member of Parliament (MP). The Singapore Police Force confirmed to media outlet CNA and Zaobao that a report was made. Physical assaults continued on school grounds Ni claimed that even after the police report was filed, her daughter was assaulted on school grounds on three separate occasions: 1, 6, and 7 August 2025. She said the school was unaware of the incidents until she informed them directly. On 7 August, Ni said her daughter returned home with a visible bruise on her arm, crying and fearful. According to her, the teachers responded by saying they were unaware of the situation and that the child should have 'reported it herself.' Ni stated her daughter is now too afraid to return to school, and has been absent since 11 August, receiving professional psychological support. She added that the Vice-Principal told her the school 'could not guarantee' her daughter's safety, leading her to prioritise her daughter's mental well-being. School's response and growing backlash On 15 August, the school confirmed to CNA that it had suspended the three students involved in making threats. It said the students had been counselled and would face further disciplinary action — including possible caning — pending police investigations. The school also claimed that its internal investigation found that Ni's daughter had also 'engaged in hurtful behaviours.' In response, the school said: 'This too will be addressed to ensure the students continue to learn the values of respect and responsibility.' Ni reacted to this statement with a public rebuttal on 16 August, stating that the school was attempting to shift blame onto the victim. 'I was shocked to read that the school claimed my daughter 'had also engaged in inappropriate behaviour that harmed others'… This deeply harms the victim, diverts public attention, and shifts blame onto the child.' She demanded that the school provide all evidence supporting the allegations. 'If my daughter did engage in misconduct, I will not cover it up and will fully support MOE's procedures. But if the school cannot provide solid evidence… I reserve the right to take legal action.' Ni further questioned why the school never informed her of any misconduct if it had indeed been aware. She added that her daughter had a clean record, had served as PE Captain, and was awarded a government scholarship, noting: 'Why now, after the bullying incident became public, does the school suddenly raise allegations of misconduct?' Student's own written plea ignored A photo from the mother published by Zaobao shows the daughter's English workbook, in which she wrote: 'Sorry teacher, can I change seat? I cannot take it anymore.' Ni said this written plea for help was ignored by the teacher, despite it being a direct call for support. She took this as further evidence of the school's inaction and failure to protect her daughter. Demands and wider concerns In her open letter, Ni requested: An immediate school transfer for her daughter. Disciplinary action and counselling for the students responsible. Accountability for school staff who failed to act. A transparent, trackable anti-bullying reporting system across schools. She concluded: 'From beginning to end, my demand has been simple: that children be able to study and grow in an environment that is safe, respectful, and just. This is not only my daughter's right — it is the most basic right of every student.' Ni also referenced a 2021 suicide case at the same school, questioning whether systemic failures in school management might be responsible for repeated tragedies. Other parents allege broader pattern of bullying Following Ni's post, other parents shared their concerns in the comments. A parent alleged that his two children at the same school have been 'victims of bullying… with bruises almost on a weekly basis.' 'There's a big commotion now in the parents support group chat,' he wrote. 'Educators mostly sweep everything under the rug with minimal follow-ups.' He also mentioned seeing police cars near the school recently and claimed to have written to the school with no meaningful response. As of 17 August 2025, the MOE has not released a formal response.

Straits Times
12 hours ago
- Straits Times
Ukraine drone attack injures train station employee in Russia's Voronezh, governor says
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A railway employee was injured and a power line damaged by a Ukrainian drone attack at a station in Russia's Voronezh region, the regional governor said on Sunday. "According to preliminary information, a railway station track technician was injured in one of the municipalities," Alexander Gusev said of the overnight attack on the Telegram messaging app. "He has been hospitalised." Gusev said the attack caused train delays, but by Sunday morning trains were running back on schedule. The Russian defence ministry, which reports only how many drones its units destroy not how many Ukraine launches, said on the Telegram messaging app that nine drones were downed over the Voronezh region in Russia's southwest. In total, the ministry said, its defence systems destroyed 46 Ukrainian drones overnight, all of them in regions west of Moscow. Reuters could not independently verify the Russian reports. There was no immediate comment from Ukraine. Kyiv says that its strikes inside Russia are in answer to Moscow's continued attacks on Ukraine and are aimed at destroying infrastructure key to Russia's war efforts. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore I want to divorce my husband and be a single mother: More victims speaking up on emotional abuse World Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand after Putin summit Singapore Buying hope: Inside S'pore's love affair with the lottery Singapore She won big in Genting, but getting $240k winnings back to Singapore was dicey Life These cats may have disabilities, but they are resilient and capable of being affectionate Singapore Motorcyclist dies after multi-vehicle collision on TPE Opinion Confessions of a born-again Singaporean Singapore Singapore congratulates Indonesia on 80th Independence Day The reports of the attacks came after a summit between the U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin yielded no agreement on ending Russia's war in Ukraine. Trump said on Saturday that Kyiv should make a deal with Moscow to end the war because "Russia is a very big power, and they're not." REUTERS

Straits Times
21 hours ago
- Straits Times
With just 1 tap, this doctor lost his Telegram account to cyber criminals
In a poll by the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore, only 13 per cent of respondents were able to distinguish between all phishing and legitimate content In 2024, there were 8,552 cases of phishing scams in Singapore in 2024, placing it among the top five scam types. Minutes after Dr Chai Chwan tapped on a link within a Telegram message from an acquaintance, his phone buzzed non-stop. A flood of Telegram messages poured in from 10 friends, asking the 60-year-old general practitioner the same urgent question: 'Is your Telegram account hacked?' They had all received an identical Telegram message sent from Dr Chai's phone number. It contained a link inviting recipients to apply for We Care @ North East Fund, a genuine scheme by the North East CDC that provides financial support to needy families. The text claimed there was a 'limited time' offer for Singaporeans to receive up to $1,000 in cash assistance and urged recipients not to 'miss out'. That was when Dr Chai realised he had fallen prey to a phishing scam. His Telegram account was compromised. In phishing scams, victims are tricked into clicking malicious links or into revealing personal information. The scam happened on a Saturday afternoon in July this year. Just 10 minutes earlier, Dr Chai had received the same link from an acquaintance. Without thinking, he tapped on it. The page that opened mimicked a Singpass login. Dr Chai tapped the QR code, but an error message appeared. This glitch saved him from handing over his personal data, but it didn't stop scammers from hijacking his Telegram account. Within minutes, the same scam message was sent to Dr Chai's Telegram contacts, this time under his name. What followed was a scramble to report the incident to both the police and Telegram. Dr Chai also spent the next few hours sending warning messages in batches to all 7,000 of his phone contacts, hoping to contain the damage. He's unsure how many of his friends received the phishing text on Telegram. 'I feel quite embarrassed,' Dr Chai admits. 'It should have been common sense (not to click on the link).' With scams becoming more sophisticated, it can be hard to spot phishing attempts, says Mr Luke Ho, deputy director of National Cyber Threat Analysis Centre of the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (CSA). In the CSA's Cybersecurity Awareness Survey 2024, only 13 per cent of respondents were able to distinguish between all phishing and legitimate content. The survey polled 1,050 respondents aged 15 years and above on their attitudes towards cyber incidents and their awareness and adoption of good cyber hygiene practices. Phishing scams 101 There were 8,552 cases of phishing scams in Singapore in 2024, placing it among the top five scam types, say the police. Victims lost at least $59.4 million. How it works: Scammers impersonate legitimate individuals or organisations on social media and messaging platforms. Upon clicking on links embedded within messages on these platforms, victims are directed to a fraudulent site. They will be asked to key in their personal, bank login or credit card details. Scammers then gain access to their messaging or bank accounts. They may even impersonate the victims to scam their circle of acquaintances, family members and friends. Evolving tactics Why is it becoming harder to spot phishing scams? One reason is the use of generative artificial intelligence by scammers, says Mr Ho. 'Scammers (can) now create content that is increasingly indistinguishable from legitimate ones.' Gone are the days when poor grammar or awkward phrasing gave phishing messages away, he adds. Cyber criminals also increasingly use security certificates – depicted as 'https' in the URL – in their fake websites. Mr Ho adds that scammers often exploit emotions, such as the fear of missing out, or the false sense of urgency in Dr Chai's situation. Such tactics pressure victims to respond quickly without checking the legitimacy of the messages. Taking action Staying safe from scams requires more than just awareness, says Mr Ho. It requires a change in how we behave online. He shares some actions that one can take to protect against scams: Set strong passwords and enable two-factor authentication – such as using biometric features, like fingerprint or facial recognition, for your online accounts Ensure that your devices are running the latest version of its software by enabling automatic updates Install the ScamShield app to filter out scam messages and block scam calls Install anti-virus apps to detect and remove malware, and malicious phishing links If you're unsure whether something is a scam, 'always check with official sources by calling the 24/7 ScamShield helpline at 1799,' Mr Ho says, 'or with family members and friends before proceeding.' For Dr Chai, the anxiety from the phishing scam has not fully gone away. 'There's always this discomfort,' he shares, from the fear that scammers still have personal information of his that they haven't used. And though his bank accounts remain secure, Dr Chai has since taken extra steps to protect himself. He downloaded the ScamShield app that helps to block out reported scam numbers and messages, giving him some peace of mind.