
The candidates for California governor are a mystery
Michael Duncan was adjusting the screen on his front door when he paused recently to consider what he wants from California's next governor. Duncan admittedly hadn't given the matter much thought. But when you get down to it, he said, the answer is fairly straightforward: Do the basics. Fight crime. Fix the state's washboard roads. Address the perennial homelessness problem. And do a better job, to the extent a governor can, preventing wildfires like the inferno that decimated wide swaths of Southern California. 'I just roll my eyes,' said Duncan, who logs about 120 miles round trip from his home in Fairfield to his environmental analyst job in Livermore — and who knows exactly where to swerve to avoid the worst potholes along the way. 'Why does it take so long to do simple things?' The answer is complicated, but that won't necessarily mollify a California electorate that seems anxious, aggrieved and out of sorts— especially as regards the state's current chief executive.
More than a half-dozen candidates are bidding to succeed Gavin Newsom. Some have pursued the job for well over a year now, eyeing the day, in January 2027, when term limits force the Democrat from office. You wouldn't know that, however, talking to a wide assortment of Californians — many of whom hadn't the slightest clue who's running. In conversations last week with nearly three dozen voters, from the outskirts of the San Francisco Bay Area through Sacramento to the foothills of the Sierra Nevada, not a handful could name a single one of the declared candidates. 'That guy in Riverside, the sheriff,' said Zach House, 31, referring to Republican Chad Bianco. Outside his door, an 8-by-12-foot American flag snapped loudly in the wind whipping through his Dixon neighborhood, down streets named Songbird, Honeybee and Blossom. 'Right now,' House said, 'that's the only person I know that interests me.' 'The Mexican American gentleman,' Brenda Turley volunteered outside the post office in Rosemont, meaning Antonio Villaraigosa. 'Wasn't he the mayor of Los Angeles?' ( He was.) Admittedly, it's relatively early in the gubernatorial contest. And it's not as though events — the fiery apocalypse in Southern California, Hurricane Trump — haven't been fairly all-consuming. But if voters seem to be paying little attention to the race, most echoed Duncan's call for a focus on fundamentals, expressing a strong desire the next governor be wholly invested in the job and not view it as a mere placeholder or steppingstone to higher office.
'I feel like (Newsom) spent more time trying to campaign to be president for the next go-round than working on the state itself,' said Duncan, 37, who described himself as a moderate who tends to vote against whichever party holds the White House, to check their power. That all-in commitment is something Kamala Harris may wish to consider as she weighs a campaign for governor — and something she'll no doubt have to address, in the event she does run. The former vice president, now dividing her time between an apartment in New York City and her home in Brentwood, remains every bit as polarising as she was during her truncated White House campaign. Turley, a retired state worker, said she'll get behind Harris without question if she runs. 'Go for it,' the 80-something Democrat urged. 'Why not? She has the experience. Look at her political background. She was (California) attorney general. She worked in the Senate.'
Peter Kay, 75, a fellow Democrat, agreed. 'She's better qualified than about 90% of the people that run for any office in this country,' said Kay, who lives in Suisun City. (The retired insurance underwriter, just returned from the car wash, was buffing a few water spots off his black Tesla and had this to say about the company's CEO: 'If he wasn't Elon Musk, he would be in some institution, probably sharing a wing with Trump.') The conservative sentiment toward Harris was summed up by Lori Smith, 66, a dental hygienist in Gold River, who responded to the mention of her name with a combination wail and snort. 'Oh, God! Oh, my God!' Smith exclaimed, vowing to leave California if Harris is elected governor. 'I could never see her being president. We dodged a bullet there. I think she just needs to live her little life in some little town somewhere and go away.'
There is, of course, no pleasing everyone, even with the sky a brilliant blue and the hills a shimmering green, thanks to a blessedly wet Northern California winter. Some griped about overly stringent environmental regulations. Other said more needs to be done to protect fish and wildlife. Some said more water needs to go to farmers. Others said, no, city dwellers deserve a bigger share. Some complained about homeless people commandeering shared public spaces. Amanda Castillo, who lives in her car, called for greater compassion and understanding. The 26-year-old works full time at a retail job in Vacaville and still can't afford a place of her own, so she beds down in a silver GMC Yukon with her boyfriend and his mother, who were inside the public library charging their electronic devices. 'I consider myself to be lucky,' Castillo said, 'because if I wasn't sleeping in the car I'd either be on the street or in a cardboard box.'
Hanging over every conversation— like the big, puffy clouds above, but much less enchanting — was President Donald Trump. Most partisans differed, as one would expect, on how California should deal with the president and his battering-ram administration. 'Anybody who has a platform should be speaking out,' fighting Trump in the courts and resisting any way possible, said Eunice Kim, 42, a Sacramento physician and professed liberal, who paused outside the library in El Dorado Hills as her boys, 5 and 8, roughhoused on the front lawn. Tanya Pavlus, a 35-year-old stay-at-home mom, disagreed. The Rancho Cordova Republican voted for Trump and cited a litany of ills plaguing the state, among them high gas prices and the steep cost of living. Anyone serving as California governor 'could use all the advice [they] can get from the president,' Pavlus said, 'because the situation speaks for itself.'
But not everyone retreated to the expected corners. Ray Charan, 39, a Sacramento Democrat who works for the state in information technology, said, like it or not, Trump is president,'so you have to come to some sort of professional arrangement. You may not agree with all the policies and everything, all the headlines and the personality stuff, but if you can somehow come together and work for the betterment of the state, then I'm all for it.' Sean Coley, a Trump voter, was similarly matter-of-fact.
'There's no fighting Trump. We've seen that,' said the 36-year-old Rancho Cordova Republican, a background investigator and part-time wedding photographer. 'If you want federal funding, if you want progress, you have to work with those who are on a different side of the table, especially when they're as aggressive as Trump is.
'I would get a Venn diagram. Figure out what he's for, what you're for,' Coley suggested. 'Figure out what's in the middle, and tackle that hard.' Pragmatism of that sort may not summon great political passions. But practicality seems to be what many Californians are looking for in their next governor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Zawya
3 hours ago
- Zawya
Africa's minerals are being bartered for security: why it's a bad idea?
A US-brokered peace deal between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda binds the two African nations to a worrying arrangement: one where a country signs away its mineral resources to a superpower in return for opaque assurances of security. The peace deal, signed in June 2025, aims to end three decades of conflict between the DRC and Rwanda. A key part of the agreement binds both nations to developing a regional economic integration framework. This arrangement would expand cooperation between the two states, the US government and American investors on 'transparent, formalized end-to-end mineral chains'. Despite its immense mineral wealth, the DRC is among the five poorest countries in the world. It has been seeking US investment in its mineral sector. The US has in turn touted a potential multi-billion-dollar investment programme to anchor its mineral supply chains in the traumatised and poor territory. The peace that the June 2025 deal promises, therefore, hinges on chaining mineral supply to the US in exchange for Washington's powerful – but vaguely formulated – military oversight. The peace agreement further establishes a joint oversight committee – with representatives from the African Union, Qatar and the US – to receive complaints and resolve disputes between the DRC and Rwanda. But beyond the joint oversight committee, the peace deal creates no specific security obligations for the US. The relationship between the DRC and Rwanda has been marred by war and tension since the bloody First (1996-1997) and Second (1998-2003) Congo wars. At the heart of much of this conflict is the DRC's mineral wealth. It has fuelled competition, exploitation and armed violence. This latest peace deal introduces a resources-for-security arrangement. Such deals aren't new in Africa. They first emerged in the early 2000s as resources-for-infrastructure transactions. Here, a foreign state would agree to build economic and social infrastructure (roads, ports, airports, hospitals) in an African state. In exchange, it would get a major stake in a government-owned mining company. Or gain preferential access to the host country's minerals. We have studied mineral law and governance in Africa for more than 20 years. The question that emerges now is whether a US-brokered resources-for-security agreement will help the DRC benefit from its resources. Based on our research on mining, development and sustainability, we believe this is unlikely. This is because resources-for-security is the latest version of a resource-bartering approach that China and Russia pioneered in countries such as Angola, the Central African Republic and the DRC. Resource bartering in Africa has eroded the sovereignty and bargaining power of mineral-rich nations such as the DRC and Angola. Further, resources-for-security deals are less transparent and more complicated than prior resource bartering agreements. DRC's security gaps The DRC is endowed with major deposits of critical minerals like cobalt, copper, lithium, manganese and tantalum. These are the building blocks for 21st century technologies: artificial intelligence, electric vehicles, wind energy and military security hardware. Rwanda has less mineral wealth than its neighbour, but is the world's third-largest producer of tantalum, used in electronics, aerospace and medical devices. For almost 30 years, minerals have fuelled conflict and severe violence, especially in eastern DRC. Tungsten, tantalum and gold (referred to as 3TG) finance and drive conflict as government forces and an estimated 130 armed groups vie for control over lucrative mining sites. Several reports and studies have implicated the DRC's neighbours – Rwanda and Uganda – in supporting the illegal extraction of 3TG in this region. The DRC government has failed to extend security over its vast (2.3 million square kilometres) and diverse territory (109 million people, representing 250 ethnic groups). Limited resources, logistical challenges and corruption have weakened its armed forces. This context makes the United States' military backing enormously attractive. But our research shows there are traps. What states risk losing Resources-for-infrastructure and resources-for-security deals generally offer African nations short-term stability, financing or global goodwill. However, the costs are often long-term because of an erosion of sovereign control. Here's how this happens: - certain clauses in such contracts can freeze future regulatory reforms, limiting legislative autonomy - other clauses may lock in low prices for years, leaving resource-selling states unable to benefit when commodity prices surge - arbitration clauses often shift disputes to international forums, bypassing local courts - infrastructure loans are often secured via resource revenues used as loan security. This effectively ringfences exports and undermines sovereign fiscal control. Examples of loss or near-loss of sovereignty from these sorts of deals abound in Africa. For instance, Angola's US$2 billion oil-backed loan from China Eximbank in 2004. This was repayable in monthly deliveries of oil, with revenues directed to Chinese-controlled accounts. The loan's design deprived Angolan authorities of decision-making power over that income stream even before the oil was extracted. These deals also fragment accountability. They often span multiple ministries (such as defence, mining and trade), avoiding robust oversight or accountability. Fragmentation makes resource sectors vulnerable to elite capture. Powerful insiders can manipulate agreements for private gain. In the DRC, this has created a violent kleptocracy, where resource wealth is systematically diverted away from popular benefit. Finally, there is the risk of re-entrenching extractive trauma. Communities displaced for mining and environmental degradation in many countries across Africa illustrate the long-standing harm to livelihoods, health and social cohesion. These are not new problems. But where extraction is tied to security or infrastructure, such damage risks becoming permanent features, not temporary costs. What needs to change Critical minerals are 'critical' because they're hard to mine or substitute. Additionally, their supply chains are strategically vulnerable and politically exposed. Whoever controls these minerals controls the future. Africa must make sure it doesn't trade that future away. In a world being reshaped by global interests in critical minerals, African states must not underestimate the strategic value of their mineral resources. They hold considerable leverage. But leverage only works if it is wielded strategically. This means: - investing in institutional strength and legal capacity to negotiate better deals - demanding local value creation and addition - requiring transparency and parliamentary oversight for minerals-related agreements - refusing deals that bypass human rights, environmental or sovereignty standards. Africa has the resources. It must hold on to the power they wield. All rights reserved. © 2022. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (


Gulf Today
8 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Japan's Upper House poll spells trouble for PM
The Sunday poll to the Upper House of the Japanese Diet is projected to end as a rebuff to the ruling coalition of Liberal Democratic Party-Komeiti coalition led by Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. The ruling coalition is set to lose its majority in the Upper House according to media projections. The television channel NHK is predicting that the LDP coalition could win between 32 and 53 seats. Though the government of Ishiba does not have to quit, the prime minister will be under greater pressure than ever to resign, and the LDP will be forced to choose a new leader. Ishiba has acknowledged the setback but he has told a television news channel that the country is facing a crucial trade dialogue with the United States, and that the responsibility of his government is to focus on the bilateral talks, with the US under President Donald Trump, threatening to impose reciprocal tariffs between 10 per cent and 25 per cent. Like many other trading partners of the US, Japan too is worried because the American tariffs would hit the export-based economy harshly. Political commentators say that Ishiba referring to the trade talks is an indirect way of saying that he would not be stepping down. But it seems most likely that after a trade agreement is finalized with the US, Ishiba might be forced to step down. His public ratings have been very low because of rampant inflation and the decision of the government to impose a consumer tax. This has been vigorously opposed by all the opposition parties though any other party in office would face the same policy dilemma about inflation. Ishiba is proposing cash handouts to all, including foreigners residing in Japan. It is the far-right Sanseito which is billed to gain the most in these elections. It is projected to win 10 to 15 seats. It holds a single seat in the upper chamber now. The party with the slogan of 'Japanese First' was born on the YouTube in 2020 during the Covid pandemic. It has won three seats in the Lower House. Party leader Sohei Kamiya has tried to explain what is meant by 'Japanese First'. He told Nippon Television, 'The phrase Japanese First was meant to express rebuilding Japanese people's livelihoods by resisting globalism. I am not saying that we should completely ban foreigners or that every foreigner should get out of Japan.' But the anti-immigrant plank is part of the party's political doctrine. The foreigners in Japan form just 3 per cent of the population but their presence has become prominent because of the increase in tourism. The tourist arrivals in Japan this year had crossed the 20-million mark. Political experts feel that the opposition parties are only taking advantage of the stressful economic condition and that they have nothing different to offer to address the existing challenge. Political science professor Yu Uchiyama of the University of Tokyo said, 'The Ishiba administration has received a harsh verdict. It seems the public believed that the government and ruling parties failed to respond effectively to various issues, including rising prices. The opposition's call for a consumption tax cut appears to have appealed to voters more than the ruling party's proposed cash handouts.' And he pointed out, 'Moves to oust Ishiba may emerge. However, under these difficult circumstances, it will be hard for anyone – regardless of who becomes prime minister – to turn the situation around.' Japan has been experiencing trouble since the 1990s, starting with stagnation despite the Bank of Japan reducing interest rates to zero and below. It is only last year that the central bank has pushed the interest rate into positive territory.


Gulf Today
14 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Trump wants to eradicate DEI in higher education
Elizabeth Hernandez, Tribune News Service The Trump administration has already disrupted Darius McGregor's academic journey. The 18-year-old graduate of Denver's East High School interned earlier this year at a laboratory on the University of Colorado's Anschutz Medical Campus, where he and his peers evaluated whether bio-fortified maize could help hungry Guatemalan children. The potentially life-saving research was funded by the US Agency for International Development, the federal agency that humanitarian aid programnes relied on to finance their work. The Trump administration dismantled USAID this spring, putting millions of lives at risk worldwide, according to a study published in the medical journal The Lancet. McGregor's project lost funding. He nearly lost his internship position, too, but the university found an alternative source to pay for it. As McGregor prepares to attend Brown University this fall with aspirations of becoming a doctor, he said he's bracing for more federal interference with his education. 'I'm concerned with what my college experience may look like, especially with funding cuts like I've already seen firsthand,' he said. 'It's discouraging for people of color, but we will not stop.' Three Black students who received scholarships from the Sachs Foundation — a Colorado-based nonprofit supporting Black communities — told The Denver Post about their experiences entering college as the Trump administration works to dismantle diversity, equity and inclusion programs intended to give them equal footing to thrive in college. Leaders of the foundation, unlike companies scaling back DEI initiatives amid federal pressure, say they're not deterred from continuing their mission. McGregor said he was alarmed to see the president of the United States threatening to slash funding or investigate colleges and schools in an effort to eradicate the sorts of DEI programs that helped him and other students of color find parity with their white peers so that they had the same opportunities to succeed. 'It has motivated me to prove myself and serve as an example,' McGregor said. 'Even when you take DEI away, we will still figure out a way to excel.' The Trump administration took aim at DEI in schools and colleges shortly after the inauguration in January, threatening to withhold federal funding from institutions unless they eliminated initiatives supporting diversity, equity and inclusion. Directives from the US Department of Education in February said any programs that treat students differently on the basis of race to achieve 'nebulous goals such as diversity, racial balancing, social justice or equity' were illegal under Supreme Court precedent. In April, a federal judge blocked the government from enforcing these directives after a lawsuit brought by the National Education Association and the American Civil Liberties Union accused the Trump administration of providing 'unconstitutionally vague' guidance and violating teachers' First Amendment rights. Regardless, Colorado universities acknowledged changing their diversity initiatives to avoid losing federal funding. The University of Colorado's Colorado Springs campus was among more than 50 universities under federal investigation for alleged racial discrimination under Trump's directives. Meanwhile, researchers have found that the disparities in the number of Black and Latino students admitted to elite colleges and universities have widened over the last 40 years, according to a University of California, Berkeley study released in 2024. The study found that, despite more students from all races going to college, Black and Latino students were increasingly less likely to attend top-tier, four-year colleges. The disparity remained significant, even when factoring in family income and parents' education, the study found. Between 2012 and 2022, college enrollment for Black students in the United States declined 22%, from 2.96 million students to 2.32 million, according to the Postsecondary National Policy Institute. 'This suggests that the underlying issue of racial inequality in college attendance goes beyond socioeconomic measures, such as family income and parents' education, and is intrinsically linked to race itself,' the study concluded. 'It points to a systemic issue within the fabric of American education and society.' It's these systemic barriers that fuel Ben Ralston, CEO of the Sachs Foundation, to continue his work. The 94-year-old organisation that provides support to Black Coloradoans was founded at a time when the Ku Klux Klan ruled Denver, Ralston said, and its leaders do not plan on backing down. 'There's a lot of trepidation right now,' Sachs said. 'We wanted to make sure that everyone in our community of scholars recognised that none of the work we do is going to change any time soon. When we look at what's happening at the federal level in reference to DEI, there is no political moment that changes our mission. There has been a historic structure put in place to exclude Black Americans and Black Coloradans from opportunities that have never been rectified. We're not going to change that mission.' Sarah Mohamed Ali's academic journey in Denver has been dotted with scholarly achievements alongside adversity. Mohamed Ali, a 2025 graduate of DSST: Cedar High School, served as an intern at Denver Health and worked as a dietary aid at an assisted living facility. The daughter of Sudanese immigrants said she was also bullied out of wearing her hijab to school in middle school. She was selected to attend New York University's Simons Science Exploration Program and the Yale Young Global Scholars summer program. After enduring pandemic learning and the COVID-19 lockdown, Mohamed Ali desired to reconnect with her authentic self and started wearing her hijab to school again. The 18-year-old was accepted to Bowdoin College in Maine to study health care, but her higher education pursuits have been executed under the cloud of a federal administration targeting DEI. 'I worked really hard throughout school, and hearing about everything that was going on months into applying for college was very scary and shocking,' she said. 'But I think in spite of everything that might be going on politically, there are still organizations you know you can rely on. You can still pursue your dreams.' The Sachs Foundation chose 53 Black scholars in Colorado this year to receive more than $1.9 million in scholarships. The foundation's undergraduate and graduate scholarships are awarded based on academic achievement, financial need and character, Ralston said. The organisation also provides student mentorship, youth college and career development, and educator-focused initiatives. 'In a moment where many institutions are retreating from their commitments to equity, we're proud to stay firm in ours,' Ralston said. 'The work we do is not just about scholarships — it's about ensuring access, opportunity and belonging for Black students who are too often excluded.' For 17-year-old Naima Criss, the Sachs Foundation offered community. This spring, the 2025 scholars met up at Colorado College to be celebrated. Renowned author and activist Ta-Nehisi Coates shared his story with students. Criss, a graduate of Denver's Regis Jesuit High School, basked in the Black joy of it all. 'There's this thing where if you're really smart and Black, people are surprised,' Criss said. 'I can just be a very chill person, and what I like is we're all amazing and we're all also just people hanging out and living their best lives. It's great to be in a space where you're celebrated but not the exception.' Criss' resume is lengthy already. In addition to being a Sachs scholar, she was named a Gates Scholarship winner — a prestigious award from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Through Girls Inc. of Metro Denver's Leadership Out Loud program, Criss flew to the nation's capital and lobbied Congress for more comprehensive sex education in schools. She's also served on the Mayor's Youth Commission