logo
Man who lit fatal Napanee fire sentenced to 7 years for manslaughter, arson

Man who lit fatal Napanee fire sentenced to 7 years for manslaughter, arson

CBC6 days ago
Social Sharing
The man who set fire to a transitional housing building in Napanee, Ont. last August, leading to the death of well-loved local fixture Walter Lasher, was sentenced on Friday to seven years in prison.
Ontario Court of Justice Judge Geoffrey Griffin said a total sentence of nine-and-a-half years was appropriate, given Andrew Thompson's "serious and violent crimes," but gave him credit for pretrial custody largely spent triple-bunked and in lockdown.
The 32-year-old looked blank as his sentence was read out.
Thompson was initially charged with first-degree murder for sparking the fatal Aug. 3, 2024 fire on John Street, but pleaded guilty in May to one count each of manslaughter and arson.
Lasher, a 67-year-old man, was a regular sight downtown where he was known for greeting friends and strangers alike with a friendly wave or smile. He died of smoke inhalation after being pulled from the burning building.
During a court appearance last month, Lasher's family members described him as childlike in many ways, with a disability that kept him from writing or reading anything other than his name. Several fought back tears while reading their victim impact statements.
Lasher's sister Freda Hart previously told the court he'd sat on every park bench in Napanee and was "as much a part of downtown as the landscape," adding that strangers still approach her to say how much they miss him.
"He didn't deserve to die in that cruel way," she said. "How would you feel if your brother were killed in a fire that was intentionally set?"
Asked during that court date if he had anything to say, Thompson apologized to Lasher's family, calling him a "great man" who was always kind.
"I am truly sorry," he said.
Defence Lawyer Peter Zaduk argued his client was in a haze from drug abuse at the time of the fire and should be sentenced to between five and eight years, with credit for two years of time served.
Repeated attempts to start fire
Crown Attorney Monica Heine disagreed, referring to surveillance video she said showed Thompson making repeated attempts to set fires in the building.
Court heard Thompson was in a relationship with a woman who lived in the building, across the hall from Lasher.
On the day of the fire, Thompson arrived to find another man in her room and learned she'd had an affair. His final attempt to light the fire involved setting her mattress ablaze, causing smoke to spread through the rooming house.
Thompson also hid one fire extinguisher and removed another from the front hall, spraying it so it couldn't be used to put out the flames, according to the Crown.
"These actions took place over a significant period of time, were persistent, required thought, diligence and focus," Heine said, calling for a sentence of 10 years.
Justice Griffin described the fire as a "horrifying and appalling day for the Napanee community."
He agreed with the Crown that surveillance video showing Thompson's four separate attempts to spark a fire over the course of more than an hour showed his actions weren't impulsive, but instead done in a "calculated manner."
Making sure the fire extinguishers weren't available could "only be seen as planning and deliberation," the judge added.
Griffin said Lasher dealt with mobility issues, which would have been obvious to Thompson.
The older man tried to escape as the smoke spread, but only managed to make it to a common room on the second floor, where he was found by emergency crews.
Meanwhile, after finally managing to start the fire, Thompson could be seen "scurrying away" while "covering his face," said the judge.
"It would have taken nothing to a bang on Mr. Lasher's locked door," he added.
While being led to a waiting police cruiser following his sentencing, Thompson repeated his apology to the victim's family.
Lasher's loved ones said while the decision did provide closure, some of them felt the sentence should have been longer. Regardless, they said, nothing can make up for the loss of Walter.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House of Commons hit by cyberattack from 'threat actor': internal email
House of Commons hit by cyberattack from 'threat actor': internal email

CBC

time27 minutes ago

  • CBC

House of Commons hit by cyberattack from 'threat actor': internal email

The House of Commons and Canada's cybersecurity agency are investigating a significant data breach caused by an unknown "threat actor" targeting employee information. According to an internal email obtained by CBC News, the House of Commons alerted staff on Monday that there was an information breach. It said a malicious actor was able to exploit a recent Microsoft vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to a database containing information used to manage computers and mobile devices. Some of the information obtained by the hacker is not available to the public, according to the email. That includes employees' names, job titles, office locations and email addresses, as well as information regarding their House of Commons-managed computers and mobile devices. Canada's Communications Security Establishment (CSE) said it is aware of the incident and is working with the House of Commons to provide support, but could not confirm who was behind the attack. The CSE defines a threat actor as a group or individual that aims "with malicious intent" to "gain unauthorized access to or otherwise affect victims' data, devices, systems and networks." A recent threat report from the CSE found that adversarial nations, including the People's Republic of China (PRC), Russia and Iran, are increasingly behind cyber threats to Canada. But the agency said it's too early to tell who — or what — was behind this breach. "Attribution of a cyber incident is difficult. Investigating cyber threat activity takes resources and time, and there are many considerations involved in the process of attributing malicious cyber activity," said the CSE in a statement. The cyberattack happened on Friday, according to the email sent to employees. It calls on employees and members of the House of Commons to be especially vigilant as information accessed during the breach could be used in scams, or to target and impersonate parliamentarians. In a statement, the House of Commons said it was working with national security partners to investigate the matter, but would not disclose information — including how many employees are affected — citing the ongoing probe. Sharp increase in cyber threats The most recent national cyber threat assessment from the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security reports that Canada is considered a "valuable target" for criminals and state adversaries looking to disrupt systems. It also found a "sharp increase in both the number and severity of cyber incidents" over the past two years. "State adversaries are getting bolder and more aggressive," wrote Rajiv Gupta, the head of the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security. "Cybercriminals driven by profit are increasingly benefiting from new illicit business models to access malicious tools and are using artificial intelligence to enhance their capabilities." The report says China presents the most sophisticated and active cyber threat to Canada, noting that over the past four years, at least 20 networks associated with Government of Canada agencies and departments have been compromised by PRC threat actors.

2 Montreal police officers suspended for lying about man who died in custody win appeal
2 Montreal police officers suspended for lying about man who died in custody win appeal

CBC

time27 minutes ago

  • CBC

2 Montreal police officers suspended for lying about man who died in custody win appeal

Two Montreal police officers who were suspended for lying about the health condition of a man who died in custody have won their appeal — thanks to a technicality about how the evidence against them was gathered. A Quebec court judge decision issued last month overturns the initial decision from 2023, in which the police ethics committee slammed the two officers — Dominic Gagné and Mathieu Paré. At the time, the police ethics committee said the officers were caught in a lie and tried to "explain the inexplicable" after it became clear that there was video footage that contradicted their claims. But following an appeal, Quebec court Judge Alexandre Henri ruled that evidence against the two officers was obtained in a way that violated their Charter right against self-incrimination because they were not told they had the right to remain silent. As a result, the judge significantly reduced the suspension for the two officers from 22 days without pay to two days. The July ruling largely revolves around the way meetings between the two officers and the province's police watchdog unfolded. And it's the latest twist in a case that goes back nearly eight years, when David Tshiteya Kalubi died the same night police arrested him. Kalubi was 23 years old. Officers 'somewhat trapped' by investigators, judge says On Nov. 7, 2017, Kalubi was a passenger in a car that was pulled over during a traffic stop. Police discovered there were two outstanding warrants for his arrest and brought him to their operations centre in the city's east end. While being processed, police asked him if he had any medical conditions they should know about: He told them he had sickle cell anemia and needed medication to treat the condition. He did not have it on him at the time. But the officers, Paré and Gagné, didn't log that information on the inmate control sheet and Kalubi died hours later after being transferred to be detained at municipal court. A Quebec coroner ultimately concluded that Kalubi did not die because he didn't have access to medication, but the officers' actions were still the focus of an investigation by the province's police watchdog, the Bureau des enquêtes indépendantes (BEI). BEI investigators met with the officers, one at a time, in January 2018. After BEI investigators showed video footage that showed Kalubi had told them about his condition, "Paré ended the meeting and left the premises," the Quebec court ruling reads. "Gagné also watched the video. On the advice of his lawyer, he indicated in a written statement that he would not add further details to his version of events." In his decision, the Quebec court judge contemplated whether the BEI's investigation was administrative or criminal in nature. He believes it was clearly the latter. And if the meeting with the officers is part of a criminal investigation, the officers, according to the judge, had to be told they had the right to remain silent. Judge Henri described the violation of the officers' rights to silence and against self-incrimination as "grave" and said "the officers are somewhat trapped by the BEI investigators that wait until Paré makes his statement to show them the video." "The court is of the opinion that the protection of the fundamental rights of the police officers must prevail over the search for the truth," his ruling reads. "By excluding the police officers' reports and statements as well as their testimony linked to those documents, it becomes difficult to conclude that they gave the BEI statements that they knew were false or inaccurate." According to the July court decision, the police ethics commissioner warned against introducing concepts from criminal proceedings into ethics cases. CBC News reached out to the police ethics committee and asked if it plans to appeal. We're waiting to hear back. We've also reached out to the Montreal Police Brotherhood for comment. Montreal police acknowledged it was aware of the decision but declined to comment, citing ongoing legal proceedings. In 2019, the province's Crown prosecutor's office announced there would be no charges laid in connection with Kalubi's death. A ruling that changes everything In addition to his argument that the officers had a right to remain silent because the BEI investigation was criminal in nature, the Quebec court judge in last month's ruling also brought up a Quebec Court of Appeal decision from 2024. In that case, the province's highest court sided with the Montreal Police Brotherhood and a group representing local police officers across the province and said officers had the right to remain silent and had no obligation to submit their version of events during BEI investigations. Although this came after the police ethics committee's decision to suspend the two officers, it reaffirmed a lower court ruling from 2022. "In retrospect, it would've certainly been more prudent, even advised, for the committee to suspend its proceedings while waiting for the Court of Appeal," the judge wrote. He also said that the 2024 Court of Appeal ruling had to be applied retroactively because it was a "judicial change of law" and not just a legislative change. By ruling that the officers did not knowingly lie to investigators — in light of the evidence now deemed inadmissible — the judge shaved 20 days off their 22-day suspensions without pay. They are still suspended for two days for showing negligence and carelessness toward Kalubi's health and safety by failing to document his medical condition.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store