Vance previews US-Iran nuclear talks, says Trump 'open' to sitting down with Russians, Chinese in future
Vice President JD Vance previewed the next round of U.S.-Iran nuclear talks on Wednesday, saying President Donald Trump would be "open" to sitting down with Chinese and Russian officials in the future to prevent proliferation.
U.S. and Iranian officials are scheduled for a fourth round of nuclear talks in Oman in the coming days. Trump will visit the Middle Eastern countries of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates next week.
At the Munich Leaders Meeting in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, former German ambassador to the U.S., Wolfgang Ischinger, asked Vance if the administration would "go for zero enrichment" by Tehran and noted the unresolved "Gaza issue."
Trump Teases 'Very, Very Big Announcement' Ahead Of Middle East Trip, Carney Says He's 'On Edge Of My Seat'
Vice President JD Vance looks on during a discussion at the Munich Leaders meeting at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on May 7, 2025.
Vance cited "two big issues" with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the formal name of the Iran nuclear deal secured in 2015 during the Obama administration.
Trump has said the flawed deal did not prevent Iran from building an atomic bomb. The vice president on Wednesday added that former President Barack Obama's agreement had "incredibly weak" enforcement regarding inspections, and he, therefore, didn't believe "it actually served the function of preventing the Iranians from getting on the pathway to nuclear weapons."
Read On The Fox News App
Secondly, Vance said the Trump administration believes there were some elements of the Iranian nuclear program that were actually "preserved" under the JCPOA.
"Yes, there weren't nuclear weapons. Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapon," Vance said, arguing the deal "allowed Iran to sort of stay on this glide path towards a nuclear weapon if they flip the switch and press go."
"We think that there is a deal here that would reintegrate Iran into the global economy," Vance said ahead of the talks. "That would be really good for the Iranian people, but would result in the complete cessation of any chance that they can get a nuclear weapon. And that's what we're negotiating towards. And as the president has said, that's Option A."
If Option A is "very good for the Iranian people," Vance offered that Option B "is very bad."
"It's very bad for everybody. And it's not what we want, but it's better than Option C, which is Iran getting a nuclear weapon. That is what is completely off the table for the American administration. No ifs, ands or buts," Vance said.
Vice President JD Vance and Wolfgang Ischinger, president of the Foundation Council, participate in a discussion at the Munich Leaders meeting hosted by the Munich Security Conference in Washington, D.C., on May 7, 2025.
Israel Says Trump's Middle East Visit Is The 'Window Of Opportunity' For Hostage Deal
Trump told NBC's "Meet the Press" in an interview that aired Sunday that he would only accept "total dismantlement" of Iran's nuclear program.
The vice president on Wednesday said the Trump administration's broader objective is to prevent nuclear proliferation, noting that he believes the president would be "open" to sitting down with China and Russia down the road.
"If Iran gets a nuclear weapon, which country then next gets a nuclear weapon, and then when that country gets a nuclear weapon, which country after that? We really care not just about Iran, but about nuclear proliferation," Vance said. "The president hates nuclear proliferation. I hate nuclear proliferation. And I think that the president would be very open to sitting down with the Russians and the Chinese and saying, 'look, let's get this thing in a much better place. Let's reduce the number of nuclear weapons that are in the world writ large.' That's obviously not a conversation for tomorrow. That's a conversation, God willing, for a few years from now."
"But there is no way you get to that conversation if you allow multiple regimes all over the world to enter this sprint for a nuclear weapon," Vance added. "And we really think that if the Iran domino falls, you're going to see nuclear proliferation all over the Middle East. That's very bad for us. It's very bad for our friends. And it's something that we don't think can happen."
As for negotiations with Iran, Vance gave a grade of "so far, so good," thanking intermediaries, including the Omanis, for ensuring that the talks are "on the right pathway."
Vice President JD Vance at the Munich Leaders meeting hosted by the Munich Security Conference at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on May 7, 2025.
"But this is going to end somewhere, and it will end either in Iran eliminating their nuclear program -- their nuclear weapons program," Vance said. "They can have civil nuclear power. Okay. We don't mind that. But let me ask this basic question – which regime in the world has civil nuclear power and enrichment without having a nuclear weapon? And the answer is no one."
"So our proposition is very simple. Yes, we don't care if people want nuclear power. We're fine with that. But you can't have the kind of enrichment program that allows you to get to a nuclear weapon. And that's where we draw the line."
Trump announced on Tuesday that the U.S. military, which has been bombing Iran-backed Houthis since March 15 to defend freedom of navigation, would stop its strikes on the Yemen-based terror group, which communicated it does "not want to fight" anymore. The Houthis claimed responsibility for a missile launched from Yemen that struck near the main terminal of an Israeli airport last weekend hours before the Israeli Cabinet voted to expand fighting in Gaza.
From the Oval Office on Tuesday, Trump also teased a "very, very big announcement" happened before his Middle East trip, but declined to clarify the subject, besides saying it "wasn't necessarily about trade."
Original article source: Vance previews US-Iran nuclear talks, says Trump 'open' to sitting down with Russians, Chinese in future
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
As Russian losses in Ukraine hit 1 million, Putin faces an economic time bomb
Russian losses in Ukraine hit a massive, and grim milestone on June 12 — 1 million Russian soldiers killed or wounded during the 39-month-long full-scale war, according to figures from Kyiv. Although hugely symbolic, the number is unlikely to prompt a change in tactics from Moscow as it gears up for more offensives this summer, and escalates drone and missile attacks on Ukrainian civilians. But behind the figure lies an economic time bomb that the Kremlin will find impossible to ignore. "(Russian President) Vladimir Putin made a fundamental strategic mistake in deciding how to resource this war," George Barros, Russia team lead at the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), told the Kyiv Independent. "What Vladimir Putin has done is he has created a system in which he doesn't use the monopoly of violence of the Russian state to coerce Russians to go fight and die in Ukraine, as the Soviet Union might have. What Putin has done is he's created an alternative social contract where he pays you to go fight in Ukraine. "That strategy can work if you're planning on running a short war. It does not work if you are running a multi-year protracted war." Russia effectively has two armies — a conscript army, and a contract army. Russia's conscript army is the country's standing armed forces that are required to defend Russia itself. To maintain this force, the Kremlin conducts conscription twice a year, in spring and fall, requiring eligible men to serve for one year. In the latest draft, Putin signed a decree on March 31 ordering the spring conscription of 160,000 men. But crucially, conscripts by law are not allowed to be sent abroad to fight wars in foreign countries, something which is not only a legal contract, but a social contract that is deeply embedded in Russian society — civil society groups consisting of the mothers of conscripts are perhaps the only group of Russian citizens that Putin is still forced to respect and listen to. This is where Russia's contract army comes in. "When the full-scale invasion started, the Russians attacked Ukraine with what they call the contract servicemen, the professional military who have some experience, and (voluntarily) sign contracts for a fixed period of time," Kateryna Stepanenko, Russia deputy team lead and analyst at the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), told the Kyiv Independent. But Russia soon ran into a problem — the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The Kremlin had envisioned a swift and easy victory over Ukraine, and the capture of Kyiv within a matter of days. This proved to be a disastrous miscalculation and instead, many of Russia's most elite troops and modern equipment were obliterated by Ukrainian resistance. As the war dragged on, and Russia's losses mounted, Moscow needed to replenish its forces without drawing upon its conscript army and announcing a full mobilization to avoid unrest. A partial mobilization announced in September 2022 led to the only widespread protests against the war inside Russia during the entire full-scale invasion, making clear to Putin that announcing anything more would cause him serious problems. "The Russians realized that they were in a challenging political situation," Stepanenko said. The solution? Pay people to fight. "It is the only way of recruitment for the war now because ideologically motivated recruits ended in spring-summer 2022 and partial mobilization of the fall 2022 created domestic political tensions and risks which were considered as unacceptable for the Kremlin in those circumstances," Pavel Luzin, senior fellow with the Democratic Resilience Program at the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA), told the Kyiv Independent. Russia's mounting losses throughout the war created a double-edged problem — more and more replacements were needed, but attracting them to what was clearly such a high-risk endeavour necessitated increasing rewards. The solution? Keep offering more and more money. Sign up bonuses for joining the Russian army have ballooned over the course of the war. In July 2024, Putin ordered a doubling of the lump-sum payment offered to recruits in September 2022 to 400,000 rubles (over $5,000). But this was just the base level payment — the Kremlin has placed recruitment quotas on Russian oblasts, meaning some have had to offer many times more than this in order to reach them. "There are some oblasts in central Russia that are offering up to $40,000, 3 million rubles plus, just for a one-time sign-up bonus," Barros said. For context, the average Russian monthly wage in 2024 was $980, so a one-time sign up bonus of $40,000 is nearly four times higher than what the average worker can expect to make in a whole year. But with such huge losses in Ukraine, the bill for the Kremlin is huge. "They lose and recruit somewhere in the ballpark of 35,000 to 45,000 people per month, and perhaps they recruit a little bit north of that number," Barros said. "At $40,000 a head just for the sign-up bonus, let alone salaries and other benefits and remittances if you're killed or wounded, this is a very fast way to not be sustainable." According to an analysis by economist Janis Kluge, Russia's daily bill just for sign-up bonuses is $24 million. The ballooning bills come at a time when Russia's economy is already under huge strain from Western sanctions and falling oil and gas revenues. "The implications for Russia are grave," energy security analyst Wojciech Jakóbik wrote in an op-ed for the Kyiv Independent this week. "Military spending has ballooned to 6.3% of GDP — its highest level since the Cold War — while the budget deficit continues to rise," he added. "To fund its war, the Kremlin is raiding reserves, raising taxes, and cutting social programs. Absent war spending, Russia might already be in recession." Predictions about the imminent collapse of Russia's economy have been made throughout its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, yet so far it hasn't crashed and burned as some expected. But three years of sanctions are eroding the country's fiscal stability, despite Moscow claiming otherwise. Russian GDP growth has dropped precipitously this year as sanctions hamper its main sources of income — oil and gas revenue — and curb imports of components needed for its military-industrial complex. According to Barros, making any predictions about whether or not the Russian economy is going to collapse is "supremely difficult to do," but the signs for the Kremlin "don't bode well." "If you look at the current Russian economic indicators, for example their inflation rate, their overnight lending interest rates, Russian monetary constraints… government spending is out of control — it's a very loose fiscal policy and so the economy is at risk of overheating," he said. "I don't know to what extent the economy can continue to last." Barros said one major thing to keep an eye on are the Russian banks that are taking on "tremendous amounts of debt" in order to finance the Russian economy and the Kremlin's war machine in Ukraine. "I suspect what will happen one day at the current rate is a Russian bank will have to default on its debt and that will trigger some sort of financial meltdown," he said. "I can't name the time or the hour or the place, but it seems very much like Vladimir Putin today is writing checks that Vladimir Putin a year or two years from now will not be able to cash." Currently, Western sanctions against Russia are still in place and the EU has just announced its 18th package. In the U.S., a bipartisan sanctions bill, introduced on April 1 by Republican Senator Lindsey Graham and Senate Democrat Richard Blumenthal, seeks to impose a 500% tariff on imports from countries that continue purchasing Russian oil and raw materials. This would deal another major blow to the Kremlin and its ability to wage war but U.S. President Donald Trump seems in little rush to hurry it through. But the biggest factor in bringing down the Russian economy remains in the hands of Ukraine. "We have to keep reminding ourselves that the key driver, the engine of Russia's economic woes, is in fact its casualty rate and its losses on the battlefield in Ukraine," Barros said. "That is what is driving the need to recruit and replace 45,000 soldiers a month. That is what is destroying all the main battle tanks. That is what is actively destroying the Russians. "And the minute the Ukrainians become less lethal, the minute that the Ukrainians do not impose those heavy losses on Russia at the same scale, then the economic picture becomes much better for the Kremlin." Read also: Putin's suspected daughter found working in anti-war galleries in Paris We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Axios
25 minutes ago
- Axios
ICE ramps up immigrant arrests in courthouses across U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents — often dressed in plainclothes — are now arresting immigrants at courthouses nationwide, sometimes moments after their hearings end. Why it matters: The courthouse crackdown is part of a sweeping Trump administration effort to fast-track removals and increase the number of deportations this year — a strategy that's dramatically expanding who gets targeted and how. The big picture: The recent ramp-up follows a January policy shift that authorizes ICE to target courthouses for the first time in years — a move advocates say is quietly upending the legal process for immigrants. Under the Biden administration, ICE was not allowed to conduct enforcement operations at or near courthouses. What they're saying: "ICE is now following the law" and placing immigrants in expedited removal, "as they always should have been," a senior Homeland Security spokesperson told Axios. Immigrant activists describe it as a trap, warning that courthouses are becoming enforcement zones where due process rights are eroding. How it works: An immigration court that dismisses the case — often because the Department of Homeland Security withdraws the charges or because the applicant has no active relief from removal — opens the door for ICE to swoop in post-dismissal, no longer restrained by a pending court case. These immigrants, if they've been in the U.S. for less than two years, are then arrested on-site and fast-tracked for deportation. Failure to appear at court results in a removal order called an "in absentia" deportation order. Driving the news: Under a February executive order from President Trump, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is now defaulting to issuing Notices to Appear (NTAs) for anyone denied an immigration benefit — including asylum, green cards and work permits. The policy change increased the number of NTAs issued by the agency compared to under the Biden administration. ICE and Customs and Border Protection also issue NTAs. Someone denied a visa extension can now be swept into removal proceedings, even without a criminal record. NTAs are also being issued to immigrants who commit fraud, including giving false information to an employer. State of play: The policy shift has supercharged the deportation pipeline and contributed to a surge of courthouse arrests across the country. By the numbers: Federal immigration authorities have launched deportation proceedings against more than 22,100 immigrants since late February, according to new USCIS data out Thursday. USCIS is now issuing about 1,840 NTAs every week, including hundreds tied to asylum and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) cases, per new agency figures. Zoom in: In recent weeks, ICE officers have ramped up arrests in immigration courts in numerous cities, from Seattle and Phoenix to San Antonio and New York City. At Denver's immigration court, for example, at least eight immigrants — including two young children — have been detained by ICE in the last two weeks, according to local organizers. What they're saying: Denver activists say the arrests are fueling fear and signal a collapse of due process. "The truth here is that the jack boots of ICE are terrorizing immigrant communities that are trying to take advantage of the due process of law that they are entitled to," Denver immigration attorney Hans Meyer said at a press conference last week. Now immigrants are "questioning if the legal way is really the right way," Jennifer Piper, the American Friends Service Committee's Denver program director, added.
25 minutes ago
Coinbase adds former top Obama and Harris adviser Plouffe as it broadens its political reach
WASHINGTON -- A senior adviser to Kamala Harris' 2024 presidential campaign is joining Coinbase's global advisory council, which already includes several former U.S. senators and Donald Trump's ex-campaign manager, as the cryptocurrency exchange broadens its political reach. David Plouffe, a top Democratic strategist best known as an architect of Barack Obama's successful 2008 presidential campaign, is the latest addition to the council, joining as the cryptocurrency industry plays an increasingly prominent role in shaping fast-moving legislation in Congress. The legislation aims to create a comprehensive framework for the regulation of digital assets and comes amid a shift in Washington. President Trump, a Republican, has pledged to make the U.S. the global capital of cryptocurrency, contrasting with what industry leaders viewed as a stifling regulatory approach under the previous Democratic administration. Trump and his family have also been aggressively expanding their personal business into almost every part of the cryptocurrency ecosystem, including raising billions of dollars to buy bitcoin, creating a new stablecoin and launching and promoting a Trump-themed meme coin. Chris LaCivita, the former co-campaign manager of Trump's successful 2024 presidential bid, joined Coinbase's advisory council in January. Former U.S. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, a Democrat-turned-independent from Arizona, also joined the council, which consists of a number of other high-profile figures from both major political parties. Plouffe previously served on the global advisory board for Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, before joining Harris' presidential campaign as a senior adviser in August. Faryar Shirzad, Coinbase's chief policy officer, described the role of the advisers as being a 'sound board' to discuss policy efforts and business strategy. In Congress, legislation is advancing far more quickly than usual for a new industry — a pace that some involved in shaping the bills say comes amid an all-out pressure campaign from the cryptocurrency sector. On Wednesday, a group of Democrats joined the Republican majority to advance legislation regulating stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency typically pegged to the U.S. dollar. Final passage through the Senate could come next week. Meanwhile, a more sweeping bill to implement cryptocurrency market structure has begun moving through House committees.
