Defense Health Agency head forced to abruptly retire: Report
Army Lt. Gen. Telita Crosland, one of the most senior Black female officers in the Army who has served in her role since January 2023, 'is beginning her retirement' as of Friday morning, according to a statement from Stephen Ferrara, the acting assistant secretary of defense for health affairs.
The statement offered no reasoning for Crosland's quick departure, but two officials told Reuters that she was informed that she must retire and was not given a reason why.
The move comes exactly a week after President Trump fired six senior military officers, including the Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman and the first female head of the Navy.
'I want to thank Crosland for her dedication to the nation, to the military health system, and to Army medicine for the past 32 years,' Ferrara said in the statement.
Crosland, the first Black woman to lead the Defense Health Agency, graduated from the U.S. Military Academy West Point and entered the Army as a Medical Corps officer in 1993. Prior to her last role, the highly decorated officer served as the Army's deputy surgeon general, according to her official Defense Department biography.
Under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the Pentagon has moved to quickly oust diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, arguing without proof that they wreak havoc on unit cohesion.
'The single dumbest phrase in military history is 'our diversity is our strength,'' Hegseth said earlier this month during a town hall meeting at the Pentagon. 'From our perspective, why do you get rid of something like DEI? Because from our perspective, it's served a purpose of dividing the force, as opposed to uniting the force.'
Trump administration defense officials have also ordered the end of commemorations of identity month celebrations including Black History Month and Women's History Month, and directed the Pentagon to erase all DEI content from its digital footprint.
That all comes as the military prepares to kick out all transgender service members.
In Crosland's place, David Smith, the acting principal deputy assistant secretary of defense for health affairs, will serve as the acting director of the DHA while the department works through the nomination process for her replacement.
'Dr. Smith is a steady hand with decades of experience in the Military Health System in and out of uniform. I ask everyone to support Dr. Smith and the entire DHA team as we stabilize and strengthen our system serving the most lethal fighting force on the planet,' Ferrara said.
Headquartered in Falls Church, Va., the DHA employs nearly 130,000 civilians and military personnel to serve 9.5 million service members and military retirees and their families.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
12 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Dozens killed seeking aid in Gaza as Israel weighs further military action
Advertisement Another escalation of the nearly 22-month war could put the lives of countless Palestinians and around 20 living Israeli hostages at risk and would draw fierce opposition both internationally and within Israel. Netanyahu's far-right coalition allies have long called for the war to be expanded and for Israel to eventually take over Gaza, relocate much of its population, and rebuild Jewish settlements there. President Trump, asked by a reporter Tuesday whether he supported the reoccupation of Gaza, said he wasn't aware of the 'suggestion' but that 'it's going to be pretty much up to Israel.' Of the 38 Palestinians killed while seeking aid, at least 28 died in the Morag Corridor, an Israeli military zone in southern Gaza where UN convoys have been repeatedly overwhelmed by looters and desperate crowds in recent days, and where witnesses say Israeli forces have repeatedly opened fire. Advertisement The Israeli military said troops fired warning shots as Palestinians advanced toward them, and that it was not aware of any casualties. Nasser Hospital, which received the bodies, said another four people were killed in the Teina area, on a route leading to a site in southern Gaza run by the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an American contractor. The Al-Awda Hospital said it received the bodies of six people killed near a GHF site in central Gaza. GHF said there were no violent incidents at or near its sites and that the one in central Gaza was not open on Wednesday. It said the violence may have been related to the chaos around UN convoys. Two of the Israeli airstrikes hit Gaza City, in the north of the territory, killing 13 people there, including six children and five women, according to the Al-Ahli Hospital, which received the bodies. The Israeli military says it only targets militants and blames civilian deaths on Hamas because its militants are entrenched in heavily populated areas. Israel facilitated the establishment of four GHF sites in May after blocking the entry of all food, medicine, and other goods for 2 1/2 months. Israeli and US officials said a new system was needed to prevent Hamas from siphoning off humanitarian aid. The United Nations, which has delivered aid to hundreds of distribution points across Gaza throughout the war when conditions allow, has rejected the new system, saying it forces Palestinians to travel long distances and risk their lives for food, and that it allows Israel to control who gets aid, potentially using it to advance plans for further mass displacement. Advertisement The UN human rights office said last week that some 1,400 Palestinians have been killed seeking aid since May, mostly near GHF sites but also along UN convoy routes where trucks have been overwhelmed by crowds. It says nearly all were killed by Israeli fire. This week, a group of UN special rapporteurs and independent human rights experts called for the GHF to be disbanded, saying it is 'an utterly disturbing example of how humanitarian relief can be exploited for covert military and geopolitical agendas in serious breach of international law.' The experts work with the UN but do not represent the world body. The GHF called their statement 'disgraceful' and urged the UN and other aid groups to work with it 'to maximize the amount of aid being securely delivered to the Palestinian people in Gaza.' The Israeli military says it has only fired warning shots when crowds threatened its forces, and GHF says its armed contractors have only used pepper spray and fired into the air on some occasions to prevent deadly crowding at its sites. Israel's air and ground war has destroyed nearly all of Gaza's food production capabilities, leaving its people reliant on international aid. A new report by the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization and the UN satellite center found that just 8.6 percent of Gaza's cropland is still accessible following sweeping Israeli evacuation orders in recent months. Just 1.5 percent is accessible and undamaged, it said. The military offensive and a breakdown in security have made it nearly impossible for anyone to safely deliver aid, and aid groups say recent Israeli measures to facilitate more assistance are far from sufficient. Advertisement Hospitals recorded four more malnutrition-related deaths over the last 24 hours, bringing the total to 193 people, including 96 children, since the war began in October 2023, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. Jordan said Israeli settlers blocked roads and hurled stones at a convoy of four trucks carrying aid bound for Gaza after they drove across the border into the Israeli-occupied West Bank. Israeli far-right activists have repeatedly sought to halt aid from entering Gaza. Jordanian government spokesperson Mohammed al-Momani condemned the attack, which he said had shattered the windshields of the trucks, according to the Jordanian state-run Petra News Agency. The Israeli military said security forces went to the scene to disperse the gathering and accompanied the trucks to their destination.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pharma prepared to work with Trump on DTC drug sales: Pfizer CEO
This story was originally published on BioPharma Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily BioPharma Dive newsletter. Pfizer and other large pharmaceutical companies are taking seriously President Donald Trump's demand that drugmakers make more of their medicines available direct to consumers in the U.S. at lower cost, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said Tuesday. 'We have serious discussions in the industry,' Bourla told investors on a conference call Pfizer held to discuss its earnings for the second quarter. 'I'm connected very often individually with all the major companies and they are all ready to roll up their sleeves and execute something like that.' Pfizer and partner Bristol Myers Squibb recently announced plans to offer their widely-used blood thinner Eliquis at a discounted cash price through an online service. The company previously launched a direct-to-consumer service that allows patients to book telehealth appointments, schedule vaccinations and fill prescriptions for certain medicines, such as those Pfizer sells for migraine and COVID-19. 'We think it is a fantastic way to go ahead, so we will work collaboratively to do it,' Bourla said. Obesity drugmakers Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk have also recently opened up more ways for cash-paying patients to access their weight loss medicines directly. Other companies are signaling interest, too, in exploring ways to sidestep pharmacy benefit managers. These drug-purchasing middlemen extract from drugmakers rebates that insurers say they use to lower overall costs, but not necessarily in ways that are obvious to a prescription-filling patient. Expanding direct-to-consumer options was one of four demands Trump made of the pharmaceutical industry last week in letters issued to 17 drugmakers, including Pfizer. In those letters, the president threatened to use 'every tool' the U.S. government has available if the companies don't take steps to lower the cost of their products to the prices paid in other industrialized countries. Such a 'most favored nation' policy could be a major blow to the industry, although analysts are divided on how sweeping its impact would be if limited only to Medicaid, as Trump indicated. On Tuesday's call, Bourla said he is in 'active discussions' at the 'highest levels of the U.S. government,' including conversations with Trump, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz. In addition to leading Pfizer, Bourla is the current board chair of industry lobbying group PhRMA. 'The letter asks a lot from us,' Bourla added. 'But we are engaged in productive discussion with them and in general I'm happy with the way that they listen to us.' Pricing threats aren't the only challenge drugmakers face in the U.S. The Commerce Department is nearing the end of an investigation into pharmaceutical imports expected to result in sector-specific tariffs. On Tuesday, Trump told CNBC that his administration will initially impose a small levy on pharmaceuticals that could later rise as high as 250% over time. Such duties would be costly for drugmakers, but analysts believe a phase-in period would allow many companies to adjust their supply chains in such a way that the worst financial hit could be mitigated. Already, most of the largest drugmakers have announced major manufacturing investments in the U.S. Pfizer anticipates that it can absorb the impact of tariffs this year, as well as any changes it makes to its products' prices, while still meeting its financial forecast of $61 billion to $64 billion in revenue. On Tuesday, the company raised its guidance for adjusted diluted earnings per share by 10 cents. Shares in Pfizer rose by nearly 4% by midday Tuesday. Recommended Reading Trump redoubles threats in attempt to strongarm drugmakers on prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Short, Brisk Walks Could Help You Live Longer Than Long, Slow Strolls
The speed of your steps could make a significant difference in adding years to your life, according to a new study. Researchers led by a team from Vanderbilt University in the US analyzed the physical activity of 79,856 adults in 12 US states, comparing links between time spent walking slowly, time spent walking quickly, and eventual cause of death (where applicable) across an average follow-up period of almost 17 years. The data showed that those people who spent at least a quarter of an hour each day walking briskly were significantly less likely to die during the study period, especially from cardiovascular disease. What makes the findings particularly useful is they're based on a sample that includes people typically underrepresented in walking studies like this: the cohort was predominantly made up of low-income and Black individuals, who are often more likely to live in impoverished areas and less likely to have access to safe walking spaces. Related: "Our research has shown that fast walking as little as 15 minutes a day was associated with a nearly 20 percent reduction in total mortality, while a smaller reduction in mortality was found in association with more than three hours of daily slow walking," says epidemiologist Wei Zheng, from Vanderbilt University "This benefit remained strong even after accounting for other lifestyle factors and was consistent across various sensitivity analyses." The researchers categorized slow walking as walking the dog, or walking around at work. To qualify for the faster walking linked to the reduction in the risk of death, it had to be something like climbing stairs or walking briskly as part of an exercise routine. While the study isn't comprehensive enough to show direct cause and effect, the drop in mortality risk is significant enough to strongly suggest some kind of link, and the researchers think the benefits that aerobic exercise brings to heart health is key. Fast walking makes the heart work harder, improving cardiovascular health. Burning calories can also help people stick to a healthy weight. "While the health benefits of daily walking are well established, limited research has investigated the effects of factors such as walking pace on mortality, particularly in low-income and Black/African-American populations," says Zheng. One of the reasons that researchers are so keen to promote walking as a way of staying healthy is that it's just about the simplest exercise out there: most of us can do it, without any special equipment, and it's relatively easy to roll into a daily routine (try parking a little further away from work, for example). "Public health campaigns and community-based programs can emphasize the importance and availability of fast walking to improve health outcomes, providing resources and support to facilitate increased fast walking within all communities," says epidemiologist Lili Liu, from Vanderbilt University. The research has been published in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine. Related News 5 Things You Ought to Know Before Buying Supplements There's One Simple Method to Reduce Alcohol Intake, Scientists Say, And It Works Untested Peptide Injections Are Being Sold as 'Next-Gen Biohacks' Solve the daily Crossword