SD Senate rejects effort to boost Native American history, culture lessons in schools
PIERRE — A bill to move Native American culture and history from a permitted to a required part of South Dakota's curriculum was loosened by its sponsor in the state Senate on Tuesday, but still failed its floor vote.
In its original form, Senate Bill 196 would have mandated the teaching of the Oceti Sakowin Essential Understandings. The phrase 'Oceti Sakowin' refers to the Lakota, Dakota and Nakota people.
The set of standards and lessons was adopted seven years ago by the South Dakota Board of Education Standards with input from tribal leaders, educators and elders. A survey conducted by the state Department of Education indicated use of the Essential Understandings by 62% of teachers, but the survey was voluntary and hundreds of teachers did not respond.
Lawmakers advance bill requiring SD schools to teach Native American history, culture
The bill from Sen. Tamara Grove, R-Lower Brule, passed the Senate Education Committee unanimously one week ago.
On the Senate floor, Grove moved an amendment that tossed the requirement that the standards be taught in favor of a requirement that the state's Indian Education Advisory Council and heads of the education departments in the state's nine tribes be involved in the next rewrite of the understandings.
'This amendment addresses the concerns of the education department,' Grove said Tuesday.
Education Secretary Joe Graves told the Education Committee last week that the state doesn't need additional mandates beyond math, science, social studies and English-language arts/reading.
Grove said mandated deeper involvement by tribes and the advisory council would mean Native Americans would 'be at the table when the sausage is made.'
Sen. John Carley, R-Piedmont, spoke against the amended bill. He called it 'a mandate of a mandate,' as portions of the understandings are already folded into the social studies standards created at the state level.
The state's educators have more important things to worry about than Oceti Sakowin lessons, he argued.
'If we're going to remandate a mandate, I'd recommend we remandate math and reading,' Carley said.
The Senate voted 28-7 to defeat the bill.
Meanwhile, Gov. Larry Rhoden announced Tuesday that he signed related legislation into law that will require all certified teachers, rather than only new educators or those moving from out-of-state, to take a course in South Dakota Indian Studies.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Redistricting Push Would Further Divide a Polarized Congress
President Trump's drive to secure Republican advantage in the House through mid-decade redistricting — and Democrats' move to retaliate with their own efforts to redraw political lines to their advantage — could supercharge the partisan shift in Congress. Should the efforts succeed, they would amplify the trend of one party gaining a stranglehold on state congressional delegations, intensifying the deep polarization that has helped to paralyze Congress in recent years. Even before multiple state legislatures, goaded by Mr. Trump, began to consider redrawing their maps, the number of House delegations represented by a single party was at a 60-year high. Number of states whose House and Senate were controlled by one party Democrats Republicans Source: Smart Politics Notes: Data includes states that had a single-party delegation at some point during the Congress term. The years indicate the beginning of each Congress term. By Lazaro Gamio and Zach Levitt A sudden new round of redistricting would continue a remarkable shift of one party gaining congressional supremacy in a state through gerrymandering and ideological shifts, leaving the opposition barely represented or shut out entirely. The result would have profound implications for Congress. 'The number has been on the rise basically since 2010, when Republicans roared back after Obama's victory,' said Eric Ostermeier, a researcher at the Humphrey School of Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota, who tracks the political makeup of congressional delegations. 'Red states are getting redder, blue states are getting bluer. All this data points to this getting worse.' States whose House and Senate were controlled by one party Democrats Republicans AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY Sources: Smart Politics Notes: Data includes states that had a single-party delegation at some point during the Congress term. The years indicate the beginning of each Congress term. By Lazaro Gamio and Zach Levitt Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'I Know It's A Radical Idea,' Says Bernie Sanders, 'But We Need A Government That Represents Working Families, Not Billionaires'
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is again sounding the alarm on what he sees as a system rigged for the ultra-wealthy and against working Americans. 'The system is just not working for the average American,' Sanders wrote in a recent post on X. 'Not wages, not health care, not housing, not educational opportunity, not retirement security.' He added: 'I know it's a radical idea, but we need a government that represents working families, not the billionaire class.' Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Named a TIME Best Invention and Backed by 5,000+ Users, Kara's Air-to-Water Pod Cuts Plastic and Costs — Calling Out Corporate Power In Red States During a recent CNN interview amid his 'Fighting Oligarchy' tour through Republican strongholds like West Virginia, Sanders said the Democratic Party has failed working-class people and needs to return to its roots. 'This used to be, decades ago, one of the strongest Democratic states in the country,' he said. 'Now it's a strong Republican state, because I think in many ways the Democratic Party has turned its back on what was its base.' He told CNN that economic issues cut across political lines and that many red states are filled with people who want affordable housing, better wages and guaranteed health care. 'They don't want to see tax breaks for billionaires. They don't want to see the rich get richer. They want health care as a human right. They want to raise the minimum wage to a living wage,' Sanders said. Trending: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can He also didn't shy away from criticizing then-Vice President Kamala Harris' failed presidential campaign, saying she was too influenced by wealthy donors. 'She had too many billionaires telling her not to speak up for the working class of this country,' he said. A Broken System That Protects The Powerful Sanders in Jujne warned of a new class of 'uber capitalists' who believe they deserve to rule in a 'Flagrant' podcast. 'There is a new breed of uber capitalists out there who really believe... that they are superior human beings,' he said. He pointed to far-right rhetoric that openly dismisses democracy in favor of elite rule. Sanders said this mindset echoes old ideas of divine entitlement. 'Back in the 19th century... I am the king, God made my family king. Sorry you're starving to death, but that's the way life goes.'He criticized billionaires for hoarding wealth and only choosing to give it away when they are near death, calling it a system that has the resources to solve real problems but refuses to act. 'We are the richest country in the history of the world,' he said. 'And yet 60% of people live paycheck to paycheck.' 'Is it a radical idea that we join every other major country on Earth and guarantee health care for people?' Sanders asked on CNN. 'Is it a radical idea to say that we've got to raise the minimum wage to $17 an hour?' For Sanders, these aren't fringe ideas—they're common sense in much of the developed world. Read Next: Imagn Images Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article 'I Know It's A Radical Idea,' Says Bernie Sanders, 'But We Need A Government That Represents Working Families, Not Billionaires' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Democrats ramp up pressure on Trump, GOP over Epstein files with arcane gambit
Democrats on Wednesday ramped up pressure on Republicans over the Jeffrey Epstein files, turning to an arcane rule to attempt to force the release of the documents that have become a significant pain point for the Trump administration and Republicans. Led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), they are seeking the documents via the 'rule of five,' which dates to a 1928 law and requires government agencies to hand over information if any five lawmakers on a Senate or House panel — in this case the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee — request them. The rule is relatively untested in the courts, but that isn't stopping Democrats from using it to turn the screws on an issue that has divided the GOP. 'This is not complicated,' Schumer said at a press conference on Wednesday. 'Every single time Trump, his administration [and] Republican leaders have had a chance to be transparent about the Epstein files, they've chosen to hide.' Schumer was not only flanked by Sen. Gary Peters (Mich.), the committee's top Democrat, and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), but also a sizable placard tying President Trump to Epstein, who died in federal prison six years ago while awaiting trial for sex trafficking charges. The picture showed an image of Trump and Epstein at an event, with the president being quoted as saying the disgraced financier was a 'terrific guy,' 'a lot of fun to be with' and 'likes beautiful women as much as I do.' Schumer and all seven Democrats on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee signed on to a letter to the Department of Justice demanding the files. 'After missteps and failed promises by your Department regarding these files, it is essential that the Trump Administration provide full transparency,' the Democrats wrote to Attorney General Pam Bondi, pointing to promises she and Trump have made. 'We call on you to fulfill those promises of transparency,' they continued. They gave Bondi until Aug. 15 to hand over the relevant documents. The letter marked the latest attempt to put Republicans on the back foot and keep the Epstein issue front and center as lawmakers ready to depart for the August recess. Trump has made a concerted effort to push the discussions surrounding Epstein to the side. He urged his supporters to drop the issue, and in recent weeks the administration released a series of documents related to Hillary Clinton, former President Obama and Martin Luther King Jr. The Epstein issue drove such a wedge in the party that it forced the House to break early for the monthlong August recess after the chamber became paralyzed by an uproar from members over the administration's handling of the Epstein files. 'The evasions, the delays, the excuses — they are not just odd, they're alarming,' Schumer said. 'It begs the question: If there's nothing to hide, why all the evasiveness?' In addition, multiple Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee's panel on federal law enforcement defied the White House by backing a Democratic-led push to subpoena the Justice Department for its files regarding the Epstein investigation. And Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) moved during a separate Oversight subcommittee hearing to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell, a longtime Epstein associate who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking. An attorney for Maxwell said on Tuesday that she would only speak with the committee if granted immunity. The panel flatly rejected that possibility. The issue had been more muted in the Senate, but Democrats are working to change that. Schumer did not rule out the possibility of utilizing amendment votes on the three-bill funding package that could come to the floor before the August break. He said that they are checking in with members as part of the hotline being run on the planned 'minibus.' And Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) has repeatedly tried to pass via unanimous consent a bill requiring the Justice Department to release the Epstein documents, forcing Republicans to object. It's unclear whether the Justice Department will acquiesce to the Democratic 'rule of five' request, and what would happen if they stonewall the effort. 'This is a law,' Schumer told reporters. 'This should be bipartisan, and we're still talking to Republican colleagues about trying to join us and that could help get this public. If not, there's recourse in the courts. This is the law.' 'We have talked to some of our lawyers. This can be challenged in the courts,' he added. A Justice Department spokesperson confirmed receipt of the letter but declined to comment further. How Republicans plan to handle this gambit is also unclear at this point. 'We're looking into it. Obviously, it's a dated law,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said, labeling the rule 'obscure.' 'I don't know how they came up with it. We're having some lawyers look at it.' Despite claims by Schumer, multiple Republicans indicated that they had not been approached by Democrats to back their push to force the release of the documents even though some have echoed similar calls. 'I've long said, I think DOJ should release all the documents, just like they did with MLK, RFK, JFK,' said Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), a fellow committee member. 'Everything they've got, they should put it out there.' 'I think it's a little bit more of a stunt. They didn't reach out to any Republicans before,' Hawley added. 'They didn't ask me [to sign the letter].' Multiple Homeland Security Committee Republicans also noted that they utilized the 'rule of five' during the Biden administration on multiple occasions to request documents, but were stonewalled repeatedly. Among the items they sought information about were those pertaining to the origins of COVID-19, vaccine safety and the 'burrowing' of Biden-era political appointees to become nonpolitical permanent roles. 'We were stiffed every time,' Hawley said. 'I don't think we ever got anything substantive.' Whether this is the maneuver that gets it done, some Republicans believe that the administration will eventually end up releasing the documents, as the fervor of the MAGA base has shown few signs of letting up over the Epstein files. 'I expect DOJ to get information out, period. I don't think this is what's going to move it out. I think there's plenty of interest in folks to just say, 'Get it out there,'' said Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), a Homeland Security Committee member. The Oklahoma Republican added that conspiracy theories will only grow while the files remain behind closed doors. 'The conspiracy theories don't get better with less information,' Lankford continued. 'They just continue ramping up.' Rebecca Beitsch contributed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.