South Korean man's wrongful spy charges overturned, 58 years after execution
SEOUL - A man executed after wrongfully being convicted of spying for North Korea has been posthumously exonerated by a South Korean court, in a retrial held over half a century after his death.
Court officials said on June 25 that the Supreme Court confirmed a lower court's not-guilty verdict for the late Oh Gyeong-mu, who was convicted of violating the National Security Act and now-defunct Anti-Communism Act in 1967.
A separate retrial in the 2020s also cleared the charges against the younger brother and sister of the deceased.
The Oh brothers were lured into North Korea in 1966 by their eldest brother, Mr Oh Gyeong-ji, where they were held for 40 days and subjected to ideological education by the Pyongyang regime. Upon returning to the South, both voluntarily turned themselves in to the authorities.
However, prosecutors accused them of acting as North Korean spies, and the court ultimately convicted them on espionage charges.
'It cannot be considered that a legally-valid investigation was conducted on the accused, and their confession of crime can be seen as unlawfully acquired evidence through cruelty such as illegal arrest,' the 2023 ruling by Seoul Central District Court said, dismissing the confession as an evidence of crime.
'The court would like to offer its deepest condolences to the brutality imposed on the (Oh) family, due to their actions conducted out of love of their family,' it added.
The prosecution challenged the decision, but both the appellate and the nation's highest court upheld the earlier ruling. The appellate court said Mr Oh Gyeong-mu meeting his older brother was to suggest he turn himself in, due to concern of their mother, and said there was no reason to believe he had any intent of helping the North.
Brotherly love led to death and imprisonment
Mr Oh Gyeong-dae, the younger-brother of Mr Oh Gyeong-mu, was a tangerine farmer on Jeju Island in 1966 when he was approached by their long-lost half-brother, Mr Oh Gyeong-ji
The eldest of the three, Mr Oh Gyeong-ji, had gone missing during the 1950–53 Korean War. He asked Mr Oh Gyeong-dae to accompany him to Japan, but instead, took him to North Korea.
After they returned to the South, Mr Oh Gyeong-ji threatened the youngest brother and forced him to arrange a meeting with Mr Oh Gyeong-mu, who was living in Seoul. The two younger brothers were tricked into going to North Korea, and were received education on ideology of the totalitarian Pyongyang regime before being released 40 days later.
Mr Oh Gyeong-mu and Mr Oh Gyeong-dae turned themselves in to the South Korean authorities upon their return, but Seoul's regime under dictatorial leader Park Chung-hee used oppressive means such as torture to force them into false confessions.
The older Oh was sentenced to death and the younger Oh received 15 years in prison in a 1967 verdict. The execution was carried out five years later
Their younger sister was sentenced to three years in prison, suspended for five years, for knowingly aiding their spying activities.
Mr Oh Gyeong-dae was cleared of his charges in November of 2020, and subsequent rulings have exonerated the wrongful charges against both his siblings. THE KOREA HERALD/ASIA NEWS NETWORK
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
6 hours ago
- Straits Times
South Korean man's wrongful spy charges overturned, 58 years after execution
SEOUL - A man executed after wrongfully being convicted of spying for North Korea has been posthumously exonerated by a South Korean court, in a retrial held over half a century after his death. Court officials said on June 25 that the Supreme Court confirmed a lower court's not-guilty verdict for the late Oh Gyeong-mu, who was convicted of violating the National Security Act and now-defunct Anti-Communism Act in 1967. A separate retrial in the 2020s also cleared the charges against the younger brother and sister of the deceased. The Oh brothers were lured into North Korea in 1966 by their eldest brother, Mr Oh Gyeong-ji, where they were held for 40 days and subjected to ideological education by the Pyongyang regime. Upon returning to the South, both voluntarily turned themselves in to the authorities. However, prosecutors accused them of acting as North Korean spies, and the court ultimately convicted them on espionage charges. 'It cannot be considered that a legally-valid investigation was conducted on the accused, and their confession of crime can be seen as unlawfully acquired evidence through cruelty such as illegal arrest,' the 2023 ruling by Seoul Central District Court said, dismissing the confession as an evidence of crime. 'The court would like to offer its deepest condolences to the brutality imposed on the (Oh) family, due to their actions conducted out of love of their family,' it added. The prosecution challenged the decision, but both the appellate and the nation's highest court upheld the earlier ruling. The appellate court said Mr Oh Gyeong-mu meeting his older brother was to suggest he turn himself in, due to concern of their mother, and said there was no reason to believe he had any intent of helping the North. Brotherly love led to death and imprisonment Mr Oh Gyeong-dae, the younger-brother of Mr Oh Gyeong-mu, was a tangerine farmer on Jeju Island in 1966 when he was approached by their long-lost half-brother, Mr Oh Gyeong-ji The eldest of the three, Mr Oh Gyeong-ji, had gone missing during the 1950–53 Korean War. He asked Mr Oh Gyeong-dae to accompany him to Japan, but instead, took him to North Korea. After they returned to the South, Mr Oh Gyeong-ji threatened the youngest brother and forced him to arrange a meeting with Mr Oh Gyeong-mu, who was living in Seoul. The two younger brothers were tricked into going to North Korea, and were received education on ideology of the totalitarian Pyongyang regime before being released 40 days later. Mr Oh Gyeong-mu and Mr Oh Gyeong-dae turned themselves in to the South Korean authorities upon their return, but Seoul's regime under dictatorial leader Park Chung-hee used oppressive means such as torture to force them into false confessions. The older Oh was sentenced to death and the younger Oh received 15 years in prison in a 1967 verdict. The execution was carried out five years later Their younger sister was sentenced to three years in prison, suspended for five years, for knowingly aiding their spying activities. Mr Oh Gyeong-dae was cleared of his charges in November of 2020, and subsequent rulings have exonerated the wrongful charges against both his siblings. THE KOREA HERALD/ASIA NEWS NETWORK Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Independent Singapore
7 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
US Supreme Court clears path for rapid deportations without hearings
UNITED STATES: In an important legal triumph for the Trump administration, the US Supreme Court on Monday revoked a jurisdictional block that had provisionally stopped extraditions of refugees to third countries without initially offering them an opportunity to appeal and informing them that they might face torture or harassment. In a recent Reuters report, the court's unspecified emergency directive, issued without clarification, permits immigration officials to continue expulsions while legal complications continue to unfold. Migrants lose due process protections under emergency ruling The Supreme Court ruling directly impacts an earlier decision by US District Judge Brian Murphy, who prohibited the government from implementing such exclusions without due process of law. The court's conservative majority succeeded in the 6-3 decision, with the three liberal justices delivering a scathing and unequivocal dissent. Justice Sonia Sotomayor panned the ruling as a 'gross abuse' of judicial power. 'Apparently, the court finds the idea that thousands will suffer violence in far-flung locales more palatable than the remote possibility that a district court exceeded its remedial powers,' she wrote. Third-country deportations under fire The decision focuses on the Trump administration's use of 'third-country' deportations, relocating migrants to countries other than their own, frequently volatile and risky. The Department of Homeland Security contended that the procedure is essential to exclude migrants found guilty of grave crimes when their home countries decline deportation. Refugees set aside for extradition to countries like South Sudan have purportedly committed offences including manslaughter and armed robbery, the administration maintained. But Judge Murphy had earlier found that the administration desecrated the US Constitution's due process defences by not permitting migrants a reasonable opportunity to raise safety concerns before extradition. He mentioned an attempt to send them to South Sudan — a country which the State Department warns poses life-threatening risks — as an example of the plan's irresponsible implementation. While Monday's Supreme Court decision rescinded the April 18 sanction, Murphy later explained that a distinct May 21 directive concerning deportations to South Sudan 'remains in full force and effect'. Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, called the Supreme Court's move 'horrifying', cautioning that it takes away fundamental legal protections. 'These protections have been the last defence against torture and death,' she said. White House cheers win, critics sound alarm The White House and Trump bureaucrats rejoiced at the decision. 'The Supreme Court's stay of a left-wing district judge's injunction reaffirms the president's authority to remove criminal illegal aliens from our country and Make America Safe Again,' said spokeswoman Abigail Jackson. 'Fire up the deportation planes,' added DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. But the court's action also triggered alarm within the immigration advocates' circle and legal academics. Sotomayor, in her dissenting statement, reproached the administration for 'openly flouting' court directives in numerous cases, including the contentious employment of Guantanamo Bay as a transfer point for expulsions to El Salvador. 'This is not the first time the court closes its eyes to noncompliance,' Sotomayor warned. 'Nor, I fear, will it be the last.' See also Shock, fear and sadness grip Australia's 'bushfire refugees' In the meantime, information has emerged of probable future extraditions to Libya, another nation long disapproved by the U.S. for its handling of captives and convicts, driving additional apprehension about where this legal precedent could lead.
Straits Times
8 hours ago
- Straits Times
Ex-Russian president Medvedev calls EU an enemy, says Ukrainian membership would be dangerous
Deputy head of Russia's security council Dmitry Medvedev chairs a meeting on manning the Russian Armed Forces with contract servicemen, in Moscow on July 4, 2023. PHOTO: REUTERS Ex-Russian president Medvedev calls EU an enemy, says Ukrainian membership would be dangerous MOSCOW - Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev said on June 25 that the European Union had evolved into an enemy of Russia that posed a direct threat to its security, and Moscow was now opposed to Ukraine joining the bloc. Russia has long been opposed to Ukraine joining the Nato Western military alliance – one of the reasons it gives for its decision to launch a full-scale war against Ukraine in 2022. But it has in the past been more relaxed about the prospect of Kyiv becoming a member of the EU. President Vladimir Putin said in June 2022 that Russia had 'nothing against' that, and the Kremlin said as recently as February that joining the bloc was Ukraine's sovereign right. However, Mr Medvedev, who is now deputy chairman of Russia's security council, said that the EU had shifted from being an economic bloc dedicated to preventing war into what he called a politicised anti-Russian organisation that was slowly turning into a military bloc. 'Brussels today is a real enemy of Russia. In its current twisted form, the European Union is no less of a threat to us than the North Atlantic Alliance,' Mr Medvedev wrote on social media platform Telegram. He said it was therefore wrong to say now that Ukraine should be free to 'join anything you like' apart from Nato. 'The EU, stuffed with weapons... is a direct threat to Russia. That is exactly how it should be treated. At least until it changes its approach to us,' he added. 'Thus, the so-called (idea of) Ukraine in the EU is a danger for our country.' Ukraine applied for EU membership shortly after the start of the war in 2022 and was granted candidate status later that year. Mr Medvedev said that bilateral cooperation between Moscow and certain individual EU member states should, however, continue. He did not name specific countries, but central European neighbours Hungary and Slovakia have taken pains to maintain cordial relations with Mr Putin since the start of the war. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
