How to watch Brazil vs Paraguay live: Stream link, TV channel, team news, prediction
Carlo Ancelotti's Brazil know a home win against in-form Paraguay could secure their automatic qualification to the 2026 World Cup.
MORE — Which teams have qualified for the 2026 World Cup?
In his debut as the new Brazil manager on Thursday, Ancelotti saw his side draw 0-0 away at Ecuador. Going forward it wasn't great, but Ancelotti will get in-form Barcelona winger Raphinha back for this huge game (he was suspended for the draw at Ecuador) against surprise-package Paraguay. By the time they kick off Brazil will know whether or not a win will be enough to secure World Cup qualification as Venezuela kick off at Uruguay at 7pm ET on Tuesday. A win would also take them above Paraguay in the standings.
Advertisement
As for Paraguay, they recorded a massive 2-0 win against Uruguay on Thursday to boost their hopes of qualifying for a World Cup for the first time since 2010. Miguel Almiron is their star but they also have Brighton youngsters Juilo Encisco and Diego Gomez as Paraguay have surprised everyone and sit third in the qualifying table in South America. No matter what happens in this game in Sao Paulo, La Albirroja look certain to be heading to the 2026 World Cup next summer. That is a huge achievement.
How to watch Brazil vs Paraguay live, stream link and start time
Kick off time: 8:45pm ET, Tuesday (June 10)
Venue: Neo Quimica Arena — Sao Paulo, Brazil
Streaming, TV channel: Universo
Brazil team news, focus
Getting Raphinha back from suspension is huge and he will start with Vinicius and probably Matheus Cunha in attack. Ancelotti has to get Brazil's talented forwards going as he knows defensively they are solid. This is all about Ancelotti getting the balance right and starting to build the right combinations one year out from the World Cup.
Advertisement
OUT: Gabriel Magalhaes (hamstring - MORE), Gabriel Jesus (torn ACL)
Paraguay team news, focus
Brighton's young midfielder Diego Gomez could miss this one after he came off against Uruguay. Almiron will look to buzz around as always in attack, while Enciso loves to create and feeds off Almiron and Torino striker Antonio Sanabria.
QUESTIONABLE: Diego Gomez (physical discomfort)
Brazil vs Paraguay prediction
This feels like Brazil will get the win they need to kick-start Ancelotti's reign. Raphinha coming back is huge and will be the difference. Brazil 3-0 Paraguay.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
8 hours ago
- Forbes
Flamengo And Palmeiras Carry Brazil's Hopes At Club World Cup
RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL - MAY 21: Gerson Santos da Silva of Flamengo enters the pitch prior to the ... More match between Flamengo and Botafogo PB as part of Copa do Brasil 2025 at Maracana Stadium on May 21, 2025 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. (Photo by) In 2023, the final of the Club World Cup was a mismatch. After forty seconds, Manchester City and Julian Alvarez took the lead and never looked back against Fluminense. The entire 90 minutes were a prolonged practice session for the Premier League team: the South American champion had Marcelo as a full back and Paulo Henrique Ganso in midfield, but Fluminense had no answer to the sheer precision and ruthlessness of Pep Guardiola's drilled XI - the result of a club transformed by the wealth of its Abu Dhabi owners. As they lifted the trophy under a ring of Saudi fireworks in Jeddah, after winning the Champions League earlier that year, City was on top of the world. The outcome had been predictable: the Rio club had a 2023 revenue of $125 million whereas the English champion generated $902 million. Brazil and the rest of the world simply couldn't keep up with the riches flooding into the European game. This summer, City and Fluminense, part of a Brazilian quartet, will be back at the Club World Cup, alongside 30 other clubs in an expanded format, a tournament that is the brainchild of FIFA boss Gianni Infantino. But will Europe's hegemony be challenged at all? In 2012, Brazil's Corinthians were the last non-European team to win the competition, defeating Chelsea 1-0 in the final with a second-half goal from Paulo Guerrero. It was a masterclass from Tite, who served as Brazil manager from 2016 to 2022. Today, Palmeiras's Abel Ferreira is another manager who can mastermind great victories with a defensive mindset, even more so in knockout competitions. He twice led Palmeiras to victory in the Copa Libertadores, the equivalent of the Champions League. Palmeiras endured a difficult start to the current season with a defeat to Corinthians in the local state championship, and, in the national league, the club has relinquished the top spot. Raphael Veiga has returned in time from injury, which means Estevao will move back to the right. This summer, the youngster will depart for Chelsea and he wants to sign off in style. He is the latest in a line of exports after Gabriel Jesus, Danilo, Vitor Reis and Endrick. The Sao Paulo club will get its campaign underway against Porto, but should be able to navigate a group that also includes Al Ahly and Inter Miami. The group of Flamengo, the other dominant force in Brazilian soccer, is perhaps more challenging. The Rio club plays against Esperance de Tunis and Los Angeles, but the standout tie is in Philadelphia against Chelsea. In 2022, Flamengo's revenue passed 1 billion reais ($180 million) for the first time, but the difference with the London club remains substantial. Last year, Chelsea enjoyed a revenue of $635 million. Even so, the Brazilians are optimistic. In an interview, club president Luiz Eduardo Baptista said that the depth of the squad should enable Flamengo to compete on three fronts. However, manager Filipe Luis has pointed to the burdensome, congested calendar. The club struggled to progress from the group stage of the Copa Libertadores. In a boost, playmaker Giorgian de Arrascaeta is reaching again reaching peak form. And that's precisely why Flamengo and Palmeiras could cause an upset in the tournament: European clubs are at the end of their season while Flamengo and Palmeiras, halfway through their campaign, should be at their peak. The economic reality can't be ignored, but at least, the clubs can dream of repeating Corinthians' feat in 2012 when 30,000 Brazilian supporters had the time of their lives in Yokohama.
Digital Trends
10 hours ago
- Digital Trends
FIFA Club World Cup 2025: What is it, and what new tech is it bringing?
The FIFA Club World Cup 2025 kicks off June 14 in North America, as the best club sides from domestic soccer leagues around the world take to the field in a tournament which will crown the best club in the world. This isn't to be confused with the very similarly named FIFA World Cup – which is also being hosted by the US in 2026 along with Canada and Mexico – where the top nations from around the world (think the USMNT, Brazil, England etc) compete to be the best country in the world. Recommended Videos Major international soccer tournaments not only deliver compelling sporting action, but also tend to be the proving ground for new technology to improve the game and enhance the viewing experience. From new camera angles and viewing experiences, to improved refereeing systems, the Club World Cup 2025 arrives with a bumper crop of net-busting tech. What is the Club World Cup and why is it changing? The Club World Cup 2025 will see 32 of the best domestic soccer teams from around the world descend on the US to battle it out and decide who is worthy of the title 'world champions'. There's a major change for the 2025 tournament, as FIFA has significantly increased the number of clubs competing, from just seven in previous tournaments, to a whopping 32 teams this year. That means even more of the world's best players will be plying their trade at the tournament, giving soccer fans the ultimate viewing experience with 63 games in total. For FIFA, that's an attractive, and more specifically lucrative, situation with increased opportunities for revenue generation from the tournament. It also appeases clubs who have complained in the past about not being invited to the tournament, plus for the US specifically it'll act as a perfect trial event ahead of jointly hosting the FIFA World Cup in 2026. Another change for the Club World Cup is its frequency, as starting from 2025 it will now be a quadrennial (every four years) event, rather than an annual occurrence. The tournament's first game, between Al Ahly and Inter Miami, kicks off on June 14, with the Club World Cup final scheduled for July 13 at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey. In total, 12 stadiums (including six NFL venues) will host matches across 11 cities; Mercedes-Benz Stadium (Atlanta)* Bank of America Stadium (Charlotte)* TQL Stadium (Cincinnati) Rose Bowl Stadium (Los Angeles) Hard Rock Stadium (Miami)* GEODIS Park (Nashville) Camping World Stadium (Orlando) Inter&Co Stadium (Orlando) Lincoln Financial Field (Philadelphia)* Lumen Field (Seattle)* Audi Field (Washington, D.C.) MetLife Stadium (East Rutherford)* *NFL stadium, where advanced technology will allow referee camera footage to be broadcast live. Which Teams Are In The Expanded Format? North and Central America will be represented by five teams at the 2025 Club World Cup, with three MLS sides (Inter Miami, Los Angeles FC, Seattle Sounders) appearing at the competition. Europe is the most represented continent at the Club World Cup 2025, with 12 qualifying teams heading out to the US, including Manchester City and Chelsea from the English Premier League, along with Real Madrid, Bayern Munich and Paris Saint-Germain (PSG). Some high-profile clubs with recent silverware wins have missed out though, including Liverpool and Barcelona. South America has six clubs representing, while both Asia and Africa are sending four clubs to the tournament. Finally, Oceania has a single club heading to the Club World Cup – rounding off the 32. Confederation Number of Teams Qualified Teams Qualification Route CONCACAF (North & Central America) 5 Inter Miami* Los Angeles FC Monterrey Pachuca Seattle Sounders 3x Champions Cup winners 1x play-off match winner (2025) *1x additional host nation club UEFA (Europe) 12 Atletico Madrid Bayern Munich Benfica Borussia Dortmund Chelsea Inter Milan Juventus Manchester City Paris Saint-Germain Porto Real Madrid Red Ball Salzburg 3x Champions League winners (past three seasons) 9x Champions League best performing clubs (past three seasons) CONMEBOL (South America) 6 Boca Juniors Botafogo Flamengo Fluminense Palmeiras River Plate 4x Copa Libertadores winners 2x best-ranked eligible clubs (past four seasons) CAF (Africa) 4 Al Ahly Esperance de Tunis Mamelodi Sundowns Wydad 2x Champions League winners 2x best-ranked eligible clubs (past four seasons) AFC (Asia) 4 Al Ain Al Hilal Ulsan HD Urawa Red Diamonds 3x Champions League Elite winners 1x best-ranked eligible club (past four seasons) OFC (Oceania) 1 Auckland City 1x Champions League best-ranked eligible club (past four years) What new technology will we see in the new Club World Cup? While the Club World Cup will mean even more games for players who have already completed a long season, there will be a number of new technologies introduced that could change the way the game is enjoyed for years to come. 1. Referee Body Cams Arguably the biggest change is the addition of referee body cams. While this is a trial, and FIFA has stressed it as such, the idea is to offer 'new experiences' for TV viewers, allowing them to see the play from 'a very unique perspective', said Pierlugia Collina, chairman of the FIFA referees committee. The footage is transmitted by a secure, private 5G connection to the production team, who will then be able to use these angles in replays and other coverage. Referee body camera in action. We can expect to see more of this at @FIFACWC ⚽️ Footage from Botafogo vs. Pachuca in the FIFA Intercontinental Cup 2024™ where body cameras were trialled. #TakeItToTheWorld | #FIFACWC | #FootballUnitesTheWorld — FIFA Media (@fifamedia) June 6, 2025 NFL stadiums will be able to show certain elements of the game, such as the coin toss at the start, thanks to the upgraded communication technology already contained within. Not all footage will be eligible for broadcast, sadly. Anything 'controversial', such as red card or penalty decisions, will not be shown = hopefully this will be allowed in the future if the technology proves to be a success. 'Ref cams' have been trialled for the last year in various matches around the world, including the English Premier League and Germany's Bundesliga, but this will be the first time the footage will be broadcasted to the fans. 2. Live Video Assistant Referee (VAR) Video Feeds and clearer communication One of the key frustrations for fans since the introduction of VAR in the early 2020s has been the vague nature of what's happening when watching in the stadium. While those at home are usually informed by the commentators of the reason for the stoppage to check for a possible infringement, those watching live are usually left in the dark. The Club World Cup will see footage from the referee's VAR monitor streamed to the large screens in stadiums, allowing fans to see what's being judged (in a similar fashion to the experience on TV). Once the decision has been made, the referee will then be able to broadcast their decision over the sound system, to ensure everyone knows the reason for the stoppage. Offside Detection One of the more exciting changes (depending on your perspective over whether technology belongs in soccer…) is the increased use of AI to help improve the accuracy of offside decisions. Multiple cameras will be used from all angles, as well as sensors contained within the ball, allowing AI to quickly and more accurately spot where offside infringements are committed. There will also be an audio signal, according to The Athletic, that will alert the assistant referee that they can raise their flag to signal a potential offside, meaning play will be stopped more quickly. This is only a semi-automated system, as the VAR will still have the ability to review controversial decisions. However, as this is one of the more binary situations in soccer as to whether someone is offside or not, the addition of the advanced tech could help the game's flow immensely. 4. Substitution tablet Coming in under the heading of 'why aren't they doing this already?', each team's coaching staff will be given a tablet to give information to the match officials over which substitutions they intend to make. This will mean the end of using (wasteful) paper to signal the decisions, and will help maintain the records of which players are entering and leaving the pitch. New 'eight second rule' for goalkeepers While this one isn't to do with technology, it does involve counting… which is kind of tech-focused, right? Previously, there's been a little-enforced rule that goalkeepers must release the ball from their hands within six seconds, or an indirect free kick would be awarded. To combat the lack of instances of this being penalised, FIFA is trialling a new system at the Club World Cup: goalkeepers will be allowed eight seconds to hold the ball, but the referee will be counting down on their fingers. There will be a warning at five seconds, and if the 'keeper doesn't let it go on time, then a corner will be awarded. This should, like the improved offside technology, should allow the game to flow a little faster and reduce the amount of time the ball's out of play. How can I watch the Club World Cup? FIFA has signed a $1bn deal with broadcast DAZN to show all matches free-to-air for the 2025 iteration of the re-imagined tournament. The first match kicks off at 7PM PT / 10PM ET on Saturday 14 June, where Al-Ahly take on Inter Miami (or to give the club its full name, 'Lionel Messi's Inter Miami'. If you want to watch the games, you can download the DAZN app for most smart TVs, including Hisense, LG and Samsung, on Amazon Fire Stick or Roku or on your smartphone. From there, you'll just need to signup for the DAZN service for free, and you'll be able to use those login details (either through an email address, or using Single Sign on with Google, Facebook or Apple) on your different devices. That means there's no reason to not watch the coverage of all 63 games as this new tournament kicks off. Will it become a fixture in the soccer calendar, or will it be just another set of games being added to the groaning amount of cups for teams to win?
New York Times
13 hours ago
- New York Times
How USMNT's World Cup run-up, global ranking compares to past hosts
When Mauricio Pochettino was hired to coach the U.S. men's national team in September 2024, the federation amplified their shared 'belief that U.S. Soccer is on the cusp of something truly special.' Over the past week, however, his squad couldn't even handle a Turkey and Swiss. A year away from the 2026 World Cup in the United States, Canada and Mexico and sandwiched in between two regional competitions, the USMNT hardly looks ready. Pochettino's side followed an embarrassing fourth-place showing at the Nations League with a pair of consecutive friendly losses. The latest, a 4-0 thrashing against Switzerland – with all goals coming in the first 36 minutes – provides little optimism about the looming Concacaf Gold Cup, to say nothing of the sport's grandest tournament. How much of an outlier is this brutal run-up to hosting the World Cup? To understand how the USMNT compares to past hosts, let's look back at every one since the U.S. last hosted the men's World Cup in 1994. To look at how a team improved or regressed, we'll use the Elo Ratings system. While FIFA's rankings are pushed the hardest and even used for competition draws, the formula has changed often and still seems unreflective of recent form. The Elo model uses head-to-head results to award points to teams after every game, with the score fully transparent and ranked among every other national team in the world. The Elo Rating also considers the stakes of a game, where competitive games will impact a team's rating to a more outsized extent than a friendly. For example, one-goal defeats to Panama and Canada in March's Concacaf Nations League have more sway over the U.S.'s Elo Rating than Tuesday's loss to Switzerland or January's 3-1 win over Venezuela. Advertisement Over the course of six games in 2025, the model assesses Pochettino's side to be in freefall. After rising to 28th globally at the end of the January window, four straight defeats have sunk the U.S. to 45th — its lowest ranking since 1997. That feels a bit more honest than FIFA's latest rankings, which has the USMNT 16th in the world as of April 3. The other 2026 cohosts have only seen slight changes to their ranking since the start of 2025. Mexico has risen eight spots, from 32nd to 24th, while Canada has taken a slight dip from 26th to 29th. At the start of the year, the USMNT was nestled between their regional rivals; now, faltering form has placed the U.S. well behind the pack. Using Elo, we hope to answer a simple question: did the games host nations played in the 18 months preceding their World Cup leave them in better or worse position in the global landscape? Elo Rating on January 1, 1993: 32nd (1688) For the first half of 1993, the hosts (who had qualified outright in 1990) slumped through 14 friendlies. Most notable was a 3-1 defeat at then-74th ranked Japan, while the program notched credible draws against Denmark and Russia on home soil. Then came the U.S. Cup, a short-lived round robin tournament providing stout competition: Brazil, England and Germany. While the United States lost its opener to Brazil and lost a 4-3 slugfest against Germany, the middle match was an undeniable highlight. The USMNT beat England 2-0 in Foxborough, with Thomas Dooley and Alexi Lalas scoring. England, which entered the match ranked ninth, ultimately failed to qualify for the 1994 World Cup. The USMNT fell back to earth immediately after, taking one point from its Copa América group. A month later, it finished as runner-up to Mexico in the 1993 Gold Cup, sinking to 55th at year's end after some more worrying friendlies. 1994 began in the same vein, with friendlies ranging from wins over Norway and Mexico to defeats against Sweden, Iceland and Chile. Advertisement Pre-tournament record: 13-19-17 (1.18 ppg) Elo Rating before 1994 World Cup: 58th (1605); -26 ranks No match from this 18-month stretch carried as much weight, in the Elo ratings and in real life, as the U.S.'s 2-1 win over Colombia. The infamous result that ultimately cost Andrés Escobar his life helped the USMNT advance from its group, coupled with an opening-match draw against Switzerland. Ultimately, the hosts fell in the round of 16 to eventual champion Brazil. Elo Rating after 1994 World Cup: 49th (1627) Trend: -17 ranks, -61 points Elo Rating on January 1, 1997: 3rd (2017) This is where the difference between the nascent early 1990s USMNT and the well-established nature of Les Bleus becomes starkly pronounced. While the U.S. needed to enter and host any tournament it could to whip itself into readiness, France kept a fairly lean datebook during its run-up, playing just 15 games compared to its hosting predecessor's 49. France spent the entirety of its prep ranked either third or fourth in the Elo Ratings, averaging roughly one friendly a month against mostly European opposition. A win against Spain was quickly nullified by a defeat in Russia. In a hosted friendly tournament akin to the U.S. Cup, France struggled, drawing with Brazil and Italy but losing to England. Its final window gave cause for concern: a narrow victory over Belgium (20th), a draw against Morocco (31st) and a slim win at Finland (68th) were hardly befitting of a World Cup contender. In hindsight, the close calls allowed the team to coalesce ahead of the occasion. After all, youngsters Patrick Vieira, Thierry Henry and David Trezeguet entered the tournament with just 14 combined international caps. Pre-tournament record: 8-5-2 (1.93 ppg) Elo Rating before 1998 World Cup: 4th (2004); -1 rank France snapped out of its pre-tournament sleepwalk in a hurry, claiming all nine points on offer from a thin Group C despite Zinedine Zidane being sent off in its second group match. Its path through the knockout bracket was also unconvincing in moments: narrowly overcoming Paraguay in the round of 16, needing a shootout to see out Italy in the quarterfinal and pipping Croatia 2-1 in the semifinal. Advertisement Ultimately, Davor Šuker's goal was the only one France would concede after the group stage. The tale of the 1998 final is largely told through a Brazilian's vantage point, as Ronaldo's pre-match convulsive fit led to Mário Zagallo removing him from his lineup before reinstating him just 45 minutes before kickoff. The striker looked like a shell of himself, while a Zidane brace and a last-minute celebrator from Emmanuel Petit ensured the World Cup trophy remained in France. Elo Rating after 1998 World Cup: 1st (2090); +3 ranks Trend from start: +2 ranks, +73 points Elo Rating on January 1, 2001: 21st (1797) One of two nations to serve as the first co-hosts in tournament history, Japan also benefitted from the Confederations Cup no longer being a Saudi Arabian-organized standalone. Instead, this was the first installment where it served as a dress rehearsal for hosts a year out from the World Cup, providing meaningful matches in venues that would become familiar to a global audience the following summer. Japan won its group, beating Canada and Cameroon before playing Brazil to a scoreless draw. Japan then beat Australia 1-0 in the semifinal before falling to France in the final by an identical scoreline. It was the undeniable high point of the build-up period, which otherwise saw a smattering of friendlies on either side of the Confederations Cup. Pre-tournament record: 8-6-5 (1.58 ppg) Elo Rating before 2002 World Cup: 15th (1850); +6 ranks As with the previous summer, Japan won its group after drawing with Belgium and beating Russia and Tunisia. The good luck ended once the knockout bracket took shape, however, as Japan stared down Turkey in the round of 16. History remembers this Turkey side as one of the great knockout grinders in World Cup history. Japan ultimately fell 1-0, with Ümit Davala scoring the lone goal in the 12th minute. Turkey went on to finish third in the tournament, notching another 1-0 win in the quarterfinal. As such, Japan finished this stretch in a near-identical standing to where it began at the start of 2001. Elo Rating after 2002 World Cup: 20th (1827) Trend from start: +1 rank, +30 points Elo Rating on January 1, 2001: 25th (1765) Another beneficiary of the Confederations Cup, South Korea didn't fare nearly as well as its co-host. A 5-0 defeat in its opener against France left the team at a severe disadvantage. While it did well to beat Mexico and Australia in its final group games, the blowout saw South Korea finish third in Group A, eliminated on goal difference. Like Japan, South Korea flanked its Confederations Cup appearance with friendlies. Wins over Croatia and the U.S. served as highpoints, while it suffered another 5-0 defeat shortly after the Confederations Cup, this time against Czech Republic. Unlike its co-hosts, however, South Korea participated in the 2002 Concacaf Gold Cup (held in January and February), hoping to bolster its preparations. The guests held their own, losing to the USMNT in the group but beating Mexico on penalties in the quarterfinal. Ultimately, they lost to eventual runner-up Costa Rica in a 3-1 semifinal before Canada beat them in the consolation game — the two most consequential results from this stretch according to the Elo Ratings. Advertisement Pre-tournament record: 11-11-9 (1.42 ppg) Elo Rating before 2002 World Cup: 34th (1736); -9 ranks It was South Korea who fared better among the co-hosts. It kicked off its tournament with a 2-0 win over Poland, but a draw against the USMNT left Korean hopes of advancing in the balance entering the final game against Portugal. The visiting favorites did themselves no favors, as João Pinto drew a 29th-minute red card for sliding through the back of Park Ji-sung. Still a few years ahead of his move to Manchester United, Park scored the match-winner in the second half to vault South Korea to its knockout bracket in World Cup history – and famously send the U.S. through in the process. History hasn't been entirely favorable to the ensuing semifinal run. Francesco Totti was sent off in the round of 16 on a controversial call, while Spanish media still believe that then-FIFA executive Jack Warner rigged the quarterfinals by giving the cohosts a favorable referee assignment. No matter: after beating Italy on a golden goal, South Korea toppled Spain in PKs, only to have a storybook run ending with a 1-0 semifinal defeat to Germany. Elo Rating after 2002 World Cup: 27th (1782) Trend from start: -2 ranks, +17 points Elo Rating on January 1, 2005: 12th (1883) Jurgen Klinsmann had his work cut out for him ahead of Germany's hosting duties, having to fold in a rising generation (including Bastian Schweinsteiger, Per Mertesacker and Lukas Podolski) into the established core led by Oliver Kahn, Michael Ballack and Miroslav Klose. Controversially, Klinsmann took the captain's armband off of Kahn and thrust him into a goalkeeper competition with Jens Lehmann, unsettling the program's mainstays. The group made an unconvincing case at its Confederations Cup: wins against Australia, Tunisia and Mexico were overshadowed by a draw against Argentina and a 3-2 defeat to Brazil in a rematch of the 2002 final. Its preparations closed out with some concerning results, namely losses in Slovakia and Turkey. Italy logged a 4-1 win over Germany three months before the tournament, leaving many to wonder if Klinsmann was cut out for international management as the FIFA rankings placed the hosts 22nd. The Elo Ratings' head-to-head model liked them much more than that, though, positioning them 10th entering the 2006 World Cup. Pre-tournament record: 10-5-4 (1.84 ppg) Elo Rating before 2006 World Cup: 10th (1913); +2 ranks Germany left no bones about its group, beating Costa Rica, Poland and Ecuador by a combined 8-2 scoreline. A Podolski brace inside 12 minutes sprung the hosts to an early lead in the round of 16 against Sweden, seeing out that scoreline to book a date with pre-tournament favorite Argentina in the quarterfinal. Lehmann backed his coach's trust with some shootout heroics, working off research notes tucked in his sock before making two saves to send Germany to the semis. The hosts played Italy hard in the semifinal, forcing extra time and keeping the contest scoreless for 118 minutes. Seemingly, Lehmann would have another chance to unfurl paper from his hosiery. Instead, Italy left back Fabio Grosso broke the stalemate in the 119th minute, with Alessandro Del Piero finishing the job two minutes later. Advertisement Germany went on to beat Portugal in the third place game, while Italy beat France after Zidane's infamous headbutt. Klinsmann would ride the coattails of this performance into several jobs over the years, most notably leading the U.S. from 2011-2017 before being sacked in the middle of its only World Cup qualification failure since 1986. Elo Rating after 2006 World Cup: 8th (1955) Trend from start: +4 ranks, +72 points Elo Rating on January 1, 2009: 75th (1534) Even compared to the plucky USMNT of 1994, no previous World Cup host was a clearer underdog who would've otherwise struggled to qualify than South Africa. Bafana Bafana made the field in 1998 and 2002, but was still in a rebuilding phase as 2009 kicked off. The guarantee of meaningful games provided ample opportunity for growth, between tournament hopefuls like Chile and Serbia wanting to pay the hosts a friendly visit and the Confederations Cup fielding top opponents. South Africa advanced from its Confederations Cup group after beating New Zealand and drawing with Iraq and falling against Spain. It lost to Brazil 1-0 in the semis and 3-2 in a consolation rematch against a Spain side reeling from its shocking defeat to the USMNT. The three losses began a six-match skid in the summer and fall of 2009, followed by friendly losses against Serbia, Germany and Ireland. Equally surprising was the struggle at the 2009 COSAFA Cup in Zimbabwe, with South Africa finishing fourth among 13 teams from the Southern part of Africa. The New Zealand win was its most impactful result of the build-up, followed by friendly victories over Norway, Jamaica and Colombia. Pre-tournament record: 14-8-12 (1.56 ppg) Elo Rating before 2010 World Cup: 63rd (1594); +12 ranks While the tournament opener from Siphiwe Tshabalala was an instant classic, South Africa suffered from receiving an unusually tough draw for a host. Mexico leveled late in that opening match, and Uruguay thrashed them 3-0 in Pretoria. South Africa sprung one last surprise by toppling a rudderless France 2-1 in the finale, but a -2 goal differential saw the hosts go out in a tie-breaker with Mexico. Then again, the 63rd-best team in the world seldom advances from a World Cup group. Elo Rating after 2010 World Cup: 54th (1619) Trend from start: +21 ranks, +85 points Elo Rating on January 1, 2013: 2nd (2051) Twelve years after Ronaldo, Ronaldinho and Kaká won Brazil's fifth World Cup, Neymar seemed poised to lead his nation to a record-extending sixth. Brazil stayed in the top three of the Elo Ratings throughout its run-up, although the defensive cracks that doomed the Seleção in the tournament were visible ahead of time. Advertisement Brazil opened 2013 with a 2-1 friendly loss to England at Wembley, then drew four of its next five games against Italy, Russia, Chile and England again. Pressure was building ahead of the Confederations Cup, but a perfect nine-point group stage against Japan, Mexico and Italy returned Brazil to the ascendency. The hosts ultimately won the tune-up tournament final against Spain, winning six of seven games to close 2013 in pole position. Their 2014 schedule was quite lean: a 5-0 win in South Africa, and a pair of wins against Panama and Serbia immediately before the group stage kicked off. What could possibly go wrong? Pre-tournament record: 16-4-2 (2.36 ppg) Elo Rating before 2014 World Cup: 1st (2038); +1 rank First, the good: Brazil won its group with Mexico, Croatia and Cameroon and weathered a round-of-16 test by eliminating Chile in PKs. Their 2-1 win in the quarterfinal over Colombia was marred by Neymar exiting on a stretcher after taking a knee to his back, ruling him out for the competition. You know what came next. With Neymar injured and Thiago Silva suspended, Brazil was a shell of itself in a 7-1 scoreline that is among the most famous (or infamous, depending on your slant) results in history. That Germany went on to win the final provided no consolation. It's a loss from which Brazil has seemingly never recovered. Elo Rating after 2014 World Cup: 7th (1980) Trend from start: -5 ranks, -71 points Elo Rating on January 1, 2017: 39th (1691) Rather than play a balanced schedule of home and away matches, as most hosts before had done, Russia played all but two games at home, working to foster a staunch advantage when the tournament rolled around. While friendly results were uneven as the Russians invited likely qualifiers like Brazil, Spain and Argentina, their Confederations Cup was arguably even more worrisome. After dispatching New Zealand 2-0 in the opener, losses against Portugal and Mexico saw Russia be the second Confederations Cup host to fall in the group stage. While Russia notched a 4-2 win in its first friendly after that, it failed to win any of the ensuing seven friendlies before the World Cup. Advertisement Pre-tournament record: 2-5-8 (0.73 ppg) Elo Rating before 2018 World Cup: 44th (1678); -5 ranks Leaning into the feverish fan-created atmospheres, Russia shocked everyone by holding its own. Wins over Saudi Arabia and Egypt were enough to advance from their group despite a loss to Uruguay. Russia labored to force penalty shootouts in its two knockout games, beating Spain in the round of 16 before falling to eventual runner-up Croatia in the quarterfinal. Elo Rating after 2018 World Cup: 38th (1721) Trend from start: +1 rank, +30 points Elo Rating on June 1, 2021: 47th (1646) Qatar didn't follow Russia's lead and instead took a page from South Korea's book by looking for additional tournaments. With AFC combining qualification for the World Cup and Asian Cup in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, Qatar got meaningful games against regional rivals before accepting an invitation into the 2021 Concacaf Gold Cup. A group win over Honduras and a quarterfinal triumph over El Salvador more than made up for a semifinal loss against the USMNT. In the first run-up without a Confederations Cup since 1998 after FIFA folded the tournament, Qatar hosted the 2021 Arab Cup as a test event. Qatar finished third, winning four games before losing to Algeria and beating Egypt on penalties in a third place game. 2022 featured many friendlies against lower-ranked opponents, with a 2-1 win over Panama (in Spain) being the standout result. Pre-tournament record: 16-7-8 (1.77 ppg) Elo Rating before 2022 World Cup: 48th (1680); -1 rank Qatar went on to make history in 2022, just not how it had intended. It became the first World Cup host to exit a group stage without netting a single point. Its draw was tough, with matches against Netherlands, Senegal and Ecuador. Elo Rating after 2022 World Cup: 65th (1578) Trend from start: -18 ranks, -68 points 1. South Africa, 2010: +12 ranks 2. Japan, 2002: +6 ranks 3. Germany, 2006: +2 ranks 4. Brazil, 2014: +1 rank 5. France, 1998: -1 rank 6. Qatar, 2022: -1 rank 7. Russia, 2018: -5 ranks 8. South Korea, 2002: -9 ranks 9. United States, 1994: -26 ranks 1. South Africa, 2010: +21 ranks 2. Germany, 2006: +4 ranks 3. France, 1998: +2 ranks T-4. Japan, 2002: +1 rank T-4. Russia, 2018: +1 rank 6. South Korea, 2002: -2 ranks 7. Brazil, 2014: -5 ranks 8. United States, 1994: -17 ranks 9. Qatar, 2022: -18 ranks
