
European leaders stress Ukraine support ahead of Trump-Putin summit
In a joint statement, the leaders of Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland and the European Commission, said that the current line of contact between Russia and Ukraine could only be a 'starting point of negotiations'.
Advertisement
They said: 'Ukraine has the freedom of choice over its own destiny. Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities.
'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine.
'We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force.'
The statement comes a day after Mr Trump announced that he would meet Mr Putin in Alaska on Friday, as he seeks an end to a conflict he had promised he could finish on his first day in office.
Advertisement
The US president had earlier suggested that any peace deal was likely to involve 'some swapping of territories', with reports suggesting this could involve Ukraine giving up its Donetsk region.
But president Volodymyr Zelenskiy has already rejected any proposal that would compromise Ukraine's territorial integrity, something that is forbidden by Ukraine's constitution.
On Sunday Mr Zelenskiy said Kyiv "values and fully supports" the joint statement by European leaders on achieving peace in Ukraine while protecting Ukrainian and European interests.
"The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people today for the sake of peace in Ukraine, which is defending the vital security interests of our European nations," Zelenskiy wrote on X.
Advertisement
"Ukraine values and fully supports the statement by President Macron, Prime Minister Meloni, Chancellor Merz, Prime Minister Tusk, Prime Minister Starmer, President Ursula von der Leyen, and President Stubb on peace for Ukraine."
He said Mr Putin wanted to 'exchange a pause in the war, in the killing, for the legalisation of the occupation of our land – he wants to get territorial spoils for the second time'.
Mr Zelenskiy added: 'We will not allow this second attempt to partition Ukraine. Knowing Russia, where there is a second, there will be a third.'
He also said that any peace agreement that excluded Ukraine would be a decision 'against peace'.
Advertisement
In their statement, the European leaders said they welcomed Mr Trump's 'work to stop the killing in Ukraine, end the Russian Federation's war of aggression and achieve just and lasting peace and security for Ukraine'.
Adding that they were 'ready to support this work diplomatically' and through military and financial support for Kyiv, they reiterated the need for 'robust and credible security guarantees' for Ukraine and their own 'unwavering support' for the country.
The statement also comes after British foreign secretary David Lammy hosted a meeting of top Ukrainian officials and European national security advisers alongside US vice-president JD Vance on Saturday.
Saturday's meeting of national security advisers was co-hosted by US vice-president JD Vance. Photo: Suzanne Plunkett/PA
The meeting took place at the British foreign secretary's official country retreat, Chevening, in Kent, where Mr Vance is staying at the start of a UK holiday.
Advertisement
After the meeting, Mr Lammy said: 'The UK's support for Ukraine remains ironclad as we continue working towards a just and lasting peace.'
It is understood that the meeting had been called at Washington's request, and included representatives from the US, Ukraine, France, Germany, Italy, Finland and Poland as well as the UK.
Ukraine was represented by Rustem Umerov, secretary of the country's national security and defence council, and the head of Mr Zelenskiy's office, Andriy Yermak.
In a post on social media, Mr Yermak said the allies' positions were 'clear' that 'a reliable, lasting peace is only possible with Ukraine at the negotiating table, with full respect for our sovereignty and without recognising the occupation'.
Ahead of the meeting at Chevening, British prime minister Keir Starmer discussed the talks in a call with Mr Zelenskiy on Saturday, and also spoke to French president Emmanuel Macron.
Meanwhile, the conflict continues, with Ukrainian authorities reporting four people killed and 16 wounded in Russian drone strikes on Saturday in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
DoJ says George Washington University violated law over Jewish students and faculty
Donald Trump's administration says it has determined that George Washington University (GWU) has violated federal civil rights law, making it the latest higher educational institution to be targeted by the White House over last spring's campus protests against Israeli military strikes in Gaza. In an announcement Tuesday, the Trump-led justice department accused the Washington DC-based university of failing to take 'meaningful action' to combat antisemitism during demonstrations there. A statement that GWU spokesperson Shannon McClendon provided to the Guardian on Tuesday said it 'condemns antisemitism, which has absolutely no place on our campuses or in a civil and humane society'. 'Moreover, our actions clearly demonstrate our commitment to addressing antisemitic actions and promoting an inclusive campus environment by upholding a safe, respectful, and accountable environment,' McClendon's statement said. 'We have taken appropriate action under university policy and the law to hold individuals or organizations accountable, including during the encampment, and we do not tolerate behavior that threatens our community or undermines meaningful dialogue.' A statement from the justice department claimed that an investigation found that GWU was 'deliberately indifferent to the hostile educational environment for Jewish, American-Israeli, and Israeli students and faculty' during the pro-Palestinian campus protests in April and May 2024. In a letter to GWU's president, the justice department alleged finding 'numerous incidents of Jewish students being harassed, abused, intimidated and assaulted by protesters' – and that the university 'was deliberately indifferent to the complaints it received, the misconduct that occurred, and the harms that were suffered by its students and faculty' in violation of a provision of the US Civil Rights Act prohibiting programs that receive federal aid from discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin. The justice department asserted that it had given GWU the 'opportunity to resolve this matter through a voluntary resolution agreement' to 'ensure immediate remediation of these issues and related reforms to prevent the recurrence of discrimination, harassment, and abuse'. The administration's letter gave the university until 22 August to 'to indicate whether GWU has interest in such a dialogue'. McClendon's statement said GWU on Tuesday was reviewing the administration's letter 'to respond in a timely manner'. But McClendon's statement did make it a point to say: 'We have worked diligently with members of (GWU)'s Jewish community, as well as Jewish community organizations, city and federal authorities to protect the (university) community from antisemitism and we remain committed to working with them to ensure every student has the right to equal educational opportunities without fear of harassment or abuse.' As reported by Reuters, protesters who were part of the 2024 campus demonstrations last year – including the group Jewish Voice for Peace and other Jewish groups – have accused the US government of conflating their criticism of Israel's government, the country's military assaults in Gaza, and Zionism as antisemitism. Trump at the beginning of his second presidency in January nonetheless signed an executive order purporting to 'combat antisemitism'. And in March, the administration warned at least 60 universities about possible action over alleged violations of federal civil rights laws related to antisemitism. In July, Columbia agreed to pay $200m as part of a settlement to resolve government investigations into allegations that the school violated federal anti-discrimination laws by failing to protect students from antisemitic harassment on campus. The agreement also reportedly restored more than $400m in research grants to the university. And on 6 August, the Trump administration suspended $584m in federal funding for the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) over similar allegations of civil rights violations related to antisemitism and affirmative action. The administration accused UCLA of 'acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students'. The UC system's president has said that it has agreed to talks with the administration over the allegations against UCLA. In April, Democratic congressman Jerry Nadler of New York publicly condemned Trump linking antisemitism to his crackdown on US universities. Nadler said that the 'president is weaponizing the real pain American Jews face to advance his desire to wield control over the truth-seeking academic institutions that stand as a bulwark against authoritarianism'.


Reuters
a few seconds ago
- Reuters
State Department softens criticism of Trump partner countries in overhauled human rights report
WASHINGTON, Aug 12 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's administration has significantly changed a key U.S. government report on human rights worldwide, dramatically softening criticism of some countries that have been strong partners of the Republican president, such as El Salvador and Israel, which rights groups say have robust track records of human rights abuses. Instead, the U.S. State Department in its widely anticipated 2024 Human Rights Report sounded an alarm about the erosion of freedom of speech in Europe and ramped up criticism of Brazil and South Africa, both of which Washington has clashed with over a host of issues. Any criticism of governments over their treatment of LGBTQI rights, which appeared in Biden administration editions of the report, appeared to have been largely omitted. Washington referred to Russia's invasion of Ukraine mainly as the "Russia-Ukraine war." The report's section on Israel was much shorter than last year's edition and contained no mention of the severe humanitarian crisis or death toll in Gaza. Some 61,000 people have died, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, as a result of Israel's military operations in response to an attack by Palestinian militant group Hamas in October 2023. The report was delayed for months as Trump appointees altered an earlier State Department draft dramatically to bring it in line with "America First" values, according to government officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. The report introduced new categories such as "Life" and "Liberty," and "Security of the Person." "There were no credible reports of significant human rights abuses," the 2024 report said about El Salvador, in sharp contrast with the 2023 report that talked about "significant human rights issues" and listed them as credible reports of unlawful or arbitrary killings, torture, and harsh and life-threatening prison conditions. Washington's bilateral ties with El Salvador have strengthened since Trump took office, as the administration has deported people to El Salvador with help from President Nayib Bukele, whose country is receiving $6 million from the U.S. to house the migrants in a high-security mega-prison. The Trump administration has moved away from the traditional U.S. promotion of democracy and human rights, seeing it as interference in another country's affairs, even as it criticized countries selectively, consistent with its broader policy towards a particular country. One example is Europe, where Trump officials repeatedly weighed in on European politics to denounce what they see as suppression of right-wing leaders, including in Romania, Germany, and France, and accused European authorities of censoring views such as criticism of immigration. For decades, the State Department's congressionally mandated Human Rights Report has been used as a blueprint of reference for global rights advocacy. This year's report was prepared following a major revamp of the department, which included the firing of hundreds of people, many from the agency's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, which takes the lead in writing the report. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in April wrote an opinion piece that said the bureau had become a platform for "left-wing activists," saying the Trump administration would reorient the bureau to focus on "Western values." In Brazil, where the Trump administration has clashed with the government, the State Department found the human rights situation declined, after the 2023 report found no significant changes. This year's report took aim at the courts, stating they took action undermining freedom of speech and disproportionately suppressing the speech of supporters of former President Jair Bolsonaro, among others. Bolsonaro is on trial before the Supreme Court on charges he conspired with allies to violently overturn his 2022 electoral loss to leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Trump has referred to the case as a "witch hunt" and called it grounds for a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods. In South Africa, whose government the Trump administration has accused of racial discrimination towards Afrikaners, this year's report said the human rights situation significantly worsened. It stated that "South Africa took a substantially worrying step towards land expropriation of Afrikaners and further abuses against racial minorities in the country." In last year's report, the State Department found no significant changes in the human rights situation in South Africa. Trump, earlier this year, issued an executive order that called for the U.S. to resettle Afrikaners, describing them as victims of "violence against racially disfavored landowners," allegations that echoed far-right claims but which have been contested by South Africa's government.


The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US court says Trump's Doge team can access social security numbers and other sensitive data
A US appeals court on Tuesday rejected a bid by a group of unions to block the Trump administration government downsizing team known as the 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) from accessing sensitive data on Americans. The Virginia-based fourth US circuit court of appeals in a 2-1 decision said the unions were unlikely to prevail on claims that Doge would violate federal privacy laws by accessing data at the US Department of Education, treasury department, and office of personnel management. The court refused to block Doge's access to the agencies' computer systems and data such as social security numbers and individuals' citizenship status pending the outcome of the case. The decision reverses a temporary injunction issued by a federal judge in Maryland, which had been paused by the appeals court in April. The agencies involved in the case and the unions that sued, which include the American Federation of Teachers and the National Federation of Federal Employees, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Donald Trump after taking office in January launched Doge, then headed by the billionaire Elon Musk, to dramatically shrink government bureaucracy and federal spending. Doge, which is not a formal government agency, has overseen job and spending cuts at nearly every federal agency and has been the focus of numerous lawsuits. Musk stepped down from Doge in May after publicly falling out with Trump. The fourth circuit on Tuesday said the unions that sued along with a group of military veterans had not shown how they would be injured by Doge accessing agencies' computer systems. They also probably lacked legal standing to sue because that access is not a 'final agency action' that can form the basis of a lawsuit, the court said. A dissenting judge said it was prudent to temporarily block access to the data while the case plays out, and that the standard his colleagues had imposed on the plaintiffs was too high.