Apple Watch needs this sleep feature to compete with Garmin, Oura, and Whoop — but it might be coming soon
Apple has been able to expertly track your different sleep stages for years, as well as your total time in bed and total time asleep. That said, you do need to remember to put your watch into sleep mode before falling asleep, and ensure it's got enough charge to record your sleep all night. If you have the vitals app pinned to your Smart Stack, you can see a breakdown of your sleep each morning, but unlike Garmin, Oura, and Whoop, Apple doesn't give you an overall sleep score. However, according to rumors, we might not have long to wait.
Writer Steve Moser uncovered a graphic named 'Watch Focus Score' from deep within the code of Apple's Health app (reported by MacRumors). This score shows an Apple Watch with the number 84 in it, surrounded by three bars that curve to form a circle. The colors of the bars are red, light blue, and purple, which correspond to the sleep stages shown in the Health app — red reflecting time awake, light blue showing REM sleep, and purple reflecting time spent in deep sleep.
Few more notes:1) Some other versions of this graphic have a thermometer icon which says to me that this feature will be available on old and new Apple Watches.2) Maybe this is why the sleep icon is changing from light blue to purple.3) I imagine the watch face complication… https://t.co/IKF5SYTZst pic.twitter.com/WqYY7CaWf4July 23, 2025
It's not clear whether this feature would be part of the watchOS 26 update coming this fall (although it's not available on the public beta), or a feature launched with the rumored Apple Watch 11.
Why does every other brand use a sleep score? In simple terms, it helps you see quickly what those different stages mean. For example, last night, my Apple Watch 10 recorded my 7 hours and 34 minutes of sleep (my kid slept through the night for the first time ever, a fact worth celebrating), but my Oura ring 4 gave me a sleep score of 89, and told me that yes, this was outstanding compared to my typical range.
Of course, I know I slept better than I have in the past 18 months since my son was born, but I appreciate seeing the quality of sleep in the form of a sleep efficiency number. With Oura, I can also see how my sleep score changes over time, and why my sleep score might be lower from one day to the next. It allows me to make healthier decisions, such as not doom-scrolling Instagram before trying to sleep, or drinking a glass of wine too close to bedtime.
Garmin and Whoop also have similar sleep features. The best Garmin watches give you a score out of 100, which is then incorporated into the watch's daily readiness number, reflecting how ready you are for a hard workout. Whoop, on the other hand, gives you an overall sleep performance score, as well as a breakdown of different metrics, all of which have their score out of 100.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
It's a metric Apple Watch users have been dreaming about for years, and hopefully one that'll roll out onto watches sooner rather than later.
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
33 minutes ago
- Forbes
Skipping Nvidia Left Amazon, Apple And Tesla Behind In AI
Everyone thinks they are a comic. And everyone in big cap high tech thinks they can design better and/or cheaper AI chip alternatives to the industry-leader, Nvidia. Turns out, it's simply not that easy. Apple and AWS have recently run aground in AI growth, and Tesla has just abandoned their own Dojo Supercomputer chip development, saying they are switching to Nvidia and AMD for training AI models. (Like many semiconductor developers, Nvidia is a client of Cambrian-AI Research). Oh, and today, The Information reported that 'Microsoft's AI Chip Effort Falls Behind'. There is definitely an important trend here. A few companies have eschewed getting locked in to Nvidia, paying the high prices state-of-the-art AI technology commands. This penny-smart but pound-foolish approach left the world's largest consumer electronics company (Apple) and the undisputed cloud leader (AWS) far behind, just when generative AI created massive end user opportunities they could not adequately address. Nvidia's CUDA platform is the de-facto standard for training and deploying large language models for generative AI. CUDA offers unmatched performance, developer tooling and ecosystem support. Companies that build on CUDA — like Microsoft (with OpenAI) and Meta (with LLaMA) — have been able to scale quickly and deliver cutting-edge AI products. By contrast, Amazon and Apple chose to go their own way, and Tesla took the Nvidia off-ramp in 2019. Let's take a look, as each took a different approach, and mostly failed. Apple Maintains Its ABN Strategy (Anybody But Nvidia) Apple's generative AI journey has been even more problematic. After unveiling 'Apple Intelligence' in 2024, the company's most anticipated upgrade — a fully LLM-powered Siri — has been delayed until 2026. Apple has some serious semiconductor bona fides, with its M-class Arm-based chips for desktops and the A-class for mobile. The company is justifiably proud of these efforts. But Apple tried its hand at AI acceleration early on using its own chips and then shifted to Google TPU-based AI development. Not a bad choice, mind you, but the TPU does not have the performance nor the AI development tool-set that Nvidia Blackwell enjoys. The result? Well, how's that AI-enhanced Siri and Apple Intelligence working out for you? Yeah, not at all. To be sure, Apple has significant technical challenges that come with having an installed base and a focus on privacy above all, but not using Nvidia from the start probably cost it more in extra work and time to market than the 'expensive' Nvidia infrastructure would have cost. Siri's architecture, built over a decade ago, wasn't designed for generative AI, and retrofitting it has proven more difficult and taking longer than Apple expected. To make matters worse, Apple's AI teams have faced internal fragmentation, with some pushing for in-house developed AI models and others advocating partnerships with with OpenAI, Perplexity or Google. The company also lost key talent to competitors. Ruoming Pang, who led Apple's foundation models team, left for Meta in 2023. Other researchers followed, citing slow progress and lack of clarity in Apple's AI strategy. Amazon AWS Does Offer Nvidia GPUs, but Prefers its Own Silicon AWS recently paid the price of its slow generative AI sales on Wall Street caused by Amazon's hubris and NIH (not invented here). The market share of new generative AI use cases landing on AWS is reportedly lower than its overall cloud share, with Microsoft taking over the lead. According to IOT-Analytics, Microsoft has about 16% share of new genAI case studies, as does AWS, well below AWS leadership share in 2023 of 37%. AWS is not losing its first-place share in the overall cloud market, at least not yet, but for genAI-specific apps and new enterprise AI workloads, Azure and Google are increasingly competitive, and in some cases are outpacing AWS in genAI-related tools and adoption. Reducing reliance on Nvidia and lowering costs sounded like a good strategy. So, Amazon's AWS division, like Google and Microsoft, invested heavily in custom silicon for training and inference, named, of course, Trainium and Inferentia. The latest release, Trainium2, was launched in 2024 and appears to offer impressive specs: up to 83.2 petaflops of FP8 compute and 6 TB of HBM3 memory bandwidth. Amazon even created a 40,000-chip Trainium UltraCluster to support generative AI workloads. But accelerator performance alone doesn't create AI. You need software, great chip-to-chip networking and a thriving developer ecosystem. AWS developers found Trainium software harder to work with than CUDA, and they reportedly pushed back to management against Trainium's limitations. Management essentially said shut up and get to work. So, Trainium adoption lagged. Amazon realized it needed to invest even more to create the developers ecosystem, and it launched the Build on Trainium initiative — a $110 million investment in university research. While appealing, this effort came years after Nvidia had firmly cemented its dominance in AI research and development. That is $110 million that could have been better spent on Nvidia hardware and better AI. And that $110 million is on top of the money that AWS spent developing the Trainium and Inferentia chips, probably well over $1 billion. So, Amazon decided to invest another $4 billion in Anthropic, the company behind Claude. Anthropic agreed to use Trainium chips for training its models in return. But behind the scenes, tensions emerged. Engineers at Anthropic reportedly also pushed back against Trainium. Many preferred Nvidia's stack for its maturity and tooling. Anthropic teams had to rework their CUDA-based pipelines to work on Trainium, leading to delays and performance issues. While Amazon touted the partnership as a breakthrough, it was a compromise — Anthropic needed funding, and Amazon needed a flagship AI partner. Amazon appears of late to be changing course, deepening its partnership with Anthropic and expanding support for Nvidia GPUs. AWS is building a massive Nvidia cloud infrastructure, Project Ceiba, with over 20,000 Nvidia GPUs. But it is only available to Nvidia engineers for use in developing AI and chips, not for public cloud access. Now Tesla has Seen the Light In 2019, Tesla shifted from using Nvidia to its custom FSD Chip for vehicle Autopilot hardware and neural network inference, replacing Nvidia's Drive PX2 system. And it began a major effort to build its own AI Supercomputer, DOJO, with its in-house chips. Since 2019, Tesla has reportedly spent over $1 billion developing DOJO along with another $500 million developing a DOJO supercomputer in Buffalo, New York. Last week, Elon Musk announced on X that he was ending this program and would instead deploy on Nvidia and AMD GPUs. I suspect Tesla will mostly deploy Nvidia this year and see how AMD's MI400 looks in 2026. Should Cloud Service Providers Even Build Their Own AI Chips? Well, first, let's look at a company that did not. OpenAI has recently reached $12 billion in annualized revenue and broke the $700 million ChatGPT weekly active user barrier. And guess what it uses? Yep, Nvidia. Sam Altman does have the gleam of OpenAI chips in his eye, to be sure, but he also realizes that speed, ease of use and development time matters more to OpenAI than the savings that proprietary chips could provide. At least for now. Meta has its own MTIA chip, but it is used for internal workloads, like recommendation engines for its Facebook and other properties. Microsoft has its own Maia chips starting with the Maia 100, announced in 2023, Used primarily for internal testing and select workloads. The planned successor, Maia 200, is now expected in 2026 due to delays. Maia 200 is designed for data center AI acceleration and inference workloads. We will see if Microsoft learns from Tesla and Apple's mistakes. I suspect Google is perhaps alone in realizing a decent return on its TPU investments, but it has generally failed to attract large outside customers, aside from Apple. But it gets a lot of bang for the buck for internal workloads and training. My advice to CSPs is this: if you can get Nvidia GPUs, use them. If you have a workload for which you believe they are not ideal and can model a decent ROI, then go for it. Otherwise, save your capital. The Consequences of Skipping Nvidia Can be Dire A year in the world of generative AI can mean the difference between heaven and hell, or at least multi-billion-dollar successes or failure. The hubris of some high tech companies have cost them billions of dollars, spent needlessly. Amazon ceded early leadership in cloud AI to Microsoft Azure, which now hosts many of the world's top models. Apple missed the 'AI supercycle' for iPhone upgrades, as consumers saw little reason to buy new devices without meaningful Siri improvements. Tesla has seen the light and is moving fast. All three of these companies now face pressure to catch up — not just in model performance, but in developer mindshare and ecosystem momentum. Yeah, you can build your own AI chip. But you might regret it.
CNET
35 minutes ago
- CNET
I Finally Cleared Out My Duplicate iPhone Photos. It Was Weirdly Therapeutic
My iPhone Photos app slowly crept past the point of being fun to scroll. Trips, pet videos, burst shots and a mountain of screenshots kept chewing through storage until the "iPhone storage almost full" alert became routine. I wanted a win I could see right away without paying for another app or more iCloud space. It was like playing the free storage lottery. The Photos app ended up being the fix I was searching for. On iOS 16 or newer, a Duplicates album gathers identical shots so you can merge or delete them in batches. I opened it out of curiosity and cleared dozens of lookalikes from the same vacation album. The storage bar moved. Backups felt faster. Browsing the camera roll stopped lagging. If your iPhone is packed with copies of the same photo, start there. Open Photos, tap Albums, find Duplicates under Utilities, then merge or delete. Removing duplicate photos frees up space quickly and turns cleanup into a simple, focused task that also surfaces memories you forgot you saved. For more, check out every new feature we're expecting Apple to drop with iOS 26 this fall. Remove duplicate photos and videos to get more storage on your iPhone. Screenshots by Jeff Carlson/CNET Apple introduced its "duplicate detection" feature in 2022 and it works just as its name suggests. The tool uses on-device AI to identify identical images and aggregate them in an easy-to-find album in the Photos app. Apple says the iPhone classifies duplicates not only as exact copies but also as photos that appear to be the same but have unique resolutions, file formats or other slight differences. That includes lower-resolution versions you may have saved to share on social media or even bursts of near-identical shots taken at the same time. Here's how to use the iPhone's built-in tool to free up storage space: 1. Open the Photos app on your iPhone. 2. Scroll down to the Utilities section and tap Duplicates. This is where you can view all the duplicate photos on your iPhone and delete them, either individually or at once. 3. If you want to delete all the duplicates at once, tap the Select button, and then tap Select All. You can also remove them in groups of two or more: Tap Select in the top right corner and then tap the Select button to the right of the pairs. Next, tap Merge [number] to merge all the duplicate photos your iPhone detects and send them to the trash. 4. If you want to delete duplicates individually, tap the Merge button that appears next to each pair. Then tap Merge [number] Copies to delete duplicates. Go down the line and repeat this step for all the identical photos you want to delete. Merging keeps the best version of the photo in your library. The duplicates are moved to the Recently Deleted album. If you found this iOS feature helpful, check out CNET's cheat sheet for iOS 18. For more advice on how to save space, read our full list of tips for clearing your iPhone's storage.
CNN
36 minutes ago
- CNN
New ‘Make America Healthy Again' report to be released in weeks
Food & healthFacebookTweetLink Follow Americans will have to wait several weeks for the Trump administration's next steps in its agenda to 'Make America Healthy Again,' according to three people familiar with the matter. While President Donald Trump's MAHA Commission will submit its strategy to the White House on Tuesday — sticking to an executive-ordered deadline — scheduling issues stand in the way of its public release. The commission is 'on track' to deliver its report to the White House by August 12, White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement. 'The report will be unveiled to the public shortly thereafter as we coordinate the schedules of the President and the various cabinet members who are a part of the Commission.' Officials are aiming to launch their strategy by the end of this month, according to the three people familiar. The commission's first MAHA report, issued in May, laid out the case that ultraprocessed foods, pharmaceutical prescriptions and environmental toxins are driving a crisis of childhood chronic disease in America. Much of the reports' findings echoed longtime arguments of health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who leads the commission. The second installment is expected to propose strategies and reforms to tackle those issues. Actions can include, per the president's executive order, ending certain federal practices that 'exacerbate the health crisis' and 'adding powerful new solutions.' Public health experts, MAHA supporters and industry advocates alike have been anxiously awaiting the commission's recommendations, and how far they will go. There is lingering unease among farmers and agricultural groups after the first report flagged studies that suggest links between commonly used pesticides and various illnesses such as cancer and liver problems. Groups like the American Farm Bureau Federation called those 'unproven theories' and warned that calling use of common pesticides into question could jeopardize Americans' confidence in the food supply. Federal health and agricultural officials sought to reassure farmers in the ensuing weeks. This month, a high-ranking Enviornmental Protection Agency official told attendees at a sugar industry conference that agencies would 'respect' the current regulatory framework, as reported by DTN Progressive Farmer, an agriculture news and analysis company. Another potential battleground is the federal path forward on ultraprocessed foods. Kennedy has led a public campaign for major food brands to voluntarily remove artificial additives and dyes from popular products, but nutrition advocates have pushed for the administration to crack down with regulations. This month, a former leader of the US Food and Drug Administration challenged the agency to remove ultraprocessed foods from the market by essentially outlawing certain ingredients. But some have remained skeptical that federal MAHA leaders will take drastic action. 'We need policies to change big food and the food system, so it produces healthier foods,' Jim Krieger, executive director of Healthy Food America, said in a news briefing Monday. 'Will [the MAHA commission] move beyond PR efforts, voluntary agreements and handshakes — none of which have really worked to improve the food system in the past — and suggest regulatory action with real teeth?'
