logo
Dining across the divide: ‘She said ‘woke' had gone too far'

Dining across the divide: ‘She said ‘woke' had gone too far'

The Guardian01-06-2025
Occupation Early retired primary headteacher
Voting record A diehard Lib Dem, but will vote tactically and loves Labour's Cat Smith, who she says is a great local MP
Amuse bouche She's a governor of two independent schools in Kazakhstan, one in its capital, Astana, and one in Almaty
Occupation Geography lecturer
Voting record Used to vote Labour, but was put off by their stance on the Palestinian cause and their attitude to the left. Now votes Green
Amuse bouche Once, she and some flatmates made their own version of Findus Crispy Pancakes from scratch
Emma She seemed very nice, very smiley. We were having a bit of banter outside straightaway.
Sue The first two minutes were awkward, but once we had looked at the menu we didn't shut up.
Emma We both had surf and turf. She ordered it and I had to ask the waitress how to use the tools to eat the lobster. It was delicious.
Sue I had chocolate mousse for dessert, and Emma had raspberry and elderflower sorbet. It was beautiful; the whole place was gorgeous.
Emma The main bone of contention was that she said 'woke' had gone too far. It was originally an African-American term that means being aware of structural racism. So to suggest it's gone too far is to suggest anti-racism has gone too far, that social justice has, which it obviously hasn't. It must be very frustrating for African Americans, that their language gets co-opted. It's important to remember who it belongs to and not let it be neutralised.
Sue If by 'woke' you're talking about protected characteristics, then obviously I respect those; they are absolutely essential. But I feel it stifles free speech, and those who are marginalised become even more so.
Emma Sue has worked in schools in a lot of really deprived communities. Her concern is that when you get this intellectual censoriousness of liberal identity politics, the people the left should be serving are excluded.
Sue If you over-police and don't look at context, you won't have any idea where people are coming from; whether they might be receptive to changing their view. You have to really work to understand what it's like when you haven't got a voice. Somebody who hasn't had a privileged, middle-class education, who lives a hand-to-mouth existence – their reality is going to be polar opposite.
Sue I bet Emma is an amazing lecturer. She speaks with such passion about the young people she's working with. And I was talking with equal passion about the children I've worked with – lack of school readiness is really striking. We had children whose socialisation, speech, potty training, just general physical strength, weren't where they should have been. They hadn't got the pincer grip needed to write because they'd used screens and simply swiped.
Emma We're both quite anti social media; neither of us use it. We both think young people need to spend more time outside, and we've seen negative impacts in the cohorts we teach. Nowadays, students come to university and it will be their first time pushed into independence, very high stakes. I think it affects their happiness. They seem very stressed, and you shouldn't be stressed when you're 19 – you should be living your best life.
Emma I work in the environment department at the university and I live in an eco-community, so all my friends and colleagues were saying: 'You've got to say this about net zero, you've got to say that.' And then I met Sue and she said: 'I've got an environmental science degree, I'm not against net zero.'
Sue She thought I was going to be all 'Drill, baby, drill'. She said: 'Shall I tell you about my eco house?' And I said: 'Yes, please.'
Emma I almost felt like I doing a Blind Date. We had loads of very personal conversations, and kept saying: 'This doesn't go in the paper.' We ended up going very deep.
Sue We had so much in common. She's the type of person I would want to be friends with. She's absolutely authentic and I trusted her.
Additional reporting: Kitty Drake
Emma and Sue ate at Quite Simply French in Lancaster.
Want to meet someone from across the divide? Find out how to take part
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nigel Farage's Trump-Vance delusion
Nigel Farage's Trump-Vance delusion

New Statesman​

time3 hours ago

  • New Statesman​

Nigel Farage's Trump-Vance delusion

A protestor attends the "Vance not welcome party", organised by Stop Trump Coalition supporters and local residents in Charlbury, Oxfordshire. Photo byJD Vance is on holiday, but it looks more like a diplomatic mission to spread Maga cheer deep into the British right. Images of him spending an evening in the Cotswolds with former Apprentice contestant and rumoured Reform candidate for Mayor of London, Thomas Skinner, have struck many as odd. But Vance has form here, adding to his Amazon Wishlist all the Brits he would like at his political picnic: Robert Jenrick, Nigel Farage, Danny Kruger, Chris Philp. I wonder if they appreciate just how unpopular Vance and Trump are to their British audiences. Vance is touring a Britain that, were it a US state, would have voted for Kamala Harris by more than California, 68 to 32 per cent. Current British feeling towards the US president is weak. Vance is less well known. But he still has a net favourability score of -44 among Brits. A more recent YouGov poll puts Trump's favourables at just 16 per cent. On paper, Farage shouldn't be anywhere near to someone so unpopular as Trump. You wouldn't think it wise to peg your movement to one so roundly disliked. But I return to the important distinction between voter instincts; the electorate can be broadly split into those of a 'shake things up' mentality and those who are better described under the phrase 'steady as she goes'. Reform voters unsurprisingly fit into the former distinction. It explains why so few of them (1 per cent) look upon Starmer in a positive light. This also explains why a majority of them like Trump too, even if 41 per cent of them don't. Meanwhile, the current Labour government could be making a much bigger deal of this close association. It would deal dividends among their anti-Trump base. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Trump is a reason many voters are reluctant to come out for Reform. And this, it appears, is something the likes of Farage and Skinner are blind to. [See also: Rachel Reeves' road to recovery] Related

Uefa's ‘Stop killing children' banner isn't fooling anyone
Uefa's ‘Stop killing children' banner isn't fooling anyone

Spectator

time16 hours ago

  • Spectator

Uefa's ‘Stop killing children' banner isn't fooling anyone

Who does Uefa think it's kidding? It says the huge banner saying 'Stop killing children' unfurled at a Super Cup match last night was 'not political'. It was 'about humanity', insists an insider. 'In fact, you could just say it is common sense', they said. They must think we were born yesterday. Everyone whose moral faculties have not been entirely fried by the Gaza war knows this banner was likely a political dig at that state it is fashionable to hate – Israel. To display such a banner ahead of a Spurs match – a team with deep links to Britain's Jewish community – is especially egregious The banner said 'Stop Killing Children – Stop Killing Civilians'. It was displayed on the pitch in Udine, Italy ahead of the clash between Tottenham Hotspur and Paris Saint-Germain. Children from conflict zones around the world stood by the banner, including two Palestinian kids. Uefa's rules forbid the display of political messages before, during or after matches. But this wasn't political, it says – it was a cry of concern for littl'uns everywhere. I call BS. I suppose it is wholly coincidental that such a banner has been displayed at a time when Europe's chattering classes feverishly accuse the Jewish State of being a child-killing entity. Spend more than 60 seconds on social media and you'll encounter this calumny. Browse the 'respectable' press and there it is. Venture into your city centre when there's a 'pro-Palestine' march and you'll hear the mob holler it: 'Israel spills the blood of children!' This view of Israel as a uniquely murderous state, as a nation that takes pleasure in the butchery of children, is all the rage right now. 'Israel is annihilating Palestinian children', op-ed writers cry. It is 'targeting childhood' itself, we're told. A Unicef official described Israel's war in Gaza as a 'war on children'. It is no such thing, of course; it is a war on the neo-fascists of Hamas who invaded Israel on 7 October 2023 to rape and massacre Jews. On those weekly street rages against Israel you'll see placard after placard calling on it to 'Stop Killing Children'. Israel is seen as an infanticidal regime, as uniquely wicked among the nations of the earth in that children do not merely perish in its wars, as they tragically do in all wars – no, they are targeted for execution by this sick state that gets a twisted thrill from letting the blood of innocents. You don't have to be an expert in Medieval History to hear the echo of the blood libel in these chants. Where once Jews were seen as the dastardly spillers of the blood of Christian children, now the Jewish state is seen as the murderous spiller of the blood of Palestinian children. Some people might believe the left's anti-Israel hotheads when they say it is entirely coincidental that they now accuse the Jewish nation of the same ritualistic crimes of child slaughter that the Jewish people were once accused of – I am not one of those people. For me, it was made most clear on an anti-Israel demonstration in Westcliff-on-Sea in Essex back in April. Protesters carried dolls in shrouds stained with fake blood while screaming 'Stop killing babies!' as Jewish families walked home from synagogue after Sabbath prayers. How profoundly shaming that 900 years after the blood libel was born in the City of Norwich, England's Jews once more found themselves surrounded by a frothing mob howling about child slaughter. And now into this mix comes Uefa's apparently innocent banner. Look, who knows what the thinking was of the individuals who thought it would be a good idea to mention the death of children in war before a game of footie. But the impact of the banner is undeniable: it will have made hundreds of thousands of people think about that 'evil' state that the cultural elite insists is murdering children for sport. 'For centuries, Europe has traded in the blood libel that Jews kill children, and clearly the trope remains as popular as ever', said the Campaign Against Antisemitism in response to the Uefa furore. Quite right. To display such a banner ahead of a Spurs match – a team with deep links to Britain's Jewish community – is especially egregious. Why not a banner saying 'Stop Kidnapping Jews', in reference to Hamas's brutal, 15-month abduction of the British-Israeli Spurs fan, Emily Damari? Children die in all wars. It's the worst thing about war. But the Israel-Hamas war is the first of my lifetime where there has been such a grim, frenzied obsession with these tragic deaths, and such a certain conviction that they are not accidental tragedies at all but the intentional handiwork of that monstrous Jewish army. I'm tired of tiptoeing around this: the reason they accuse this nation alone of ritualistic child murder is because it is the Jewish nation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store