Fifteen (more) reasons you should be loving the Wallabies
Consistency is key
It got a bit lost in the confusion of James O'Connor's selection - and a reshuffling bench - but the value of selection consistency by Wallabies coach Joe Schmidt was clear in the Boks' upset. Schmidt named the same starting side from Sydney, bar one, and mostly the same bench, too.
The last time Schmidt named just one change in the starting XV? The team that ran on against England at Twickenham last year.
It can take some luck with injuries, but cohesion and consistency haven't been a strong point of the Wallabies in recent years, with lots of tinkering from lots of coaches. But when looking at World Cup-winning sides, fielding most of the same team over a number of preceding years is always a common trait.
Don't rush veterans out the door
The contributions of Nic White recently, with gritty defence and pressure kicking, show the value of time in the Test saddle. It simply can't be faked. And even after several years in the wilderness, and after a patchy start, James O'Connor's muscle memory had him pulling all the right levers in the second half, when every bad decision can concede territory and points. Longer-term No.23 anyone?
We can be quick in rugby to search for the next young thing, rising up the ladder. But mostly, when it comes to Test rugby, the proven old thing is way more valuable.
Leadership is about action
Harry Wilson is not the most naturally athletic footballer, and that was his downfall in the eyes of Wallabies coaches before Joe Schmidt. Dave Rennie had him in and out of the Wallabies, and Eddie Jones just had him out.
But Schmidt has figured out that there have not been many more passionate Wallabies ever, than Wilson, and his choice as captain has materially improved the side. He lifts as a leader, and the Wallabies take their emotional cues from the skipper. If you are looking for answers about why the Wallabies 'have no quit in them', as Michael Hooper said, look no further than the example set by the captain.
Jorgensen is a freak
At what point do we stop being surprised by the stuff 'Mild Max' can do on a rugby field? In yet another superb Test performance – coming after a superb spring tour and a super Lions series – Jorgensen scored a crucial try with his trademark side-swerve that regularly embarrasses teammates at training.
But it was his gritty defence that shone just as much at Ellis Park. Even with forwards down his channel, Jorgensen stood his ground all night.
Rank improvement
The win over the Springboks may help the Wallabies go deep at the 2027 World Cup, and not just boost belief. It also boosted the Wallabies' world ranking in a major way, with the 16-point win harvesting three valuable ranking points.
Loading
The Wallabies need to finish the year in the top six to get a top seeding for their home World Cup. That way, you avoid having one of the very big boys in your pool, and likely avoid major teams in the early finals, too.
The Wallabies are still ranked sixth, but the win over the Boks turned a narrow margin ahead of Argentina into a big buffer. And get this - if the Wallabies beat SA again with the same margin, they can even leapfrog the Boks into third this weekend
Nick Frost is world-class
The giant Brumby was demoted on the spring tour last year because the Wallabies coaches wanted more edge and physicality from him. Frost has vastly improved his contact strength and a thumping one-on-one shot on Eben Etzebeth in the second half spoke volumes.
Throw in the fact Frost is arguably the best lineout forward in the game, and the 206cm giant is shaping as a vital World Cup weapon.
Schmidt is a mind-gamer
It was an historic win, but it didn't stop Joe Schmidt going hard on the mind games straight after the Wallabies win, saying he felt the team had been lucky and the scoreboard didn't reflect the contest against a Boks side who'll be fired up next week in Cape Town.
It would be interesting to hear if the language used in the dressing rooms was the same. You'd doubt it.
Hot takes may burn
There was no shortage of pundits and columnists keeping a low profile on Sunday, or audibly beeping as they swiftly reversed their views. Scepticism about a Wallabies win was understandable, but the scalding hot take of one RugbyPass columnist – titled The Wallabies have no chance against the Springboks – ended up particularly egg-on-facey.
'Let's be honest: if the Springboks don't pulverise the Wallabies at Ellis Park, it's a major upset. Ellis Park doesn't deal in fairy tales. The altitude is unforgiving, the Boks are unrelenting, and history is unyielding. This is the double world champions against the sixth-best team in the world. How good are the Wallabies? We're about to find out. Keep an ear out for the audible thunk as they come back down to earth.'
We heard a thunk, alright.
Are the Wallabies hoodoo gurus?
This Wallabies side is quietly ticking off some hoodoos and records. The win at Twickenham was the first against England there since 2016, the Wales' win was a record, and victory over the Lions at Accor was the first win at Sydney Olympic Park in a decade. The win in Newcastle was a first, too.
The breakthrough win at Ellis Park now means the longest drought at a regular venue is Eden Park, at 39 years. The Wallabies play the All Blacks at Eden Park next month.
That is all. Just leaving it there.
Fraser McReight is the world's best no.7
As far as a pure openside fetcher goes, it's hard to find anyone as good in the world game as Fraser McReight. His performance against the Boks continued a remarkable tradition of No.7s in gold, and his and names sits comfortably with Poidevin, Wilson, Waugh, Smith, Pocock and Hooper.
Discipline is key
As recently as three years ago, the Wallabies' discipline was the worst of any tier-one nation. They routinely conceded 12-13 penalties a game and lost at least one man to the sin-bin each game.
Loading
It pointed to a team that struggled for belief and was more often on the back foot than the front. That has changed dramatically under Schmidt and his obsession with strong fundamentals, particularly in the carry-clean. The Wallabies conceded just four penalties at Ellis Park, and have now gone seven straight Tests without a card; the longest since 2017.
Depth is developing
The Wallabies' depth has been a problem in recent years, but it is worth noting Schmidt's side claimed back-to-back wins against the British and Irish Lions and the Springboks without star forwards Rob Valetini and Allan Alaalatoa, their first two choices for the No.10 jersey and the first-choice No.9. And with a couple of hookers missing as well.
Giteau law demise timely
The recent strong form of Tom Hooper, Taniela Tupou and Langi Gleeson – who are all heading overseas at the end of 2025 – has shown there is wisdom in discarding a hard-and-fast mentality around the Giteau law, and overseas-bound players in general.
Hooper and Gleeson were not involved in the first Wallabies camp this year, but both have grown incredibly this season and need to be involved in the Test squad as often as possible through to 2027.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘You've won nothing': How World Cup-winning Wallabies silenced South Africa in 1992
The last time the Wallabies won at Cape Town, in 1992, captain Nick Farr-Jones and his World Cup-winning squad played in a country filled with tension. The Springboks had been officially isolated from Test rugby for eight years due to the nation's apartheid regime, and the arrival of teams from New Zealand and Australia for two Tests was a tentative gesture of support for a country grappling with the transition to democracy. One year before Farr-Jones had lifted the World Cup in front of Queen Elizabeth, but according to many Afrikaners, it was a phoney prize. 'We went up to Pretoria [for a tour match],' Farr-Jones said. 'You've got a lot of Afrikaners up there and, of course, they [South Africa] weren't part of the 1991 World Cup, and my long-lasting memory is the Afrikaners coming up to me, recognising me, knowing who I was and basically to summarise, they would say, 'Congratulations on winning what you perceive to be the World Cup, and until you've beaten us, you've won nothing'.' In 1992, South Africa was stumbling on its first tentative steps to democracy as it attempted to transition from the institutionalised racial segregation of apartheid. Nelson Mandela had been released from prison two years earlier after 27 years behind bars, and talks between his party, the African National Congress, and the government were difficult. The invitation to New Zealand and Australia to play the Springboks in South Africa only came with the express blessing of the ANC. 'When I was a young fella, in the mid-80s, I always thought that sport and politics shouldn't cross over,' Farr-Jones said. 'But when I saw the pressure that isolation [in sport] brought on South Africa to change, I turned 180 degrees. 'I believe that that isolation was very important in getting rid of apartheid, that abhorrent culture, and so I went from someone who [believed] sport and politics shouldn't interfere, to someone that felt this was the right thing to do in isolating South Africa, economically and sport.' In the lead up to the game, Farr-Jones had the opportunity to spent time with Mandela, a man who he bonded with as a fellow lawyer and admired greatly for his courageous stance against apartheid. The Wallabies almost did not take to the field in Newlands, as the ANC and its supporters were unhappy after their requests for the apartheid-era national anthem and flag not to be used before the game against New Zealand were ignored.
The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
‘You've won nothing': How World Cup-winning Wallabies silenced South Africa in 1992
The last time the Wallabies won at Cape Town, in 1992, captain Nick Farr-Jones and his World Cup-winning squad played in a country filled with tension. The Springboks had been officially isolated from Test rugby for eight years due to the nation's apartheid regime, and the arrival of teams from New Zealand and Australia for two Tests was a tentative gesture of support for a country grappling with the transition to democracy. One year before Farr-Jones had lifted the World Cup in front of Queen Elizabeth, but according to many Afrikaners, it was a phoney prize. 'We went up to Pretoria [for a tour match],' Farr-Jones said. 'You've got a lot of Afrikaners up there and, of course, they [South Africa] weren't part of the 1991 World Cup, and my long-lasting memory is the Afrikaners coming up to me, recognising me, knowing who I was and basically to summarise, they would say, 'Congratulations on winning what you perceive to be the World Cup, and until you've beaten us, you've won nothing'.' In 1992, South Africa was stumbling on its first tentative steps to democracy as it attempted to transition from the institutionalised racial segregation of apartheid. Nelson Mandela had been released from prison two years earlier after 27 years behind bars, and talks between his party, the African National Congress, and the government were difficult. The invitation to New Zealand and Australia to play the Springboks in South Africa only came with the express blessing of the ANC. 'When I was a young fella, in the mid-80s, I always thought that sport and politics shouldn't cross over,' Farr-Jones said. 'But when I saw the pressure that isolation [in sport] brought on South Africa to change, I turned 180 degrees. 'I believe that that isolation was very important in getting rid of apartheid, that abhorrent culture, and so I went from someone who [believed] sport and politics shouldn't interfere, to someone that felt this was the right thing to do in isolating South Africa, economically and sport.' In the lead up to the game, Farr-Jones had the opportunity to spent time with Mandela, a man who he bonded with as a fellow lawyer and admired greatly for his courageous stance against apartheid. The Wallabies almost did not take to the field in Newlands, as the ANC and its supporters were unhappy after their requests for the apartheid-era national anthem and flag not to be used before the game against New Zealand were ignored.
The Age
6 hours ago
- The Age
Nowhere to hide: Australia exposed by Smith retirement
It's no coincidence that Australia's hiding by South Africa in Cairns was their first ODI since the retirement of Steve Smith. In conditions that were momentarily tricky against the wily left-arm spin of Keshav Maharaj, Australia showed absolutely no ability to adapt to a newish ball spinning off a tacky surface, when they needed only to get through four or so overs for the drop and bite to diminish. That adaptability and thought were hallmarks of Smith's ODI career, finding ways to work with the ebb and flow of a 50-over game to make the runs required. Last time Australia played games up in Cairns, a 3-0 thumping of New Zealand in 2022, Smith was a star on a series of similarly testy surfaces, scoring his runs at a relatively sedate pace but playing the situation with mastery. But without him this time, after Smith elected to hang up his one-day kit and go play in the Hundred in England instead, the batting line-up looked dispiritingly gullible when pitted against Maharaj. He spun a web as thick as that conjured up by Shane Warne against South Africa in a famous World Cup semi-final at Edgbaston in 1999. Marnus Labuschagne, ostensibly there to take Smith's role, misread the length and was beaten by turn to be lbw, the 14th occasion on which a left-arm spinner had got him in an ODI. Cameron Green was similarly outfoxed to lose his off stump, and Josh Inglis – a noted player of spin – was nowhere to a quicker delivery that skidded through. Alex Carey's first-ball sweep was misjudged, and Aaron Hardie contrived for a near action replay of Green's dismissal. Maharaj's spell of destruction reduced the Australians to 6-89, having been 0-60 just nine overs before. That captain Mitchell Marsh and number eight Ben Dwarshuis were then able to play Maharaj with few dramas, in a game-prolonging stand of 71, only enhanced the sense of worry about what had just transpired.
