logo
Hamas agrees to proposed ceasefire in Gaza

Hamas agrees to proposed ceasefire in Gaza

IOL News11 hours ago
A picture shows rubble and destroyed buildings in the al-Tuffah neighbourhood of Gaza City on August 14, 2025, following more than 22 months of war between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas.
Image: Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP
HAMAS accepted a new ceasefire proposal for Gaza without requesting amendments, a source from the group told AFP on Monday, after a fresh diplomatic push to end more than 22 months of war.
Mediators Egypt and Qatar, backed by the United States, have struggled to secure a lasting truce in the conflict, which has triggered a dire humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip.
However, after receiving a new proposal from mediators, Hamas indicated that it was ready for talks.
"Hamas has delivered its response to the mediators, confirming that Hamas and the factions agreed to the new ceasefire proposal without requesting any amendments," the source said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
A Palestinian source familiar with the talks said mediators were "expected to announce that an agreement has been reached and set a date for the resumption of talks", adding guarantees were offered to ensure implementation and pursue a permanent solution.
Another Palestinian official earlier said mediators had proposed an initial 60-day truce and hostage release in two batches.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The proposal comes more than a week after Israel's security cabinet approved plans to expand the war into Gaza City and nearby refugee camps, which has sparked international outcry as well as domestic opposition.
An Islamic Jihad source told AFP the plan envisaged a 60-day ceasefire "during which 10 Israeli hostages would be released alive, along with a number of bodies".
Out of 251 hostages taken during Hamas's October 2023 attack, 49 are still held in Gaza including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. The Israeli army has killed more than 62,004 Palestinians, most of them civilians, according to figures from the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza which the United Nations considers reliable.
The Islamic Jihad source said "the remaining captives would be released in a second phase", with negotiations for a broader settlement to follow. They added that "all factions are supportive" of the Egyptian and Qatari proposal.
US President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social: "We will only see the return of the remaining hostages when Hamas is confronted and destroyed!!!"
"The sooner this takes place, the better the chances of success will be."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hamas accepts ceasefire proposal for Gaza as public pressure mounts on Netanyahu. What you need to know
Hamas accepts ceasefire proposal for Gaza as public pressure mounts on Netanyahu. What you need to know

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

Hamas accepts ceasefire proposal for Gaza as public pressure mounts on Netanyahu. What you need to know

Crowds wait outside Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. The hospital has become a focal point for families searching for loved ones as casualties mount in the latest strikes. Image: Saeed Jaras / Middle East Images / Middle East Images via AFP Hamas officials have announced their acceptance of a proposed ceasefire deal for Gaza. This is everything that we know about it. The proposed agreement involves a suspension of military operations for 60 days. During this period, half of the approximately 20 remaining living Israeli hostages would be released in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. Egypt took a central role as a key mediator in this negotiation. This development comes after intense negotiations in Cairo involving Egyptian and Qatari officials. The acceptance by Hamas comes as pressure mounts on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who faced the largest protests of the war on Sunday. More than 400,000 people gathered in Tel Aviv to demand a deal for hostage release. Protesters have also called for fresh demonstrations this Sunday. Netanyahu has criticised these large-scale street protests, claiming they "give comfort to Hamas's position in negotiations" and toughen their stance. He has further claimed that ending the war without defeating Hamas would lead to a recurrence of what he called "October 7 atrocities". Despite the proposed deal, Netanyahu has previously indicated that Israel is no longer interested in "part deals" and would only agree to end the war if Hamas releases all hostages at once, disarms, and allows for the demilitarisation of Gaza. In addition to protests, the Israeli Prime Minister has faced fierce criticism from domestic political figures and hostage families. The Hostages and Missing Families Forum lambasted Netanyahu, stating: "They have been languishing in Gaza for 22 months, on your watch". Yair Golan, leader of the Israeli opposition Democrats party, accused Netanyahu of strengthening Hamas and needing "an eternal war in order to cling to his seat and to escape a commission of inquiry" into the October 7 attack. It's also worth noting that the Israeli government is planning a large new military offensive to take control of Gaza City. This move could displace up to 1 million Palestinians. A statement from the Israeli prime minister's office outlined five "principles" for ending the war, which this takeover is presumably intended to support. This is what the takeover plan entails. The disarmament of Hamas The return of all hostages, both living and dead. The demilitarisation of the Gaza Strip. Israeli security control over the Gaza Strip. The establishment of an alternative civilian administration that is neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority. The human cost of the war in Gaza remains severe, with Gaza health officials reporting that the war's death toll has reached 62,000 people. Due to the blockade, Palestinians are also starving and not getting much-needed aid. IOL NEWS

Togo tight-lipped as Burkina jihadists infiltrate north
Togo tight-lipped as Burkina jihadists infiltrate north

eNCA

time4 hours ago

  • eNCA

Togo tight-lipped as Burkina jihadists infiltrate north

Jihadists from Burkina Faso have stepped up their assaults on northern Togo since the beginning of the year, with the Togolese government tight-lipped on their covert infiltration. Keen not to sap the morale of the Togolese soldiers fighting the incursion, the small west African nation's authorities have offered little in the way of official comment or figures on violence by jihadists, who have gained ground since their first deadly attack in the country in 2022. In a rare admission, Togolese Foreign Minister Robert Dussey recently said Islamist fighters had killed at least 62 people since January -- more than double the deaths the government recorded in the whole of 2023. Those losses reflect a surge in jihadist unrest in Togo's north, at a time when armed fighters linked to Al-Qaeda or the Islamic State group are gaining ground across the wider west African region. For Togolese political scientist and essayist Madi Djabakate, the lack of coverage in the Togolese press stems from the government's "policy of informational lockdown". Togo's High Authority for Broadcasting and Communication (HAAC) has "expressly forbidden journalists from mentioning the attacks or human or material losses, so as not to demoralise the troops engaged on the ground", he told AFP. - Porous borders - Like neighbouring Benin, Togo is confronted with an overspill of violence from eastern Burkina Faso, where jihadists run rampant. In 2024, Burkina Faso saw the most deaths of any country in the world from "terrorism" for the second year running, with 1,532 victims out of a worldwide total of 7,555, according to the Global Terrorism Index. Located near the Togolese border, the Burkinabe province of Kompienga is home to a powerful branch of the Al-Qaeda-linked Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims, known by its Arabic acronym, JNIM. AFP | Ioana PLESEA, Valentina BRESCHI Just over the frontier, Kpendjal prefecture is the Togolese region worst-hit by jihadist attacks, which west African security specialist Mathias Khalfaoui said was a result of the porous border. Yet in the past year the violence has spread beyond the borderlands. In a study for the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, a think tank associated with Germany's conservative CDU party, Khalfaoui said the jihadist advance could easily go under the radar "because of its slow and methodical nature". "Until 2023, the danger was still concentrated in the territories directly bordering Burkina Faso," the analyst said. Since May 2024, he said, the jihadists have extended their influence further south, towards the nearby prefectures of Oti and South Oti. - 'Absence of the state' - Khalfaoui said the expansion of the jihadists' scope in Togo was "becoming clear". "We have to go back to December 2022 to find a month when, to our knowledge, there was no attack," Khalfaoui said in his study. But tackling the issue is a challenge given the dire economic situation of Togo's north, the poorest and least developed part of an already impoverished nation, Khalfaoui added. AFP | PIUS UTOMI EKPEI Djabakate, the Togolese political scientist, agreed, arguing that the country's current approach was "essentially military and repressive". "The affected prefectures, notably Kpendjal and West Kpendjal, suffer from a structural absence of the state," Djabakate said. "Civil servants posted to these areas perceive their assignment as a punishment, given the harsh living conditions and the absence of public services," he added. Togo has deployed around 8,000 soldiers to the affected region, while the defence budget ballooned from 8.7 percent of GDP in 2017 to 17.5 percent in 2022, according to Foreign Minister Dussey. The government has also attempted to improve living conditions for Togolese in the north, through an emergency aid programme launched in 2023. But the situation is unlikely to improve without better coordination on tackling jihadism between countries in a divided west Africa, according to analysts in the region.

Rethinking social literacy in post-apartheid South Africa
Rethinking social literacy in post-apartheid South Africa

Eyewitness News

time6 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Rethinking social literacy in post-apartheid South Africa

Jamil F. Khan 19 August 2025 | 10:27 Literacy Department of Basic Education (DBE) colonialism Picture: Education has always been a political space in South Africa. The battle for custody of knowledge has, in many ways, shaped the society we live in today. Within this battle, ways of knowing and unknowing, remembering and forgetting, are equally valuable commodities. Related to knowing is the practice of literacy, by which many countries measure their social development. This literacy refers to our ability to read and count words and numbers. Literacy in post-1994 South Africa has been a contested space, with our Department of Basic Education having restructured and redefined the education system a number of times. The definitions of milestones and passing requirements have also evolved, the enduring impact of one being the introduction of a 30% pass mark implemented under former Minister of Basic Education, Angie Motshekga. This decision has had an enduring impact, having made its way into social discourse as a signifier of the decline of education in South Africa. Though I would agree that it is a very low bar, this regulation has interacted with the social landscape in an interesting way. It has become a racialised accusation of incompetence and stupidity that is said to be a part of the mediocrity that comes from Black governance. This idea also interacts with the disdain expressed towards Black Economic Empowerment as an aid to Black mediocrity and corruption. Though the mechanics of the pass mark requirement (which is much more complex) are completely misunderstood, ignoring that a report card with a 30% aggregate will not get someone into university, the narrative that all education is inferior makes education a form of corruption itself. Though our literacy rates have shocked us when announced, there is an arena where we are consistently failing: social literacy. South Africans are deeply estranged from each other, with very few tools to read our society the way we would read books. The destruction of a shared social literacy might be one of the biggest prices we paid through colonisation and apartheid. While we might want to focus on seemingly more important things like the economy, we must realise that the social, which is the practice of being human, affects everything else, for as long as humans run those systems. To co-operate in efforts to truly "fix" our country, we must get to know each other better. The motto on our coat of arms says "!KE E:/XARRA //KE" which translates into "diverse people unite" in the indigenous |Xam language. While, of course, profound and beautiful as a sentiment, not least for being expressed in one of our oldest indigenous languages, it is not easy to achieve. The diversity we have comes with deeply painful histories, and in many ways, it was foisted on us with violence. What we hope to celebrate is how we have survived, despite it. To acknowledge these complications when we engage with our diversity, requires a critical diversity literacy (CDL). A framework developed by Wits Professor Emeritus Melissa Steyn, CDL suggests a way for us to read our society better and so become more literate in our engagement with diversity. In order to be critically diversity literate, there are ten criteria that we must commit first is that we must understand that our differences are constructed by unequal power, and they affect us differently and have different meanings attached to them. The second is that we must be willing to recognise that categories, such as race, gender, sexuality, class, ability, with which we name each other, are not just names; they are attached to different levels of privilege and oppression and that they determine our life experiences in various ways. Criterion three demands that we learn ways of analysing privilege and oppression while acknowledging that they are dynamic systems that work together to have cumulative effects on people's lives. Fourth, we must also understand that oppressive systems are not only a part of historical legacies, but they still operate today, right now. Fifth, we are a product of our social experiences and environments. This understanding hopes to steer us away from the totalising discourses that produce stereotypes. Number six asks us to focus on the languages we use to voice our relationships to each other's differences. This does not only, but can, refer to the modification of our diverse group of South African languages, but also learning a vocabulary to speak about and describe privilege and oppression, in any language. Language must evolve to help us meet each other in our interactions. The seventh criterion requires that we, through the use of our newly acquired vocabularies, learn to see through the ways that power has normalised oppression and sanitised privilege, as a natural state of the world. This requires a rejection of the explanations that maintain the status quo. Number eight reminds us that different locations in the world have produced different hierarchies of inequality, and therefore, we cannot apply the same analysis to each location. Here, a historical analysis becomes important again. It also reminds us that people's shared experiences of oppression and privilege across contexts show us that it is not coincidental, but the outcome of coordinated systems of unequal power. The second last criterion, nine, requires an engagement with our emotions. Not only in the sense of expressing our emotions, but also understanding how our emotions towards people who are different to us, shape our actions and reactions towards those people. Being critically diversity literate is as much about feeling as it is about thinking our way to a better place. That better place is envisioned with the tenth and final criterion of CDL, which requires us, while having hopefully internalised the previous criteria, to channel it into our efforts to transform every level of our society into spaces of deepened social justice. The importance of our social literacy and our ability to see ourselves and the divisions that separate us lies in the price of an ever more fractured social contract, that we cannot afford to pay. This is a test we cannot fail because the success of our country relies deeply on our ability to co-exist equitably. To be literate in this way is for us to truly confront the estrangement that still makes co-existence amongst South Africans a difficult task. Jamil F. Khan is an award-winning author, doctoral critical diversity scholar, and research fellow at the Johannesburg Institute for Advanced Study.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store