logo
Rights groups sue German ministers over deportation of Afghans from Pakistan

Rights groups sue German ministers over deportation of Afghans from Pakistan

Reuters2 days ago
BERLIN, Aug 15 (Reuters) - Advocacy groups filed a criminal case against Germany's foreign and interior ministers on Friday, accusing them of failing to protect Afghan nationals in Pakistan with German admission approvals from deportation to Taliban-controlled Afghanistan.
Pakistan has begun deporting documented Afghan refugees ahead of a September 1 deadline, a move the United Nations warns could force more than one million to leave.
Among those at risk are more than 2,000 Afghans approved for relocation to Germany under programmes for people deemed vulnerable under Taliban rule in Afghanistan.
The relocations have been put on hold, pending a review by Germany's new conservative-led government as it tries to deliver on its election promise to curb migration.
Refugee group PRO ASYL and the Patenschaftsnetzwerk Ortskraefte, a non-profit supporting former local staff who worked for Germany, filed a criminal complaint with Berlin prosecutors against Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul and Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt.
By allowing Pakistan to deport Afghans already accepted into German resettlement programmes, they said, the ministers had committed "abandonment" and "failure to render assistance" to people at risk under Section 221 of the Criminal Code.
They said more than 400 people approved for relocation to Germany had been arrested in Pakistan in recent weeks and 34 people had already been deported. Deportees face grave risks under Taliban rule, including imprisonment, mistreatment or execution, the groups said.
Victoria Lies, a lawyer who represents several of those affected, said some of her clients had been separated from their families, and in one case, a girl had been sent back to Afghanistan alone.
The foreign and interior ministries did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the lawsuit.
However, Wadephul said on Friday his ministry was in "high-level contact with the Pakistani government to ensure the protection of these people and to provide rapid assistance to those who have been deported or arrested in recent days".
The interior ministry has said it cannot provide a timeline to determine the future of the admission programme but expects decisions soon.
The two NGOs' complaint builds on a July 8 legal opinion commissioned by them, which said German officials could be criminally liable if they fail to prevent the deportations.
It adds to more than 80 lawsuits by affected Afghans seeking German government approval for their visas, with courts siding with them in some cases, though the interior ministry has appealed those rulings.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

German foreign minister criticises 'aggressive' China ahead of trip to Japan
German foreign minister criticises 'aggressive' China ahead of trip to Japan

Reuters

time4 hours ago

  • Reuters

German foreign minister criticises 'aggressive' China ahead of trip to Japan

BERLIN, Aug 17 (Reuters) - Germany's foreign minister on Sunday criticised what he called the "aggressive behaviour" of China in the Taiwan Strait ahead of a trip to Japan and Indonesia, and stressed the need to strengthen internationally binding rules. Speaking to reporters, Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul praised Japan's solidarity with Europe over Ukraine as he prepared to board a plane, and highlighted the importance and economic potential of the two populous Asian countries. His ministry also published a separate statement from Wadephul in which he expressed concern about China. "China's increasingly aggressive behaviour in the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas also affects us in Europe: fundamental principles of our global co-existence are at stake here," the minister said. "We are countering this together through our commitment to an international order, which is supported by the strength of the law and binding rules for all." Tensions have simmered between China and other powers in the Asia-Pacific region over territorial claims. Earlier this week the Chinese military said it monitored and "drove away" a U.S. destroyer that sailed near the disputed Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea, while the U.S. Navy said its action was in line with international law. Wadephul's criticism of China comes as Chancellor Friedrich Merz prepares to join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy at a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington that aims to work towards a peace settlement in Ukraine. China, a major trading partner but also rival of Germany, has stood by Russia since its invasion of Ukraine, causing friction with Western powers over the conflict. Beijing says it is not helping Russia's military and is not a party to the war.

How an Israeli arms embargo divided Merz's party
How an Israeli arms embargo divided Merz's party

Telegraph

time4 hours ago

  • Telegraph

How an Israeli arms embargo divided Merz's party

Germany's decision to partially block weapons exports to Israel has opened a rift in Friedrich Merz's fledgling coalition. For decades, Germany has been perhaps Europe's most ardent supporter of Israel, a policy rooted in its guilt over the Holocaust. Elsewhere in Europe, leaders are under pressure at home to adopt a tougher stance on Israel after Benjamin Netanyahu announced plans to fully occupy the Gaza Strip. The opposite is the case in Germany. The chancellor's arms embargo has sparked a rebellion within his coalition, with some warning that the move will play into the hands of Hamas. Hastily announced last week, Mr Merz's embargo will block German exports of weapons that would be used inside Gaza, in a sign of Berlin's disapproval of the new Israeli plan to occupy the devastated enclave. 'The even tougher military action by the Israeli army in the Gaza Strip... makes it increasingly difficult for the German government to see how these goals will be achieved,' Mr Merz said, in a highly unusual public rebuke of Israel that blindsided many of his MPs, according to sources. In practice, the ban means that Germany can continue to provide Israel with around 30 per cent of its weapons – the other 70 per cent coming from the United States mainly – but they can only be used inside Israeli territory or in the occupied West Bank. Experts told The Telegraph this is an attempt to strike a delicate balance between support for Israeli security, a key pillar of the post-war German state's raison d'être, and growing public concern about the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza. The announcement, however, has caused an outcry in Mr Merz's Right-wing Christian Democrats [CDU] party. And it's not because they feel the move does not go far enough, as might be the case in Sir Keir Starmer's Labour party. On the contrary, CDU members have been left 'stunned, angry and horrified' by the embargo, which they consider a betrayal of German support for Israel and, some say, a gift to Hamas. Mr Merz was this week forced to convene a 'crisis meeting' with top CDU allies, which lasted long into the night, to justify the embargo to them, the German tabloid Bild reported. There was much to discuss. Roderich Kiesewetter, one of the most hawkish MPs in the CDU, described the embargo as 'a serious political and strategic error' which risked unravelling Germany's alliance with the Jewish state. Boris Rhein, the CDU president of the west German state of Hesse, also publicly opposed the ban. 'Hamas can only be defeated in battle, not at the negotiating table. We must continue to equip Israel to fight this battle, to defeat Hamas and to end terrorism,' he said. Support for Israel linked to 'reason of state' Even the CDU's youth wing has joined the fray, with Johannes Winkel, one of its leading figures, fuming that Mr Merz had 'broken with the basic values of CDU politics'. The Christian Social Union in Bavaria [CSU], the sister party of the CDU in Mr Merz's coalition, also distanced itself from the embargo, describing it as 'questionable.' As the CDU feverishly debates Mr Merz's decision, one concept keeps cropping up: the concept of 'Staatsräson'. Germany's unwavering support of Israel, both militarily and diplomatically, is considered to be an integral part of the state's reason for existence. That policy is largely driven by Germany's guilt over the Holocaust, which is quite literally etched into the country's foundations: the streets of Berlin are dotted with 'stumble stones,' the small brass memorial blocks in memory of murdered Jewish families At the same time, some in Germany are beginning to question if their ethos of 'nie wieder [never again]' – the notion that the crimes of the Holocaust must never be repeated – requires them to oppose the death and destruction in the Gaza Strip. This is based on the argument that 'nie wieder' should be applied not only to the Nazi genocide, but to any genocide worldwide. It is a challenging area for Germans to navigate, and not just ethically; comparing the Holocaust to other historical events in a way that plays down the former's magnitude can be a criminal offence. Mr Netanyahu's new goal of fully occupying the Gaza Strip, which human rights groups fear will lead to yet more civilian deaths, therefore presented Germany's chancellor with a dilemma. 'Domestic pressure has been mounting on Merz for some time due to the deteriorating situation in Gaza,' Dr Trevelyan Wing, a fellow at Cambridge University's Centre for Geopolitics, told The Telegraph. 'At the same time, Germany considers the defence of Israel to be its Staatsräson. So it's a balancing act for Merz,' he added. Dr Wing noted that one recent survey found 66 per cent of Germans wanted the Chancellor to put more pressure on Israel to wrap up the war, which has so far killed an estimated 60,000 Palestinians. The war itself was launched in retaliation for the Oct 7 Hamas massacre which killed more than a thousand Israelis. A recent study by the Lancet medical journal estimated that around 60 per cent of the victims in the first nine months of the Gaza war were children, women and over-65s. Experts sceptical over impact Even so, Dr Wing added, Mr Merz's arms embargo has taken many conservatives by surprise in Germany. 'You now have some saying it's a break with that reason of state,' he said. There are also practical matters to consider: Germany is said to rely heavily on the Israeli intelligence services for domestic security, to compensate for decades of underinvestment in the German equivalents of MI5 and MI6. And Germany recently signed a €4bn (£3.4bn) deal to buy Israel's highly advanced Arrow 3 missile defence system. Experts are generally sceptical about the embargo having a major impact on Israel's arms procurement, due to the United States already providing the vast majority of its weapons. But the more tangible consequences may be felt in Berlin, where Mr Merz seems to have many enemies in his own party, with some of them perhaps looking for excuses to cause political chaos. Back in May, when Mr Merz's candidacy for chancellor was put before the German parliament – in what was supposed to be a mere formality – he shockingly lost the vote. It was the first time in Germany's postwar history that a chancellor lost a confirmation vote, and was widely viewed as a warning shot by CDU MPs who disliked their new leader. While he is a veteran of the CDU, Mr Merz is a somewhat divisive figure. His Right-wing populist streak on migration has alienated the liberal wing of the party, which much preferred the understated, subtle leadership style of his predecessor Angela Merkel. Significant elements of the CDU also remain deeply sceptical of Mr Merz's security policy, which envisages Germany becoming a major new military power to rival Britain and France by taking on huge amounts of public debt to rebuild the army. 'Israel is a very sensitive area for Merz to navigate as he tries to staunch the criticism,' said Dr Wing. 'And there are a lot of people in his party who don't really like him.'

Keir Starmer to join European leaders for Zelenskyy-Trump meeting at White House on Monday
Keir Starmer to join European leaders for Zelenskyy-Trump meeting at White House on Monday

The Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Keir Starmer to join European leaders for Zelenskyy-Trump meeting at White House on Monday

Update: Date: 2025-08-17T11:36:05.000Z Title: Giorgia Meloni Content: UK prime minister, French president and German chancellor among leaders meeting Donald Trump on Monday after Ukrainian president's request Kirsty McEwen (now) and Yohannes Lowe (earlier) Sun 17 Aug 2025 13.28 CEST First published on Sun 17 Aug 2025 09.44 CEST From 1.28pm CEST 13:28 Sir Keir Starmer will join President Zelenskyy and European leaders for a meeting with President Trump at the White House on Monday, Downing Street has said. 1.14pm CEST 13:14 Swedish prime minister Ulf Kristersson will virtually attend Sunday's meeting with the coalition of the willing before President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's visit to Washington on Monday, a spokesperson from the prime minister's office told Reuters. Kristersson will however not fly to Washington with Zelenskyy alongside other European leaders on Monday, the spokesperson said. 12.57pm CEST 12:57 Italian prime minister is also due to travel to Washington tomorrow, her office has said. Meloni, who has been labelled as 'Europe's Trump whisperer' and has spent time at Mar-a-Lago, Trump's Florida home, was the only European leader invited to his inauguration in January. Trump has described the Italian prime minister, a supporter of Ukraine, as 'a wonderful person'. Updated at 12.57pm CEST 12.37pm CEST 12:37 Germany's chancellor, Friedrich Merz, will also be travelling to Washington tomorrow for the Trump-Zelenskyy talks, according to the federal government. The chancellor's spokesperson has been quoted by BBC News as having said: The trip will serve as an exchange of information with US President Donald Trump following his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Chancellor Merz will discuss the status of peace efforts with the heads of state and government and underscore Germany's interest in a swift peace agreement in Ukraine. The talks will address, among other things, security guarantees, territorial issues, and continued support for Ukraine in its defence against Russian aggression. This includes maintaining the pressure of sanctions. Speaking to the German public broadcaster ZDF yesterday after being briefed together with other European leaders by Trump on his talks with Putin, Merz said the US was ready to be part of security guarantees for Ukraine, without spelling out exactly what this would entail. French President Emmanuel Macron and Finnish President Alexander Stubb will also go to Washington with Zelesnkyy on Monday. In a statement, the French presidency office says the leaders will pursue 'coordination between the Europeans and the United States with the goal of coming to a just and lasting peace that preserves the vital interests of Ukraine and the security of Europe.' Updated at 12.45pm CEST 12.27pm CEST 12:27 The coalition of the willing video conference call is expected to be led by the UK and France and take place at about 14:00 BST. Updated at 12.35pm CEST 12.09pm CEST 12:09 European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has just confirmed in a post on X that she will be meeting Donald Trump along with other European leaders in the White House on Monday at the request of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. She also said that she will welcome Zelenskyy in Brussels later today and together will participate in a meeting of European leaders part of the 'coalition of the willing'. French President Emmanuel Macron, German chancellor Friedrich Merz, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and Nato secretary general Mark Rutte will also go to Washington DC with Zelesnkyy tomorrow. The coalition of the willing, set up by the UK and France as the Trump administration threatened to withdraw security support for Europe, is made up of more than 30 countries working together to support Ukraine. Its aim is to provide security guarantees to Ukraine in the event of a deal being reached between Kyiv and Moscow, with several countries, including France and the UK, having pledged to send troops on the ground to enforce a potential agreement. Updated at 1.24pm CEST 11.57am CEST 11:57 European officials will decide this weekend whether Volodymyr Zelenskyy will be accompanied on the visit to Washington tomorrow. They are keen to avoid the chaotic scenes played out in front of the world's press in the White House in February, when Donald Trump got into a shouting match with the Ukrainian leader, telling him to make a deal with Russia 'or we're out' and warning that Zelenskyy was 'gambling with world war three'. Zelenskyy left the White House early after Trump gave him a dressing-down that followed an ambush led by vice-president JD Vance, a skeptic of US support for Ukraine. Politico is reporting that, in order to prevent another potential flare up and to try to ensure greater European involvement in negotiations, Finnish President Alexander Stubb – and possibly Nato secretary general Mark Rutte – may accompany Zelenskyy for his Washington trip tomorrow. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen may also join, according to Bloomberg, but these plans are not finalised. All three senior European figures have a seemingly good relationship with the US president. Updated at 11.59am CEST 11.16am CEST 11:16 Russia's defence ministry said this morning that Russian forces had destroyed and intercepted 300 Ukrainian drones and struck storage sites for Sapsan operational-tactical missiles, Interfax news agency reported. Russia's defence ministry said Russian forces had gained better positions near the settlement of Zolotyi Kolodiaz in the Donetsk region, though pro-Ukrainian maps showed that Ukrainian forces had contained the Russian advance, Reuters reports. The defence ministry said war planes, drones and missiles had been used to strike Ukrainian storage sites for Sapsan missiles across the country. 'Four guided aerial bombs and 300 aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicles were shot down by air defense systems,' the ministry was quoted as having said. Updated at 12.00pm CEST 10.53am CEST 10:53 Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said Russia is complicating efforts to end the war. In a post on X, he wrote: We see that Russia rebuffs numerous calls for a ceasefire and has not yet determined when it will stop the killing. This complicates the situation. If they lack the will to carry out a simple order to stop the strikes, it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater – peaceful coexistence with its neighbors for decades. But together we are working for peace and security. Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war. Today, coordination with partners has been ongoing throughout the day … We are preparing for Monday's meeting with President Trump, and I am grateful for the invitation. It is important that everyone agrees there needs to be a conversation at the level of leaders to clarify all the details and determine which steps are necessary and will work. 10.42am CEST 10:42 The Ukrainian military said on Saturday it had pushed Russian forces back by about 2km (1.2 miles) on part of the Sumy front in northern Ukraine. There was no immediate comment from Russia, which controls a little over 200 sq km in the region, according to Ukraine's battlefield mapping project DeepState. Updated at 11.35am CEST 10.18am CEST 10:18 US President Donald Trump said after Friday's meeting with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, that he wants to bypass a ceasefire and move straight to a permanent peace deal. This is a major shift in policy. Before the summit, Trump demanded Putin agree to an immediate ceasefire or face heavy US sanctions on oil exports. Ukrainian and European leaders fear that a straight-to-peace deal, skipping over a preliminary ceasefire, gives Moscow an upper hand in talks. After calls with Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders, Trump wrote on social media on Saturday that 'it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' With Russia and Ukraine far apart in their demands, it is not clear how easily that could be achieved. We are likely to be issued with a joint statement from the leaders of the 'coalition of the willing' on the call later – it is not clear if they will use the word ceasefire or adopt more vague language to align themselves more with the new American position. Updated at 11.38am CEST 10.06am CEST 10:06 Here is some more detail from the report from my colleagues Edward Helmore and Pjotr Sauer about Trump backing a plan to cede unoccupied Ukrainian territory to Russia to secure an end to the war, with Putin demanding Ukraine withdraw from Donetsk and Luhansk as a condition for peace: Although Luhansk is almost entirely under Russian control, Ukraine still holds key parts of Donetsk, including the cities of Kramatorsk and Sloviansk and heavily fortified positions whose defence has cost tens of thousands of lives. Putin told Trump that in exchange for Donetsk and Luhansk, he would halt further advances and freeze the frontline in the southern Ukrainian region of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, where Russian forces occupy significant areas. Trump's support for ceding Ukraine's Donbas region (composed of the Luhansk and Donetsk regions), which is rich in mineral resources, including coal and iron ore, to Russia comes as he voiced support for moving straight to a peace deal and not via a ceasefire, which, Trump said in a social media post on Saturday, 'often times do not hold up.' US support for ceding the Donbas to Russia represents a breach with Ukraine and European allies that oppose such a deal. As part of a deal, the US is ready to be part of security guarantees for Ukraine, the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, said on Saturday. Trump has threatened economic penalties on countries that buy Russian oil if Moscow refuses a deal and flew US bombers over the Russian leader as he arrived in Alaska. But Ukrainian and European leaders fear that a straight-to-peace deal, skipping over a preliminary ceasefire, gives Moscow an upper hand in talks. 9.44am CEST 09:44 Welcome back to our live coverage of Russia's war on Ukraine. While Washington prepares to welcome Volodymyr Zelenskyy for crunch talks with Donald Trump on Monday, European leaders who make up the so-called 'coalition of the willing', a loose partnership of western countries pledging support for Ukraine, are set to hold a conference call on Sunday to try to protect a peace deal that does not reward Russia for its aggression. The virtual call is being co-chaired by the UK's prime minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron and the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz. At the Alaska summit on Friday, Russian President Vladimir Putin demanded Ukraine withdraw from Donetsk and Luhansk as a condition for ending the war, but offered Trump a freeze along the remaining frontline, two sources with direct knowledge of the talks told the Guardian. Trump reportedly backed the plan to cede unoccupied Ukrainian territory to Russia to secure an end to the war, telling European leaders that he believed a peace deal could be negotiated if Zelenskyy agreed to give up the Donbas region (which is composed of Donetsk and Luhansk). European leaders have repeatedly said that Zelenskyy, who has been sidelined in much of the US-Russian diplomacy to date, must play a greater role in future talks as a lasting peace cannot be achieved without his input. In a statement released on Saturday after the Alaska talks between Trump and Putin ended without any breakthrough, Starmer said in a statement posted to X: President Trump's efforts have brought us closer than ever before to ending Russia's illegal war in Ukraine. His leadership in pursuit of an end to the killing should be commended. While progress has been made, the next steps must be further talks involving President Zelenskyy. The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without him. Stay with us as we will be keeping you up to date with the latest political and military developments throughout the day. Updated at 10.05am CEST

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store