logo
US F-35 stealth fighter has a 'kill switch', but it's controlled by China and not America

US F-35 stealth fighter has a 'kill switch', but it's controlled by China and not America

Time of India02-06-2025
If the United States of America goes to a war, the F-35 Lightning II stealth fighter will play a pivotal role as it is considered to be the pinnacle of combat aircraft currently in active service worldwide by its makers. The fifth-generation fighter, in service with the defence forces of 10 countries while the same number of countries await their first F-35 jet, was rumoured to have a "kill switch" which was vehemently denied by the US military and the aircraft makers
Lockheed Martin
.
Now, there is a new revelation which shows that the F-35 fighter has a "kill switch", but it is not in the control of the USA, Instead its arch-rival
China
is the one which can activate the "kill switch" to render the entire F-35 program ineffective. Not only the F-35, but China can also derail several other US military platforms and programs if its decides to go for the kill and America has absolutely no defence against such a move.
The programs and platforms which can be a non-starter or be rendered useless by the Chinese "kill switch" are the Boeing F-47 sixth-generation fighter aircraft announced by US President
Donald Trump
in May 2025, US Navy's Virginia-class submarines, Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, armed Predator drones, Tomahawk cruise missiles, Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) smart bombs apart from advanced radar systems deployed to track enemy aerial targets.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
If You Eat Ginger Everyday for 1 Month This is What Happens
Tips and Tricks
Undo
So what is this kill switch?
China enjoys an unparallel domination in rare earths and critical elements, which are a critical component of almost all advanced weapon platforms. The country is not only the largest producer and consumer of rare earths, but also its biggest exporter. The US is so dependant on these rare earths and critical elements for maintaining its defense technological edge that over 80 per cent of its weapons system use them.
If China decides to play hardball and refuses to supply rare earths and critical elements to the US, the latter's defense industry will come to grinding halt. The Pentagon will be blinded in case there is a disruption in the supply of such critical components.
Live Events
China has more that 90 per cent of the world's processing and refining units of rare earths and it is responsible for the producing 98.8 percent of refined gallium in the world. Gallium plays an important role GPS systems and radars.
American combat aircraft airframes and missiles use magnesium while graphite and fluorspar can make or break the systems used for rocket propulsion, lasers, and nuclear fuel processing. In all the three mentioned minerals, China is the fulcrum with is massive refining capacity
During the recent talks on the tariff wars unleased by President Trump, the big ace up Beijing's sleeve was its near monopoly in the production and refining of critical elements and rare earths.
China had in 2023 cracked down on the export of eight gallium-related and six germanium-related products. It had a year later in 2024 also curbed export of antimony, another critical element. In the last few months, starting December 2024, China has completely stopped the export of gallium, germanium and antimony to the US. Critical defence related elements like tungsten and tellurium, too, have been placed on the restricted list by China.
When President Trump announced his steep 'reciprocal tariffs' taking effect against China on April 2, two days later Beijing responded by imposing curbs on the export of medium and heavy
rare earth elements
including samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and yttrium. The restricted items also includes magnets and other rare earths products.
If this situation continues, most of America's most advanced weapons will turn into duds if China raises its great wall to completely ban the export of such critical components. All of these are used in combat aircraft, missiles, naval warships, submarines and advanced radar systems.
Which US weapons depend on China
A F-35 engine, avionics, munitions and radar use over 400kg rare earth elements. Similarly Virginia-class submarines and Arleigh Burke-class destroyers of the US Navy have 4,200kg and 2,360kg of rare earths in their systems. Cruise missiles, armed drones, smart bombs, and radars depend on rare earth magnets for propulsion, targeting and guidance.
With the F-47 fighter on the drawing board, the demand for rare earths and critical elements will only increase.
Almost 81 percent of Antimony used in the F-16 Fighting Falcon as well as Minuteman III nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles is refined in China, although it is mined mostly in Australia. Even the US sends several critical minerals to China for refining and then re-imports them.
None of the current technologies can replace the use of rare earths and critical elements in the advanced weapons and China's near monopoly, especially in refining, is a clear and present danger to the US forces, which have no counter to this "kill switch".
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Politics beats the market in Trump's pay-for-play chip scheme
Politics beats the market in Trump's pay-for-play chip scheme

Mint

time28 minutes ago

  • Mint

Politics beats the market in Trump's pay-for-play chip scheme

The Trump administration's recent reversal of export restrictions on certain Nvidia and AMD's AI chips to China marks a major shift in U.S. policy and has raised legal concerns. But the deeper risks are political and economic—and warrant scrutiny. His administration decided in July to re-allow Nvidia and AMD to sell their H20 and MI308 chips to China—conditional on a 15% revenue remittance to the U.S. government. Export controls on AI chips were initially implemented by the Biden administration in 2022 to curb China's access to advanced processors critical for artificial intelligence and supercomputing, citing national security concerns. But Nvidia's H20 chip was specifically designed for the Chinese market. Even though it is reportedly incapable of training large AI models, the H20 chip is effective for inference tasks—allowing AI systems to respond to queries based on pre-trained data. Chinese engineers have leveraged the H20 chips for applications using open-source models such as DeepSeek and Alibaba's Qwen, which are increasingly popular in China's AI ecosystem. Trump continued these controls—until recently. Critics, such as Rep. Don Bacon (R., Neb.) and Liza Tobin, who served as China director at the National Security Council under the first Trump and Biden administrations, have argued that the sale of these chips, even under revenue-sharing constraints, undermines the strategic intent of the original export controls. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D., Ill.) likened it to gambling with national security. The Trump administration's reversal appears motivated by revenue generation. Bernstein Research estimates that Nvidia could sell approximately 1.5 million H20 chips in China in 2025, generating $23 billion in revenue; a 15% cut would yield more than $3 billion for the U.S. government. It aligns with Trump's broader strategy of using tariffs and trade deals to bolster government income. However, this revenue-centric approach raises concerns about the erosion of principled policymaking. The arrangement resembles a 'pay-to-play" scheme, where export licenses are granted in exchange for financial contributions. Legal scholars argue that this violates the Export Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits taxes or duties on exports. Moreover, the Export Controls Reform Act of 2018—signed by Trump himself—explicitly forbids charging exporters for licenses. The deal with Nvidia and AMD may also reflect a broader diplomatic calculus. China dominates the global supply chain for rare earth materials, which are essential for military technologies like guided missiles, fighter jets, and radar systems. These materials are also used in manufacturing key components for smartphones and electric vehicles—including batteries, touch screens, and camera lenses. The U.S. is investing in domestic mining and processing of rare earth minerals, such as at the Mountain Pass mine in California, which is the only rare-earth mining and processing facility in the U.S. But it remains heavily reliant on Chinese exports. By easing chip restrictions, the Trump administration may be signaling goodwill in hopes of securing a stable supply of rare earths. This strategic compromise, however, risks emboldening China. If Beijing perceives U.S. export controls as negotiable or monetizable, it may be less inclined to make concessions in other areas of trade or security. The precedent set by this deal could weaken the credibility of future U.S. restrictions, making it harder to enforce technology bans or secure allied cooperation. And then there are the corporate interests. The role of Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang in shaping this policy shift cannot be overlooked. Huang reportedly argued that restricting Nvidia's access to the Chinese market would inadvertently benefit domestic Chinese competitors like Huawei. He emphasized that China's AI development is deeply intertwined with Nvidia's chips and software ecosystem, suggesting that continued engagement would allow the U.S. to retain some influence over China's technological trajectory. Nvidia also maintains a research center in Shanghai. While Huang's argument has merit, it reveals the tension between corporate interests and national security. Nvidia's dependence on the Chinese market and talent pool may compromise its ability to align with U.S. strategic interests. Investors may view all of this as a slippery slope, in which political considerations begin overriding free-market principles, potentially undermining confidence in U.S. financial markets. Ultimately, the reversal of export restrictions on Nvidia and AMD's AI chips to China reflects a transactional approach to national security—one that prioritizes revenue over resilience. About the author: Christopher Tang is a distinguished professor at the UCLA Anderson School of Management. Guest commentaries like this one are written by authors outside the Barron's newsroom. They reflect the perspective and opinions of the authors. Submit feedback and commentary pitches to ideas@

Modi's diplomacy: Building bridges, guarding dignity
Modi's diplomacy: Building bridges, guarding dignity

Time of India

time28 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Modi's diplomacy: Building bridges, guarding dignity

Deepak is a well-decorated technocrat honored as Top 10 Agropreneur 2019 by Future Agro Challenge, Greece, and Technology Pioneer 2018 by World Economic Forum, Switzerland. He has also served as a member of the Expert Panel of the World Economic Forum on Digital Transformation. Deepak is an influencer in Blockchain and AgTech domains being a regular speaker, moderator, and evangelist. LESS ... MORE A recent feature in a prominent US publication suggested that Prime Minister Narendra Modi's high-visibility engagements with leaders such as China's Xi Jinping and former US President Donald Trump did not yield their intended results. Yet, framing these efforts as miscalculations or failures misses the essence of Modi's foreign policy approach — an approach defined by a willingness to extend friendship first, and an equal readiness to defend national self-respect when that friendship is tested. From the outset of his first term, Modi has leaned into personal diplomacy to reset old equations. In 2015, he stunned political observers by making an unannounced trip to Lahore to meet then–Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. This was not an impulsive gesture; it was a calculated attempt to reframe a historically fraught relationship through direct engagement. Similarly, in 2014, when Xi Jinping visited India, Modi's choice to host him warmly in Gujarat — complete with a riverfront meeting and candid conversation — signalled openness to cooperation, even as Chinese troops engaged in border provocations. The underlying message was clear: disputes need not foreclose dialogue. This philosophy has been applied not only to powerful neighbours but also to smaller nations, some of which have taken adversarial public positions toward India. Modi's outreach to the Maldives and Canada during politically tense moments illustrates his belief that diplomacy is not a prize for compliance but a tool for influencing behaviour and opening new channels of cooperation. Critics sometimes portray this as over-reliance on personal rapport, vulnerable to the volatility of individual leaders. Supporters counter that it is a deliberate strategy — a test of intent. Trust is extended until proven misplaced, and when that trust is broken, consequences are enacted swiftly and decisively. The breakdown in momentum with Washington during Donald Trump's second term is a case in point. Modi had invested considerable political capital in strengthening ties, even sharing a campaign stage in Houston in 2019 in an unprecedented display of solidarity. Under President Biden, cooperation deepened across defence, technology, and the Indo-Pacific framework. But when the Trump administration imposed steep tariffs on Indian goods — citing Russian oil purchases — and, more provocatively, gave Pakistan 'equal footing' in mediating a bilateral dispute, Modi's pushback was immediate. 'India will never compromise on the interests of its farmers, fishermen, and dairy farmers,' he said, fully aware of the personal political cost. Such responses are sometimes read in Western capitals as signs of India's 'limits.' In New Delhi, they are seen as evidence of India's arrival as a confident, independent actor — one willing to say 'no' without fearing diplomatic isolation. Modi's diplomacy is not about abrupt ruptures or unchecked nationalism. It is about calibration — sustaining openness as long as reciprocity exists and stepping back when engagement becomes coercion. His forthcoming visit to Beijing, the first in seven years, underscores this duality. Past grievances remain, but the bridge-building instinct endures. History may well record Modi as a leader who avoided unnecessary muscle-flexing yet ensured that India never traded dignity for diplomacy — proving that, in global statecraft, a firm handshake can be as potent as a clenched fist. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.

European leaders to join Ukraine's Zelenskyy for White House talks with Trump
European leaders to join Ukraine's Zelenskyy for White House talks with Trump

First Post

time28 minutes ago

  • First Post

European leaders to join Ukraine's Zelenskyy for White House talks with Trump

European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during his visit to Washington on Monday seeking an end of war. European leaders will accompany Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for his critical meeting with US President Donald Trump in Washington on Monday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced Sunday. A ceasefire in Ukraine had been one of Trump's central demands ahead of his Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, a meeting to which Ukraine and its European allies were not invited. The summit produced no breakthrough and Trump has ruled out an immediate truce. Leaders attending the Washington talks alongside Zelenskyy include German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and von der Leyen herself to press the US president on the urgency of halting hostilities. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The European leaders' presence at Zelenskyy's side, demonstrating Europe's support for Ukraine, could potentially help ease concerns in Kyiv and in other European capitals that Zelenskyy risks being railroaded into a peace deal that Trump says he wants to broker with Russia. Von der Leyen, head of the European Union's executive branch, posted on X that 'at the request of President Zelenskyy, I will join the meeting with President Trump and other European leaders in the White House tomorrow.' The Ukrainian president's last Oval Office visit in February ended in an extraordinary shouting match, with Trump and Vice President JD Vance publicly berating Zelensky for not showing enough gratitude for US aid. In an interview with broadcaster Fox News after his sit-down with Putin, Trump had suggested that the onus was now on Zelensky to secure a peace deal as they work towards an eventual trilateral summit with Putin. 'It's really up to President Zelensky to get it done,' Trump said. Meanwhile, the conflict in Ukraine rages on, with both Kyiv and Moscow launching attack drones at each other Sunday. With inputs from agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store