Benjamin Netanyahu accuses Sir Keir Starmer of 'emboldening Hamas'
Earlier this week, Sir Keir, Emmanuel Macron and Mark Carney condemned the Israeli government's 'egregious' actions in Gaza, warning that the UK and allies will take 'concrete actions' unless Mr Netanyahu changes course.
In a post on X on Thursday evening, the Israeli prime minister said Hamas wanted to 'destroy the Jewish state' and 'annihilate the Jewish people'.
Last night in Washington something horrific happened.
A brutal terrorist shot in cold blood a young beautiful couple – Yaron Lischinsky and Sara Milgrim. Yaron had just bought an engagement ring for Sarah. He was planning to give it to her in Jerusalem next week. They were… pic.twitter.com/FFdMwlacJ9
— Benjamin Netanyahu – בנימין נתניהו (@netanyahu) May 22, 2025
'I could never understand how this simple truth evades the leaders of France, Britain, Canada and others,' Mr Netanyahu said.
'I say to President Macron, Prime Minister Carney and Prime Minister Starmer, when mass murderers, rapists, baby killers and kidnappers thank you, you're on the wrong side of justice.
'Because by issuing their demand – replete with a threat of sanctions against Israel, against Israel, not Hamas – these three leaders effectively said they want Hamas to remain in power.'
Mr Netanyahu said the actions of the leaders were not 'advancing peace', but 'emboldening Hamas to continue fighting forever'.
The Israeli leader's comments come after two Israeli embassy staff were killed in Washington DC.
The victims, a man and a woman, were leaving an event at the Capital Jewish Museum when the 31-year-old suspect approached.
Israel's foreign minister identified the victims as Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim.
The attack has sent shockwaves around the world and prompted Israeli missions to beef up security.
Elias Rodriguez, 31, told police after his arrest, 'I did it for Palestine, I did it for Gaza,' federal authorities said on Thursday, as they announced criminal charges.
Sir Keir described the shooting as 'antisemitic'.
Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim were shot and killed while leaving an event at a Jewish museum in Washington (Embassy of Israel in the US via AP)
He said: 'I thoroughly condemn the antisemitic attack outside the Israeli embassy in Washington DC.
'Antisemitism is an evil we must stamp out wherever it appears.
'My thoughts are with their colleagues, family and loved ones, and as always, I stand in solidarity with the Jewish community.'
Downing Street said the Prime Minister 'stands in solidarity with the Jewish community here in the UK', adding the Government has offered its 'full support to the Israeli embassy in London'.
The Prime Minister's official spokesman added: 'As you know, we continue to provide around £18 million a year in funding for protective security measures for Jewish community sites in the UK.'
The Government's approach towards Israel's actions in Gaza will not change as a result of the killings, the spokesman indicated, but he said this 'does not take away at all from the fact that antisemitism is an evil that must be stamped out wherever it appears'.
On Tuesday, the Government suspended trade deal talks with Israel, sanctioned West Bank settlers and summoned the country's ambassador, while Foreign Secretary David Lammy described Israel's actions as 'monstrous'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
17 minutes ago
- The National
Israeli forces kill six Palestinians near Gaza aid site
Sources at Nasser Medical Complex have told Al Jazeera that at least six Palestinians were killed and others wounded by Israeli fire in al-Akhawah, near Rafah in southern Gaza. It comes despite the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) saying on Friday that it had closed all its centres until further notice following incidents of deadly violence near the sites in which Israeli forces opened fire on Palestinians seeking aid. READ MORE: Owen Jones: The UK media has ignored this hugely revealing scandal in Israel The Gaza government's media office has published a list of the casualty numbers near aid distribution points since the GHF began operating. The list, which has not been updated to reflect Saturday's casualties, states that 109 people have been killed since the aid sites opened: May 27: 3 killed, 46 wounded, 7 missing in Rafah May 28: 10 killed, 62 wounded in Rafah June 1: 35 killed, 200 wounded in Rafah; 1 killed and 32 wounded, 2 missing at the Gaza Valley Bridge June 2: 26 killed, 92 wounded in Rafah June 3: 27 killed, 90 wounded in Rafah June 6: 8 killed, 61 wounded in Rafah. Since dawn, at least 34 people have been killed by Israeli attacks, including seven people who were killed in an Israeli raid on a house sheltering displaced people west of Gaza city. Israel has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians in its brutal bombardment of Gaza since October 7 2023, primarily women and children. The assault has destroyed large parts of Gaza and displaced around 90% of its population of roughly two million Palestinians. READ MORE: Several Glasgow city centre roads closed due to emergency After blocking all food and aid from entering Gaza for more than two months, Israel began allowing a trickle of supplies to enter for the UN several weeks ago. But the UN says it has been unable to distribute much of the aid because of Israeli military restrictions on movements and because roads that the military designates for its trucks to use are unsafe and vulnerable to looters.
Western Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Fund Winter Fuel Payments with MP expenses cut says petition
The petition was started by Yvonne Keegan, who calls for the benefit to be reinstated: "I know first hand the importance of Winter Fuel Payment - it's a lifeline to pensioners during the harsh winter months. Their heating bills can skyrocket, and they end up struggling, trying desperately to keep themselves warm. "Meanwhile, our politicians are living comfortably with expenses that would be considered extravagant by most standards. We believe that our politicians – who have a stable income, can afford to pay their heating bills and do not need taxpayer-funded expenses to support this aspect of their lifestyle." Once a petition reaches 10,000 signatures, the Government responds, and if 100,000 people sign, a debate in Parliament is considered. This petition currently has 110,421 signatures. Signatures can still be added here. How much do MPs get paid? MPs' basic salary rose 2.8% to £93,904 from April, after Parliament's expenses watchdog linked it to wider proposals for the public sector. They can also claim expenses including: Office expenses Office running costs Staffing costs Travel for staff Centrally purchased stationery Postage costs Central IT costs Communications allowance They also receive allowances towards having somewhere to live in London and in their constituency, and travelling between Parliament and their constituency. MPs can claim their utility bills, including gas, electricity, other fuel and water bills, on expenses at a single property, either in London or their constituency. This is only available to those who aren't MPs in London, or don't occupy 'grace and favour' accommodation in London. There is no upper limit on how much MPs can claim back on heating and fuel costs. Which pensioners will receive Winter Fuel payments after the changes? The Government has said more pensioners will receive winter fuel payments, but payments will not be universal. Chancellor Rachel Reeves told reporters that 'more people will get winter fuel payment this winter', adding that further details will be announced 'as soon as we possibly can'. She said: 'People should be in no doubt that the means test will increase and more people will get winter fuel payment this winter.' My instant response to Winter Fuel Payment news & key message to the Chancellor (I heard while walking to the office, so pls forgive the fact it was done there and then for speed) — Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) June 4, 2025 Pensions minister Torsten Bell told MPs that, while more pensioners will be eligible, there is no prospect of returning to universal winter fuel payments. Speaking to the Work and Pensions Committee, Mr Bell said: 'Directly on your question of is there any prospect of a universal winter fuel payment, the answer is no, the principle I think most people, 95% of people, agree, that it's not a good idea that we have a system paying a few hundreds of pounds to millionaires, and so we're not going to be continuing with that. 'But we will be looking at making more pensioners eligible.' (Image: House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA Wire) The decision to means-test the previously universal payment was one of the first announcements by Chancellor Rachel Reeves after Labour's landslide election victory last year, and it has been widely blamed for the party's collapse in support. The Government has insisted the policy was necessary to help stabilise the public finances, allowing the improvements in the economic picture which Sir Keir said could result in the partial reversal of the measure. Pension Credit is currently the primary benefit by which pensioners can receive the winter fuel payment. The credit tops up incomes for poorer pensioners and acts as a gateway to additional support, including the winter fuel payment. Recommended reading: What were the cuts to winter fuel payments, and who currently receives them? On July 29 2024, the Government announced that from winter 2024, winter fuel payments would be dependent on receiving another means-tested benefit, as part of measures to fill a 'black hole' in the public finances. This meant the number of pensioners receiving the payment was reduced by around 10 million, from 11.4 million to 1.5 million. Asked what groups who are currently missing out on winter fuel payments he would like to include again, if possible, Mr Bell told the committee: 'We are committed to the principle that there should be some means-testing and that those on the highest incomes shouldn't be receiving winter fuel payments in the context of wider decisions we have to make – and fairness is an important part of that. 'You can then take from that that my priority is those who are on lower incomes but have missed out.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Supreme Court lets DOGE access Social Security data for now
The court's three liberal justices - Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson - disagreed with that decision. "The Government wants to give DOGE unfettered access to this personal, non-anonymized information right now --before the courts have time to assess whether DOGE's access is lawful," Jackson wrote in a dissent joined by Sotomayor. In March, U.S. District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander of Maryland said DOGE was intruding on "the personal affairs of millions of Americans" in a fishing expedition that's based on little more than suspicion." Hollander limited DOGE's access to the information while the courts assess the legality of the Trump administration's actions. The administration argued the judge overstepped, viewing DOGE staffers as the equivalent of intruders breaking into hotel rooms rather than as employees trying to modernize the agency's technology and root out waste - as DOGE officials said they intended to do. "District courts should not be able to wield the Privacy Act to substitute their own view of the government's 'needs' for that of the President and agency heads," Solicitor General John Sauer told the Supreme Court in an emergency appeal. DOGE has sought access to multiple agencies as part of its mission to hunt for wasteful spending and dramatically overhaul the federal government. Musk has falsely claimed that millions of Americans who are deceased are still receiving Social Security checks. Two labor unions and an advocacy group sued the SSA after DOGE began digging into personal data. They told the Supreme Court justices they shouldn't intervene because the administration hadn't shown an emergency need to access data beyond what the district judge allowed. In addition to overseeing Social Security benefits for retirees and disabled people, the Social Security Administration helps administer programs run by other agencies, including Medicare and Medicaid. A divided federal appeals court on April 30 rejected the Trump administration's request to block the district judge's order. U.S. Circuit Judge Robert King of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia, said the government hadn't shown a need for unfettered access to the highly sensitive personal information that the American people had every reason to believe would be "fiercely protected." DOGE's mission can be largely accomplished through anonymized and redacted data, which is the usual way the agency has handled technology upgrades and fraud detection, he wrote.
