These medications could save thousands of lives – but doctors aren't prescribing them
Rapidly, varenicline (then sold under its brand names, Champix and Chantix) became unavailable. This was a disaster for public health. Research from University College London estimated that varenicline being unavailable resulted in about 1,890 more avoidable deaths each year because fewer people were successfully quitting smoking.
But there was hope. Cytisine (also known as cytisinicline), a naturally occurring plant-based product that had been used for decades in Eastern Europe, and more recently to great effect elsewhere in the world, was licensed in the UK and made available from January 2024.
Even so, there was an extended period when neither were available to people trying to quit smoking in the UK (and in other countries, too). But in the UK at least, things were looking up.
Based on a limited but growing body of evidence, cytisine probably works as well as varenicline at helping people quit smoking, and it may be better tolerated with fewer side effects.
It may also appeal to more smokers who may want to use a natural product rather than a drug designed in a lab. So, with varenicline withdrawn and a similarly effective treatment available, we should have seen lives saved as people who would have taken varenicline were encouraged to try cytisine instead.
Why isn't anyone prescribing it?
This didn't happen. Cytisine – despite now being licensed and available in the UK – is still shockingly underused.
Since January 2024, only 0.2% of people trying to quit smoking have used it (the same proportion that used it in 2018, when it wasn't even officially available in the UK). Official NHS data from people accessing stop-smoking services in England confirm that only 0.7% were prescribed cytisine in 2024.
So why is this? High-profile trials continue to show cytisine's effectiveness for quitting smoking (and even for quitting vaping).
Maybe cytisine's relatively complex dosing schedule puts people off. Cytisine starts with six pills a day (one every two hours) and gradually tapers off over a few weeks: more confusing and less convenient than one-a-day varenicline.
Another possibility is that the public's attention has shifted. With so much focus in recent years on vaping as a smoking cessation aid, prescription drugs for smoking cessation may have fallen off the radar.
It could also be that GPs are reluctant to prescribe cytisine because of its cost and the assumption that local authorities should pay for it, not primary care. While it was once hoped that due to its low-cost availability in Eastern Europe, it would become the 'aspirin of smoking cessation drugs', the licensed product in the UK is now as or more expensive than other drugs.
But the simplest explanation is probably the most accurate: not enough people know about cytisine. People who smoke, GPs, pharmacists and even stop-smoking services may not know it's an option. And if no one is talking about it, no one is prescribing it. And even if they do know about it, there may be a lack of confidence in using or prescribing it because it is a new drug.
That's a problem. The UK government has made the shift from treating illness to preventing it a central part of its health strategy. Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable death in the country and the world. If we're serious about prevention, then effective smoking cessation support must be top of the agenda.
Now, varenicline is available again (without its brand names and reformulated to remove the impurities). This is welcome news, but only 1.1% of past-year smokers reported using varenicline. That's only a quarter of the number from before its withdrawal.
This raises an important question: should we return to prescribing varenicline by default, or is it time to consider cytisine as a first-line treatment? Researchers are continuing to learn more about cytisine, but as the evidence in favour of cytisine grows, maybe it needs a PR campaign for both prescribers and people who smoke.
None of this is to say that cytisine is a miracle cure, or that it will work for everyone. But that's true of every way to help people quit smoking. Quitting smoking is hard, and people trying to quit need more options, not fewer, and those options need to be visible and accessible.
Jonathan Livingstone-Banks is a Lecturer & Senior Researcher in Evidence-Based Healthcare at the University of Oxford.
Dimitra Kale is a Senior Research Fellow in Health Psychology at UCL.
Lion Shahab is a Professor in Health Psychology at UCL.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Talking therapy for depression and anxiety ‘less effective for young adults'
NHS talking therapies for depression and anxiety appear to be less effective for young adults, according to new analysis. Younger people may find it 'harder to navigate services set up for adults' – with attendance to therapy sessions hampered by stressful life events in the late teens and early 20s, experts suggest. Researchers warned there is an 'urgent need' to ensure the best possible mental healthcare for people aged 16-25 amid rising rates of mental health conditions. NHS talking therapy for conditions like anxiety and depression can include cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), counselling, and guided self-help using workbooks or online courses. To explore ways in which services could be tailored to younger people, experts from University College London (UCL) analysed data from 1.5 million people who had attended NHS talking therapies in England between 2015 and 2019, including more than 309,758 people aged between 16 and 24. Using self-reported scores from questionnaires taken before and after treatment, researchers found younger adults were 25% less likely to meet the threshold for reliable recovery after having talking therapy. They were also 17% less likely to meet criteria for reliable improvement when compared to those aged 25-65. Professor Argyris Stringaris, of UCL psychiatry, suggested people aged 16-24 may find it harder to regularly attend therapy sessions. He said: 'Young people may find it harder to navigate services which have been set up for adults, and are more likely to miss sessions or stop attending altogether. 'Additionally, the late teens and early 20s are a point of transition for many people, which can involve plenty of stressful life events and changes that may make it more difficult to consistently attend. 'Working together with young people should help optimise the content of treatment and the ways in which it is delivered. 'Finally, young people may suffer from depression and anxiety problems that may differ somehow in their causes from those affecting adults; early onset depression could have different causes and may require different approaches to treatment. This is an area that requires a lot of new basic and clinical research.' Researchers said the findings, published in Lancet Psychiatry, suggest future studies should consider tailoring mental health services to young people. Dr Rob Saunders, of UCL psychology and language sciences, said: 'Talking therapy is an effective treatment for depression and anxiety disorders, and particularly tends to be preferred to pharmacological treatment by younger adults. 'Our analysis shows that talking therapies offered by the NHS are effective for younger adults, but as they are more effective for working-age adults, we believe there is work to be done to improve services for young adults. 'Rates of depression and anxiety in young adults are rising, so there is an urgent need to ensure we are offering them the best possible mental health care.' The latest Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey, published in June, found more than a quarter of people aged 16-24 reported having so-called 'common mental health conditions', which include generalised anxiety disorder, depressive episodes, phobias, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and panic disorder. The figure was up from 17.5% in 2007. An NHS spokesperson said: 'This study finds talking therapy is still helpful for young people and so we would urge them to come forward for care with our world-leading talking therapies service which provides evidence-based mental health support to more than a million people a year, with nine in 10 patients receiving support within six weeks.' Olly Parker, head of external affairs and research at the charity YoungMinds, said: 'Growing up today is incredibly tough. 'Many young people are experiencing multiple pressures which impact their mental health, including poverty, inequality, intense academic pressure, and the online world. It's no wonder so many are struggling. 'We know many young people face long waits for mental health support and become more unwell while waiting, which can lead to needing more urgent care. We need to take an evidence-led approach to getting support right, ensuring young people are involved in choosing the treatments that work best for them. 'These findings must serve as another wake-up call to Government that urgent action is needed to reverse the decline in young people's mental health. This looks like a cross-government response that asks why so many young people are struggling, with radical solutions to address these root causes of poor mental health.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Crackdown on cosmetic surgery ‘cowboys' over botched Brazilian butt lifts and Botox
Ministers want to clamp down on 'cowboy' cosmetic procedures including Botox and Brazilian butt lifts after a string of horror incidents which left customers dead or with catastrophic damage. Officials said the industry had been blighted by 'dodgy practitioners and procedures', with some patients 'maimed' during botched treatments. It follows the case of mother-of-five, Alice Webb, who is thought to be the first person to have died following a non-surgical liquid Brazilian butt lift (BBL) procedure at a UK clinic. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has proposed new restrictions on who can access and provide treatments in a bid to protect people from 'rogue operators' with no medical training who often provide 'invasive' procedures in homes, hotels and pop-up clinics. The move should also reduce the cost imposed upon the NHS to fix botched procedures, DHSC added. Tim Mitchell, president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, hailed the proposals as an 'important first step forward for patient safety.' Health minister Karin Smyth said: 'The cosmetics industry has been plagued by a Wild West of dodgy practitioners and procedures. 'There are countless horror stories of cosmetic cowboys causing serious, catastrophic damage.' She said the government would take action too 'root out cowboys' and support 'honest and competent practitioners.' 'This isn't about stopping anyone from getting treatments – it's about preventing rogue operators from exploiting people at the expense of their safety and keeping people safe,' Ms Smyth added. 'We're giving them peace of mind and reducing the cost to the NHS of fixing botched procedures.' The government's proposals include: Only allowing healthy workers who are 'suitably qualified' to be able to deliver high-risk procedures such as (BBLs) Ensuring providers are regulated by the health regulator, the Care Quality Commission. Slapping sanctions and finanial penalties on those who break rules on high-risk procedures Ensuring clinics offering Botox and fillers are licensed Introducing age restrictions to prevent children from trying to follow 'dangerous beauty trends on social media' The timeline for the introduction and completion of these measures was not stated. But the DHSC said it will launch a consultation next year seeking views on the range of procedures which should be covered in the new restrictions. Last month, the Chartered Trading Standards Institute warned that fat injections, BBLs, Botox and fillers are being offered by untrained people in places such as public toilets. Before the proposed regulations come into force, the government has urged people seeking cosmetic procedures to ask for the provider's qualifications and insurance, and to be wary of 'suspiciously cheap' offers. Health officials launched an investigation after a number of people had reactions to Botox injections earlier this year. Professor David Sines CBE, the chair and registrar of Joint Council for Cosmetic Practitioners (JCCP), said the move will 'protect the public from untrained and inexperienced operators and it will save the NHS a considerable amount of time and money putting right the harm done through botched procedures.' The statement added the need for the new measures had become increasingly clear in recent years with the 'explosion of high street outlets offering high-risk procedures delivered by people with limited clinical knowledge and training.' He warned this has led to long-term health complications and, in some cases, has led to patient deaths. Mr Mitchell suggested the government must go further on liquid Brazilian Butt Lifts, which the RCS said the procedure should only be performed by a Cosmetic Surgery Board-certified surgeon. The surgeon warned that the procedure needs medical oversight to prevent serious complications and said that while the government's plans will improve the regulation of non-surgical interventions, it must also urgently improve the regulation of surgical procedures. Millie Kendall, chief executive of the British Beauty Council, said: 'Any measures that increase protection for the general public and professionalise the industry will help instil confidence as well as helping to prevent the normalisation of horror stories that have become synonymous with our sector.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Patients whose lives were ruined after being ‘needlessly given cancer drug for years' sue NHS trust
More than 20 patients who say their quality of life was wrecked when they were needlessly given a highly toxic cancer drug are suing the NHS trust involved. Some people were prescribed temozolomide – which should normally be used for only six months – for more than a decade during treatment by the University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust. They say the overprescribing left them with side-effects including secondary cancers and crippling fatigue. Earlier this year the Care Quality Commission was looking into at least 14 cases, but lawyers say more are emerging all the time. An investigation by lawyers Brabners found that, over the past two decades, numerous patients with brain and spinal tumours under the care of Professor Ian Brown were routinely exposed to prolonged and in some cases 'unnecessary' use of the chemotherapy drug, which has severe side-effects including extreme fatigue, confusion, sickness and seizures. The time periods temozolomide was given for allegedly ran contrary to medical and scientific guidelines. Standard NHS procedure is to use the drug over six months, and the drug manufacturer advises it be used for up to 12 months. One man said he was prescribed it for nearly two years longer than necessary, suffering extreme fatigue and low mood as a result. A woman in her twenties said she was misdiagnosed with cancer, receiving the drug needlessly for about eight years. Some patients are now having treatment for secondary cancers allegedly linked to overuse of temozolomide, the lawyers claim. Others claimed its prolonged use left them unable to pursue career ambitions and normal day-to-day activities because the chemotherapy was debilitating, with a long recovery time. Some reported loss of fertility or abnormal blood test results. The legal team says data shows that the trust's spending on the drug of £3.6m from 2009 to 2024 is 10 times that of other NHS oncology departments. The lawyers are now calling for an extended patient safety review and independent investigation, focusing in particular on treatment received by patients under Prof Brown dating back to 2006. The trust has been conducting an internal patient safety review, covering 2017 to 2023, when Prof Brown retired. A patient who identified only as Michael received an extra 22 cycles of temozolomide at the trust, despite his scans being stable. Prof Brown was not present during consultations, and Michael said he was always seen by a clinical nurse specialist. After suffering extreme fatigue and low mood, he learnt through news reports of mistreatment –not from the trust – that he should not have remained on treatment for so long, according to his lawyers. Another patient, identified only as Becky, says she received at least 100 cycles of the drug unnecessarily after being misdiagnosed with a brain tumour. Fiona Tinsley, head of medical negligence at Brabners, said: 'The extent of this scandal, and the physical and mental impact it has had on Prof Brown's patients cannot be underestimated.' She added: 'We believe there are many more patients out there who haven't yet come forward and some who may have sadly passed away. 'While we welcome the ongoing investigations being undertaken by the General Medical Council and Royal College of Physicians, we believe a full independent inquiry is necessary – including an extension of the trust's own review back to 2006 – not only to ensure justice for victims, but that processes are put in place to better identify and prevent such failings happening again.' A spokesperson for the trust told The Independent: 'We have comprehensively reviewed and spoken to all individuals who were receiving temozolomide (TMZ) treatment at the end of 2023 to ensure appropriate support and care plans are in place. 'A glioblastoma is an aggressive brain tumour with fewer than two per cent of patients surviving longer than 10 years. This is an extremely complex condition and all modes of treatment – surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy – carry the risk of complications and side-effects. 'National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice) guidelines recognise that clinicians can exercise professional judgment appropriate to individual circumstances when offering treatment to patients. 'We have commissioned the Royal College of Physicians to conduct an independent review of a representative cohort of patients who received greater than 12 cycles of adjuvant TMZ between 2017 and 2023. 'As this process is ongoing, it would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage." It's understood that CQC inspectors have been in touch with the trust to understand the details, and seek assurances that patients are not at risk. The regulator will be reviewing more information to judge whether it needs to be involved. Solve the daily Crossword